Norwegian Superintendents as Mediators of Change Initiatives

REFERENCES

• Aasen, P., Møller, J., Rye, E., Ottesen, E., Prøitz, T. S., & Hertzberg, F. (2012). Kunnskapsløftet som styringsreform—et løft eller et løfte? Forvaltningsnivåenes og institusjonenes rolle i implementeringen av reformen [Knowledge promotion as governance refrom—a promotion or a promise?: The role of the civil services and the institutions in the implementation of the reform]. Oslo, Norway: NIFU-STEP.
   Google Scholar
• Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F. (1992). Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(4), 634–665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldersheim, H., & Ståhlberg, K. (1994). From top-down to bottom-up: Free communes and the politics of administrative modernization. In H. Baldersheim & K. Ståhlberg ( Eds.), Towards the self-regulating municipality. Free communes and administrative modernization in Scandinavia ( pp. 3–20). Aldershot, UK: Darmouth.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (1994). Education reform: A critical and post-structural approach. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J., & Bowe, R. (1992). Subject departments and the implementation of National Curriculum policy. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 24(2), 97–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balogun, J. (2003). From blaming the middle to harnessing its potential. British Journal of Management, 14, 69–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balogun, J., & Johnson, G. (2004). Organizational restructuring and middle manager sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal, 47(4), 523–549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bredeson, P. V., Klar, H., & Johansson, O. (2009). Superintendents as collaborative learning in communities of practice: A sociocultural perspective on professional learning. Journal of School Public Relations 30(2), 128–149.
   Google Scholar
• Brunsson, N., & Olsen, J. P. (1993). The reforming organization. Bergen-Sandviken, Norway: Fagbokforl.
   Google Scholar
• Busher, H. (2005). Being a middle leader: Exploring professional identities. School Leadership & Management, 25(1), 137–154.
   Google Scholar
• Busher, H. (2006). Understanding educational leadership: People, power and culture. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Busher, H., & Harris, A. (1999). Leadership of school subject areas: Tnsions and dimensions of managing in the middle. School Leadership & Management, 19(3), 305–318.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Currie, G., & Procter, S. (2001). Exploring the relationship between HR and middle managers. Human Resource Management Journal, 11, 53–69.
   Google Scholar
• Currie, G., & Procter, S. (2005). The antecedents of middle managers’ strategic contributions: The case of a professional bureaucracy. Journal of Management Studies, 42(7), 1325–1356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daft, R. L., & Weick, K. E. (1984). Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 284–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datnow, A. (2002). Can we transplant educational reform, and does it last? Journal of Educational Change, 3, 215–239.
   Google Scholar
• DiPaolo, M. F., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (2005). Bridging or buffering? Journal of Educational Administration, 43(1), 60–71.
   Google Scholar
• Fimreite, A. L., & Lægreid, P. (2005). Specialization and coordination: Implications for integration and autonomy in a multi-level system ( Working paper Vol. 7/2005). Bergen, Norway: Stein Rokkan Centre for Social Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Floyd, S. W., & Wooldridge, B. (1997). Middle management’s strategic influence and organizational performance. Journal of Management Studies, 34(3), 465–485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gioia, D. A., & Chittipeddi, K. (1991). Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. Strategic Management Journal, 5, 433–448.
   Google Scholar
• Gould, R. V., & Fernandez, R. M. (1989). Structure of mediation: A formal approach to brokerage in transaction networks. Sociological Methodology, 19, 89–126.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A., Jamieson, I., & Russ, J. (1995). A study of “effective” departments in secondary schools. School Organisation, 15(3), 283–299.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson, O., Holmgren, M., Nihlfors, E., Moos, L., Skedsmo, G., Paulsen, J. M., & Risku, M. (2013). Local decisions under central watch: A new Nordic quality assurance system. In L. Moos ( Ed.), Transnational influences on values and practices in Nordic educational leadership: Is there a Nordic model? ( pp. 173–192). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson, O., Moos, L., Nihlfors, E., Paulsen, J. M., & Risku, M. (2011). The Nordic superintendents’ leadership roles: Cross-national comparisons. In J. McBeath & T. Townsend ( Eds.), International handbook on leadership for learning ( pp. 695–725). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kjærnsli, M. (2007). Hva får vi vite fra PISA 2006? [What do we know from PISA 2006?]. Acta Didactica, 1(1). Oslo, Norway: University of Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Kjærnsli, M., Lie, S., Olsen, R., & Turmo, A. (2004). Rett spor eller ville veier? Norske elevers prestasjoner i matematikk, naturfag og lesing i PISA 2003 [On or off track? Norwegian pupils’ achievements in mathematics, science and literacy in PISA 2003]. Oslo, Norway: Scandinavian University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lundgren, U. P. (1990). Educational policymaking, decentralisation and evaluation. In M. Granheim, M. Kogan, & U. P. Lundgren ( Eds.), Evaluation as policymaking: Introducing evaluation into a national decentralised educational system ( pp. 23–41). London, UK: Jessica Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H. (1980). Structure in 5’s: A synthesis of the research on organizational design. Management Science, 26(3), 322–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H. (1993). Structure in fives: Designing effective organizations. New York, NY: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Nihlfors, E. (2003). Scholchefen i skolans styrning og ledning [The superintendent in governance and leadership of the school]. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis (Uppsala Studies in Education, 102). Uppsala, Sweden: Uppsala University.
   Google Scholar
• Ogawa, R. I. (1996). Bridging and buffgering relations between parents and schools. UCEA Review, 37(2), 12–13.
   Google Scholar
• Pappas, J., M., Flaherty, K., & Wooldridge, P. (2003). Achieving strategic consensus in the hospital setting: A middle management perspective. Hospital Topics, 81(1), 15–22.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pappas, J. M., Flaherty, K., E., & Wooldridge, B. (2004). Tapping into hospital champions—Strategic middle managers. Health Care Management Review, 29(1), 8–16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Paulsen, J. M. (2012). Parental involvement in Norwegian schools. Journal of School Public Relations, 33, 29–47.
   Google Scholar
• Pawlowski, S. D., & Robey, D. (2004). Bridging user organizations: Knowledge brokering and the work of information technology professionals. MIS Quarterly, 28(4), 645–673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinsonneault, A., & Kraemer, K. L. (1997). Middle management downsizing: Empirical investigation of the impact of information technology. Management Science, 43(5), 659–679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Printy, S. M. (2008). Leadership for teacher learning: A community of practice perspective. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(2), 187–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouleau, L. (2005). Micro-practices of strategic sensemaking and sensegiving: How middle managers interpret and sell change every day. Journal of Management Studies, 42(7), 1413–1441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwab, R. C., Ungson, G. R., & Brown, W. B. (1985). Refining boundary spanning: Environmental relationships. Journal of Management, 11(1), 75–86.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R. (2003). Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R., & Meyer, J. W. (1991). The organization of societal sectors: Propositions and early evidence. In W. W. Powell & P. DiMaggio ( Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis ( pp. 108–140). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skedsmo, G. (2009). School governing in transition? Perspectives, purposes and perceptions of evaluation policy (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Tushman, M. L., & Katz, R. (1980). External communication and project performance: An investigation into the role of gatekeepers. Management Science, 26(11), 1071–1085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tushman, M. L., & Scanlan, T. J. (1981). Characteristcs and external orientation of boundary spanning individuals. Academy of Management Journal, 24(1), 83–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, A., & Louis, M. R. (1999). The migration of organizational functions to the work unit level: Buffering, spanning and bringing up boundaries. Human Relations, 52(1), 25–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar