Teacher Self-Regulatory Climate: Conceptualizing an Indicator of Leader Support for Teacher Learning and Development

References

• Achinstein, B. (2002). Conflict amid community: The micropolitics of teacher collaboration. Teachers College Record, 104(3), 421–455. doi:10.1111/tcre.2002.104.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, C. M., & Forsyth, P. B. (2006). Proximate sources of collective teacher efficacy. Journal of Educational Administration, 44(6), 625–642. doi:10.1108/09578230610704828
   Google Scholar
• Adams, C. M., Forsyth, P. B., Dollarhide, E., Miskell, R., & Ware, J. (2015). Self-regulatory climate: A social resource for student regulation and achievement. Teachers College Record, 117(2), 1–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, C. M., Ware, J. K., Miskell, R. C., & Forsyth, P. B. (2016). Self-regulatory climate: A positive attribute of public schools. The Journal of Educational Research, 109(2), 169–180. doi:10.1080/00220671.2014.934419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adler, P. S., & Borys, B. (1996). Two types of bureaucracy: Enabling and coercive. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 61–89. doi:10.2307/2393986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amrein-Beardsley, A., & Collins, C. (2012). The SAS Education Value-Added Assessment System (SAS-EVAAS) in the Houston Independent School District (HISD): Intended and unintended consequences. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 20(12). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/1096
   Google Scholar
• Assor, A., Kaplan, H., & Roth, G. (2002). Choice is good, but relevance is excellent: Autonomy‐enhancing and suppressing teacher behaviours predicting students’ engagement in schoolwork. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(2), 261–278. doi:10.1348/000709902158883
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Bass, B. M. (1995). Theory of transformational leadership redux. Leadership Quarterly, 6, 463–478. doi:10.1016/1048-9843(95)90021-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bass, B. M. (1996). A new paradigm of leadership: An inquiry into transformational leadership. Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Blase, J., & Blase, J. (1999). Principals’ instructional leadership and teacher development: Teachers’ perspectives. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35, 349–378. doi:10.1177/0013161X99353003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boal, K. B., & Bryson, J. M. (1988). Charismatic leadership: A phenomenological and structural approach. In J. G. Hunt, B. R. Baliga, H. P. Dachler, & C. A. Schriesheim (Eds.), Emerging leadership vistas (pp. 5–28). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3–15. doi:10.3102/0013189X033008003
   Google Scholar
• Bryk, A., Camburn, E., & Louis, K. S. (1999). Professional community in Chicago elementary schools: Facilitating factors and organizational consequences. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35, 751–781. doi:10.1177/0013161X99355004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryk, A. S., & Schneider, B. L. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Cacha, F. B. (1981). Teacher burnout: Causes and solutions. Kappa Delta Pi, 18(1), 26–27.
   Google Scholar
• Clift, R., Veal, M. L., Holland, P., Johnson, M., & McCarthy, J. (1995). Collaborative leadership and shared decision making: Teachers, principals, and university professors. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Correnti, R. (2007). An empirical investigation of professional development effects on literacy instruction using daily logs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 29(4), 262–295. doi:10.3102/0162373707309074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosner, S. (2009). Building organizational capacity through trust. Educational Administration Quarterly, 45(2), 248–291. doi:10.1177/0013161X08330502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, A., & Williams, L. (2008). The roles of perceived teacher support, motivational climate, and psychological need satisfaction in students’ physical education motivation. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 30, 222–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. (2013). Getting teacher evaluation right: What really matters for effectiveness and improvement. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. (2014). One piece of the whole: Teacher evaluation as part of a comprehensive system for teaching and learning. American Educator, 38(1), 4–13.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., Amrein-Beardsley, A., Haertel, E., & Rothstein, J. (2012). Evaluating teacher evaluation. Phi Delta Kappan, 93(6), 8–15. doi:10.1177/003172171209300603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 627–668. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.627
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268. doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desimone, L. M. (2011). A primer on effective professional development. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(6), 68–71. doi:10.1177/003172171109200616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desimone, L. M., Porter, A. C., Garet, M. S., Yoon, K. S., & Birman, B. F. (2002). Effects of professional development on teachers’ instruction: Results from a three-year longitudinal study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 81–112. doi:10.3102/01623737024002081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiStefano, C., & Hess, B. (2005). Using confirmatory factor analysis for construct validation: An empirical review. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 23(3), 225–241. doi:10.1177/073428290502300303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Droogenbroeck, F. V., Spruyt, B., & Vanroelen, C. (2014). Burnout among senior teachers: Investigating the role of workload and interpersonal relationships at work. Teaching and Teacher Education, 43, 99–109. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2014.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmore, R. F. (2004). School reform from the inside out: Policy, practice, and performance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eyal, O., & Roth, G. (2011). Principals’ leadership and teachers’ motivation: Self-determination theory analysis. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(3), 256–275. doi:10.1108/09578231111129055
   Google Scholar
• Firestone, W. A. (2014). Teacher evaluation policy and conflicting theories of motivation. Educational Researcher, 43(2), 100–107. doi:10.3102/0013189X14521864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firestone, W. A., Schorr, R. Y., & Monfils, L. F. (Eds.). (2004). The ambiguity of teaching to the test: Standards, assessment, and educational reform. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, T. G., Van Sickle, M. E., Clark, L. V., Fazio-Brunson, M., & Schween, D. C. (2015). Teacher self-efficacy, professional commitment and high-stakes teacher evaluation (HSTE) policy in Louisiana. Educational Policy. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0895904815586855
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, T. G., Van Sickle, M. E., & Fazio-Brunson, M. (Forthcoming). The role of “informational significance” in shaping Louisiana elementary teachers’ use of high-stakes teacher evaluation data for instructional decision making. In K. K. Hewitt, & A. Amrein-Beardsley (Eds.), Student growth measures in policy and practice: Intended and unintended consequences of high-stakes teacher evaluations. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Forsyth, P. B., Adams, C. M., & Hoy, W. K. (2011). Collective trust: Why schools can’t improve without it. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 915–945. doi:10.3102/00028312038004915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geijsel, F., Sleegers, P., Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2003). Transformational leadership effects on teachers’ commitment and effort toward school reform. Journal of Educational Administration, 41, 228–256. doi:10.1108/09578230310474403
   Google Scholar
• Geijsel, F. P., Sleegers, P. J., Stoel, R. D., & Krüger, M. L. (2009). The effect of teacher psychological and school organizational and leadership factors on teachers’ professional learning in Dutch schools. The Elementary School Journal, 109, 406–427. doi:10.1086/593940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goddard, R. D., & Goddard, Y. L. (2001). A multilevel analysis of the relationship between teacher and collective efficacy in urban schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 807–818. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00032-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goddard, R. D., Hoy, W. K., & Hoy, A. W. (2000). Collective teacher efficacy: Its meaning, measure, and impact on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 37(2), 479–507. doi:10.3102/00028312037002479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goddard, R. D., Hoy, W. K., & Hoy, A. W. (2004). Collective efficacy beliefs: Theoretical developments, empirical evidence, and future directions. Educational Researcher, 33(3), 3–13. doi:10.3102/0013189X033003003
   Google Scholar
• Goddard, R. D., Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, W. K. (2001). A multilevel examination of the distribution and effects of teacher trust in students and parents in urban elementary schools. The Elementary School Journal, 102, 3–17. doi:10.1086/499690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, J., Kruse, S., & Tarter, C. J. (2015). Enabling school structures, collegial trust and academic emphasis: Antecedents of professional learning communities. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1741143215574505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grayson, J. L., & Alvarez, H. K. (2008). School climate factors relating to teacher burnout: A mediator model. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(5), 1349–1363. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2007.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P. (2003). Leading educational change: Reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33(3), 329–351. doi:10.1080/0305764032000122005
   Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (1998). Exploring the principal’s contribution to school effectiveness: 1980–1995. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9, 157–191. doi:10.1080/0924345980090203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A. (2010). Presentism, individualism, and conservatism: The legacy of Dan Lortie’s Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Curriculum Inquiry, 40(1), 143–154. doi:10.1111/j.1467-873X.2009.00472.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital: Improving teaching in every school. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, D. N., & Herrington, C. D. (2015). Editors’ introduction: The use of teacher value-added measures in schools; New evidence, unanswered questions, and future prospects. Educational Researcher, 44(2), 71–76. doi:10.3102/0013189X15576142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, H., Kapitula, L., & Umland, K. (2011). A validity argument approach to evaluating teacher value-added scores. American Educational Research Journal, 48, 794–831. doi:10.3102/0002831210387916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoy, W. K., Smith, P. A., & Sweetland, S. R. (2002). The development of the organizational climate index for high schools: Its measure and relationship to faculty trust. The High School Journal, 86(2), 38–49. doi:10.1353/hsj.2002.0023
   Google Scholar
• Hoy, W. K., & Sweetland, S. R. (2001). Designing better schools: The meaning and measure of enabling school structures. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37(3), 296–321. doi:10.1177/00131610121969334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoy, W. K., Sweetland, S. R., & Smith, P. A. (2002). Toward an organizational model of achievement in high schools: The significance of collective efficacy. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(1), 77–93. doi:10.1177/0013161X02381004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoy, W. K., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (1999). Five faces of trust: An empirical confirmation in urban elementary schools. Journal of School Leadership, 9, 184–208.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingersoll, R. (2003). Who controls teachers? Power and accountability in America’s schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, S. M. (2015). Will VAMS reinforce the walls of the egg-crate school? Educational Researcher, 44(2), 117–126. doi:10.3102/0013189X15573351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanat-Maymon, Y., Benjamin, M., Stavsky, A., Shoshani, A., & Roth, G. (2015). The role of basic need fulfillment in academic dishonesty: A self-determination theory perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 43, 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kappler-Hewitt, K. (2015). Educator evaluation policy that incorporates EVAAS value-added measures: Undermined intentions and exacerbated inequities. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 23(76). doi:10.14507/epaa.v23.1968
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, M. (2005). Inside teaching: How classroom life undermines reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, M. (2010). Attribution error and the quest for teacher quality. Educational Researcher, 39, 591–598. doi:10.3102/0013189X10390804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, M. B. (2004). School‐and district‐level leadership for teacher workforce development: Enhancing teacher learning and capacity. Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 103(1), 303–325. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7984.2004.tb00038.x
   Google Scholar
• Kochanek, J. R. (2005). Building trust for better schools: Research based practices. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kraft, M. A., & Papay, J. P. (2014). Can professional environments in schools promote teacher development? Explaining heterogeneity in returns to teaching experience. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 36, 476–500. doi:10.3102/0162373713519496
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavigne, A. L. (2014). Exploring the intended and unintended consequences of high-stakes teacher evaluation on schools, teachers, and students. Teachers College Record, 116(1). Retrieved from http://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentId=17294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2005). A review of transformational school leadership research 1996-2005. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4, 177–199. doi:10.1080/15700760500244769
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., & Sun, J. (2012). The nature and effects of transformational school leadership: A meta-analytic review of unpublished research. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48, 387–423. doi:10.1177/0013161X11436268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linacre, J. M. (2014). Winsteps Rasch measurement [Computer software].
   Google Scholar
• Lortie, D. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. doi:10.1177/019263657505939422
   Google Scholar
• Louis, K. S., Kruse, S. D., & Associates (Eds.). (1995). Professionalism and community: Perspectives on reforming urban schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, H. M., & Printy, S. M. (2003). Principal leadership and school performance: An integration of transformational and instructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39, 370–397. doi:10.1177/0013161X03253412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, J. A., Springer, M. G., McCaffrey, D. F., Yuan, K., Epstein, S., Koppich, J., . . . Peng, A. (2011). A big apple for educators: New York City’s experiment with schoolwide performance bonuses (MG-1114-FPS). Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, M. W. (1993). What matters most in teachers’ workplace context? In J. W. Little & M. W. McLaughlin (Eds.), Teachers’ work: Individuals, colleagues, and contexts. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, M. W., & Talbert, J. E. (2001). Professional communities and the work of high school teaching. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• McNeil, L. (2000). Contradictions of school reform: Educational costs of standardized testing. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50(9), 741–749. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.50.9.741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newmann, F. M., King, M. B., & Youngs, P. A. (2000). Professional development that addresses school capacity: Lessons from urban elementary schools. American Journal of Education, 108, 259–299. doi:10.1086/444249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemiec, C. P., & Ryan, R. M. (2009). Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom: Applying self-determination theory to educational practice. Theory and Research in Education, 7(2), 133–144. doi:10.1177/1477878509104318
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, L. C., & Moomaw, W. (2005). The relationship between teacher autonomy and stress, work satisfaction, empowerment, and professionalism. Educational Research Quarterly, 29(1), 38–54.
   Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers’ trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 1(2), 107–142. doi:10.1016/1048-9843(90)90009-7
   Google Scholar
• Printy, S. M. (2008). Leadership for teacher learning: A community of practice perspective. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(2), 187–226. doi:10.1177/0013161X07312958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasch, G. (1980). Probabilistic models for intelligence and attainment tests (expanded edition). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, P. W., & Watt, H. M. G. (2006). Who chooses teaching and why? Profiling characteristics and motivations across three Australian universities. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 34(1), 27–56. doi:10.1080/13598660500480290
   Google Scholar
• Rios, J., & Wells, C. (2014). Validity evidence based on internal structure. Psicothema, 26(1), 108–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenholtz, S. J. (1991). Teachers’ workplace: The social organization of schools. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, G. (2014). Antecedents and outcomes of teachers’ autonomous motivation: A self-determination theory analysis. In P. W. Richardson, S. A. Karabenick, & H. M. G. Watt (Eds.), Teacher motivation: Theory and practice (pp. 36–51). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Brown, K. W. (2005). Legislating competence: The motivational impact of high-stakes testing as an educational reform. In C. Dweck & A. Elliot (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 354–372). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2002). An overview of self-determination theory: An organismic-dialectical perspective. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 3–33). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Weinstein, N. (2009). Undermining quality teaching and learning: A self-determination theory perspective on high-stakes testing. Theory and Research in Education, 7(2), 224–233. doi:10.1177/1477878509104327
   Google Scholar
• Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99, 323–338. doi:10.3200/JOER.99.6.323-338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumaker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2004). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Sinden, J., Hoy, W. K., & Sweetland, S. R. (2004). Enabling school structures: Principal leadership and organizational commitment of teachers. Journal of School Leadership, 14(2), 195–210.
   Google Scholar
• Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2014). Teacher self-efficacy and perceived autonomy: Relations with teacher engagement, job satisfaction, and emotional exhaustion. Psychological Reports, 114(1), 68–77. doi:10.2466/14.02.PR0.114k14w0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P., & Louis, K. S. (2002). School improvement processes and practices: Professional learning for building instructional capacity. Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 101(1), 83–104. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7984.2002.tb00005.x
   Google Scholar
• Springer, M. G., Pane, J., Vi-Nhuan, L., McCaffrey, D. F., Burns, S. F., Hamilton, L. S., & Stecher, B. M. (2012). Team pay for performance: Experimental evidence from the round rock pilot project on team incentives. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 34, 367–390. doi:10.3102/0162373712439094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Supovitz, J., Sirinides, P., & May, H. (2010). How principals and peers influence teaching and learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46, 31–56. doi:10.1177/1094670509353043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweet, S. N., Fortier, M. S., Strachan, S. M., & Blanchard, C. M. (2012). Testing and integrating self-determination theory and self-efficacy theory in a physical activity context. Canadian Psychology, 53, 319–327. doi:10.1037/a0030280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarter, C. J., Bliss, J. R., & Hoy, W. K. (1989). School characteristics and faculty trust in secondary schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 25, 294–308. doi:10.1177/0013161X89025003005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tschannen-Moran, M. (2009). Fostering teacher professionalism in schools: The role of leadership orientation and trust. Educational Administration Quarterly, 45, 217–247. doi:10.1177/0013161X08330501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tschannen-Moran, M. (2014). Trust matters: Leadership for successful schools (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Tschannen-Moran, M., & McMaster, P. (2009). Sources of self-efficacy: Four professional development formats and their relationship to self-efficacy and implementation of a new teaching strategy. The Elementary School Journal, 110, 228–245. doi:10.1086/605771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uline, C. L., Tschannen-Moran, M., & Perez, L. (2003). Constructive conflict: How controversy can contribute to school improvement. Teachers College Record, 105, 782–816. doi:10.1111/1467-9620.00268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watt, H. M. G., & Richardson, P. W. (2008). Motivations, perceptions, and aspirations concerning teaching as a career for different types of beginning teachers. Learning and Instruction, 18, 408–428. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watt, H. M. G., & Richardson, P. W. (2014). Why people choose teaching as a career: An expectancy-value approach to understanding teacher motivation. In P. W. Richardson, S. A. Karabenick, & H. M. G. Watt (Eds.), Teacher motivation: Theory and practice (pp. 3–19). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, S. M., Rozelle, J. J., & Mikeska, J. N. (2011). Cacophony or embarrassment of riches? Building a system of support for quality teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 62, 383–394. doi:10.1177/0022487111409416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, B. D., & Masters, G. N. (1982). Rating scale analysis. Chicago, IL: MESA Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yasumoto, J. Y., Uekawa, K., & Bidwell, C. E. (2001). The collegial focus and high school students’ achievement. Sociology of Education, 74, 181–209. doi:10.2307/2673274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, K., Vi-Nhuan, L., McCaffrey, D. F., Marsh, J. A., Hamilton, L. S., Stecher, B. M., & Springer, M. G. (2013). Incentive pay programs do not affect teacher motivation or reported practices: Results from three randomized studies. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 35, 3–22. doi:10.3102/0162373712462625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yukl, G. (1999). An evaluation of conceptual weaknesses in transformational and charismatic leadership theories. The Leadership Quarterly, 10, 285–305. doi:10.1016/S1048-9843(99)00013-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar