Five Myths of School Turnaround Policy and Practice

References

• Abe, Y., Weinstock, P., Chan, V., Meyers, C., Gerdeman, D., & Brandt, W. C. (2015). Exploring how methodological decisions affect the variability of schools identified as beating the odds (REL 2015–064). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Midwest.
   Google Scholar
• Argyris, C., & Schon, D. (1974). Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Arogyaswamy, K., Barker, V. L., & Yasai-Ardekani, M. (1995). Firm turnarounds: An integrative two-stage model. Journal of Management Studies, 32(4), 493–525. doi:10.1111/joms.1995.32.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balfanz, R., & Legters, N. (2004). Locating the dropout crisis: Which high schools produce the nation’s dropouts? Where are they located? Who attends them? (Report 70). Baltimore, MD: Center for Research on the Education of Students Placed Risk (CRESPAR), Johns Hopkins University. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED484525.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Baroody, K. (2011). Turning around the nation’s lowest performing schools: Five steps districts can take to improve their chances of success. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, W. W. (2011). Organization change: Theory and practice (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Castrogiovanni, G. J., Bahga, R. B., & Kidwell, R. E. (1992). Curing sick businesses: Changing CEOs in turnaround efforts. Academy of Management Executive, 6(3), 26–40. doi:10.5465/AME.1992.4274176
   Google Scholar
• Collins, J., & Porras, J. I. (2004). Built to last: Successful habits of visionary companies. New York, NY: HarperCollins Publishers, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• De la Torre, M., Allensworth, E., Jagesic, S., Sebastian, J., Salmonowicz, M., Meyers, C., & Gerdeman, D. (2012). Changes in student populations and teacher workforce in low-performing Chicago schools targeted for reform effort (Issues & Answers Report, REL 2012-No. 123). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Midwest. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs
   Google Scholar
• De la Torre, M., Allensworth, E., Jagesic, S., Sebastian, J., Salmonowicz, M., Meyers, C., & Gerdeman, R. D. (2013). Turning around low-performing schools in Chicago. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Consortium on Chicago School Research.
   Google Scholar
• Duke, D. L., & Hochbein, C. (2008). Rising to the challenges of studying school decline. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 7, 358–379. doi:10.1080/15700760802155515
   Google Scholar
• Duke, D. L. (2014). A bold approach to developing leaders for low-performing schools. Management in Education, 28(3), 80–85. doi:10.1177/0892020614537665
   Google Scholar
• Duke, D. L. (2015). Leadership for low-performing schools: A step-by-step guide to the school turnaround process. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Duke, D. L., Tucker, P., Salmonowicz, M., Levy, M., & Saunders, S. (2008). Teachers’ guide to school turnarounds. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Elmore, R. F. (1996). Getting to scale with good educational practice. Harvard Education Review, 66(1), 1–26. doi:10.17763/haer.66.1.g73266758j348t33
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmore, R. F., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1988). Steady work: Policy, practice and the reform of American education. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
   Google Scholar
• Fago, C., Cornier, J. P., & Hassel, B. C. (2016). Measuring school turnaround success. San Francisco, CA: WestEd.
   Google Scholar
• Fligstein, N. (2013). Understanding stability and change in fields. Research in Organizational Behavior, 33, 39–51. doi:10.1016/j.riob.2013.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. (2015). The new meaning of educational change (5th ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915–945. doi:10.3102/00028312038004915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gersick, C. J. G. (1991). Revolutionary change theories: A multilevel exploration of the punctuated equilibrium paradigm. Academy of Management Review, 16, 10–36. doi:10.5465/AMR.1991.4278988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grinyer, P., & McKiernan, P. (1990). Generating major change in stagnating companies [Special issue]. Strategic Management Journal, 11, 131–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassel, E. A., & Hassel, B. (2009). The big U-turn. Education Next, 9(1), 20–27.
   Google Scholar
• Herman, R., Dawson, P., Dee, T., Greene, J., Maynard, R., Redding, S., & Darwin, M. (2008). Turning around chronically low-performing schools: A practice guide (NCEE #2008-4020). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/practiceguides
   Google Scholar
• Herrman, M., Dragoset, L., & James-Burdumy, S. (2014). Are low-performing schools adopting practices promoted by school improvement grants? (NCEE 2015-4001). Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, F. M. (2013). Cage-busting leadership. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hitt, D. H., & Meyers, C. V. (in press). Sustaining turnaround. Center on School Turnaround. San Francisco, CA: WestEd.
   Google Scholar
• Kutash, J., Nico, E., Gorin, E., Rahmatulla, S., & Tallant, K. (2010). The school turnaround field guide. Social Impact Advisors. Retrieved from http://www.fsg.org
   Google Scholar
• LaPorte, T. R., & Lasher, T. (1988). Cold turkeys and task forces: Pursuing high reliability in California’s Central Valley (Working Paper No. 88-25). Berkeley, CA: Institute of Governmental Studies, University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Le Floch, K. C., Birman, B., O’Day, J., Hurlburt, S., Mercado-Garcia, D., Goff, R… .Wei, T. E. (2014). Case studies of schools receiving school improvement grants: Findings after the first year of implementation (NCEE 2014-4015). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Leanna, C. R., & Barry, B. (2000). Stability and change as simultaneous experiences in organizational life. The Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 753–759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LiCalsi, C., Citkowicz, M., Friedman, L. B., & Brown, M. (2015). Evaluation of Massachusetts Office of District and School Turnaround assistance to commissioner’s districts and schools: Impact of school redesign grants. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research. Retrieved from http://www.air.org/sites/default/files/downloads/report/15-2687_SRG_Impact-Report_ed_FINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lutterloh, C., Cornier, J. P., & Hassel, B. C. (2016). Measuring school turnaround success Center on School Turnaround. San Francisco, CA: WestEd.
   Google Scholar
• MacLeod, J. (1987). Ain’t no making it: Aspirations and attainment in a low-income neighborhood. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Masuch, M. (1985). Vicious circles in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 14–33. doi:10.2307/2392809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, M. W., & Zucker, L. G. (1989). Permanently failing organizations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Meyers, C. V., Lindsay, J., Condon, C., & Wan, Y. (2012). A statistical approach to identifying schools demonstrating substantial improvements in student learning. What does it mean to be a school in need of turnaround? [Special Issue]. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 17(1), 1–22. doi:10.1080/10824669.2012.636703
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, J., & Meyers, C. V. (2008). Turning around failing schools: Leadership lessons from the organizational sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, J. (2013). Student voices: Implications for school turnaround in urban high schools (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Payne, C. M. (2008). So much reform, so little change: The persistence of failure in urban schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, C., & Reitzug, U. C. (2014). School turnaround fever: The paradoxes of a historical practice promoted as a new reform. Urban Education, 49(1), 8–38. doi:10.1177/0042085912472511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petroski, H. (2006). Success through failure: The paradox of design. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petroski, H. (2012). To forgive design: Understanding failure. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
   Google Scholar
• Player, D., Hitt, D. H., & Robinson, W. (2014). District readiness to support school turnaround: A user’s guide to inform the work of state education agencies and districts. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Center on School Turnaround.
   Google Scholar
• Player, D., & Katz, V. (2016). Assessing school turnaround: Evidence from Ohio. The Elementary School Journal, 116(4), 675–698. doi:10.1086/686467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhim, L. M., & Redding, S. (Eds.). (2014). The state role in turnaround: Emerging best practices. San Francisco, CA: WestEd.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, J. K., & Malen, B. (2003). The human costs of education reform: The case of school reconstitution. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(5), 635–666. doi:10.1177/0013161X03257298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, W. (2015). Assessing district readiness for turnaround. School Turnaround Learning Community. Retrieved July 26, 2015, from schoolturnaroundsupport.org/webinars/assessing-district-readiness-turnaround
   Google Scholar
• Rudolph, J. W., & Repenning, N. P. (2002). Disaster dynamics: Understanding the role of quantity in organizational collapse. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 1–30. doi:10.2307/3094889
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulman, P. R. (1993). The analysis of high-reliability organizations: A comparative framework. In K. H. Roberts’ (Ed.), New challenges to understanding organizations. New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, C., McMurrer, J., & McIntosh, S. (2012). Opportunities and obstacles: Implementing stimulus-funded School Improvement Grants in Maryland, Michigan, and Idaho. Washington, DC: Center on Education Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Smylie, M. A. (2010). Continuous school improvement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Smylie, M. A. (2016). Three organizational lessons for school district improvement. In A. J. Daly, & K. S. Finnigan (Eds.), Thinking and acting systemically: Improving school districts under pressure (pp. 209–220). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Stringfield, S. (1998). An anatomy of ineffectiveness. In L. Stoll, & K. Myers (Eds.), No quick fixes: Perspectives on schools in difficulties (pp. 209–221). London, UK: Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Stringfield, S., Reynolds, D., & Schaffer, E. (2012). Making best practice standard and lasting. Phi Delta Kappan, 94(1), 45–51. doi:10.1177/003172171209400109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tushman, M. L., & O’Reilly, C. A., III. (1996). The ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38(4), 8–30. doi:10.2307/41165852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Bavel, J. J., Mende-Siedlecki, P., Brady, W. J., & Reinero, D. A. (2016). Contextual sensitivity in scientific reproducibility. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Retrieved May 24, 2016, from www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1521897113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General systems theory: Foundations, development, applications. New York, NY: George Brazillier.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E., & Quinn, R. E. (1999). Organizational change and development. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 361–386. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.361
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar