Consulting, Mediating, Conducting, and Supporting: How Community-Based Organizations Engage With Research to Influence Policy

References

• Anderson, G. L. (2009). Advocacy leadership: Toward a post-reform agenda in education. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Appadurai, A. (2006). The right to research. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 4(2), 167–177. doi:10.1080/14767720600750696
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J., Maguire, M., & Braun, A. (2012). How schools do policy: Policy enactments in secondary schools. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Banks, G. (2009, February). Evidence-based policy making: What is it? How do we get it? Paper presented at ANU Public Lecture Series, presented by ANZSOG, Productivity Commission, Canberra.
   Google Scholar
• Baum, H. S. (2003). Community action for school reform. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bowe, R., Ball, S. J., & Gold, A. (1992). Reforming education and changing schools: Case studies in policy sociology. London, UK; New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, D., & Ozga, J. (2008). BERA review 2006: Education research and policy. Research Papers in Education, 23(4), 377–405. doi:10.1080/02671520701755457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christens, B. D., & Dolan, T. (2011). Interweaving youth development, community development, and social change through youth organizing. Youth & Society, 43(2), 528–548. doi:10.1177/0044118X10383647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conner, J., Zaino, K., & Scarola, E. (2013). “Very powerful voices”: The influence of youth organizing on educational policy in Philadelphia. Educational Policy, 27(3), 560–588. doi:10.1177/0895904812454001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, A. (2010, May). Knowledge mobilization intermediaries in education. Paper presented at the Canadian Society for Studies in Education, Montreal, QC, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, A., Levin, B., & Campbell, C. (2009). The growing (but still limited) importance of evidence in education policy and practice. Journal of Educational Change, 10(2–3), 159–171. doi:10.1007/s10833-009-9107-0
   Google Scholar
• Diem, S., Young, M. D., Welton, A. D., Cumings Mansfield, K., & Lee, P. (2014). The intellectual landscape of critical policy analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 27(9), 1068–1090. doi:10.1080/09518398.2014.916007
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, A. (2012). Secretary Arne Duncan’s remarks at OECD’s release of the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2009 results. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/
   Google Scholar
• Evans, M. P., Newman, A., & Winton, S. (2015). Not your mother’s parent-teacher association: Hybridity in community-based organizations working for educational reform. The Educational Forum, 79(3), 263–279. doi:10.1080/00131725.2015.1037510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Forum for Education and Democracy. (2008). Democracy at risk: The need for a new federal policy in education. Retrieved from http://www.forumforeducation.org.
   Google Scholar
• Goar, C. (2005, April 4). Still on guard - but better armed. Toronto Star, p. A16.
   Google Scholar
• Hastie, R., & Kothari, A. (2009). Tobacco control interest groups and their influence on parliamentary committees in Canada. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 100(5), 370–375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess, E. (2007). False equivalency: Think tank references on education in the news media. Peabody Journal of Education, 82(1), 63–102. doi:10.1080/01619560709336537
   Google Scholar
• Itkonen, T. (2007). Politics of passion: Collective action from pain and loss. American Journal of Education, 113(4), 577–604. doi:10.1086/509532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirst, M. W., & Wirt, F. M. (2009). The political dynamics of American education (4th ed.). Richmond, CA: McCutchan Publishing Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Koyama, J. (2011). Principals, power, and policy: Enacting “Supplemental Educational Services.” Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 42(1), 20–36. doi:10.1111/aeq.2011.42.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, B. (2004). Making research matter more. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12(0), 56. Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v12n56/
   Google Scholar
• Levin, B. (2011). Mobilising research knowledge in education. London Review of Education, 9(1), 15–26. doi:10.1080/14748460.2011.550431
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, B. A. U., Sutton, M., & Winstead, T. (2009). Education policy as a practice of power: Theoretical tools, ethnographic methods, democratic options. Educational Policy, 23(6), 767–795. doi:10.1177/0895904808320676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannarini, T., & Fedi, A. (2009). Multiple senses of community: The experience and meaning of community. Journal of Community Psychology, 37(2), 211–227. doi:10.1002/jcop.v37:2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mawhinney, H. (2001). Theoretical approaches to understanding interest groups. Educational Policy, 15(1), 187–214. doi:10.1177/0895904801015001011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, M. W. (2006). Implementation research in education: Lessons learned, lingering questions, and new opportunities. In M. I. Honig (Ed.), New directions in policy implementation: Confronting complexity (pp. 209–228). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, M. W., Scott, W. R., Deschenes, S., Hopkins, D., & Newman, A. (2009). Between movement and establishment: Organizations advocating for youth. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mediratta, K., Shah, S., & McAlister, S. (2009). Community organizing for stronger schools: Strategies and successes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nespor, J., & Hicks, D. (2010). Wizards and witches: Parent advocates and contention in special education in the USA. Journal of Education Policy, 25(3), 309–334. doi:10.1080/02680931003671954
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, A., Deschenes, S., & Hopkins, K. (2012). From agitating in the streets to implementing in the suites: Understanding education policy reforms initiated by local advocates. Educational Policy, 26(5), 730–758. doi:10.1177/0895904811417586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakes, J. (1992). Can tracking research inform practice? Technical, normative, and political considerations. Educational Researcher, 21(4), 12–21. doi:10.3102/0013189X021004012
   Google Scholar
• Oakes, J., Renée, M., Rogers, J., & Lipton, M. (2008). Research and community organizing as tools for democratizing educational policymaking. In C. Sugrue (Ed.), The future of educational change: International perspectives (pp. 136–154). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Oakes, J., Rogers, J., & Lipton, M. (2006). Learning power: Social inquiry, grassroots organizing, and educational justice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ontario Ministry of Education. (2010). Parents in partnership: A parent engagement policy for Ontario schools. Retrieved from http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/parents/involvement/PE_Policy2010.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Opfer, V. D. (2001). Beyond self-interest: Educational interest groups and congressional influence. Educational Policy, 15(1), 135–152. doi:10.1177/0895904801015001008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opfer, V. D., Young, T. V., & Fusarelli, L. D. (2008). Politics of interest: Interest groups and advocacy coalitions in American education. In B. S. Cooper, J. G. Cibulka & L. D. Fusarelli (Eds.), Handbook of education politics and policy (pp. 196–216). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2001). Citizens as partners: OECD handbook on information, consultation and public participation. Retrieved from http://213.253.134.43/oecd/pdfs/browseit/4201131E.PDF
   Google Scholar
• Orr, M., & Rogers, J. (2011). Unequal schools, unequal voice: The need for public engagement for public education. In M. Orr & J. Rogers (Eds.), Public engagement for public education (pp. 1–24). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ozga, J. (2000). Policy research in educational settings: Contested terrain. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• People for Education. (2011). People for education: Using knowledge mobilization techniques in the parent community. Toronto, ON: People for Education.
   Google Scholar
• People for Education. (2012). Making connections beyond school walls. Retrieved from http://www.peopleforeducation.ca/research/annual-report/
   Google Scholar
• Pinto, L. E. (2012a). Curriculum reform in Ontario: “Common Sense” policy processes and democratic possibilities. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pinto, L. E. (2012b). Democratic shortfalls in privatized curriculum policy production: Silencing the “potted plants” and politicizing “quick fixes.” Policy Futures in Education, 10(2), 142–154. doi:10.2304/pfie
   Google Scholar
• Pinto, L. E. (2013). When politics trump evidence: Financial literacy education narratives following the global financial crisis. Journal of Education Policy, 28(1), 95–120. doi:10.1080/02680939.2012.690163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renée, M. (2006). Knowledge, power, and education justice: How social movement organizations use research to influence education policy (Unpublished dissertation). UCLA, Los Angeles, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Renée, M., & McAlister, S. (2011). The strengths and challenges of community organizing as an education reform strategy. Providence, RI: The Annenberg Institute for School Reform.
   Google Scholar
• Rizvi, F. L., & Lingard, B. (2010). Globalizing education policy. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rushowy, K. (2001, October 3). Parents still pay for public education—High school fees add up to $150 per student. Toronto Star, p. A15.
   Google Scholar
• Rushowy, K. (2012, May 8). NDP calls for special ed review due to wait list “cap”: Claim children’s needs are not being met. The Toronto Star, p. A2.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J., Lubienski, C., & DeBray-Pelot, E. (2009). The politics of advocacy in education. Educational Policy, 23(1), 3–14. doi:10.1177/0895904808328530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M. L., Miller-Kahn, L., Heinecke, W., & Jarvis, P. F. (2004). Political spectacle and the fate of American schools. New York, NY: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Tabuns, P. (2012). Hansard transcripts Wednesday. Retrieved August 29, 2012, from http://www.ontla.on.ca/web/house-proceedings/house_detail.do?Date=2012-08-29&Parl=40&Sess=1&locale=en - P515_141014
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. (1997). Critical policy analysis: Exploring contexts, texts and consequences. Discourse, 18(1), 23–35.
   Google Scholar
• Terry, S., Terry, P., Rauen, K. A., Uitto, J., & Bercovitch, L. (2007). Advocacy groups as research organizations: The PXE international example. Nature Reviews Genetics, 8, 157–164. doi:10.1038/nrg1991
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, C. S., & Hrebenar, R. J. (1992). Changing patterns of interest group activity. In M. P. Petracca (Ed.), The politics of interest: Interest groups transformed (pp. 150–174). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trujillo, T. (2013). The disproportionate erosion of local control: Urban school boards, high-stakes accountability, and democracy. Educational Policy, 27(2), 334–359. doi:10.1177/0895904812465118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidovich, L. (2007). Removing policy from its pedestal: Some theoretical framings and practical possibilities. Educational Review, 59(3), 285–298. doi:10.1080/00131910701427231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, A. (2005). Class, race, and power: Interest group politics and education. The Urban Review, 37(2), 127–147. doi:10.1007/s11256-005-0002-6
   Google Scholar
• Winton, S. (2010). Character education, new media and political spectacle. Journal of Education Policy, 25(3), 349–367. doi:10.1080/02680931003624532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winton, S. (2011). Managing conduct: A comparative policy analysis of safe schools policies in Toronto, Canada and Buffalo, USA. Comparative Education, 47(2), 247–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winton, S., & Gonzalez, D. (2014). The politics of interest groups in education. In J. Lindle (Ed.), Political contexts of educational leadership: ISLLC Standard 6 (Chapter 7). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Young, L., & Everitt, J. (2004). Advocacy groups. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia Press.
   Google Scholar