Exploring the Politics of Differential Resource Allocation: Implications for Policy Design and Leadership Practice

REFERENCES

• Allison, G. (1971). Model 1: The rational actor. In The essence of decision ( pp. 10 –38). Boston, MA: Little, Brown, & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, B. D., & Corcoran, S. P. (2012). The stealth inequities of school funding: How state and local school finance systems perpetuate inequitable student spending. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress.
   Google Scholar
• Berne, R., & Stiefel, L. (1994). Measuring equity at the school level: The finance perspective. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 16(4), 405 –421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brantlinger, E. (2003). Dividing classes: How the middle class negotiates and rationalizes school advantage. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Calvo, N., & Miles, K. H. (2011). Turning crisis into opportunity. Educational Leadership, 69(4), 19 –23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers, J., Levin, J., & Shambaugh, L. (2010). Exploring weighted student formulas as a policy for improving equity for distributing resources to schools: A case study of two California school districts. Economics of Education Review, 29, 283 –300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datnow, A. (2005). The sustainability of comprehensive school reform models in changing district and state contexts. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41(1), 121 –153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grubb, N. (2009). The money myth: School resources, outcomes and equity. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, D. (2008). Educational outcomes of disadvantaged students: From desegregation to accountability. In H. Ladd & E. Fiske ( Eds.), Handbook of research in education finance and policy ( pp. 551 –570). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, G. T., Fortner, C. K., & Thompson, C. L. (2010). Targeted funding for educationally disadvantaged students: A regression discontinuity estimate of the impact on high school student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 32(2), 183 –204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, W. J. (2010). Defining equity: Multiple perspectives to analyzing the performance of diverse learners. Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 142 –178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingdon, J. (2001, April). Speech delivered at the Second Annual Quello Telecommunications Policy and Law Symposium, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
   Google Scholar
• Kingdon, J. (2003), Agendas, alternatives and public policies (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Knapp, M., Copland, M., Honig, M., Plecki, M., & Porting, B. (2010). Learning-focused leadership and leadership support: Meaning and practice in urban systems. Seattle: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington.
   Google Scholar
• Ladd, H. (2008). Reflections on equity, adequacy, and weighted student funding, Education Finance and Policy, 3(4), 402 –423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladson-Billings, G. (2006). From the achievement gap to the education debt: Understanding achievement in US schools. Educational Researcher, 35(7), 3 –12.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. & Wong, K. (2004). The impact of accountability on racial and socioeconomic equity: Considering both school resources and achievement outcomes. American Educational Research Journal, 41(4), 797 –832.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. (1980). Street level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public service. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Lora, E., Panizza, U., & Quispe-Agnoli, M. (2004). Reform fatigue: Symptoms, reasons, and implications. Economic Review, 89(2), 1–28. Atlanta, GA: Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta.
   Google Scholar
• Oakes, J. (2008). Keeping track: Structuring equality and inequality in an era of accountability. The Teachers College Record, 110(3), 700 –712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plecki, M., Alejano, C., Knapp, P., & Lochmiller, C. (2006). Allocating resources and creating incentives to improve teaching and learning. Seattle: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington.
   Google Scholar
• Reardon, S., & Robinson, J. (2008). Patterns and trends in racial/ethnic and socioeconomic academic achievement gaps. In H. Ladd & E. Fiske ( Eds.), Handbook of research in education finance and policy ( pp. 497 –516). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, G. (2004). Vertical equity in school finance and the potential for increasing school responsiveness to student and staff needs. Peabody Journal of Education, 79(3), 7 –30.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, A., & Ingram, H. (1993). Social construction of target populations: Implications for politics and policy. American Political Science Review, 87(2), 334 –347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weatherly, R., & Lipsky, M. (1977). Street-level bureaucrats and institutional innovation: Implementing special education reform. Harvard Educational Review, 47(2), 171 –197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar