78
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The effects of different gold mine tailings on growth, reproduction and avoidance-behaviour of earthworms

, & ORCID Icon
Pages 35-42 | Received 24 Jun 2019, Accepted 29 Jan 2020, Published online: 24 Mar 2020

References

  • Antunes SC, Castro BB, Nunes B, Pereira R, Gonçalves F. 2008. In situ bioassay with Eisenia andrei to assess soil toxicity in an abandoned uranium mine. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 71(3): 620–631.
  • Aucamp P, Van Schalkwyk A. 2003. Trace element pollution of soils by abandoned gold mine tailings, near Potchefstroom, South Africa. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment 62(2): 123–134.
  • Bedano JC, Cantú MP, Doucet ME. 2006. Influence of three different land management practices on soil mite (Arachnida: Acari) densities in relation to a natural soil. Applied Soil Ecology 32(3): 293–304.
  • Bezuidenhout N, Rousseau PDS. 2005. An investigation into the depth and rate of weathering on gold tailings dam surfaces as key information for long-term AMD risk assessments. Water Research Commission. WRC Report No. 1347/1/05
  • Bradshaw A. 1997. Restoration of mined lands—using natural processes. Ecological Engineering 8(4): 255–269.
  • Chamber of mines South Africa. 2017. http://www.chamberofmines.org.za/sa-mining. Date of access: 08 June 2019.
  • Cortet J, Vauflery AG-D, Poinsot-Balaguer N, Gomot L, Texier C, Cluzeau D. 1999. The use of invertebrate soil fauna in monitoring pollutant effects. European Journal of Soil Biology 35(3): 115–134.
  • Demidova O, Cherp A. 2005. Risk assessment for improved treatment of health considerations in EIA. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 25(4): 411–429.
  • Doran JW, Zeiss MR. 2000. Soil health and sustainability: managing the biotic component of soil quality. Applied Soil Ecology 15(1): 3–11.
  • Edraki M, Baumgartl T, Mulligan D, Fegan W, Munawar A. 2019. Geochemical characteristics of rehabilitated tailings and associated seepages at Kidston gold mine, Queensland, Australia. International Journal of Mining, Reclamation and Environment 33(2): 133–147.
  • Eijsackers H, Reinecke A, Reinecke S, Maboeta M. 2017. Threatened southern African soils: A need for appropriate ecotoxicological risk assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 63: 128–135.
  • Eijsackers H, Swartjes FA, Van Rensburg L, Maboeta MS. 2014. The need for attuned soil quality risk assessment for non-Western humans and ecosystems, exemplified by mining areas in South Africa. Environmental Science & Policy 44: 174–180.
  • Faber JH, Van Wensem J. 2012. Elaborations on the use of ecosystem services concept for application in ecological risk assessments for soils. The Science of the Total Environment 415: 3–8.
  • ISO. 2007. Soil quality: avoidance test for testing the quality of soils and effects of chemicals on behavior – part 1: test with earthworms (Eisenia fetida and Eisenia andrei). ISO/DIS 17512–1.2., Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization.
  • Jongmans AG, Pulleman MM, Balabane M, Van Oort F, Marinissen JCY. 2003. Soil structure and characteristics of organic matter in two orchards differing in earthworm activity. Applied Soil Ecology 24(3): 219–232.
  • Jubileus MT, Theron PD, Van Rensburg L, Maboeta MS. 2013. Utilizing Eisenia andrei to assess the ecotoxicity of platinum mine tailings disposal facilities. Ecotoxicology 22(2): 331–338.
  • King HL, Pringle IC, Oosterhuis WR, Ehlers DL. 2007. The Metallogeny of the West Rand Area. Pretoria, South Africa: Council for Geoscience. pp. 92.
  • Kokta, C. 1992. Measuring effects of chemicals in the laboratory: effects criteria and endpoints. (pp. 55–62). In: Greig-Smith PW, Becker H, Edwards PJ, Heimbach F (Eds). Ecotoxicology of Earthworms. Andover, United Kingdom: Intercept Ltd.
  • Landis W, Sofield R, Yu MH, Landis WG. 2003. Introduction to environmental toxicology: impacts of chemicals upon ecological systems. Boca Raton, United States: CRC Press. .
  • Loureiro S, Soares AMVM, Nogueira AJA. 2005. Terrestrial avoidance behaviour tests as screening tool to assess soil contamination. Environmental Pollution 138: 121–131.
  • Lukkari T, Aatsinki M, Vaisanen A, Haimi J. 2005. Toxicity of copper and zinc assessed with three different earthworm tests. Applied Soil Ecology 30(2): 133–146.
  • Maboeta MS, Van Rensburg L, Jansen Van Rensburg PJ. 2008. Earthworm (Eisenia fetida) bioassay to assess the possible effects of platinum tailings disposal facilities on the environment along a gradient. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research 6(2): 13–19.
  • Maboeta MS, Oladipo OG, Botha SM. 2018. Ecotoxicity of Mine Tailings: Unrehabilitated Versus Rehabilitated. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 100(5): 702–707.
  • Newman MC. 2015. Fundamentals of ecotoxicology: the science of pollution. Boca Raton, United States: CRC Press. pp. 417.
  • OECD 222. 2004. OECD Guidelines for the testing of chemicals 222. Earthworm Reproduction test. Adopted 13 April 2004. Reproduction Test (Eisenia fetida/Eisenia andrei). Paris, France: OECD Publishing. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264070325-en.
  • Oladipo OG, Burt AF, Maboeta MS. 2019. Effect of Bacillus cereus on the ecotoxicity of metal-based fungicide spiked soils: Earthworm bioassay. Ecotoxicology (London, England) 28: 37–47.
  • Reinecke AJ. 1992. A review of ecotoxicological test methods using earthworms. (pp. 7–19). In: Greig-Smith PW, Becker H, Edwards PJ, Heimbach F (Eds). Ecotoxicology of Earthworms. Andover, United Kingdom: Intercept.
  • Reinecke AJ, Maboeta MS, Vermeulen LA, Reinecke SA. 2002. Assessment of lead nitrate and mancozeb toxicity in earthworms using the avoidance response. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 68: 779–786.
  • Rossouw AS, Annegarn HJ, Weiersbye IM, Furniss DG. 2010. Evaluating the functional status of a rehabilitated gold tailings storage facility—a case study in the Witwatersrand. South African Journal of Botany 76(2): 402.
  • Saunders JR, Knopper LD, Koch I, Reimer KJ. 2011. Inclusion of soil arsenic bioaccessibility in ecological risk assessment and comparison with biological effects. The Science of the Total Environment 412: 132–137.
  • South Africa. 2014. National norms and standards for the remediation of contaminated land and soil quality in the Republic of South Africa. 37603. Government Gazette. Pretoria, South Africa: Government Printer.
  • van Coller-Myburgh C, Van Rensburg L, Maboeta M. 2014. Utilizing earthworm and microbial assays to assess the ecotoxicity of chromium mine wastes. Applied Soil Ecology 83: 258–265.
  • van Coller-Myburgh C, Van Rensburg L, Maboeta M. 2015. Assessing the ecotoxicity of gold mine tailings utilising earthworm and microbial assays. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution 226: 218.
  • Wahl JJ, Theron PD, Maboeta MS. 2012. Soil mesofauna as bioindicators to assess environmental disturbance at a platinum mine in South Africa. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 86: 250–260.
  • Weltje L. 1998. Mixture toxicity and tissue interactions of Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn in earthworms (Oligochaeta) in laboratory and field soils: a critical evaluation of data. Chemosphere 36(12): 2643–2660.
  • Yibas B, Pulles W, Nengovhela C. 2010. Kinetic development of oxidation zones in tailings dams with specific reference to the Witwatersrand gold mine tailings dams. WRC Report No. 1554/1/10. Water Research Commission. http://www.wrc.org.za/wp-content/uploads/mdocs/1554-1-10%20Mine%20Water%20 Management1.pdf. [Accessed 3 March 2020].
  • Žaltauskaitė J, Sodienė I. 2014. Effects of cadmium and lead on the life-cycle parameters of juvenile earthworm Eisenia fetida. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 103: 9–16.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.