176
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

A fuzzy goal programming model for time, cost, and quality trade-off problem in metro construction projects considering sustainable development

&
Pages 323-330 | Received 02 Sep 2022, Accepted 01 Jun 2023, Published online: 16 Jun 2023

References

  • Akin FD, Polat G, Turkoglu H, Damci A. 2021. A crashing-based time-cost trade-off model considering quality cost and contract clauses. Int J Const Manage. 23(6):1–10.
  • Albayrak G, Özdemir I. 2018. Multimodal optimization for time-cost trade-off in construction projects using a novel hybrid method based on FA and PSO. rdlc. 17(2):304–318. doi: 10.7764/RDLC.17.2.304.
  • Ba’Its HA, Puspita IA, Bay AF. 2020. Combination of program evaluation and review technique (PERT) and critical path method (CPM) for project schedule development. Int J Integr Eng. 12(3):68–75.
  • Ballesteros-Pérez P, Mohamed K, González-Cruz MC. 2019. Automation in construction non-linear time-cost trade-off models of activity crashing: application to construction scheduling and project compression with fast-tracking. Autom Constr. 97(August 2018):229–240. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2018.11.001.
  • Bellman RE, Zadeh LA. 1970. Decision-making in a fuzzy environment. Manage Sci. 17(4):B-141–B-164. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.17.4.B141.
  • Camp J, Abkowitz M, Hornberger G, Benneyworth L, Banks JC. 2013. Climate change and freight-transportation infrastructure: current challenges for adaptation. J Infrastruct Syst. 19(4):363–370. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000151.
  • Charnes A, Cooper WW. 1977. Goal programming and multiple objective optimizations: part 1. Eur J Oper Res. 1(1):39–54. doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(77)81007-2.
  • Chen Z, Haynes KE. 2017. Transportation infrastructure and economic growth in China: a meta-analysis. In: Socioeconomic environmental policies and evaluations in regional science: Essays in Honor of Yoshiro Higano. Springer; p. 339–357.
  • Cheng MY, Tran DH, Cao MT. 2015. Chaotic initialized multiple objective differential evolution with adaptive mutation strategy (CA-MODE) for construction project time-cost-quality trade-off. J Civ Eng Manag. 22(2):210–223. doi: 10.3846/13923730.2014.897972.
  • Deǧirmenci G, Azizoǧlu M. 2013. Branch and bound based solution algorithms for the budget constrained discrete time/cost trade-off problem. J Oper Res Soc. 64(10):1474–1484.
  • Diao X, Li H, Zeng S, Tam VWY, Guo H. 2011. A pareto multi-objective optimization approach for solving time-cost-quality tradeoff problems. Technol Econ Dev Econ. 17(1):22–41. doi: 10.3846/13928619.2011.553988.
  • Dong N, Fu Y, Xiong F, Li L, Ao Y, Martek I. 2019. Sustainable construction project management (SCPM) evaluation—A case study of the Guangzhou metro line-7, PR China. Sustainability. 11(20):5731. doi: 10.3390/su11205731.
  • Doyle MW, Havlick DG. 2009. Infrastructure and the environment. Annu Rev Environ Resour. 34(1):349–373. doi: 10.1146/annurev.environ.022108.180216.
  • Ghadir H, Shayannia SA, Miandargh MA. 2022. Solving the problem of time, cost, and quality trade-off in project scheduling under fuzzy conditions using meta-heuristic algorithms. Discrete Dyn Nat Soc. 2022:1–14. doi: 10.1155/2022/6401061.
  • Guide A. 2001. Project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® Guide). In: Project Management Institute, Vol. 11, p. 7–8.
  • Hafzoǧlu AB, Azizoǧlu M. 2010. Linear programming based approaches for the discrete time/cost trade-off problem in project networks. J Oper Res Soc. 61(4):676–685.
  • Hajdu M. 2013. Two scheduling models, one project: are models applicable in case of real projects? Procedia - Soc Behav Sci. 74:165–174. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.03.023.
  • Hamta N, Ehsanifar M, Sarikhani J. 2021. Presenting a goal programming model in the time-cost-quality trade-off. Int J Const Manage. 21(1):1–11. doi: 10.1080/15623599.2018.1502930.
  • Hannan EL. 1981. On fuzzy goal programming. Decis Sci. 12(3):522–531. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1981.tb00102.x.
  • Jeang A. 2015. Project management for uncertainty with multiple objectives optimisation of time, cost and reliability. Int J Prod Res. 53(5):1503–1526. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2014.952792.
  • Jiang X, Zhang L, Xiong C, Wang R. 2016. Transportation and regional economic development: analysis of spatial spillovers in China provincial regions. Netw Spat Econ. 16(3):769–790. doi: 10.1007/s11067-015-9298-2.
  • Kammen DM, Sunter DA. 2016. City-integrated renewable energy for urban sustainability. Science. 352(6288):922–928. doi: 10.1126/science.aad9302.
  • Kebriyaii O, Heidari A, Khalilzadeh M, Antucheviciene J, Pavlovskis M. 2021. Application of three metaheuristic algorithms to time-cost-quality trade-off project scheduling problem for construction projects considering time value of money. Symmetry. 13(12):2402. doi: 10.3390/sym13122402.
  • Khalili-Damghani K, Tavana M, Abtahi AR, Santos Arteaga FJ. 2015. Solving multi-mode time-cost-quality trade-off problems under generalized precedence relations. Optim Methods Softw. 30(5):965–1001. doi: 10.1080/10556788.2015.1005838.
  • Klafszky E, Hajdu M. 1993. An algorithm to solve the cost optimization problem through an activity on arrow type network (CPM/COST problem). Period Polytech Archit. 37(1-4):27–40.
  • Koo C, Hong T, Kim S. 2015. An integrated multi-objective optimization model for solving the construction time-cost trade-off problem. J Civ Eng Manage. 21(3):323–333. doi: 10.3846/13923730.2013.802733.
  • Laurance WF, Cochrane MA, Bergen S, Fearnside PM, Delamônica P, Barber C, D'angelo S, Fernandes T. 2001. The future of the Brazilian Amazon. Science. 291(5503):438–439. doi: 10.1126/science.291.5503.438.
  • Laurance WF, Goosem M, Laurance SG. 2009. Impacts of roads and linear clearings on tropical forests. Trends Ecol Evol. 24(12):659–669. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2009.06.009.
  • Liu J, Mooney H, Hull V, Davis SJ, Gaskell J, Hertel T, Lubchenco J, Seto KC, Gleick P, Kremen C, et al. 2015. Sustainability. Systems integration for global sustainability. Science. 347(6225):1258832. doi: 10.1126/science.1258832.
  • Luong D-L, Tran D-H, Nguyen PT. 2021. Optimizing multi-mode time-cost-quality trade-off of construction project using opposition multiple objective difference evolution. Int J Constr Manage. 21(3):271–283. doi: 10.1080/15623599.2018.1526630.
  • Mavrotas G. 2009. Effective implementation of the ε-constraint method in multi-objective mathematical programming problems. Appl Math Comput. 213(2):455–465. doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2009.03.037.
  • Mendomo Meye S, Li G, Shen Z, Zhang J. 2022. Fuzzy multi-mode time–cost–quality trade-off optimization in construction management of hydraulic structure projects. Appl Sci. 12(12):6270. doi: 10.3390/app12126270.
  • Müller DB, Liu G, Løvik AN, Modaresi R, Pauliuk S, Steinhoff FS, Brattebø H. 2013. Carbon emissions of infrastructure development. Environ Sci Technol. 47(20):11739–11746. doi: 10.1021/es402618m.
  • Nguyen DT, Doan DTV, Tran NNC, Tran DH. 2021. A novel multiple objective whale optimization for time-cost-quality tradeoff in non-unit repetitive projects. Int J Constr Manage. 23(5):1–12.
  • Razavi Hajiagha SH, Akrami H, Hashemi SS, Amoozad Mahdiraji H. 2015. An integer grey goal programming for project time, cost and quality trade-off. EE. 26(1):93–100. doi: 10.5755/j01.ee.26.1.9930.
  • Razavi Hajiagha SH, Mahdiraji HA, Hashemi SS. 2014. A hybrid model of fuzzy goal programming and grey numbers in continuous project time, cost, and quality tradeoff. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 71(1-4):117–126. doi: 10.1007/s00170-013-5463-2.
  • Rodrigue J-P. 2020. The geography of transport systems. 5th ed. Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780429346323.
  • Shen L, Jiao L, He B, Li L. 2015. Evaluation on the utility efficiency of metro infrastructure projects in China from sustainable development perspective. Int J Project Manage. 33(3):528–536. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.07.005.
  • Su Q, Shi JH, Lai SJ. 2009. Research on the trade-off relationship within quality costs: a case study. Total Qual Manag Bus Excell. 20(12):1395–1405. doi: 10.1080/14783360903248922.
  • Taghvaee VM, Arani AA, Soretz S, Agheli L. 2023. Diesel demand elasticities and sustainable development pillars of economy, environment and social (health): comparing two strategies of subsidy removal and energy efficiency. Environ Dev Sustain. 25(3):2285–2315. doi: 10.1007/s10668-021-02092-7.
  • Taghvaee VM, Nodehi M, Saber RM, Mohebi M. 2022. Sustainable development goals and transportation modes: analyzing sustainability pillars of environment, health, and economy. World Dev Sustain. 1:100018. doi: 10.1016/j.wds.2022.100018.
  • Tasic I, Porter RJ. 2016. Modeling spatial relationships between multimodal transportation infrastructure and traffic safety outcomes in urban environments. Saf Sci. 82:325–337. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.09.021.
  • Tavakolan M, Nikoukar S. 2019. Developing an optimization financing cost-scheduling trade-off model in construction project. Int J Constr Manag. 22(5):1–16.
  • Zhu Y, Jiao L, Zhang Y, Wu Y, Huo X. 2021. Sustainable development of urban metro system: perspective of coordination between supply and demand. IJERPH. 18(19):10349. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910349.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.