A Model for Leadership That Improves Learning: New Insights for Schools and Scholars

REFERENCES

• Argyris, C., & Schon, D. (1974). Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Avery, G. (2004). Understanding leadership. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bazeley, P. (2007). Qualitative data analysis with NVivo. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Beatty, B. (2007). Feeling the future of school leadership: Learning to lead with the emotions in mind. Leading and Managing, 13(2), 44 –65.
   Google Scholar
• Bezzina, M. (2012). Paying attention to moral purpose in leading learning. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 40(2), 248 –271. doi:10.1177/1741143211427979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaikie, N. (2003). Analyzing quantitative data: From description to explanation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Boal, K. B., & Schultz, P. L. (2007). Storytelling, time, and evolution: The role of strategic leadership in complex adaptive systems. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(4), 411 –428. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.04.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolstad, R., Gilbert, J., McDowall, S., Bull, A., Boyd, S., & Hipkins, R. (2012). Supporting future-orientated learning and teaching: A New Zealand perspective. Retrieved from http://www. educationcounts.govt.nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/109317/994_Future-oriented-07062012.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bryk, A. S., & Schneider, B. L. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bryk, A. S., Sebring, P. B., Allensworth, E., Luppescu, S., & Easton, J. Q. (2010). Organizing schools for improvement: Lessons from Chicago. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bush, T., & Glover, D. (2012). Distributed leadership in action: Leading high-performing leadership teams in English schools. School Leadership & Management, 32(1), 21 –36. doi:10.1080/13632434.2011.642354
   Google Scholar
• Caldwell, B. (2008). Reconceptualizing the self-managing school. Educational Management Administration Leadership, 36(2), 235 –252. doi:10.1177/1741143207087775
   Google Scholar
• Caldwell, B. J. (2010). The impact of high-stakes test-driven accountability. Professional Voice, 8(1), 49 –53.
   Google Scholar
• Caldwell, B. J., & Spinks, J. M. (2008). Raising the stakes: From improvement to transformation in the reform of schools. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Camburn, E., & Han, S. (2009). Investigating connections between distributed leadership and instructional change. In A. Harris ( Ed.), Distributed leadership: Different perspectives ( Vol. 7, pp. 25 –45). Milton Keynes, UK: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education (5th ed.). London, UK: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, C., & Boyd, J. (2007). Schools as collaborative learning communities. Education Horizons, 9(6), 10 –12.
   Google Scholar
• Cranston, N., Kimber, M., Mulford, B., Reid, A., & Keating, J. (2010). Politics and school education in Australia: a case of shifting purposes. Journal of Educational Administration, 48(2), 182 –195. doi:10.1108/09578231011027842
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, M. (2012). Solo and distributed leadership: Definitions and dilemmas. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 40(5), 610 –620. doi:10.1177/1741143212451175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J., Plano Clark, V., Gutmann, M., & Hanson, W. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie ( Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research ( pp. 209 –240). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Deal, T. W., & Kennedy, A. A. (1982). Corporate cultures. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Dimmock, C. (2012). Leadership, capacity building and school improvement: Concepts, themes and impact. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dinham, S. (2007a, August). Authoritative leadership, action learning and student accomplishment. Paper presented at the Leadership Challenge: Improving Learning in Schools conference. Retrieved from http://www.acer.edu.au/documents/RC2007_ConfProceedings.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dinham, S. (2007b). The secondary head of department and the achievement of exceptional student outcomes. Journal of Educational Administration, 45(1), 62 –79. doi:10.1108/09578230710722458
   Google Scholar
• Dinham, S. (2008). How to get your school moving and improving. Camberwell, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dinham, S. (2009). The relationship between distributed leadership and action learning in schools: A case study. In A. Harris ( Ed.), Distributed leadership: Different perspectives ( Vol. 7, pp. 139 –154). Milton Keynes, UK: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dinham, S., Anderson, M., Caldwell, B., & Weldon, P. (2011). Breakthroughs in school leadership development in Australia. School Leadership & Management, 31(2), 139 –154. doi:10.1080/13632434.2011.560602
   Google Scholar
• Dinham, S., & Scott, C. (2008, April). Responsive, demanding leadership. Management Today, pp. 32 –35.
   Google Scholar
• DuFour, R., & Marzano, R. (2011). Leaders of learning: How district, school, and classroom leaders improve student achievement. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duignan, P. (2012). Educational leadership: Together creating ethical learning environments (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duignan, P., & Cannon, H. (2011). The power of many: Building sustainable collective leadership in schools. Camberwell, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• Earl, L., & Timperley, H. (2009). Understanding how evidence and learning conversations work. In L. Earl & H. Timperley ( Eds.), Professional learning conversations: Challenges in using evidence for improvement ( Vol. 1, pp. 1 –12). Milton Keynes, UK: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Elmore, R. (2000). Building a new structure for school leadership. Retrieved from http://www.politicalscience.uncc.edu/godwink/PPOL8687/Wk10%20March%2022%20Accountability/Elmore%20Building%20a%20New%20Structure%20for%20Leadership.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Frost, D. (2006). The concept of ‘agency’ in leadership for learning. Leading and Managing, 12(2), 19 –28.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. (2011). The moral imperative realized. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Gorard, S. (2001). Quantitative methods in educational research: The role of numbers made easy. London, UK: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Gronn, P. (2009). From distributed to hybrid leadership practice. In A. Harris ( Ed.), Distributed leadership: Different perspectives ( Vol. 7, pp. 197 –217). Milton Keynes, UK: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gunter, W. D., & Daly, K. (2013). Health behaviors and standardized test scores: The impact of school health climate on performance. International Journal of School & Educational Psychology, 1(3), 166 –175. doi:10.1080/21683603.2013.805173
   Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2010). Collaborative leadership and school improvement: understanding the impact on school capacity and student learning. School Leadership & Management, 30(2), 95 –110. doi:10.1080/13632431003663214
   Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P., & Huber, S. (2012). School leadership that makes a difference: international perspectives. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 23(4), 359 –367. doi:10.1080/09243453.2012.681508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, A. (2004). Distributed leadership and school improvement. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 32(1), 11 –24. doi:10.1177/1741143204039297
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A. (2009a). Distributed leadership: What we know. In A. Harris ( Ed.), Distributed leadership: Different perspectives ( Vol. 7, pp. 11 –24). Milton Keynes, UK: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A. (2009b). Distributed school leadership: Evidence, issues and future directions. ACEL Monograph Series ( Vol. 44). Winmalee, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Leaders.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A., & Day, C. (2002). Teacher leadership reflective practice and school improvement. In K. Leithwood & P. Hallinger ( Eds.), 2nd international handbook of educational leadership and administration ( pp. 957 –977). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hartas, D. (2010a). Exploratory factor analysis. In D. Hartas ( Ed.), Educational research and inquiry: Qualitative and quantitative approaches ( pp. 404 –418). London, UK: Continuum International.
   Google Scholar
• Hartas, D. (2010b). Key concepts and assumptions in quantitative data analysis. In D. Hartas ( Ed.), Educational research and inquiry: Qualitative and quantitative approaches ( pp. 308 –326). London, UK: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2003). Teachers make a difference: What is the research evidence? Retrieved from http://research.acer.edu.au/research_conference_2003/4/
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Oxford, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hesse-Biber, S. N. (2010). Mixed methods research: Merging theory with practice. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hesse-Biber, S. N., & Leavy, P. (2008). Pushing on the methodological boundaries. In S. Hesse-Biber & P. Leavy ( Eds.), Handbook of emergent methods ( pp. 25 –52). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• IBM. (2010). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 19.0. Somers, NY: Author.
   Google Scholar
• James, K. T., Mann, J., & Creasy, J. (2007). Leaders as lead learners: A case example of facilitating collaborative leadership learning for school leaders. Management Learning, 38(1), 79 –94. doi:10.1177/1350507607073026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemper, E., Stringfield, S., & Teddlie, C. (2003). Mixed methods sampling strategies in social science research. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie ( Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research ( pp. 273 –296). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Leech, N., & Onwuegbuzie, A. (2009). A typology of mixed methods research designs. Quality & Quantity, 43(2), 265 –275. doi:10.1007/s11135-007-9105-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K. (2004). What we know about successful leadership. The Practicing Administrator, 26(4), 4 –7.
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K. (2005). Understanding successful principal leadership: Progress on a broken front. Journal of Educational Administration, 43(6), 619 –629. doi:10.1108/09578230510625719
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K. (2011). Leadership and student learning: What works and how. In J. Robertson & H. Timperley ( Eds.), Leadership and learning ( pp. 41 –55). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2008). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. School Leadership & Management, 28(1), 27 –42. doi:10.1080/13632430701800060
   Google Scholar
• Lewin, R. (1993). Complexity: Life on the edge. London, UK: Phoenix.
   Google Scholar
• Louis, K., Leithwood, K., Wahlstrom, K., & Anderson, S. (2010). Investigating the links to improved student learning: Final report of research findings. Retrieved from http://www.wallacefoundation.org/knowledge-center/school-leadership/key-research/Documents/Investigating-the-Links-to-Improved-Student-Learning.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Louis, K. S., Mayrowetz, D., Smiley, M., & Murphy, J. (2009). The role of sensemaking and trust in developing distributed leadership. In A. Harris ( Ed.), Distributed leadership: Different perspectives ( Vol. 7, pp. 157 –180). Milton Keynes, UK: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Macbeath, J. (2008a). Leadership for learning: Exploring similarity and living with difference. In J. Macbeath & Y. Cheng ( Eds.), Leadership for learning: International perspectives ( pp. 1 –12). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Macbeath, J. (2008b). Leading learning in the self-evaluating school. School Leadership & Management, 28(4), 385 –399. doi:10.1080/13632430802292332
   Google Scholar
• Macbeath, J., & Swaffield, S. (2008, January). Leadership for learning: A matter of principle. Paper presented at the International Conference for School Effectiveness and Improvement, Auckland, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• MacNeil, A. J., Prater, D. L., & Busch, S. (2009). The effects of school culture and climate on student achievement. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 12(1), 73 –84. doi:10.1080/13603120701576241
   Google Scholar
• Marlowe, B. A., & Page, M. L. (2005). Creating and sustaining the constructivist classroom (2nd ed.). Moorabbin, Australia: Hawker Brownlow Education.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, S. (2012). Improving student learning in schools: exploring leadership for learning as a community activity. Leading and Managing, 18(1), 107 –121.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, S., Waniganayake, M., & De Nobile, J. (2013a). Improving learning in schools: the overarching influence of ‘presence’ on the capacity of authoritative leaders. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 17(1), 23 –39. doi:10.1080/13603124.2013.778334
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, S., Waniganayake, M., & De Nobile, J. (2013b). Leadership for Learning as an intentional, community-wide activity: The importance of developing a shared language in schools. School Leadership & Management, 33(4), 395 –411. doi:10.1080/13632434.2013.813461
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, S., Waniganayake, M., & De Nobile, J. (2014a). “Give it that title”: Interrogating the gap between school leadership practice and research. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, S., Waniganayake, M., & De Nobile, J. (2014b). Leading school improvement through building a community-wide understanding of learning and teaching: Essential conversations for school communities. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, S., Waniganayake, M., & Gibson, I. W. (2013). Scaffolding leadership for learning in school education: Insights from a factor analysis of research conducted in Australian independent schools. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. doi:10.1177/1741143213502197
   Google Scholar
• Mascall, B., Leithwood, K., Strauss, T., & Sacks, R. (2009). The relationship between distributed leadership and teachers’ academic optimism. In A. Harris ( Ed.), Distributed leadership: Different perspectives ( Vol. 7, pp. 81 –100). Milton Keynes, UK: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• McDaniel, R. R. (2007). Management Strategies for Complex Adaptive Systems. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 20(2), 21 –42.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, K. (2002). School leadership and complexity theory. London, UK: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Morse, J. (2003). Principles of mixed methods and multimethod research design. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie ( Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral Research ( pp. 189 –208). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, J., & Hallinger, P. (1993). The principalship in an era of transformation. Journal of Educational Administration, 30(3), 77 –88. doi:10.1108/09578239210014333
   Google Scholar
• Odhiambo, G., & Hii, A. (2012). Key stakeholders’ perceptions of effective school leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 40(2), 232 –247. doi:10.1177/1741143211432412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, A., & Teddlie, C. (2003). A framework for analyzing data in mixed methods research. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie ( Eds.), A handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research ( pp. 351 –383). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Penlington, C., Kington, A., & Day, C. (2008). Leadership in improving schools: A qualitative perspective. School Leadership & Management, 28(1), 65 –82. doi:10.1080/13632430701800086
   Google Scholar
• Pont, B., Nusche, D., & Moorman, H. (2008). Improving school leadership: Vol. 1. Policy and practice. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/education/school/44374889.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Punch, K. (2003). Survey research: The basics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Reeves, D. (2008). Leadership and learning. ACEL Monograph Series (Vol. 43). Winmalee, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Leaders.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, J. (2011). Partnership in leadership and learning. In J. Robertson & H. Timperley ( Eds.), Leadership and learning ( pp. 213 –226). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, V. (2006). Putting education back into educational leadership. Leading & Managing, 12(1), 62 –75.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, V. (2007). School leadership and student outcomes: Identifying what works and why. ACEL Monograph Series ( Vol. 41). Winmalee, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Leaders.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, V. (2009). Fit for purpose: An educationally relevant account of distributed leadership. In A. Harris ( Ed.), Distributed leadership: Different perspectives ( Vol. 7, pp. 219 –240). Milton Keynes, UK: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, V. (2011). Student-centered leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, V. M. J., Lloyd, C. A., & Rowe, K. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635 –674. doi:10.1177/0013161x08321509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahlberg, P. (2011). The fourth way of Finland. Journal of Educational Change, 12(2), 173 –185. doi:10.1007/s10833-011-9157-y
   Google Scholar
• Sandt, F.-O. (2012). Peer observation action research project. School Leadership and Management, 32(4), 355 –373. doi:10.1080/13632434.2012.712511
   Google Scholar
• Schein, E. (2010). Organizational Culture and Leadership (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York, NY: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Senge, P., Cambron-McCabe, N., Lucas, T., Smith, B., Dutton, J., & Kleiner, A. (2000). Schools that learn: A fifth discipline fieldbook for educators, parents and everyone who cares about education. New York, NY: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Southworth, G. (2002). Instructional leadership in schools: Reflections and empirical evidence. School Leadership & Management, 22(1), 73 –91. doi:10.1080/13632430220143042
   Google Scholar
• Southworth, G. (2011). Connecting leadership and learning. In J. Robertson & H. Timperley ( Eds.), Leadership and learning ( pp. 71 –85). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Spillane, J., & Diamond, J. (2007). Distributed leadership in practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P., Healey, K., Parise, L. M., & Kenney, A. (2011). A distributed perspective on learning leadership. In J. Robertson & H. Timperley ( Eds.), Leadership and learning ( pp. 159 –171). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stacey, R. D., Griffin, D., & Shaw, P. (2000). Complexity and management: Fad or radical challenge to systems thinking? London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, M. K., & Nelson, B. S. (2003). Leadership content knowledge. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(4), 423 –448. doi:10.3102/01623737025004423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swaffield, S. (2008). Critical friendship, dialogue and learning, in the context of leadership for learning. School Leadership & Management, 28(4), 323 –336. doi:10.1080/13632430802292191
   Google Scholar
• Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2003). The past and future of mixed methods research: From data triangulation to mixed model designs. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie ( Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research ( pp. 671 –701). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Teitel, L. (2013). School-based instructional rounds: Improving teaching and learning across classrooms. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Timperley, H. (2011). Leading teachers’ professional learning. In J. Robertson & H. Timperley ( Eds.), Leadership and learning ( pp. 118 –130). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Timperley, H., & Robertson, J. (2011). Establishing platforms for leadership and learning. In J. Robertson & H. Timperley ( Eds.), Leadership and learning ( pp. 3 –12). London. UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tschannen-Moran, M. (2009). Fostering teacher professionalism in schools: The role of leadership orientation and trust. Educational Administration Quarterly, 45(2), 217 –247. doi:10.1177/0013161X08330501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uhl-Bien, M., Marion, R., & McKelvey, B. (2007). Complexity leadership theory: Shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era. Leadership Quarterly, 18(4), 298 –318. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Bilsen, A., Bekebrede, G., & Mayer, I. (2010). Understanding complex adaptive systems by playing games. Kompleksinių adaptyvių jų sistemų įvaldymas naudojant žaidimus [Informatics in Education], 9(1), 1 –18.
   Google Scholar
• Witziers, B., Bosker, R. J., & Kruger, M. L. (2003). Educational leadership and student achievement: The elusive search for an association. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(3), 398 –425. doi:10.1177/0013161x03253411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar