A comparison of aquatic macroinvertebrate and large branchiopod community composition between temporary pans of a conservation area and surrounding communal area in South Africa

References

• Best EPH, Verhoeven JTA, Wolff WJ. 1993. The ecology of The Netherlands wetlands characteristics, threats, prospects and perspectives for ecological research. Hydrobiologia 265: 305–320. doi: 10.1007/BF00007274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs J, Fox G, Whitfield M, Williams P. 1998. A guide to the methods of the national pond survey. Oxford, United Kingdom: Pond Action.
   Google Scholar
• Bird MS, Day JA. 2014. Wetlands in changed landscapes: the influence of habitat transformation on the physico-chemistry of temporary depression wetlands. PLoS One 9: e88935. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088935
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bird MS, Day JA. 2016. Impacts of terrestrial habitat transformation on temporary wetland invertebrates in a sclerophyllous Sand fynbos landscape. Hydrobiologia 782: 169–185. doi: 10.1007/s10750-016-2804-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bird MS, Mlambo MC, Day JA. 2013. Macroinvertebrates as unreliable indicators of human disturbance in temporary depression wetlands of the south-western Cape, South Africa. Hydrobiologia 720: 19–37. doi: 10.1007/s10750-013-1618-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bird MS, Mlambo MC, Wasserman RJ, Dalu T, Holland AJ, Day JA, Villet MH, Bilton DT, Barber-James HM, Brendonck L. 2019. Deeper knowledge of shallow waters: reviewing the invertebrate fauna of southern African temporary wetlands. Hydrobiologia 827: 89–121. doi: 10.1007/s10750-018-3772-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanchet FG, Legendre P, Borcard D. 2008. Forward selection of explanatory variables. Ecology 89: 2623–2632. doi: 10.1890/07-0986.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouahim S, Rhazi L, Amami B, Waterkeyn A, Rhazi M, Saber E-R, Zouahri A, Van den Broeck M, Muller SD, Brendonck L, et al. 2014. Unravelling the impact of anthropogenic pressure on plant communities in Mediterranean temporary ponds. Marine and Freshwater Research 65: 918–929. doi: 10.1071/MF13194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brendonck L, De Meester L. 2003. Egg banks in freshwater zooplankton: evolutionary and ecological archives in the sediment. Hydrobiologia 491: 65–84. doi: 10.1023/A:1024454905119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brendonck L, Rogers DC, Olesen J, Weeks S, Hoeh WR. 2008. Global diversity of large branchiopods (Crustacea, Branchiopoda) in freshwater. Hydrobiologia 595: 167–176. doi: 10.1007/s10750-007-9119-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brendonck L, Williams WD. 2000. Biodiversity in wetlands of dry regions (drylands). Biodiversity in wetlands, assessment, function and conservation. In: Gopal B, Junk WJ, Davis JA (Eds). Wetlands. Leiden, Germany: Backhuys Publishers. pp. 181−194.
   Google Scholar
• Burnham KP, Anderson DR. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. New York, United States: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Chao A, Colwell RK, Lin C-W, Gotelli NJ. 2009. Sufficient sampling for asymptotic minimum species richness estimators. Ecology 90: 1125–1133. doi: 10.1890/07-2147.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chessman BC, Trayler KM, Davis JA. 2002. Family-and species- level biotic indices for macroinvertebrates of wetlands on the Swan Coastal Plain, Western Australia. Marine and Freshwater Research 53: 919–930. doi: 10.1071/MF00079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalu T, Wasserman RJ, Dalu MTB. 2017. Agricultural intensification and drought frequency increases may have landscape-level consequences for ephemeral ecosystems. Global Change Biology 23: 983–985. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13549
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day JA, Harrison AD, de Moor IJ. 2002. Guides to the freshwater invertebrates of southern Africa. Diptera. (Report TT201/02: 1–200). Pretoria, South Africa: Water Research Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Day JA, Stewart BA, de Moor IJ, Louw AE. 1999. Guides to the freshwater invertebrates of southern Africa. Crustacea I: Notostraca, Anostraca, Conchostraca and Cladocera. (Report TT121/00: 1–123). Pretoria, South Africa: Water Research Commission.
   Google Scholar
• de Moor I, Day J, de Moor F. 2009. Guides to the freshwater invertebrates of southern Africa. Insecta I: Ephemeroptera, Odonata and Plecoptera. (TT 207/03). Pretoria, South Africa: Water Research Commission.
   Google Scholar
• de Moor IJ, Day JA, de Moor FC. 2003. Guides to the freshwater invertebrates of southern Africa. Insecta II: Hemiptera, Megaloptra, Neuroptera, Trichoptera and Lepidoptera. (Report TT214/03: 1–209). Pretoria, South Africa: Water Research Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Declerck S, De Bie T, Ercken D, Hampel H, Schrijvers S, Van Wichelen J, Gillard V, Mandiki R, Losson B, Bauwens D, et al. 2006. Ecological characteristics of small farmland ponds: Associations with land use practices at multiple spatial scales. Biological Conservation 131: 523–532. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2006.02.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Declerck S, Vandekerkhove J, Johansson L, Muylaert K, Conde-Porcuna JM, Van der Gucht K, Pérez-Martínez C, Lauridsen T, Schwenk K, Zwart G, et al. 2005. Multi-group biodiversity in shallow lakes along gradients of phosphorus and water plant cover. Ecology 86: 1905–1915. doi: 10.1890/04-0373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickens CW, Graham PM. 2002. The South African Scoring System (SASS) Version 5 Rapid Bioassessment Method for Rivers. African Journal of Aquatic Science 27: 1–10. doi: 10.2989/16085914.2002.9626569
   Google Scholar
• Dube T, DeNecker L, van Vuren JHJ, Wepener V, Smit NJ, Brendonck L. 2017. Spatial and temporal variation of invertebrate community structure in flood-controlled tropical floodplain wetlands. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 32: 1–15. doi: 10.1080/02705060.2016.1230562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dube T, Wepener V, van Vuren JHJ, Smit N, Brendonck L. 2015. The case for environmental flow determination for the Phongolo River, South Africa. African Journal of Aquatic Science 40: 269–276. doi: 10.2989/16085914.2015.1074061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira M, Wepener V, van Vuren JHJ. 2012. Aquatic invertebrate communities of perennial pans in Mpumalanga, South Africa: a diversity and functional approach. African Invertebrates 53: 751–768. doi: 10.5733/afin.053.0212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox J, Weisberg S. 2011. An R Companion to Applied Regression. 2nd Ed. London, United Kingdom: Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert B, Bennett JR. 2010. Partitioning variation in ecological communities: do the numbers add up? Journal of Applied Ecology 47: 1071–1082. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01861.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goslee SC, Urban DL. 2007. The ecodist package for dissimilarity- based analysis of ecological data. Journal of Statistical Software 22: 1–19. doi: 10.18637/jss.v022.i07
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guareschi S, Bilton D, Velasco J, Millán A, Abellán P. 2015. How well do protected area networks support taxonomic and functional diversity in non-target taxa? The case of Iberian freshwaters. Biological Conservation 187: 134–144. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.04.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillemain M, Houte S, Fritz H. 2000. Activities and food resources of wintering teal (Anas crecca) in a diurnal feeding site: a case study in Western France. Revue d’Écologie 55: 171–181.
   Google Scholar
• Hermosillo-Núñez BB, Ortiz M, Rodríguez-Zaragoza FA. 2018. Keystone species complexes in kelp forest ecosystems along the northern Chilean coast (SE Pacific): Improving multispecies management strategies. Ecological Indicators 93: 1101–1111. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.06.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill MJ, Death R, Mathers KL, Ryves DB, White JC, Wood PJ. 2017. Macroinvertebrate community composition and diversity in ephemeral and perennial ponds on unregulated floodplain meadows in the UK. Hydrobiologia 793: 95–108. doi: 10.1007/s10750-016-2856-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill MJ, Sayer CD, Wood PJ. 2016. When is the best time to sample aquatic macroinvertebrates in ponds for biodiversity assessment? Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 188: 194–205. doi: 10.1007/s10661-016-5178-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes AO, Tanner CC, McKergow LA, Sukias JPS. 2016. Unrestricted dairy cattle grazing of a pastoral headwater wetland and its effect on water quality. Agricultural Water Management 165: 72–81. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2015.11.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jabot F, Laroche F, Massol F, Arthaud F, Crabot J, Dubart M, Blanchet S, Munoz F, David P, Datry T. 2019. Assessing metacommunity processes through signatures in spatiotemporal turnover of community composition. bioRxiv 48033. https://doi.org/10.1101/480335.
   Google Scholar
• Jeppesen E., Lauridsen T.L., Kairesalo T., Perrow M.R. (1998) Impact of submerged macrophytes on fish-zooplankton Interactions in lakes. (pp 91–114). In: Jeppesen E, Søndergaard M, Søndergaard M, Christoffersen K (Eds). The structuring role of submerged macrophytes in lakes. Ecological Studies (analysis and synthesis). Vol 131. New York, United States: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kaaya LT, Day JA, Dallas HF. 2015. Tanzania River Scoring System (TARISS): a macroinvertebrate-based biotic index for rapid bioassessment of rivers. African Journal of Aquatic Science 40: 109–117. doi: 10.2989/16085914.2015.1051941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langenheder S, Ragnarsson H. 2007. The role of environmental and spatial factors for the composition of aquatic bacterial communities. Ecology 88: 2154–2161. doi: 10.1890/06-2098.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legendre P. 2007. Studying beta diversity: ecological variation partitioning by multiple regression and canonical analysis. Journal of Plant Ecology 31(5): 976–981. doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2007.0124
   Google Scholar
• Legendre P, Fortin MJ. 1989. Spatial pattern and ecological analysis. Vegetatio 80: 107–138. doi: 10.1007/BF00048036
   Google Scholar
• Legendre P, Fortin MJ, Borcard D. 2015. Should the Mantel test be used in spatial analysis? Methods in Ecology and Evolution 6: 1239–1247. doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin D, Foster DP, Ungar LH. 2011. VIF regression: a fast regression algorithm for large data. Journal of the American Statistical Association 106: 232–247. doi: 10.1198/jasa.2011.tm10113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lumbreras A, Marques JT, Belo AF, Cristo M, Fernandes M, Galioto D, Machado M, Mira A, Sa-Sousa P, Silva R, et al. 2016. Assessing the conservation status of Mediterranean temporary ponds using biodiversity: a new tool for practitioners. Hydrobiologia 782: 187–199. doi: 10.1007/s10750-016-2697-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mabidi A, Bird MS, Perissinotto R, Rogers DC. 2016. Ecology and distribution of large branchiopods (Crustacea, Branchiopoda, Anostraca, Notostraca, Laevicaudata, Spinicaudata) of the Eastern Cape Karoo, South Africa. ZooKeys 618: 15–38. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.618.9212
   Google Scholar
• Macadam CR, Stockan JA. 2015. More than just fish food: ecosystem services provided by freshwater insects. Ecological Entomology 40: 113–123. doi: 10.1111/een.12245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nhiwatiwa T, Brendonck L, Dalu T. 2017. Understanding factors structuring zooplankton and macroinvertebrate assemblages in ephemeral pans. Limnologica - Ecology and Management of Inland Waters 64: 11–19. doi: 10.1016/j.limno.2017.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nhiwatiwa T, Brendonck LUC, Waterkeyn A, Vanschoenwinkel B. 2011. The importance of landscape and habitat properties in explaining instantaneous and long-term distributions of large branchiopods in subtropical temporary pans. Freshwater Biology 56: 1992–2008. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2011.02630.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nhiwatiwa T, Waterkeyn A, Riddoch BJ, Brendonck L. 2014. A hotspot of large branchiopod diversity in south-eastern Zimbabwe. African Journal of Aquatic Science 39: 57–65. doi: 10.2989/16085914.2014.892869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NWA. 1998. (National Water Act) (Act No.36, 1998), 1998. Part 3, the Reserve. South African Government Gazette 19182. Pretoria, South Africa: Government Printer.
   Google Scholar
• Oksanen J, Blanchet F, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin P, O′ Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Wagner H. 2016. The vegan package. Community ecology package 10. Available at: https://cran.r-project.org/package=vegan.
   Google Scholar
• Ollis DJ, Ewart-Smith JL, Day JA, Job NM, Macfarlane DM, Snaddon CD, Sieben EJJ, Dini JA, Mbona N. 2015. The development of a classification system for inland aquatic ecosystems in South Africa. Water SA 41: 727–745. doi: 10.4314/wsa.v41i5.16
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ollis DJ, Malan HL. 2014. Development of decision-support tools for assessment of wetland present ecological status (PES). Vol. 1. Review of available methods for the assessment of the ecological condition of wetlands in South Africa. (WRC Report No. TT 608/14). Pretoria, South Africa: Water Research Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Peres-Neto PR, Legendre P, Dray S, Borcard D. 2006. Variation partitioning of species data matrices: Estimation and comparison of fractions. Ecology 87: 2614–2625. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2614:VPOSDM]2.0.CO;2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers DC. 2014. Anostracan (Crustacea: Branchiopoda) zoogeography II. Relating distribution to geochemical substrate properties in the USA. ZooKeys 3856: 1–49.
   Google Scholar
• Saraiva DD, Santos ASd, Overbeck GE, Giehl ELH, Jarenkow JA. 2018. How effective are protected areas in conserving tree taxonomic and phylogenetic diversity in subtropical Brazilian Atlantic Forests? Journal for Nature Conservation 42: 28–35. doi: 10.1016/j.jnc.2018.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schell JM, Santos-Flores CJ, Allen PE, Hunker BM, Kloehn S, Michelson A, Lillie RA, Dodson SI. 2001. Physical-chemical influences on vernal zooplankton community structure in small lakes and wetlands of Wisconsin, USA. Hydrobiologia 445: 37–50. doi: 10.1023/A:1017574316867
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider B, Cunha ER, Marchese M, Thomaz SM. 2015. Explanatory variables associated with diversity and composition of aquatic macrophytes in a large subtropical river floodplain. Aquatic Botany 121: 67–75. doi: 10.1016/j.aquabot.2014.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scoones I. 1991. Wetlands in drylands. Key resources for agricultural and pastoral production in Africa. Ambio 20: 366–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Šmilauer P, Lepš J. 2014. Multivariate analysis of ecological data using CANOCO 5. 2nd Ed. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stals R, de Moor I. 2007. Guides to the freshwater invertebrates of southern Africa. Coleoptera. (TT 320/07). Pretoria, South Africa: Water Research Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Stoch F, Korn M, Turki S, Naselli-Flores L, Marrone F. 2016. The role of spatial environmental factors as determinants of large branchiopod distribution in Tunisian temporary ponds. Hydrobiologia 782: 37–51. doi: 10.1007/s10750-015-2637-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torres MV, Giri F, Collins PA. 2018. Temporal and spatial patterns of freshwater decapods associated with aquatic vegetation from floodplain rivers. Hydrobiologia 823: 169–189. doi: 10.1007/s10750-018-3704-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trigal C, García-Criado F, Aláez C-F. (2007). Macroinvertebrate communities of mediterranean ponds (North Iberian Plateau): importance of natural and human-induced variability. Freshwater Biology 52: 2042–2055. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2007.01805.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Broeck M, Waterkeyn A, Brendonck L, Rhazi L. 2015a. Distribution, coexistence, and decline of Moroccan large branchiopods. Journal of Crustacean Biology 35: 355–365. doi: 10.1163/1937240X-00002316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Broeck M, Waterkeyn A, Rhazi L, Grillas P, Brendonck L. 2015b. Assessing the ecological integrity of endorheic wetlands, with focus on Mediterranean temporary ponds. Ecological Indicators 54: 1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.02.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanschoenwinkel B, De Vries C, Seaman M, Brendonck L. 2007. The role of metacommunity processes in shaping invertebrate rock pool communities along a dispersal gradient. Oikos 116: 1255–1266. doi: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2007.15860.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waterkeyn A, Grillas P, Vanschoenwinkel B, Brendonck L. 2008. Invertebrate community patterns in Mediterranean temporary wetlands along hydroperiod and salinity gradients. Freshwater Biology 53: 1808–1822. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2008.02005.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster R. 2001. Statistics to support soil research and their presentation. European Journal of Soil Science 52: 331–340. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2389.2001.00383.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittington M, Malan G, Panagos MD. 2013. Trends in water bird diversity at Banzi, Shokwe and Nyamithi pans, Ndumo Game Reserve, South Africa. Ostrich 84: 47–61. doi: 10.2989/00306525.2013.775188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams DD. 1996. Environmental constraints in temporary fresh waters and their consequences for the insect fauna. Journal of the North American Benthological Society: 634–650. doi: 10.2307/1467813
   Google Scholar
• Williams DD. 2006. The biology of temporary waters. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zamora-Marín J, Gutiérrez-Cánovas C, Abellán P, Millán A. 2016. The role of protected areas in representing aquatic biodiversity: a test using α, β and γ diversity of water beetles from the Segura River Basin (SE Spain). Limnetica 35: 179–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar