Digestibility of nutrients and aspects of the digestive physiology of the greater cane rat, journalThryonomys swinderianus journalin two seasons

References

• ANNOR, S.Y., KAGYA-AGYEMANG, J.K., ABBAM, J.E.Y., OPPONG, S.K. & AGOE, I.M. 2008. Growth performance of grasscutter (Thryonomys swinderianus) eating leaf and stem fractions of guinea-grass (Panicum maximum). Livestock Research Rural Development 20: 8.
   Google Scholar
• BAPTIST, R. & MENSAH, G.A. 1986. The cane rat – farm animal of the future? World Animal Review No 60: 2–6.
   Google Scholar
• BJÖRNHAG, G. 1994. Adaptations in the large intestine allowing small animals to eat fibrous foods. In: The Digestive System in Mammals: Food, Form and Function, (eds) D.J. Chivers & P. Langer, pp. 287–309. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• BOZINOVIC, F. 1995. Nutritional energetics and digestive responses of an herbivorous rodent (Octodon degus) to different levels of dietary fibre. Journal of Mammalogy 76(2): 627–637.
   Google Scholar
• BOZINOVIC, F., NOVOA, F.F. & SABAT, P. 1997. Feeding and digesting fibre and tannins by an herbivorous rodent, Octodon degus (Rodentia: Caviomorpha). Comparative Biochemistry & Physiology 118 A: 625–630.
   Google Scholar
• CORK, S.J., HUME, I.D. & FAICHNEY, G.J. 1999. Digestive strategies of nonruminant herbivores: the role of the hindgut. In: Nutritional Ecology of Herbivores, (eds) H-J-G. Jung & G.C. Fahey, pp. 214–260. Proceedings of the Vth International Symposium on the Nutrition of Herbivores, American Society of Animal Science, Savoy.
   Google Scholar
• EWER, R.F. 1969. Form and function in the grass cutter, Thryonomys swinderianus Temm. (Rodentia, Thryonomyidae). Ghana Journal of Science 9(2): 131–141.
   Google Scholar
• HERRERA, E.A. 1985. Coprophagy in the capybara, Hydrochoerus hydrochoeris. Journal of Zoology (London) 207A: 616–619.
   Google Scholar
• HOLTENIUS, K. & BJÖRNHAG, G. 1985. The colonic separation mechanism in the guinea-pig (Cavia porcellus) and the chinchilla (Chinchilla laniger). Comparative Biochemistry & Physiology 82A: 537–542.
   Google Scholar
• HOLZER, R., MENSAH, G.A. & BAPTIST, R. 1986. Aspects pratiques en ëlevage d’aulacodes (Thryonomys swinderianus) III comportement de coprophagie. Revue d’ Elevage et de Médecine Véterinaire des Pays Tropicaux 39(2): 247–252.
   Google Scholar
• KENAGY, G.J., VELOSO, C. & BOZINOVIC, F. 1999. Daily rhythms of food intake and feces reingestion in the degu, an herbivorous chilean rodent: optimizing digestion through coprophagy. Physiological Biochemical Zoology 72(1): 78–86.
   Google Scholar
• KYLE, R. 1987. A Feast in the Wild. Kudu Publishing, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• LLOYD, L.E., McDONALD, B.E. & CRAMPTON, E.W. 1978. Fundamentals of Nutrition, 2nd edn, W.H. Freeman, San Francisco.
   Google Scholar
• SAKAGUCHI, E. 2003. Digestive strategies of small hindgut fermenters. Animal Science Journal 74: 327–337.
   Google Scholar
• SAKAGUCHI, E., BECKER, G., RECHKEMMER, G. & ENGELHARDT, W.V. 1985. Volume, solute concentrations and production of short-chain fatty acids in the caecum and upper colon of the guinea pig. Zeitschrift für Tierphysiologie Tierernährung und Futtermittelkunde 54: 276–285.
   Google Scholar
• SAKAGUCHI, E., ITOH, H., UCHIDA, S. & HORIGOME, T. 1987. Comparison of fibre digestion and digesta retention time between rabbits, guinea-pigs, rats and hamsters. British Journal of Nutrition 58: 149–158.
   Google Scholar
• SCHNEIDER, A., KIRSCHE, B., KÖHLER, R. & FLACHOWSKY, G. 1989. Faser-Detergentien-Analyse mit verfügbaren chemikalien und vergleichende Prüfung mit der originalmethode. Archives for Animal Nutrition 39: 177–186.
   Google Scholar
• SKINNER, J.D. & SMITHERS, R.H.N. 1990. The Mammals of the Southern African Subregion, New Edition. University of Pretoria, Pretoria.
   Google Scholar
• SNIPES, R.L., HÖRNICKE, H., BJÖRNHAG, G. & STAHL, W. 1988. Regional differences in hindgut structure and function in the nutria, Myocaster coypus. Cell Tissue Research 252: 435–447.
   Google Scholar
• TAKAHASHI, T. & SAKAGUCHI, E. 1998. Behaviors and nutritional importance of coprophagy in captive adult and young nutrias (Myocastor coypus). Journal of Comparative Physiology 168: 281–288.
   Google Scholar
• TAKAHASHI, T. & SAKAGUCHI, E. 2000. Role of the furrow of the proximal colon in the production of soft and hard feces in nutrias, Myocastor coypus. Journal of Comparative Physiology 170: 531–535.
   Google Scholar
• TAKAHASHI, T. & SAKAGUCHI, E. 2006. Transport of bacteria across and along the large intestinal lumen of guinea pigs. Journal of Comparative Physiology 176: 173–178.
   Google Scholar
• VAN DER MERWE, M. & VAN ZYL, A. 2001. Postnatal growth of the greater cane rat Thryonomys swinderianus (Thryonomyidae: Rodentia) in Gauteng, South Africa. Mammalia 65: 495–507.
   Google Scholar
• VAN SOEST, P.J., ROBERTSON, J.B. & LEWIS, B.A. 1991. Symposium: carbohydrate methodology, metabolism, and nutritional implications in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 74: 3583–3597.
   Google Scholar
• VAN ZYL, A., MEYER, A.J. & VAN DER MERWE, M. 1999. The influence of fibre in the diet on growth rates and the digestibility of nutrients in the greater cane rat (Thryonomys swinderianus). Comparative Biochemistry & Physiology 123A: 129–135.
   Google Scholar
• VAN ZYL, A., RAMBAU, R.V. & VAN DER MERWE, M. 2005. Aspects of the anatomy and histology of the alimentary canal of the greater cane rat, Thryonomys swinderianus, with reference to its feeding physiology. African Zoology 40: 25–36.
   Google Scholar
• VIETMEYER, N.D. 1991. Microlivestock: Little-known Small Animals with a Promising Economic Future. Board on Science and Technology for International Development, National Academy Press, Washington D.C.
   Google Scholar