Department-Head Leadership for School Improvement

References

• Bestard, G. (1996). The work of secondary school department heads ( Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, N., Newton, W., Wise, C., Woods, P. A. & Economou, A. (2003). The role and purpose of middle leaders in schools ( Summary report summer 2003). Nottingham: NCSL.
   Google Scholar
• Black, L. (2005). The role of department head as a change agent in the implementation of the newest Alberta English program of studies ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
   Google Scholar
• Brown, M., & Rutherford, D. (1999). A re-appraisal of the role of the head of department in UK secondary schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 37(3), 229–242. doi:10.1108/09578239910275472
   Google Scholar
• Busher, H., & Harris, A. (1999). Leadership of school subject areas: Tensions and dimensions of managing in the middle. School Leadership & Management, 19(3), 305–317. doi:10.1080/13632439969069
   Google Scholar
• Chingos, M., Whitehurst, G., & Gallaher, M. (2013). School districts and student achievement. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. (1999). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Seattle, WA: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington.
   Google Scholar
• Dinham, S. (2007). The secondary head of department and the achievement of exceptional student outcomes. Journal of Educational Administration, 45(1), 62–79. doi:10.1108/09578230710722458
   Google Scholar
• Earley, P., & Fletcher-Campbell, F. (1989). The time to manage. Windsor, England: NFER-Nelson.
   Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P. (2003). Leading educational change: Reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33(3), 329–352. doi:10.1080/0305764032000122005
   Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. (2011). Exploring the journey of school improvement: Classifying and analyzing patterns of change in school improvement processes and learning outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 22(1), 1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannay, L. (1992). Secondary school change: Current practices, future possibilities (Technical report). Kitchener, Canada: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A. (1998). Improving ineffective departments in secondary schools: Strategies for change and development. Educational Management & Administration, 26(3), 269–279.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A., Jamieson, I., & Russ, J. (1995). A study of effective departments in secondary schools. School Organization, 15(3), 283–299.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A., Leithwood, K., Day, C., Sammons, P., & Hopkins, D. (2007). Distributed leadership and organizational change: Reviewing the evidence. Journal of Educational Change, 8(4), 337–347. doi:10.1007/s10833-007-9048-4
   Google Scholar
• Highfield, C. (2012). The impact of middle leadership practices on student academic outcomes in New Zealand secondary schools ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Hord, S., & Murphy, S. (1985, March). The high school department head: Powerful or powerless in guiding change? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• James, C., & Aubrey-Hopkins, J. (2003). The leadership authority of educational middle managers: The case of subject leaders in secondary schools in Wales. International Studies in Educational Administration, 31(1), 50–64.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis, A. (2008). Leadership lost: A case study in three selective secondary schools. Management in Education, 22(1), 24–30. doi:10.1177/0892020607085627
   Google Scholar
• Kinsella, S. (2011). Independent school department heads: The influence of role ambiguity, relationships, and professional development on career aspirations ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Fordham University, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, V., Bryk, A., & Smith, J. (1993). The organization of effective secondary schools. Review of Research in Education, 19, 171–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K. (2012). The Ontario leadership framework 2012 with a discussion of the research foundations. Toronto, Canada: Institute for Educational Leadership.
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2008). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. School Leadership & Management, 28(1), 27–42. doi:10.1080/13632430701800060
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2005). A Review of Transformational School Leadership Research 1996–2005. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4(3), 177–199. doi:10.1080/15700760500244769
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., Mascall, B., & Strauss, T. (Eds.). (2009). Distributed leadership according to the evidence. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., & Riehl, C. (2005). What we already know about successful school leadership. In W. A. Firestone, & C. Riehl (Eds.), A new agenda: Directions for research on educational leadership. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., & Seashore Louis, K. (2012). Linking leadership to student learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., & Sun, J. (2012). The nature and effects of transformational school leadership: A meta-analytic review of unpublished research. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(3), 387–423. doi:10.1177/0013161X11436268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucy, J. R. (1986). Curriculum revision: Who will provide the leadership? NASSP Bulletin, 70(493), 85–87. doi:10.1177/019263658607049320
   Google Scholar
• Luyten, H. (2003). The size of school effects compared to teacher effects: An overview of the research literature. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 14(1), 31–51. doi:10.1076/sesi.14.1.31.13865
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCartney, C., & Schrag, F. (1990). Departmental and school leadership in promoting higher-order thinking. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 22(6), 529–543. doi:10.1080/0022027900220602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, J. (2007). Teacher leadership: Barriers and supports. In T. Townsend (Ed.), International handbook of school effectiveness and school improvement (pp. 681–705). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Printy, S. (2008). Leadership for teacher learning: A community of practice perspective. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(2), 187–226. doi:10.1177/0013161X07312958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Printy, S., Marks, H., & Bowers, A. (2010). Integrated leadership: How principals and teachers share transformational and instructional influences. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, V., Hohepa, M., & Lloyd, C. (2009). School leadership and student outcomes: Identifying what works and why. Auckland, NZ: University of Auckland and the New Zealand Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Sammons, P., Anders, Y., & Hall, J. (2013). Editorial: Educational effectiveness approaches in early childhood research across Europe. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 24(2), 131–137. doi:10.1080/09243453.2012.749790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seashore Louis, K., & Wahlstrom, K. (2012). Shared and instructional leadership: When principals and teachers successfully lead together. In K. Leithwood, & K. Seashore Louis (Eds.), Linking leadership to student learning (pp. 25–41). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (2000). Teacher development: Roles of domain expertise and pedagogical knowledge. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 21(1), 129–135. doi:10.1016/S0193-3973(99)00057-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siskin, L. S. (1991). Departments as different worlds: Subject subcultures in secondary schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 27(2), 134–160. doi:10.1177/0013161X91027002003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siskin, L. S. (1997). The Challenge of Leadership in Comprehensive High Schools: School Vision and Departmental Divisions. Educational Administration Quarterly, 33(1 Suppl), 604–623. doi:10.1177/0013161X970331005
   Google Scholar
• Tschannen Moran, M. (2013). Trust matters: Leadership for successful schools (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Waters, T., Marzano, R. J., & McNulty, B. (2003). Balanced leadership: What 30 years of research tells us about the effect of leadership on pupil achievement. A working paper. Aurora, CO: Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Weller, D. (2001). Department heads: The most underutilized leadership position. NASSP Bulletin, 85(625), 73–81. doi:10.1177/019263650108562508
   Google Scholar
• Wettersten, J. (1993). Leadership strategies of exemplary high school department heads: Four case studies ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
   Google Scholar
• Wise, C. (2001). The monitoring role of the academic middle manager in secondary schools. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 29(3), 333–341. doi:10.1177/0263211X010293007
   Google Scholar
• Worner, W., & Brown, G. (1993). The instructional leadership team: A new role for the department head. NASSP Bulletin, 77(553), 37–45. doi:10.1177/019263659307755307
   Google Scholar
• Wyeth, T. A. (1992). The department head and high school leadership ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Harvard University, Boston MA.
   Google Scholar