1,202
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

Conceptualizing Essential Components of Effective High Schools

, , , &

References

  • Adams, J. E., & Kirst, M. (1999). New demands for educational accountability: Striving for results in an era of excellence. In J. Murphy, & K. S. Louis (Eds.), Handbook of research in educational administration (2nd ed., pp. 463–489). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Adelman, C. (2006). The toolbox revisited: Paths to degree completion from high school through college. Washington, DC: US. Department of Education.
  • Aladjem, D. K., Birman, B. F., Orland, M., Harr-Robins, J., Heredia, A., Parrish, T. B., & Ruffini, S. J. (2010). Achieving dramatic school improvement: An exploratory study. A cross-site analysis from the evaluation of comprehensive school reform program implementation and outcomes study. Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development, US Department of Education.
  • Allensworth, E., Nomi, T., Montgomery, N., & Lee, V. (2009). College preparatory curriculum for all: Consequences of requiring Algebra and English I for ninth graders in Chicago. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31(4), 367–391. doi:10.3102/0162373709343471
  • Alper, L., Fendel, D., Fraser, S., & Resek, D. (1997). Designing a high school mathematics curriculum for all students. American Journal of Education, 106(1), 148–178. doi:10.1086/444179
  • Anagnostopoulos, D. (2003). The new accountability, student failure, and teachers’ work in urban high schools. Educational Policy, 17(3), 291–316. doi:10.1177/0895904803017003001
  • Anagnostopoulos, D., & Rutledge, S. (2007). Making sense of school sanctioning policies in urban high schools: Charting the depth and drift of school and classroom change. The Teachers College Record, 109(5), 1261–1302.
  • Anderman, L., Andrzejewski, C., & Allen, J. (2011). How do teachers support students’ motivation and learning in their classrooms? Teachers College Record, 113(5), 969–1003.
  • Applebee, A., Langer, J., Nystrand, M., & Gamoran, A. (2003). Discussion-based approaches to developing understanding: Classroom instruction and student performance in middle and high school English. American Educational Research Journal, 40(3), 685–730. doi:10.3102/00028312040003685
  • Ascher, C. (1988). Urban school-community alliances. New York, NY: ERIC Clearinghouse on Urban Education.
  • Aughinbaugh, A. (2012). The effects of high school math curriculum on college attendance: Evidence from the NSLY97. Economics of Education Review, 31, 861–870. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2012.06.004
  • Balfanz, R., Bridgeland, J., Bruce, M., & Fox, J. Hornig (2013). Building a grad nation: Progress and challenge in ending the high school dropout epidemic - 2013 annual update. Washington, DC: Civic Enterprises, the Everyone Graduates Center at Johns Hopkins University School of Education, America’s Promise Alliance, and the Alliance for Excellent Education. Retrieved from http://www.civicenterprises.net/MediaLibrary/Docs/Building-A-Grad-Nation-Report-2013_Full_v1.pdf.
  • Bauch, P., & Goldring, E. (2000). Teacher work context and parent involvement in urban high schools of choice. Educational Research & Evaluation, 6(1), 1–23.
  • Becker, B. E., & Luthar, S. S. (2002). Social-emotional factors affecting achievement outcomes among disadvantaged students: Closing the achievement gap. Educational Psychologist, 37(4), 197–214. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3704_1
  • Berends, M. (2000). Teacher-reported effects of new American school designs: Exploring relationships to teacher background and school context. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22(1), 65–82. doi:10.3102/01623737022001065
  • Berends, M. (2004). In the wake of A Nation at Risk: New American schools’ private sector school reform initiative. Peabody Journal of Education, 79(1), 130–163. doi:10.1207/s15327930pje7901_7
  • Betts, J. R., & Shkolnik, J. L. (2000). The effects of ability grouping on student achievement and resource allocation in secondary schools. Economics of Education Review, 19(1), 1–15. doi:10.1016/S0272-7757(98)00044-2
  • Blasik, K., Williams, R., Johnson, J., & Boegli, D. (2003). The marriage of rigorous academics and technical instruction with state-of-the-art technology: A success story of William T. McFatter technical high school. The High School Journal, 87(2), 44–55. doi:10.1353/hsj.2003.0020
  • Boaler, J., & Staples, M. (2008). Creating mathematical futures through an equitable teaching approach: The case of Railside School. Teachers College Record, 110(3), 608–645.
  • Boger, C. (2005). The Socioeconomic composition of the public schools: A crucial consideration in student assignment policy. Chapel Hill, NC: Center for Civil Rights.
  • Brown, B. (2008). Assessment and academic identity: Using embedded assessment as an instrument for academic socialization in science education. Teachers College Record, 110(10), 2116–2147.
  • Burris, C. C., Wiley, E., Welner, K., & Murphy, J. (2008). Accountability, rigor, and detracking: Achievement effects of embracing a challenging curriculum as a universal good for all students. Teachers College Record, 110(3), 571–608.
  • Carbonaro, W. (2005). Tracking, students’ effort, and academic achievement. Sociology of Education, 78(1), 27–49. doi:10.1177/003804070507800102
  • Carbonaro, W., & Gamoran, A. (2002). The production of achievement inequality in high school English. American Educational Research Journal, 39(4), 801–827. doi:10.3102/00028312039004801
  • Carlson, D., & Planty, M. (2011). The ineffectiveness of high school graduation credit requirement reforms: A story of implementation and enforcement? Educational Policy, 20(10), 1–35.
  • Cellini, S. (2006). Smoothing the transition to college? The effect of TECH-PREP programs on educational attainment. Economics of Education Review, 25, 394–411. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2005.07.006
  • Chatterji, C. M. (2005). Achievement gaps and correlates of early mathematics achievement: Evidence from the ECLS-K-first grade sample. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13(46). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v13n46/v13n46.p
  • Cohen, J. (2006). Social, emotional, ethical, and academic education: Creating a climate for learning, participation in democracy, and well-being. Harvard Educational Review, 76, 201–237. doi:10.17763/haer.76.2.j44854x1524644vn
  • Cohen, J., McCabe, L., Michelli, N. M., & Pickeral, T. (2009). School climate: Research, policy, practice, and teacher education. Teachers College Record, 111(1), 180–213.
  • Cook, M., & Evans, W. N. (2000). Families or schools? Explaining the convergence in White and Black academic performance. Journal of Labor Economics, 18, 729–754. doi:10.1086/209975
  • Cooper, K. (2014). Eliciting engagement in the high school classroom: A mixed-methods examination of teaching practices. American Educational Research Journal, 51(2), 363–402. doi:10.3102/0002831213507973
  • Copland, M. A. (2003). Leadership of inquiry: Building and sustaining capacity for school improvement. Educational Policy and Analysis, 25(4), 375–395. doi:10.3102/01623737025004375
  • Cothran, D., Kulinna, P., & Garrahy, D. (2003). “This is kind of giving a secret away…”: Students’ perspectives on effective class management. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(4), 435–444. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(03)00027-1
  • Crosnoe, R. (2001). Academic orientation and parental involvement in education during high school. Sociology of Education, 74(3), 210–230. doi:10.2307/2673275
  • Crosnoe, R., Johnson, M., & Elder, G. (2004). Intergenerational bonding in school: The behavioral and contextual correlates of student-teacher relationships. Sociology of Education, 77(1), 60–81. doi:10.1177/003804070407700103
  • Crosnoe, R., & Schneider, B. (2010). Social capital, information, and socioeconomic disparities in math course work. American Journal of Education, 117(1), 79–107. doi:10.1086/656347
  • Curry, M. (2008). Critical friends groups: The possibilities and limitations embedded in teacher professional communities aimed at instructional improvement and school reform. Teachers College Record, 110(4), 733–774.
  • Danielson, C. (2007). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  • Darling-Hammond, L., Ancess, J., & Ort, S. (2002). Reinventing high school: Outcomes of the coalition campus schools project. American Educational Research Journal, 39(3), 639–673. doi:10.3102/00028312039003639
  • Davies, D. (1995). Commentary. In L. Rigsby, M. Reynolds, & M. Wang (Eds.), School-community connections (pp. 267–280). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Davison, M. L., Young, S. S., Davenport, E. C., Butterbaugh, D., & Davison, L. J. (2004). When do children fall behind? What can be done? Phi Delta Kappan, 85(10), 752–761. doi:10.1177/003172170408501010
  • DeBray, E. (2005). A comprehensive high school and a shift in New York State policy: A study of early implementation. The High School Journal, 89(1), 18–45. doi:10.1353/hsj.2005.0013
  • Dexter, K. M., Tai, R. H., & Sadler, P. M. (2006). Traditional and block scheduling for college science preparation: A comparison of college science success of students who report different high school scheduling plans. The High School Journal, 89(4), 22–33. doi:10.1353/hsj.2006.0007
  • Dolejs, C. (2006). Report on key practices and policies of consistently higher performing high schools. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research. Retrieved from http://www.betterhighschools.org/docs/ReportOfKeyPracticesandPolicies_10-31-06.pdf
  • Domina, T. (2009). What works in college outreach: Assessing targeted and schoolwide interventions for disadvantaged students. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31(2), 127–152. doi:10.3102/0162373709333887
  • Domina, T., Conley, A. M., & Farkas, G. (2011). The link between educational expectations and effort in the college-for-all Era. Sociology of Education, 84(2), 93. doi:10.1177/1941406411401808
  • Domina, T., & Ruzek, E. (2012). Paving the way: K–16 partnerships for higher education diversity and high school reform. Educational Policy, 26(2), 243–267.
  • Domina, T., & Saldana, J. (2012). Does raising the bar level the playing field? Mathematics curricular intensification and inequality in American high schools, 1982–2004. American Educational Research Journal, 49(4), 695–708. doi:10.3102/0002831211426347
  • Eccles, J., Barber, B., Stone, M., & Hunt, J. (2003). Extracurricular activities and adolescent development. Journal of Social Issues, 59(4), 865–889. doi:10.1046/j.0022-4537.2003.00095.x
  • Elmore, R. F., Abelmann, C. H., & Fuhrman, S. H. (1996). The new accountability in state education reform: From process to performance. In H. Ladd (Ed.), Holding schools accountable: Performance-based reform in education (pp. 65–98). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
  • Emerling, B. (2010). Tracing the effects of teacher inquiry on classroom practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 377–388. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.02.019
  • Englund, M., Egeland, B., & Collins, A. (2008). Exceptions to high school dropout prediction in a low-income sample: Do adults make a difference? Journal of Social Issues, 64(1), 77–94. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2008.00549.x
  • Fallis, R., & Opotow, S. (2003). Are students failing school or are schools failing students? Class cutting in high school. Journal of Social Issues, 59(1), 103–119. doi:10.1111/1540-4560.00007
  • Feldman, A., & Matjasko, J. (2005). The role of school-based extracurricular activities in adolescent development: A comprehensive review and future directions. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 159–210. doi:10.3102/00346543075002159
  • Feldman, M., & Pentland, B. (2003). Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(1), 94–118. doi:10.2307/3556620
  • Fernandez, K. E. (2011). Evaluating school improvement plans and their effect on academic performance. Educational Policy, 25(2), 338. doi:10.1177/0895904809351693
  • Flynn, N. (2009). Toward democratic discourse: Scaffolding student-led discussions in the social studies. Teachers College Record, 111(8), 2021–2054.
  • Freiberg, H. J. (Ed.). (1999). School climate: Measuring, improving and sustaining healthy learning environments. Philadelphia, PA: Falmer Press.
  • Fuhrman, S., & Elmore, R. (2004). Redesigning accountability systems for education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Gamoran, A. (1997). Curriculum Change as a Reform Strategy: Lessons from the United States and Scotland. Teachers College Record, 98(4), 608–28.
  • Gamoran, A., Porter, A., Smithson, J., & White, P. (1997). Upgrading high school mathematics instruction: Improving learning opportunities for low-achieving, low-income youth. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19(4), 325–338. doi:10.3102/01623737019004325
  • Gillies, R., & Boyle, M. (2008). Teachers’ discourse during cooperative learning and their perceptions of this pedagogical practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(5), 1333–1348. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2007.10.003
  • Goddard, R. D., LoGerfo, L., & Hoy, W. K. (2004). High school accountability. Educational Policy, 18(3), 403–425. doi:10.1177/0895904804265066
  • Goldring, E., Huff, J., May, H. & Camburn, E. (2008). School context and individual characteristics: What influences principal practice? Journal of Educational Administration, 46(3), 332–52.
  • Gregory, A., Cornell, D., & Fan, X. (2011). The relationship of school structure and support to suspension rates for black and white high school students. American Educational Research Journal, 48(4), 904–934. doi:10.3102/0002831211398531
  • Gregory, A., & Ripski, M. (2008). Adolescent trust in teachers: Implications for behavior in the high school classroom. School Psychology Review, 37(3), 337–353.
  • Grissom, J., & Loeb, S. (2011). Triangulating principal effectiveness: How perspectives of parents, teachers, and assistant principals identify the central importance of managerial skills. American Educational Research Journal, 48(5), 1091–1123. doi:10.3102/0002831211402663
  • Grissom, J. A., Loeb, S., & Master, B. (2013). Effective instructional time use for school leaders: Longitudinal evidence from observations of principals. Educational Researcher, 42, 8. doi:10.3102/0013189X13510020
  • Grossman, P., Loeb, S., Cohen, J., Hammerness, K., Wyckoff, J., Boyd, D., & Lankford, H. (2010). Measure for measure: The relationship between measures of instructional practice in middle school English language arts and teachers’ value-added scores (NBER Working Paper No. 45). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Gutierrez, R. (2000). Advancing African-American, urban youth in mathematics: Unpacking the success of one math department. American Journal of Education, 109(1), 63–111. doi:10.1086/444259
  • Hallinan, M. (2008). Teacher influences on students’ attachment to school. Sociology of Education, 81(3), 271–283. doi:10.1177/003804070808100303
  • Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. (1996). Reassessing the principal’s role in school effectiveness: A review of empirical research, 1980–1995. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32(1), 5–44. doi:10.1177/0013161X96032001002
  • Heck, R., & Hallinger, P. (2009). Assessing the contribution of distributed leadership to school improvement and growth in math achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 46(3), 659–689. doi:10.3102/0002831209340042
  • Heck, R. H., Price, C. L., & Thomas, S. L. (2004). Tracks as emergent structures: A network analysis of student differentiation in a high school. American Journal of Education, 110(4), 321–353. doi:10.1086/422789
  • Heckman, J. & LaFontaine, P. (2010). The American high school graduation rate: Trends and levels. Review of Economics and Statistics, 92(2), 244–262.
  • Hemmings, A. (2003). Fighting for respect in urban high schools. The Teachers College Record, 105(3), 416–437. doi:10.1111/tcre.2003.105.issue-3
  • Hill, H. C., Blunk, M., Charalambous, C., Lewis, J., Phelps, G. C., Sleep, L., & Ball, D. L. (2008). Mathematical knowledge for teaching and the mathematical quality of instruction: An exploratory study. Cognition and Instruction, 26, 430–511. doi:10.1080/07370000802177235
  • Holme, J. J., Richards, M. P., Jimerson, J. B., & Cohen, R. W. (2010). Assessing the effects of high school exit examinations. Review of Educational Research, 80(4), 467–526. doi:10.3102/0034654310383147
  • Horn, C., & Kurlaender, M. (2009). The end of Keyes: Resegregation trends and achievement in Denver public schools. In C. Smrekar, & E. Goldring (Eds.), From the courtroom to the classroom: The shifting landscape of school desegregation (chap. 9). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
  • Horng, E., Klasik, D., & Loeb, S. (2010). Principal’s time use and school effectiveness. American Journal of Education, 116(4), 491–523. doi:10.1086/653625
  • Hoy, W. K., Tarter, C. J., & Hoy, A. W. (2006). Academic optimism of schools: A force for student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 43(3), 425–446. doi:10.3102/00028312043003425
  • Huff, J., Goldring, E., & Guthrie, J. (2012, March). Learning-centered leadership practices for effective high schools serving at risk students. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Education Finance and Policy, Boston, MA.
  • Huffman, D., & Kalnin, J. (2003). Collaborative inquiry to make data-based decisions in schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 569–580. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(03)00054-4
  • Hughes, W. W. (2004). Blocking student performance in high school? Economics of Education Review, 23(6), 663–667. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2004.03.002
  • Iatarola, P., Conger, D., & Long, M. (2011). Determinants of high schools’ advanced course offerings. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33(3), 340–359. doi:10.3102/0162373711398124
  • Ingram, D., Seashore Louis, K., & Schroeder, R. (2004). Accountability policies and teacher decision making: Barriers to the use of data to improve practice. Teachers College Record, 106(6), 1258–1287. doi:10.1111/tcre.2004.106.issue-6
  • Jacobs, K. D., & Kritsonis, W. A. (2006). Partially decentralizing administrative practices in secondary schools to develop collective staff efficacy and improve student achievement. National Journal for Publishing and Mentoring Doctoral Student Research, 3(1), 1–5.
  • Johnson, M. K., Crosnoe, R., & Elder Jr, G. H. (2001). Students' attachment and academic engagement: The role of race and ethnicity. Sociology of Education, 74(4), 318–340.
  • Kalogrides, D., & Loeb, S. (2013). Different teachers, different peers: The magnitude of student sorting within schools. Educational Researcher, 42(6), 304–316. doi:10.3102/0013189X13495087
  • Kanno, Y., & Kangas, S. (2014). “I’m not going to be, like, for the AP”: English language learners’ limited access to advanced college-preparatory courses in high school. American Educational Research Journal, 51(5), 848–878. doi:10.3102/0002831214544716
  • Kaufman, P., & Chapman, C. (2004). Dropout rates in the United States: 2001 (NCES 2004–057), Table A-1. October Supplement, 1972–2001. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, Current Population Survey (CPS).
  • Kelly, S., & Turner, J. (2009). Rethinking the effects of classroom activity structure on the engagement of low-achieving students. Teachers College Record, 111(7), 1665–1692.
  • Kerr, K. A., Marsh, J. A., Ikemoto, G. S., Darilek, H., & Barney, H. (2006). Strategies to promote data use for instructional improvement: Actions, outcomes, and lessons from three urban districts. American Journal of Education, 112, 496–520. doi:10.1086/505057
  • Klar, H. (2012). Fostering distributed instructional leadership: A sociocultural perspective of leadership development in urban high schools. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 11, 365–390. doi:10.1080/15700763.2012.654886
  • Lachat, M., & Smith, S. (2005). Data use in urban high schools. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 10(3), 333–349. doi:10.1207/s15327671espr1003_7
  • Langer, J. (2000). Excellence in English in middle and high school: How teachers’ professional lives support student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 37(2), 397–439. doi:10.3102/00028312037002397
  • Langer, J. (2001). Beating the odds: Teaching middle and high school students to read and write well. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 837–880. doi:10.3102/00028312038004837
  • Lee, J. (2002). Racial and ethnic achievement gap trends: Reversing the progress toward equity. Educational Researcher, 31(1), 3–12. doi:10.3102/0013189X031001003
  • Lee, J. (2004). Multiple facets of inequity in racial and ethnic achievement gaps. Peabody Journal of Education, 79(2), 51–73. doi:10.1207/s15327930pje7902_5
  • Lee, V., & Burkham, D. (2003). Dropping out of high school: The role of school organization and structure. American Educational Research Journal, 40(2), 353–393. doi:10.3102/00028312040002353
  • Lee, V. E., Bryk, A. S., & Smith, J. B. (1993). The organization of effective secondary schools. In L. Darling-Hammond (Ed.), Review of research in education (vol. 19, pp. 171–267). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
  • Lee, V. E., & Smith, J. B. (1995). Effects of high school restructuring and size on early gains in achievement and engagement. Sociology of Education, 68(4), 241–270.
  • Lee, V. E., & Smith, J. B. (1999). Social support and achievement for young adolescents in Chicago: The role of school academic press. American Educational Research Journal, 36(4), 907–945. doi:10.3102/00028312036004907
  • Lee, V., Smerdon, B. A., Alfed-Liro, C., & Brown, S. L. (2000). Inside large and small high schools: Curriculum and social relations. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22(2), 147–171. doi:10.3102/01623737022002147
  • Legault, L. (2006). Why do high school students lack motivation in the classroom? Toward an understanding of academic amotivation and the role of social support. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(3), 567–582. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.3.567
  • Leithwood, K., Leonard, L., & Sharratt, L. (1998). Conditions fostering organizational learning in schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 34(2), 243–276. doi:10.1177/0013161X98034002005
  • Leithwood, K., & Riehl, C. (2005). What we know about successful school leadership. In W. Firestone, & C. Riehl (Eds.), A new agenda: Directions for research on educational leadership. New York, NY: Teacher College Press.
  • Levine, T., & Marcus, A. (2010). How the structure and focus of teachers’ collaborative activities facilitate and constrain teacher learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 389–398. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.03.001
  • Lewis, T., & Cheng, S. Y. (2006). Tracking, expectations, and the transformation of vocational education. American Journal of Education, 113(1), 67–99. doi:10.1086/506494
  • Little, J. W. (1982). Norms of collegiality and experimentation: Workplace conditions of school success. American Educational Research Journal, 19(3), 325–340.
  • Long, M., Conger, D., & Iatarola, P. (2012). Effects of high school course-taking on secondary and post-secondary success. American Educational Research Journal, 49(2), 285–322. doi:10.3102/0002831211431952
  • Louis, K. S., Leithwood, K., Wahlstrom, K., & Anderson, S. (2010). Investigating the links to improved student learning: Final report of research findings. Retrieved from http://www.wallacefoundation.org/KnowledgeCenter/KnowledgeTopics/CurrentAreasofFocus/EducationLeadership/Documents/Learning-from-Leadership-Investigating-Links-Final-Report.pdf
  • Lucas, S. R., & Berends, M. (2002). Sociodemographic diversity, correlated achievement, and de facto tracking. Sociology of Education, 75, 328–348. doi:10.2307/3090282
  • Luo, M. (2008). Structural equation modeling for high school principals’ data-driven decision making: An analysis of information use environments. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 603–634. doi:10.1177/0013161X08321506
  • Mahoney, J. L. (2000). School extracurricular activity participation as a moderator in the development of antisocial patterns. Child Development, 71(2), 502–516. doi:10.1111/cdev.2000.71.issue-2
  • Marsh, H., & Kleitman, S. (2005). Consequences of employment during high school: Character building, subversion of academic goals, or a threshold? American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 331–369. doi:10.3102/00028312042002331
  • Mau, R. Y. (1992). The validity and devolution of a concept: Student alienation. Adolescence, 27(107), 731–742.
  • Maxwell, N. L., & Rubin, V. (2002). High school career academies and post-secondary outcomes. Economics of Education Review, 21(2), 137–152. doi:10.1016/S0272-7757(00)00046-7
  • McLaughlin, M., & Talbert, J. E. (1993). Contexts that matter for teaching and learning: Strategic opportunities for meeting the nation’s educational goals. Stanford, CA: Center for Research on the Context of Secondary School Teaching, Stanford University.
  • McLaughlin, M. W. (1994). Somebody knows my name: Issues in restructuring schools (Issue Report no. 7, pp. 9–12). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison, School of Education, Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 376 565).
  • Measures of Effective Teaching Project. (2012). Gathering feedback for teaching: Combining high-quality observations with student surveys and achievement gains. Seattle, WA: Author.
  • Mediratta, K., & Fruchter, N. (2001). Mapping the field of organizing for school improvement: A report on education organizing in Baltimore, Chicago, Los Angeles, The Mississippi Delta, New York City, Philadelphia, San Francisco, and Washington, DC. New York, NY: New York University, The Institute for Education and Social Policy.
  • Metz, M. H. (1990). How social class differences shape teachers’ work. In M. W. McLaughlin, J. E. Talbert, & N. Bascia (Eds.), The contexts of teaching in secondary schools. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Mickelson, R., & Everett, B. (2008). Neotracking in North Carolina: How high school courses of study reproduce race and class-based stratification. Teachers College Record, 110(3), 535–570.
  • Mickelson, R., Smith, S., & Southworth, S. (2009). Resegregation, achievement and the chimera of choice in post-unitary Charlotte–Mecklenburg schools. In C. Smrekar, & E. Goldring (Eds.), From the courtroom to the classroom: The shifting landscape of school desegregation (chap. 6). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
  • Miller, L., & Mittleman, J. (2012). High Schools That Work and college preparedness: Measuring the model’s impact on mathematics and science pipeline progression. Economics of Education Review, 31, 1116–1135. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2012.07.014
  • Miller, L. S. (1995). An American imperative: Accelerating minority educational advancement. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Moore, G., & Slate, J. (2008). Who’s taking the advanced placement courses and how are they doing: A statewide two-year study. High School Journal, 92, 1.
  • Muller, C., Riegle-Crumb, C., Schiller, K. S., Wilkinson, L., & Frank, K. A. (2010). Race and academic achievement in racially diverse high schools: Opportunity and stratification. Teachers College Record, 112(4), 1038.
  • Murnane, R. (2013). U.S. high school graduation rates: Patterns and explanations. Journal of Economic Literature, 51(2), 370–422.
  • Murphy, J. (2010). Turning around failing schools: Insights for educational leaders. Journal of Educational Change, 11(2), 157–176. doi:10.1007/s10833-008-9101-y
  • Murphy, J., Beck, L. G., Crawford, M., Hodges, A., & McCaughy, C. L. (2001). The productive high school: Creating personalized academic communities. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  • Murphy, J. F., Elliott, S. N., Goldring, E. B., & Porter, A. C. (2006). Learning-centered leadership: A conceptual foundation. New York: The Wallace Foundation.
  • Murphy, J. F., Goldring, E. G., Cravens, X. C., & Elliott, S. N. (2007). The Vanderbilt assessment of leadership in education: Measuring learning-centered leadership. East China Normal University Journal.
  • Nasir, N., Jones, A., & McLaughlin, M. (2011). School connectedness for students in low-income urban high schools. Teachers College Record, 113(8), 1755–1793.
  • National High School Center. (2008). Eight elements of high school improvement: A mapping framework. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research.
  • No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, § 115, Stat. 1425 (2002).
  • Nystrand, M. (1997). Opening dialogue: Understanding the dynamics of language and learning in the English classroom. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Orfield, G., & Lee, C. (2005). Why segregation matters: Poverty and educational inequality. Cambridge, MA: The Civil Rights Project.
  • Pane, J., Griffin, B. A., McCaffrey, D., & Karam, R. (2014). Effectiveness of Cognitive Tutor Algebra I at scale. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 36(2), 127–144. doi:10.3102/0162373713507480
  • Parker, W., Lo, J., Yeo, A., Valencia, S., Nguyen, D., Abbot, R., & Vye, N. (2013). Beyond breadth-speed-test: Toward deeper knowing and engagement in an advanced placement course. American Educational Research Journal, 50(6), 1424–1459. doi:10.3102/0002831213504237
  • Patterson, J., Hale, D., & Stessman, M. (2008). Cultural contradictions and school leaving: A case study of an urban high school. High School Journal, 91, 2. doi:10.1353/hsj.2008.0001
  • Peck, S., Roeser, R., Zarrett, N., & Eccles, J. (2008). Exploring the roles of extracurricular activity quantity and quality in the educational resilience of vulnerable adolescents: Variable- and pattern-centered approaches. Journal of Social Issues, 64(1), 135–156. doi:10.1111/josi.2008.64.issue-1
  • Pianta, R., Hamre, B., & Mintz, S. (2011). Classroom assessment scoring system: Secondary manual. Charlottesville, VA: The Center for Advanced Study of Teaching and Learning.
  • Pierce, K. M. (2005). Posing, pretending, waiting for the bell: Life in high school classrooms. The High School Journal, 89(2), 1–15. doi:10.1353/hsj.2005.0023
  • Plunk, A., Tate, W., Bierut, L., & Grucza, R. (2014). Intended and unintended effects of state-mandated high school science and mathematics course graduation requirements on educational attainment. Educational Researcher, 43(5), 230–241. doi:10.3102/0013189X14540207
  • Porter, A., Chester, M., & Schlesinger, M. (2004). Framework for an effective assessment and accountability program: The Philadelphia example. The Teachers College Record, 106(6), 1358–1400. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2004.00382.x
  • Purkey, S., & Smith, M. (1983). Effective schools: A review. Elementary School Journal, 83(4), 426–452. doi:10.1086/461325
  • Quinn, D. M. (2002). The impact of principal leadership behaviors on instructional practice and student engagement. Journal of Educational Administration, 40(5), 447–467. doi:10.1108/09578230210440294
  • Rampey, B. D., Dion, G. S., & Donahue, P. L. (2009). NAEP 2008 trends in academic progress (NCES 2009–479). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
  • Ready, D. D., & Lee, V. E. (2008). Choice, equity, and the schools-within-schools reform. Teachers College Record, 110(9), 1930–1958.
  • Reardon, S. F., Arshan, N., Atteberry, A., & Kurlaender, M. (2010). Effects of failing a high school exit exam on course taking, achievement, persistence, and graduation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 32(4), 498–520. doi:10.3102/0162373710382655
  • Reed, K. (2015). School incorporation and high school completion among Latino youth. American Journal of Education, 121, 347–379. doi:10.1086/680408
  • Rhodes, V., Stevens, D., & Hemmings, A. (2011). Creating positive culture in a new urban high school. The High School Journal, 94(3), 82–94. doi:10.1353/hsj.2011.0004
  • Rice, J. K., Croninger, R. G., & Roellke, C. F. (2002). The effect of block scheduling high school mathematics courses on student achievement and teachers’ use of time: Implications for educational productivity. Economics of Education Review, 21(6), 599–607. doi:10.1016/S0272-7757(01)00045-0
  • Robinson, V., Lloyd, C., & Rowe, K. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635–674. doi:10.1177/0013161X08321509
  • Roeser, R. W., & Peck, S. C. (2003). Patterns and pathways of educational achievement across adolescence: A holistic-developmental perspective. In W. Damon (Series Ed.), S. C. Peck, & R. W. Roeser (Vol. Eds.), New directions for child and adolescent development: Vol. 101. Personcentered approaches to studying human development in context (pp. 39–62). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Rothstein, R. (2004). Class and schools. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute/Teachers College Press.
  • Rumberger, R. (2001, January). Why students drop out of school and what can be done. Paper presented at the Dropouts in American Conference, Boston, MA.
  • Rumberger, R. (2011). Dropping out: Why students drop out of high school and what can be done about it. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Rumberger, R., & Larson, K. (1998). Student mobility and the increased risk of high school dropout. American Journal of Education, 107(1), 1–35. doi:10.1086/444201
  • Saavedra, A. (2014). The academic impact of enrollment in international baccalaureate diploma programs: A case study of Chicago public schools. Teachers College Record, 116(4), 1–40.
  • Sanders, M. G., & Lewis, K. C. (2004). Partnerships at an urban high school: Meeting the parent involvement requirements of. No Child Left Behind. E-Journal of Teaching and Learning in Diverse Settings, 2(1), 78–98.
  • Schildkamp, K., & Visscher, A. (2010). The use of performance feedback in school improvement in Louisiana. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(7), 1389–1403. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2010.04.004
  • Schreiber, J., Veal, R., Flinders, D., & Churchill, S. (2001). Second year analysis of hybrid schedule high school. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 9(46). doi:10.14507/epaa.v9n46.2001
  • Schulz, L. (2011). Targeting school factors that contribute to youth alienation: Focused school counseling programs. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 38(2), 75–83.
  • Sebastian, J., & Allensworth, E. (2012). The influence of principal leadership on classroom instruction and student learning: A study of mediated pathways to learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(4), 626–663. doi:10.1177/0013161X11436273
  • Shannon, G. S., & Bylsma, P. (2002, November). Addressing the achievement gap: A challenge for Washington state educators. Olympia, WA: Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction.
  • Shaver, A. V., & Walls, R. T. (1998). Effect of Title I parent involvement on student reading and mathematics achievement. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 31(2), 90–97.
  • Shear, L., Means, B., Mitchell, K., House, A., Gorges, T., Joshi, A., … & Shkolnik, J. (2008). Contrasting paths to small-school reform: Results of a 5-year evaluation of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation’s national high schools initiative. Teachers College Record, 110(9), 1986–2039.
  • Shifrer, D., Callahan, R., & Muller, C. (2013). Equality or marginalization? The high school course-taking of students labeled with a learning disability. American Educational Research Journal, 50(4), 656–682.
  • Smerdon, B. (2002). Students’ perceptions of membership in their high schools. Sociology of Education, 75(4), 287–305. doi:10.2307/3090280
  • Smrekar, C., & Cohen-Vogel, L. (2001). The voices of parents: Rethinking the intersection of family and school. Peabody Journal of Education, 76(2), 75–100. doi:10.1207/S15327930pje7602_5
  • Snyder, T. D., Dillow, S. A., & Hoffman, C. M. (2009). Digest of education statistics 2008 (NCES 2009-020). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
  • Spillane, J., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. (2001). Investigating school leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Educational Researcher, 30, 23–28. doi:10.3102/0013189X030003023
  • Spillane, J. P. (2012). Data in practice: Conceptualizing the data-based decision-making phenomena. American Journal of Education, 118(2), 113–141. doi:10.1086/663283
  • Staples, M. (2007). Supporting whole-class collaborative inquiry in a secondary mathematics classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 25(2–3), 161–217. doi:10.1080/07370000701301125
  • Stephan, J., & Rosenbaum, J. (2012). Can high schools reduce college enrollment gaps with a new counseling model? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 35(2), 200–219. doi:10.3102/0162373712462624
  • Strayhorn, T. (2010). The role of schools, families, and psychological variables on math achievement of Black high school students. High School Journal, 93(4), 177–194. doi:10.1353/hsj.2010.0003
  • Stronge, J. (2002). Qualities of effective teachers. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  • Supovitz, J., Sirinides, P., & May, H. (2010). How principals and peers influence teaching and learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(1), 31–56. doi:10.1177/1094670509353043
  • Swanson, M. C., Marcus, M., & Elliott, J. (2000). Rigor with support: Lessons from AVID. Leadership, 30(2), 26–27, 37–38.
  • Taines, C. (2012). Intervening in alienation: The outcomes for urban youth of participating in school activism. American Educational Research Journal, 49(1), 53–86. doi:10.3102/0002831211411079
  • Tedford, J. T. (2008). When remedial means what it says: How teachers use data to reform instructional interventions. The High School Journal, 92(2), 28–36. doi:10.1353/hsj.0.0016
  • Thompson, C. L., & O’Quinn, S. D. (2001). First in America special report: Eliminating the Black-White achievement gap. Chapel Hill, NC: North Carolina Education Research Council.
  • Tubin, D. (2015). School success as a process of structuration. Educational Administration Quarterly, 1–35. doi:10.1177/0013161X15569346
  • United States National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform: A report to the nation and the secretary of education. Washington, DC: United States Department of Education by the National Commission on Excellence in Education: [Supt. of Docs., U.S. G.P.O. distributor].
  • Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teacher practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 80–91. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2007.01.004
  • Walker, C., & Greene, B. (2009). The relations between student motivational beliefs and cognitive engagement in high school. Journal of Educational Research, 102(6), 463–472. doi:10.3200/JOER.102.6.463-472
  • Watt, K., Powell, C., Mendiola, I., & Cossio, G. (2006). Schoolwide impact and AVID: How have selected Texas high schools addressed the new accountability measures? Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 11(1), 57–53. doi:10.1207/s15327671espr1101_4
  • Wells, R., Gifford, E., Bai, Y., & Corra, A. (2015). A network perspective on dropout prevention in two cities. Educational Administration Quarterly, 51(1), 27–57. doi:10.1177/0013161X13511110
  • Wenglinsky, H. (2002). The link between teacher classroom practices and student academic performance. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 10(2). doi:10.14507/epaa.v10n12.2002
  • Wenglinsky, H. (2004). The link between instructional practice and the racial gap in middle schools. Research on Middle Level Education, 28(1), 1–13.
  • White, R., Haslam, M. B., & Hewes, G. (2006). Improving student literacy in the Phoenix Union high school district. Washington, DC: Policy Studies Associates.
  • Whitney, J., Leonard, M., Leonard, W., Camelio, M., & Camelio, V. (2005). Seek balance, connect with others, and reach all students: High school students describe a moral imperative for teachers. The High School Journal, 89(2), 29–39. doi:10.1353/hsj.2005.0024
  • Wilcox, K. C., & Angelis, J. I. (2011). High school best practices: Results from cross-case comparisons. The High School Journal, 94(4), 138–153. doi:10.1353/hsj.2011.0009
  • Yazzie-Mintz, E. (2009). Engaging the voices of students: A report on the 2007 & 2008 High School Survey of Student Engagement. Arlington, VA: National Association for College Admission Counseling.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.