96
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Is a reduction in the individual vigilance of mothers a key evolutionary driver of group formation in white rhinos?

, , &
Pages 109-114 | Received 05 Sep 2012, Accepted 02 Apr 2013, Published online: 20 Apr 2015

References

  • ALE, S.B. & BROWN, J.S. 2007. The contingencies of group size and vigilance. Evolutionary Ecology Research 9: 1263–1276.
  • BEAUCHAMP, G. & RUXTON, G.D. 2007. Dilution games: use of protective cover can cause a reduction in vigilance for prey in groups. Behavioral Ecology 18: 1040–1044.
  • BEAUCHAMP, G. & RUXTON, G.D. 2008. Disentangling risk dilution and collective detection in the anti-predator vigilance of semipalmated sandpipers in flocks. Animal Behaviour 75: 1837–1842.
  • BRASHARES, J.S. & ARCESE, P. 2002. Role of forage, habitat and predation in the behavioural plasticity of a small African antelope. Journal of Animal Ecology 71: 626–638.
  • BRAIN, C., FORGE, O. & ERB, P. 1999. Lion predation on black rhinoceros (Diceros bicornis) in Etosha National Park. African Journal of Ecology 37: 107–109.
  • BURGER, J. & GOCHFELD, M. 1994. Vigilance in African mammals: differences among mothers, other females, and males. Behaviour 131: 153–169.
  • BURGER, J., SAFINA, C. & GOCHFELD, M. 2000. Factors affecting vigilance in springbok: importance of vegetative cover, location in herd, and herd size. Acta Ethologica 2: 97–104.
  • CARO, T.M., GRAHAM, C.M., STONER, C.J. & VARGAS, J.K. 2004. Adaptive significance of antipredator behaviour in artiodactyls. Animal Behaviour 67: 205–228.
  • CHILDRESS, M.J. & LUNG, M.A. 2003. Predation risk, gender and the group size effect: does elk vigilance depend upon the behaviour of conspecifics? Animal Behaviour 66: 389–398.
  • DEHN, M.M. 1990. Vigilance for predators: detection and dilution effects. Behavioral Ecology & Sociobiology 26: 337–342.
  • ELGAR, M.A. 1989. Predator vigilance and group size in mammals and birds: a critical review of the empirical evidence. Biological Reviews 64: 13–33
  • FAIRBANKS, B. & DOBSON, F.S. 2007. Mechanisms of the group-size effect on vigilance in Columbian ground squirrels: dilution versus detection. Animal Behaviour 73: 115–123.
  • FORTIN, D., BOYCE, M.S., MERRILL, E.H. & FRYXELL, J.M. 2004. Foraging costs of vigilance in large mammalian herbivores. Oikos 107: 172–180.
  • FOSTER, W.A. & TREHERNE, J.E. 1981. Evidence for the dilution effect in the selfish herd from fish predation on a marine insect. Nature 293: 466–467
  • FRID, A.1997. Vigilance by female Dall’s sheep: interactions between predation risk factors. Animal Behaviour 53:799–808.
  • GEORGIADIS, N., HACK, M. & TURPIN, K. 2003. The influence of rainfall on zebra population dynamics: implications for management. Journal of Applied Ecology 40: 125–136.
  • GOSLING, L.M. 1986. The evolution of the mating strategies in male antelopes. In: Ecological Aspects of Social Evolution: Birds and Mammals, (eds) D.I. Rubenstein & R.W. Wrangham, pp. 244–281. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
  • HAMILTON, W.D. 1971. Geometry for the selfish herd. Journal ofTheoretical Biology 31: 295–311.
  • HILLMAN-SMITH, A.K.K., OWEN-SMITH, N., ANDERSON, J.L., HALL-MARTIN, A.J. & SELALADI, J.P. 1986. Age estimation of the white rhinoceros (Cerato-therium simum). Journal of Zoology, London 210: 355–379.
  • JARMAN, P.J. 1974. The social organization of antelope in relation to their ecology. Behaviour 48: 215–267.
  • KRAUSE, J. & RUXTON, G.D. 2002. Living in Groups. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • LAUNDRÉ, J.W., HERNÁNDEZ, L. & ALTENDORF, K.B. 2001. Wolves, elk, and bison: reestablishing the ‘landscape of fear’ in Yellowstone National Park, U.S.A. Canadian Journal of Zoology 79: 1401–1409
  • LIMA, S.L. 1995. Back to the basics of anti-predatory vigilance: the group-size effect. Animal Behaviour 49: 11–20.
  • LIMA, S.L., DILL, L.M. 1990. Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Canadian Journal of Zoology 68: 619–640.
  • LIMA, S.L., ZOLLNER, P.A. 1996. Anti-predatory vigilance and the limits to collective detection: visual and spatial separation between foragers. Behavioral Ecology & Sociobiology 38: 355–363.
  • LOVERIDGE, A.J., HUNT, J.E., MURINDAGOMO, F. & MACDONALD, D.W. 2006. Influence of drought on predation of elephant (Loxodonta africana) calves by lions (Panthera leo) in an African wooded savannah. Journal of Zoology, London 270: 523–530.
  • MOSS, C. 1988. Elephant Memories. William Morrow and Company, New York.
  • OWEN-SMITH, N. 1973. The behavioural ecology of the white rhinoceros. Ph.D. thesis, University of Wisconsin, Madison, U.S.A.
  • OWEN-SMITH, N. 1988. Megaherbivores. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. PULLIAM, H.R. 1973. On the advantage of flocking. Journal of Theoretical Biology 38: 419–429.
  • RIEUCAU, G. & MARTIN, J.G.A. 2008. Many eyes or many ewes: vigilance tactics in female bighorn sheep Ovis canadensis vary according to reproductive status. Oikos 117: 501–506.
  • ROBERTS, G. 1996. Why individual vigilance declines as group size increases. Animal Behaviour 51:1077–1086.
  • SALNICKI, J., TEICHMANN, M., WILSON, V.J. & MURINDAGOMO, F. 2001. Spotted hyaenas Crocuta crocuta prey on new-born elephant calves in Hwange National Park, Zimbabwe. Koedoe 44: 79–83.
  • SHRADER, A.M. & OWEN-SMITH, N. 2002. The role of companionship in the dispersal of white rhinoceroses (Ceratotherium simum). Behavioral Ecology & Sociobiology 52: 255–261.
  • SHRADER, A.M., OWEN-SMITH, N. & OGUTU, J.O. 2006. How a mega-grazer copes with the dry season: food and nutrient intake rates by white rhinoceros in the wild. Functional Ecology 20: 376–384.
  • STENSLAND, E., ANGERBJRN, A. & BERGGREN, P. 2003. Mixed species groups in mammals. Mammalian Review 33: 205–223.
  • TURNER, G.F. & PITCHER, T.J. 1986. Attackabatement: a model for group protection by combined avoidance and dilution. American Naturalist 128: 228–240.
  • VEHRENCAMP, S.L. 1983. A model for the evolution of despotic versus egalitarian societies. Animal Behaviour 31: 667–682.
  • VINE, I. 1971. Risk of visual detection and pursuit by a predator and the selective advantage of flocking behaviour. Journal of Theoretical Biology 30: 405–422.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.