Factors influencing Building Information Modelling adoption for residential property development

References

• Abanda FH, Manjia MB, Pettang C, Tah JHM, Nkeng GE. 2014. Building information modelling in Cameroon: overcoming existing challenges. Int J 3-D Inf Model. 3(4):1–25. doi: 10.4018/ij3dim.2014100101.
   Google Scholar
• Adindu CC, Musa MA, Okoro CS, Bamfo-Agyei E, Yusuf SO. 2020. A building information modelling framework for enhanced participation in customized mass housing projects in Africa. Islamic Univers Multidiscip J. 7(2):317–331.
   Google Scholar
• Ahuja R, Jain M, Sawhney A, Arif M. 2016. Adoption of BIM by architectural firms in India: technology organisation-environment perspective. Archit Eng Des Manag. 12(4):311–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahuja R, Sawhney A, Jain M, Arif M, Rakshit S. 2020. Factors influencing BIM adoption in emerging markets – the case of India. Int J Constr Manag. 20(1):65–76. doi: 10.1080/15623599.2018.1462445.
   Google Scholar
• Ayinla KO, Adamu Z. 2018. Bridging the digital divide gap in BIM technology adoption. Eng Constr Archit Manag. 25(10):1398–1416. doi: 10.1108/ECAM-05-2017-0091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babbie E. 2020. The practice of social research. Wadsworth: Nelson Education Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Babatunde SO, Udeaja C, Adekunle AO. 2020. Barriers to BIM implementation and ways to improve its adoption in the Nigerian AEC firms. Int J Build Pathol Adapt. 39(1):48–71. doi: 10.1108/IJBPA-05-2019-0047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banawi A. 2017. Barriers to implement building information modelling (BIM) in public projects in Saudi Arabia. International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, Springer, Cham, 119–125.
   Google Scholar
• Building Information Model Standard Project Committee. 2007. National building information model standard NBIMS. Washington DC: The National Institute of Building Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Building Services Research and Information Association (BSRIA). 2013. Building information modelling: an introduction for house builders, report published by BSRA on behalf of NHBC Foundation. Milton Keynes: BSRIA.
   Google Scholar
• Burke S. 2020. Why are residential property developers in Ireland not Using BIM? Capstone Reports, School of Multidisciplinary technologies. Dublin, Ireland: Technological University.
   Google Scholar
• Eastman CM, Teicholz P, Sacks R, Liston K. 2011. BIM Handbook: a guide to building information modelling for owners, managers, designers, engineers and contractors, 2nd ed. Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia AJ, Mollaoglu S, Syal KM. 2016. Adoption of building information modelling in small size home-building businesses, Working Paper, Construction Management Program, School of Planning, design and construction, Michigan State University, United States of America, p. 49.
   Google Scholar
• Hong Y, Sepasgozar SME, Ahmadian FF, Akbarnezhad A. 2016. Factors influencing BIM adoption in small and medium sized construction organisations. Proceedings of the 33rd International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction, 2016, p. 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Juan Y-K, Lai W-Y, Shih S-G. 2016. Building information modelling acceptance and readiness assessment in Taiwanese architectural firms. J Civil Eng Manag. 23(3):356–367. doi: 10.3846/13923730.2015.1128480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeping M, Dixon T, Ellison L. 2007. The performance of buildings, directive and commercial property investment. London: Investment Property Forum.
   Google Scholar
• Liao L, Teo EAL. 2017. Critical success factors for enhancing the building information modelling implementation in building projects in Singapore. J Civil Eng Manag. 23(8):1029–1044. doi: 10.3846/13923730.2017.1374300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mah D, Manrique JD, Yu H, Al-Hussein M, Nasseri R. 2011. House construction CO2 footprint quantification: a BIM approach. Constr Innov. 11(2):161–178. doi: 10.1108/14714171111124149.
   Google Scholar
• Manrique JD, Al-Hussein M, Bouferguene A, Nasseri R. 2015. Automated generation of shop drawings in residential construction. Autom Constr. 55:15–24. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2015.03.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGraw Hill. 2014. The business value of BIM for construction in major global markets. Bedford: McGraw Hill Construction, Research and Analytics.
   Google Scholar
• Momade MH, Durdyev S, Tam NV, Shahid S. 2022. Factors influencing construction technology adoption in residential projects at Vietnam. Ain Shams Eng J. 2022:101906. doi: 10.1016/j.asej.2022.101906.
   Google Scholar
• Okereke R, Muhammed U, Eze E. 2021. Potential benefits of implementing building information modelling (BIM) in the Nigerian construction industry. J Eng Technol Manag Busin. 8(2):1–15. doi: 10.30880/jtmb.2021.08.02.001.
   Google Scholar
• Olanrewaju O, Chileshe N, Babarinde SA, Sandanayake M. 2020. Investigating barriers to building information modelling (BIM) implementation within the Nigerian construction industry. Eng Constr Archit Manag. 27(10):2931–2958. doi: 10.1108/ECAM-01-2020-0042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olawumi TO, Chan DWM. 2020. Key drivers for smart and sustainable practices in the built environment. Eng Constr Archit Manag. 27(6):1257–1281. doi: 10.1108/ECAM-06-2019-0305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pallant J. 2010. SPSS survival manual: a step by step guide to data analysis using the SPSS program, 4th ed., Berkshire: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Park KS, Kim KP. 2014. Essential BIM input data study for housing refurbishment: homeowners’ preferences in the UK. Buildings. 4(3):467–487. doi: 10.3390/buildings4030467.
   Google Scholar
• Parn E, Mayouf M, Laycock P, Edwards DJ. 2015. Building information modelling for UK housing: exploring potential drivers and opportunities to deliver better customer experience. Mindanao J Sci Technol. 13:51–64.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson H, Milligan V, Martin C. 2019. Building Australia’s affordable housing industry: capacity challenges and capacity-enhancing strategies. Int J Housing Policy. 19(1):46–68. doi: 10.1080/19491247.2018.1469108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razali MN, Yunus NM, Zainudin AZ, Mei JLY. 2017. Sustainable property development by Southeast Asian property companies. Prop Manag. 35(1):109–126. doi: 10.1108/PM-01-2015-0004.
   Google Scholar
• Sanderford AR, Keefe MJ, Koebel CT, McCoy AP. 2015. Factors influencing U.S. homebuilders adoption of green homebuilding products. J Sustain Real Estate. 7(1):60–82. doi: 10.1080/10835547.2015.12091875.
   Google Scholar
• Saka AB, Chan DWM. 2020. Profound barriers to building information modelling (BIM) adoption in construction small and medium-sized enterprises: an interpretive structural modelling approach. Const Innov. 20(2):261–284. doi: 10.1108/CI-09-2019-0087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saka AB, Chan DWM, Siu FMF. 2020. Drivers of sustainable adoption of building information modelling (BIM) adoption in the Nigerian construction small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs. Sustainab. 12(9):3710–3133. doi: 10.3390/su12093710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarvari H, Chan DWM, Rakhshanifar M, Banaitiene N, Banaitis A. 2020. Evaluating the impact of building information modelling (BIM) on mass house building projects. Buildings. 10(2):35. doi: 10.3390/buildings10020035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith WN. 2017. Current state of practice associated with the use of building information modelling (BIM) in the custom home building industry [M.Sc]. Thesis submitted Brigham Young University, United States of America.
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick B, Fidell L. 2001. Using multivariate statistics, 3rd ed. New York (NY): Haper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Tan S, Gumusburun AG, Tel MZ, Serter M, Metinal YB. 2022. Modelling the critical success factors for BIm implementation in developing countries: sampling the Turkish AEC industry. Sustainability. !14(15):9537. doi: 10.3390/su14159537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yusuf N, Shafiei MWM. 2011. Factors affecting housing developers’ readiness to adopt innovative systems. Hous Stud. 26(3):369–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar