Fifteen Years of Publication: Leadership and Policy in Schools and Its Scholarly Contribution Since Its Foundation

References

• (*) represents articles reviewed from LPS.
   Google Scholar
• Altheide, D. L. (1996). Qualitative media analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA.: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Becher, T. (1989). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines. London, UK: The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• *Bird, J. J., Dunaway, D. M., Hancock, D. R., & Wang, C. (2013). The superintendent’s leadership role in school improvement: Relationships between authenticity and best practices. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 12(1), 77–99. doi:10.1080/15700763.2013.766348
   Google Scholar
• *Bjork, L. G., Browne-Ferrigno, T., & Kowalski, T. J. (2014). The superintendent and educational reform in the United States of America. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 13(4), 444–465. doi:10.1080/15700763.2014.945656
   Google Scholar
• Bridges, D. (2006). The disciplines and discipline of educational research. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 40(2), 259–272. doi:10.1111/jope.2006.40.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Brown, K. M. (2006). The educational benefits of diversity: The unfinished journey from “mandate” in Brown to “choice” in Grutter and Comfort. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 5(4), 325–354. doi:10.1080/15700760600968390
   Google Scholar
• *Browne-Ferrigno, T., Allen, L. W., & Hurt, P. (2008). Longitudinal reform and renewal efforts to improve public schools: Kentucky’s standards and indicators for school improvement. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 7(4), 401–427. doi:10.1080/15700760701748477
   Google Scholar
• *Browne-Ferrigno, T., & Fusarelli, B. J. (2005). The Kentucky principalship: Model of school leadership reconfigured by ISLLC Standards and reform policy implementation. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4(2), 127–156. doi:10.1080/15700760590965587
   Google Scholar
• Bush, T. (1999). Crisis or crossroads? The discipline of educational management in the late 1990s. Educational Management and Administration, 27(3), 239–252.
   Google Scholar
• Bush, T., & Crawford, M. (2012). Mapping the field over 40 years: A historical review. Educational Management, Administration & Leadership, 40(5), 537–543. doi:10.1177/1741143212451827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Buttram, J. L., & Farley-Ripple, E. N. (2016). The role of principals in professional learning communities. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 16(2), 192–222. doi:10.1080/15700763.2015.1039136
   Google Scholar
• Byrd, J. K. (2007). A call for statistical reform in EAQ. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43(3), 381–391. doi:10.1177/0013161X06297137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callahan, R. E. (1962). Education and the cult of efficiency. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, R. F. (1979). A critique of the Educational Administration Quarterly. Educational Administration Quarterly, 15(3), 1–19. doi:10.1177/0013131X7901500303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Carza, E., Murakami-Ramalho, E., & Merchant, B. (2011). Leadership succession and successful leadership: The case of Laure Martinez. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 10(4), 428–443. doi:10.1080/15700763.2011.610558
   Google Scholar
• *Cohen-Vogel, L., & Harrison, C. (2013). Leading with data: Evidence from the National Center on Scaling Up Effective Schools. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 12(2), 122–145. doi:10.1080/15700763.2013.792934
   Google Scholar
• *Cosner, S. (2012). Leading the ongoing development of collaborative data practices: Advancing a schema for diagnosis and intervention. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 11(1), 26–65. doi:10.1080/15700763.2011.577926
   Google Scholar
• Culbertson, J. A. (1988).A century’s quest for a knowledge base. In N. J. Boyan (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational administration (pp. 3–26). New York, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• *DeMatthews, D. (2015). Making sense of social justice leadership. A case study of principal’s experiences to create a more inclusive school. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 14(2), 139–166. doi:10.1080/15700763.2014.997939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Duke, D. L., Tucker, P. D., Higgins, J., Lanphear, L., Levy, M. K., & Salmonowicz, M. J. (2008). Are local policies supporting instruction becoming standardized? Leadership and Policy in Schools, 7(1), 1–29. doi:10.1080/15700760701655466
   Google Scholar
• *Eacott, S., & Norris, J. (2014). Managerial rhetoric, accountability, and school leadership in contemporary Australia. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 13(2), 169–187. doi:10.1080/15700763.2014.901395
   Google Scholar
• English, F. W. (2003). The postmodern challenge to the theory and practice of educational administration. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
   Google Scholar
• *Firestone, W. A., Hayes, B. F., Robinson, M. N., & Shalaby, C. (2008). Professional development for instruction and student learning? A new state policy for administrators. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 7(2), 119–153. doi:10.1080/15700760701682130
   Google Scholar
• Fitz, J. (1999). Reflections on the field of educational management studies. Educational Management & Administration, 27(3), 313–321. doi:10.1177/0263211X990273007
   Google Scholar
• *Flessa, J. J. (2012). Principals as middle managers: School leadership during the implementation of primary class size reduction policy in Ontario. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 11(3), 325–343. doi:10.1080/15700763.2012.692429
   Google Scholar
• *Giles, C. (2006). Transformational leadership in challenging urban elementary schools: A role for parent involvement? Leadership and Policy in Schools, 5(3), 257–282. doi:10.1080/15700760600805865
   Google Scholar
• Glass, T. (2004). The history of educational administration viewed through its textbooks. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Education.
   Google Scholar
• Glatter, R. (2014). Educational administration 1969–2014: Reflections on pragmatism, agency and reform. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 46(3), 351–366. doi:10.1080/00220620.2014.919904
   Google Scholar
• *Gonzalez, M., Glasman, N. S., & Glasman, L. D. (2002). Daring to link principal preparation programs to student achievement in schools. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 1(3), 265–283. doi:10.1076/lpos.1.3.265.7889
   Google Scholar
• *Gronn, P., & Hamilton, A. (2004). “A bit more life in the leadership”: Co-principalship as distributed leadership practice. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 3(1), 3–35.
   Google Scholar
• Gunter, H. M. (2002). Purposes and positions in the field of educational management. Educational Management & Administration, 30(1), 7–26. doi:10.1177/0263211X020301005
   Google Scholar
• *Hallinger, P. (2005). Instructional leadership and the school principal: A passing fancy that refuses to fade away. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4(3), 221–239. doi:10.1080/15700760500244793
   Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P., & Bryand, D. (2013). Mapping the terrain of educational leadership and management in East Asia. Journal of Educational Administration, 51(5), 618–637. doi:10.1108/JEA-05-2012-0066
   Google Scholar
• *Hallinger, P., Lee, M., & Ko, J. (2014). Exploring the impact of school principals on teacher professional communities in Hong Kong. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 13(3), 229–259. doi:10.1080/15700763.2014.901396
   Google Scholar
• *Hallinger, P., Lee, T. H. T., & Szeto, E. (2013). Review of research on educational leadership and management in Hong Kong, 1995–2012: Topographical analysis of an emergent knowledge base. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 12(3), 256–281. doi:10.1080/15700763.2013.826809
   Google Scholar
• *Halverson, T. J., & Plecki, M. L. (2015). Exploring the politics of differential resource allocation: Implications for policy design and leadership practice. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 14(1), 42–66. doi:10.1080/15700763.2014.983129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Harris, A. (2005). Teacher leadership: More than just a feel-good factor? Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4(3), 201–219. doi:10.1080/15700760500244777
   Google Scholar
• Hashem, M. (2007). Becoming an independent field: Societal pressures, state, and professions. Higher Education, 54, 181–205. doi:10.1007/s10734-005-2295-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heck, R. H. (2006). Scholarship in educational administration: At a crossroads or dead end? In D. E. Mitchell (Ed.), New foundations for knowledge in educational administration, policy, and politics (pp. 101–127). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, M. (1997). From bulleting to journal: Metamorphosis and new vistas. Educational Management & Administration, 25(3), 243–263. doi:10.1177/0263211X97253003
   Google Scholar
• Immegart, G. L. (1990). What is truly missing in advanced preparation in educational administration? Journal of Educational Administration, 28(3), 5–13. doi:10.1108/09578239010136448
   Google Scholar
• *Ingle, W. K., Johnson, P. A., Givens, M. R., & Rampelt, J. (2013). Campaign expenditures in school levy referenda and their relationship to voter approval: Evidence from Ohio, 2007-2010. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 12(1), 41–76. doi:10.1080/15700763.2013.766347
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson, S., & Day, C. (2007). The international successful school principalship project (ISSPP). International Studies in Educational Administration, 35(3), 3–10.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. (1977). The Essential Tension. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• *Leithwood, K. (2010). Characteristics of school districts that are exceptionally effective in closing the achievement gap. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 9(3), 245–291. doi:10.1080/15700761003731500
   Google Scholar
• *Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2005). A review of transformational school leadership research, 1996–2005. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4(3), 177–199. doi:10.1080/15700760500244769
   Google Scholar
• Lenoir, T. (1993). The discipline of nature and the nature of disciplines. In E. Messer-Davidow, D. R. Shumway, & D. J. Sylvan (Eds.), Knowledges: Historical and critical studies in disciplinarity (pp. 70–102). Charlottesville, VA: University Press of Virginia.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, J., Vriesenga, M., & Storey, V. (2007). Educational Administration Quarterly, 1979–2003: An analysis of types of work, methods of investigation, and influences. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43(5), 612–628. doi:10.1177/0013161X07307796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Nir, A. E., & Ben-Ami, T. (2005). School-parents relationship in the era of school-based management: Harmony or conflict? Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4(1), 55–72. doi:10.1080/15700760590924627
   Google Scholar
• *Notman, R. (2015). Seismic leadership, hope, and resiliency: Stories of two Christchurch schools post-earthquake. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 14(4), 437–459. doi:10.1080/15700763.2015.1039137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oplatka, I. (2007). The scholarship of educational management: Reflections from the 2006 CCEAM conference. International Studies in Educational Administration, 35(1), 92–104.
   Google Scholar
• Oplatka, I. (2008). The field of educational management: Some intellectual insights from the 2007 BELMAS Conference. Management in Education, 22(3), 4–10. doi:10.1177/0892020608093256
   Google Scholar
• Oplatka, I. (2009). The field of educational administration: An historical overview of scholarly attempts to recognise epistemological identities, meanings and boundaries from 1960s onwards. Journal of Educational Administration, 47(1), 8–35. doi:10.1108/09578230910928061
   Google Scholar
• Oplatka, I. (2010). The legacy of educational administration: A historical analysis of an academic field. Berlin, Germany: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Oplatka, I. (2012). “Fifty years of publication”: Ponderings into the legacies of the Journal of Educational Administration. Journal of Educational Administration, 50(1), 34–56. doi:10.1108/09578231211196050
   Google Scholar
• *Oplatka, I. (2013). The principal’s role in promotion teachers’ extra-role behaviors: Some insights from road-safety education. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 12(4), 420–439. doi:10.1080/15700763.2013.847461
   Google Scholar
• *Papa, F. (2007). Why do principals change schools? A multivariate analysis of principal retention. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 6(3), 267–290. doi:10.1080/15700760701263725
   Google Scholar
• Park, J. (2015). Thematic approach to theoretical speculations in the field of educational administration. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 47(4), 359–371. doi:10.1080/00131857.2014.976929
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Pashiardis, P., & Savvides, V. (2011). The interplay between instructional and entrepreneurial leadership styles in Cyprus rural primary schools. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 10(4), 412–427. doi:10.1080/15700763.2011.610557
   Google Scholar
• Rodgers, R., & Rodgers, N. (2000). Defining the boundaries of public administration: Undisciplined mongrels versus disciplined purists. Public Administration Review, 60(5), 435–445. doi:10.1111/puar.2000.60.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Roellke, C., & Rice, J. K. (2008). Responding to teacher quality and accountability mandates: The perspective of school administrators and classroom teachers. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 7(3), 264–295. doi:10.1080/15700760701822124
   Google Scholar
• *Rutledge, S. A., Harris, D. N., Thompson, C. T., & Ingle, W. K. (2008). Certify, blink, hire: An examination of the process and tools of teacher screening and selection. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 7(3), 237–263. doi:10.1080/15700760701822132
   Google Scholar
• *Scribner, S. P., & Crow, G. M. (2012). Employing professional identities: Case study of a high school principal in a reform setting. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 11(3), 243–274. doi:10.1080/15700763.2012.654885
   Google Scholar
• *Spillane, J. P., & Orlina, E. C. (2005). Investigating leadership practice: Exploring the entailments of taking a distributed perspective. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4(3), 157–176. doi:10.1080/15700760500244728
   Google Scholar
• *Sumbera, M. J., Pazey, B. L., & Lashley, C. (2014). How building principals made sense of free and appropriate public education in the least restrictive environment. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 13(3), 297–333. doi:10.1080/15700763.2014.922995
   Google Scholar
• *Sun, M., & Youngs, P. (2009). How does district principal evaluation affect learning-centered principal leadership? Evidence from Michigan school districts. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 8(4), 411–445. doi:10.1080/15700760902890490
   Google Scholar
• Swafford, G. L. (1990). Window or mirror? A content analysis of the first 25 years of the Journal of Educational Administration. Journal of Educational Administration, 28(1), 5–23. doi:10.1108/09578239010140632
   Google Scholar
• *Szczesiul, S. A., Nehring, J., & Carey, T. (2015). Academic task demand in the 21st-century, high-stakes accountability school: Mapping the journey from poor [to fair to good to great] to excellent? Leadership and Policy in Schools, 14(4), 460–489. doi:10.1080/15700763.2015.1026448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Tekleselassie, A. A., & Vilarreal, P. (2011). Career mobility and departure intentions among school principals in the United States: Incentives and disincentives. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 10(3), 251–293. doi:10.1080/15700763.2011.585536
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, A. R. (2010). Educational leadership as a field of study: Professional journals 1994-2006. In P. Peterson, E. Baker, & B. McGraw (Eds.), International encyclopaedia of education (Vol. 4, pp. 731–739). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• *Watson, T. N., & Bogotch, I. (2015). Reframing parent involvement: What should urban school leaders do differently? Leadership and Policy in Schools, 14(3), 257–278. doi:10.1080/15700763.2015.1024327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Werts, A. B., Sala, M. D., Lindle, J., Horace, J. M., Brewer, C., & Knoeppel, R. (2013). Education stakeholders’ translation and sense-making of accountability policies. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 12(4), 397–419. doi:10.1080/15700763.2013.860464
   Google Scholar
• Whitley, R. (1983). The rise and decline of university disciplines in the sciences. In R. Jurkovich, & J. H. P. Paelinck (Eds.), Problems in interdisciplinary studies (pp. 11–25). Brookfield, VT: Gower.
   Google Scholar
• Whitley, R. (1984). The intellectual and social organisation of the sciences. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• *Winton, S., & Evans, M. P. (2016). Consulting, mediating, conducting, and supporting: How community-based organizations engage with research to influence policy. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 15(1), 4–25. doi:10.1080/15700763.2015.1052522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Ylimaki, R. M., Bennett, J. V., Fan, J., & Villasenor, E. (2012). Notions of “success” In Southern Arizona schools: Principal leadership in changing demographic and border contexts. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 11(2), 168–193. doi:10.1080/15700763.2011.585539
   Google Scholar
• *Young, M. D., & Creighton, T. (2002). Who is framing the national understanding of educational leadership preparation and practice? Leadership and Policy in Schools, 1(3), 222–241. doi:10.1076/lpos.1.3.222.7894
   Google Scholar
• *Zembylas, M., & Iasonos, S. (2016). The entanglement of leadership styles and social justice leadership: A case study from Cyprus. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 15(3), 297–322. doi:10.1080/15700763.2015.1044540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar