Professional knowledge infusion and service performance within outbound consultant-supplier interfaces in Tanzania’s construction industry: can networking and stakeholder support play cards?

References

• Ajzen I. 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Org Behavior Human Decision Process. 50(2):179–211. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albuquerque F, Bersanetti F. 2023. Servitization and construction industry: ideas and insights from the commercial building sector. Int J Const Manage. 23:1–15. doi: 10.1080/15623599.2023.2211422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AQRB. 2021. Directory list of registered architects, quantity surveyors and practicing firms. Architects and Quantity Surveyors Registration Board. www.aqrb.go.tz.
   Google Scholar
• Bäckstrand J, Fredriksson A. 2022. The role of supplier information availability for construction supply chain performance. Production Planning Control. 33(9–10):863–874. doi: 10.1080/09537287.2020.1837933.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bröchner J, Silfwerbrand J. 2019. Performance of performance specifications in design-build highway projects. CEB. 19(2):111–125. doi: 10.5130/AJCEB.v19i2.6659.
   Google Scholar
• Chan DWM, Sarvari H, Golestanizadeh M, Saka A. 2023. Evaluating the impact of organizational learning on organizational performance through organizational innovation as a mediating variable: evidence from Iranian construction companies. Int J Const Manage. 23:1–14. doi: 10.1080/15623599.2023.2239486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng Q, Liu Y, Chang Y. 2022. The incentive mechanism in knowledge alliance: based on the input-output of knowledge. J Innov Knowledge. 7(2):100175. doi: 10.1016/j.jik.2022.100175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen H, Yao Y, Zhou H. 2021. How does knowledge coupling affect exploratory and exploitative innovation? The chained mediation role of organisational memory and knowledge creation. Technol Anal Strategic Manage. 33(6):713–727. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2020.1840543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cisterna D, Heyl JV, Alarcón DM, Herrera RF, Alarcón LF. 2018. Application of social network analysis in lean and infrastructure projects. 26th Annual Conference of the International. Group for Lean Construction (IGLC). p. 412–421. doi: 10.24928/2018/0483.
   Google Scholar
• Collier JE. 2020. Applied structural equation modeling using AMOS: basic to advanced techniques. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Deng H, Xu Y, Deng Y, Lin J. 2022. Transforming knowledge management in the construction industry through information and communications technology: a 15-year review. Autom Constr. 142(August):104530. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104530.
   Google Scholar
• Dobrzykowski DD, Hong PC, Park JS. 2012. Building procurement capability for firm performance: a service-dominant logic view. Benchmarking. 19(4/5):567–584. doi: 10.1108/14635771211258016.
   Google Scholar
• Dong C, Liu X, Tang F, Qiu S. 2023. How upstream innovativeness of ecosystems affects firms’ innovation: the contingent role of absorptive capacity and upstream dependence. Technovation. 124:102735. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duryan M, Smyth H. 2019. Service design and knowledge management in the construction supply chain for an infrastructure programme. BEPAM. 9(1):118–137. doi: 10.1108/BEPAM-04-2018-0060.
   Google Scholar
• Ekung S, Opoku A, Okonkwo C. 2022. Organisational learning and sustainability of service-based firms: a canonical correlation analysis. Int J Const Manage. 23(13):2160–2170. doi: 10.1080/15623599.2022.2045863.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmitt S. 2006. Selection and specification of building products: implications for design managers. Arch Eng Design Manage. 2(3):176–186. doi: 10.1080/17452007.2006.9684614.
   Google Scholar
• ERB. 2021. Directory of registered engineers and practicing firms. Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: Engineers Registration Board. www.erb.go.tz.
   Google Scholar
• Fornell C, Larcker DF. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Market Res. 18(1):39–50. doi: 10.1177/002224378101800104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao Y, Yue M, Zhang J, Jin Z, Zhang S, Pan K. 2023. The impact of institutional pressures on BIM identity formation in the construction industry and the mediating role of perceived usefulness. J Manage Eng. 39(6):04023038-1–04023038-14. doi: 10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-5286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaskin J, Lim J. 2016. Model fit measures. Amos Plugin. http://statwiki.gaskination.com/index.php?title=Plugins.
   Google Scholar
• Ghosh A, Edwards DJ, Hosseini MR. 2020. Patterns and trends in Internet of Things (IoT) research: future applications in the construction industry. ECAM. 28(2):457–481. doi: 10.1108/ECAM-04-2020-0271.
   Google Scholar
• Gold S, Seuring S, Beske P. 2010. Sustainable supply chain management and inter-organizational resources: a literature review. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Mgmt. 17(4):230–245. doi: 10.1002/csr.207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant RM. 1996. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Manage J. 17(S2):109–122. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250171110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC. 2019. Multivariate data analysis. In: Cengage Learning, EMEA. 8th ed. Vol. 87. United Kingdom: Annabel Ainscow.
   Google Scholar
• Hu L, Bentler PM. 1999. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equation Modeling: A Multidis J. 6(1):1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jia J, Zhang M, Yang G. 2022. Factors influencing BIM integration with emerging technologies: knowledge coupling perspective. J Manage Eng. 38(2):1–12. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0001018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khamaksorn A, Tah JHM, Kurul E, Department of Knowledge and Innovation Management, College of Arts, Media and Technology, Chiang Mai University, Thailand. 2022. Social networks and knowledge transfer in international construction joint venture projects: a case study in Thailand. JCDC. 27(1):111–137. doi: 10.21315/jcdc2022.27.1.7.
   Google Scholar
• Kikwasi GJ, Escalante C. 2020. The construction sector in Tanzania. In: Mining for Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press; p. 256–281. doi: 10.1093/oso/9780198851172.003.0012.
   Google Scholar
• Kikwasi GJ, Sospeter NG. 2023. Challenges facing supply chain management on time delivery of construction projects in Tanzania. Lecture Notes Civil Eng. 245:257–267. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-97748-1_21.
   Google Scholar
• Kuys B, Ranscombe C, Zhang W. 2023. Visualising product concepts to engage manufacturers with little or no industrial design capability. Design Studies. 87:101188. doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2023.101188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lello D, Huang Y, Alananga S, Emuze F. 2023. The impact of outbound collaboration behavior on service performance in Tanzania’s construction projects: the mediating role of knowledge infusion. Int J Const Supply Chain Manage. 13(1):92–111. doi: 10.14424/ijcscm2023130106.
   Google Scholar
• Mai NK, Do TT, Phan NA. 2022. The impact of leadership traits and organizational learning on business innovation. J Innov Knowl. 7(3):100204. doi: 10.1016/j.jik.2022.100204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masucci M, Brusoni S, Cennamo C. 2020. Removing bottlenecks in business ecosystems: the strategic role of outbound open innovation. Res Policy. 49(1):103823. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2019.103823.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mennens K, Van Gils A, Odekerken-Schröder G, Letterie W. 2018. Exploring antecedents of service innovation performance in manufacturing SMEs. Int Small Business J. 36(5):500–520. doi: 10.1177/0266242617749687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moretti F, Biancardi D. 2020. Inbound open innovation and firm performance. J Innovation Knowl. 5(1):1–19. doi: 10.1016/j.jik.2018.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nauman S, Bhatti SH, Imam H, Khan MS. 2022. How servant leadership drives project team performance through collaborative culture and knowledge sharing. Project Manage J. 53(1):17–32. doi: 10.1177/87569728211037777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Örtqvist D. 2020. Performance outcomes from reciprocal altruism: a multi-level model. J Small Business Entrepreneurship. 32(3):227–240. doi: 10.1080/08276331.2019.1661616.
   Google Scholar
• Pauna T, Lehtinen J, Kujala J, Aaltonen K. 2023. The role of governmental stakeholder engagement in the sustainability of industrial engineering projects. IJMPB. 16(8):77–99. doi: 10.1108/IJMPB-09-2022-0197.
   Google Scholar
• Peltokorpi A, Seppänen O. 2022. Managing product information for lean construction: use cases and a proposed process. Proceeding of 30th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC). p. 388–398. doi: 10.24928/2022/0142.
   Google Scholar
• Pico WJD. 2012. Estimating building costs for the residential & light commercial construction professional. 2nd ed. NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Raphael AO, Samuel OS, Dipeolu AA, Department of Architecture, Olabisi Onabanjo University, Ibogun Campus, Ogun State, Nigeria. 2022. Evaluation of service quality gaps in construction professional service firms in Nigeria. JCDC. 27(1):25–40. doi: 10.21315/jcdc2022.27.1.2.
   Google Scholar
• Reid I, Matthias O, Bamford D. 2019. Management consultancy’s role in delivering lasting [triple bottom line] benefits. Production Plan Control. 30(5–6):479–492. doi: 10.1080/09537287.2018.1501815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth L, Corsi S. 2023. Ambidexterity in a geographic context: a systematic literature review on international exploration and exploitation of knowledge. Technovation. 124:102744. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102744.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sekaran U, Bougie R. 2010. Research methods for business: a skill building approach. 5th ed. United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Sika. 2018. Sika product manual (2017/18).
   Google Scholar
• Sun J, Ren X, Anumba CJ. 2019. Analysis of knowledge-transfer mechanisms in construction project cooperation networks. J Manage Eng. 35(2):1–13. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan L, Kocsis A, Burry J, Kyndt E. 2023. Performance of architectural teams: the role of team learning, reflexivity, boundary crossing and error communication. Design Studies. 87:101190. doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2023.101190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseng ML, Lin S, Chen CC, Calahorrano Sarmiento LS, Tan CL. 2019. A causal sustainable product-service system using hierarchical structure with linguistic preferences in the Ecuadorian construction industry. J Cleaner Prod. 230:477–487. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tshuma B, Steyn H, van Waveren CC. 2022. The mediation role of the PMO in the transfer of knowledge between projects – a case study of five PMOs. IJMPB. 15(1):150–174. doi: 10.1108/IJMPB-03-2021-0063.
   Google Scholar
• Valiant LG. 2006. Knowledge Infusion. Proceedings of the American Association for Artificial Intelligence. p. 1546–1551. www.aaai.org.
   Google Scholar
• Vargo SL, Lusch RF. 2017. Service-dominant logic 2025. Int J Res Marketing. 34(1):46–67. doi: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2016.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Li J, Qi Y. 2023. Fostering knowledge creation through network capability ambidexterity with the moderation of an innovation climate. JKM. 27(3):613–631. doi: 10.1108/JKM-11-2021-0818.
   Google Scholar
• Wiedmer R, Whipple JM, Griffis SE, Voorhees CM. 2020. Resource scarcity perceptions in supply chains: the effect of buyer altruism on the propensity for collaboration. J Supply Chain Manag. 56(4):45–64. doi: 10.1111/jscm.12242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue X, Zhang X, Wang L, Skitmore M, Wang Q. 2018. Analyzing collaborative relationships among industrialized construction technology innovation organizations: a combined SNA and SEM approach. J Cleaner Prod. 173:265–277. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang YS, Choi TY, Carter CR, Yin R. 2022. Expanding the boundaries of buyer- supplier agency problems: moving from dyad to triad. J Purchasing Supply Manage. 28(3):100749. doi: 10.1016/j.pursup.2022.100749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yepeng W, Jiao Y, Hui X, Lyu C. 2022. The more engagement, the better? The influence of supplier engagement on new product design in the social media context. Int J Inf Manage. 64:102475. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu S, Abbas J, Álvarez-Otero S, Cherian J. 2022. Green knowledge management: scale development and validation. J Innov Knowledge. 7(4):100244. doi: 10.1016/j.jik.2022.100244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zafari K, Biggemann S, Garry T. 2023. Development of business-to-business relationships in turbulent environments. Indus Marketing Manage. 111(March 2022):1–18. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2023.03.002.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Chen X. 2016. Role of lean tools in supporting knowledge creation and performance in lean construction. Procedia Eng. 145:1267–1274. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.04.163.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang W, Jiang Y, Zhou W, Pan W. 2023. Antecedents of knowledge-seeking intentions and efforts within new product development teams: empirical evidence from knowledge-based Chinese companies. JKM. 27(2):356–382. doi: 10.1108/JKM-08-2021-0617.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao D, Jiang Y, Lin C, Liu X, Wu YJ. 2022. Impacts of knowledge expectations on recipients’ continuous cross-project learning intention. Int J Project Manage. 40(2):120–131. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2021.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Y, Huang Y, Hu S, Sun J. 2023. How tripartite stakeholders promote green technology innovation of China’s heavily polluting enterprises? Sustainability. 15(12):9650. doi: 10.3390/su15129650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar