Advanced search
Publication Cover
Leadership and Policy in Schools Volume 16, 2017 - Issue 2: Theorizing Educational Leadership Studies, Curriculum, and Didaktik - NonAffirmative Education Theory in Bridging Disparate Fields Guest Editors: Rose M. Ylimaki and Michael Uljens
Submit an article Journal homepage
900
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

School Leadership and Curriculum: German Perspectives

Stephan HuberInstitute for the Management and Economics of Education, University of Teacher Education Zug, Zug, SwitzerlandCorrespondence[email protected]
,
Pierre TulowitzkiLudwigsburg University of Education, Ludwigsburg, Germany
&
Uwe HameyerKiel University, Kiel, Germany
Pages 272-302 | Published online: 30 May 2017

References

  • Baumert, J., Artelt, C., & Klieme, E. (2001). PISA 2000 – Die Länder der Bundesrepublik Deutschland im Vergleich. Zusammenfassung der zentralen Befunde. [PISA 2000 – Summary of the Central Findings of a Comparison of the German ‘Länder’] Berlin: MPIB.
  • Blase, J., & Blase, J. (2003). Handbook of instructional leadership: How successful principals promote teaching and learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  • Böhm-Kasper, O. (2004). Schulische Belastung und Beanspruchung—Eine Untersuchung von Schülern und Lehrern am Gymnasium. [Strain and Stress at School – A Study on Students and Teachers of Grammar Schools] Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
  • Bridges, E. M. (1967). Instructional leadership: A concept re‐examined. Journal of Educational Administration, 5(2), 136–147. doi:10.1108/eb009614
  • Bryk, A. S. (2010). Organizing schools for improvement. Phi Delta Kappan, 91(7), 23. doi:10.1177/003172171009100705
  • Bryk, A. S., Sebring, P. B., Allensworth, E., Luppescu, S., & Easton, J. Q. (2010). Organizing Schools for Improvement. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Coleman, J. S., Campbell, E. Q., Hobson, C. J., McPartland, J., Mood, A. M., Weinfeld, F. D., & York, R. L. (1966). Equality of Educational Opportunity. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Helath, Education, and Welfare, Office of Education/National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED012275.pdf
  • Dolch, J. (1971). Lehrplan des Abendlandes. Zweieinhalb Jahrtausende seiner Geschichte (3rd ed.). [Curriculum of the occident. Two and a half thousand years of its history] Ratingen, Germany: Henn.
  • Easley, J., II, & Tulowitzki, P. (Eds.). (2016). Educational Accountability: International perspectives on challenges and possibilities for school leadership. London, UK: Routledge.
  • Edmonds, R. (1979). Effective schools for the urban poor. Educational Leadership, 37(1), 15–18, 20.
  • Elbers, D. (1973). Curriculumreformen in den USA : Ein Bericht über theoretische Ansätze und praktische Reformverfahren mit einer Dokumentation über Entwicklungsprojekte. (Vol. 28). [Curriculum reforms in the USA: Report on theoretical approaches and practical reform measures with a documentation of development projects] Berlin, Germany: Max-Planck-Institut für Bildungsforschung.
  • Faas, D. (2011). The nation, Europe, and migration: A comparison of geography, history, and citizenship education curricula in Greece, Germany, and England. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43(4), 471–492. doi:10.1080/00220272.2011.584560
  • Fidler, B. (1997). School leadership: Some key ideas. School Leadership & Management, 17(1), 23–38. doi:10.1080/13632439770140
  • Flechsig, K.-H., & Haller, H.-D. (1973). Entscheidungsprozesse in der Curriculumentwicklung (Vol. 24). [Decision making processes in curriculum development] Stuttgart, Germany: Klett.
  • Frey, K. (1971). Theorien des Curriculums. [Curriculum theories] Weinheim, Germany: Beltz.
  • Goodlad, J. I. (1960). Curriculum: The state of the field. Review of Educational Research, 30(3), 185. doi:10.2307/1169277
  • Hallinger, P. (2003). Leading educational change: Reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33(3), 329–351. doi:10.1080/0305764032000122005
  • Hallinger, P. (2005). Instructional leadership and the school principal: A passing fancy that refuses to fade away. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4(3), 221–239. doi:10.1080/15700760500244793
  • Hallinger, P. (2010). A review of three decades of doctoral studies using the Principal Instructional Management rating scale: A lens on methodological progress in educational leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47(2), 271–306. doi:10.1177/0013161x10383412
  • Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. F. (1986). The social context of effective schools. American Journal of Education, 328–355. doi:10.1086/443853
  • Hallinger, P., & Wang, W.-C. (2015). Assessing instructional leadership with the principal instructional management rating scale. London, UK: Springer.
  • Hameyer, U. (1978). Innovationsprozesse: Analysemodell und Fallstudien zum sozialen Konflikt in der Curriculumrevision. [Innovation processes: Models of analysis and case studies of social conflicts of curriculum revisions] Weinheim, Germany: Beltz.
  • Hameyer, U. (2006). School improvement in Germany: Current state and outlook. In J. Chi-Kin Lee & M. Williams (Eds.), School improvement: International perspectives (pp. 361–378). New York, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
  • Hameyer, U. (2007). Transforming domain knowledge: A systemic view at the school curriculum. Curriculum Journal, 18(4), 411–427. doi:10.1080/09585170701688744
  • Hameyer, U. (2010). Transforming the school curriculum in Germany. In H. E. Law & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Schools as curriculum agencies: Asian and European perspectives on school-based curriculum development (pp. 217–238). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
  • Hameyer, U., Frey, K., & Haft, H. (Eds.). (1983). Handbuch der Curriculumforschung. [Handbook on curriculum research] Weinheim, Germany: Beltz.
  • Hameyer, U., Köller, O., & Behr, U. (2010). Kompetent werden. [How to become competent] Bad Berka, Germany: Thillm.
  • Hameyer, U., & Tulowitzki, P. (2013). Reflecting curriculum trends in Germany: A conceptual framework for analysis. In W. Kuiper & J. Berkvens (Eds.), Balancing curriculum regulation and freedom across Europe (pp. 81–98). Enschede, The Netherlands: SLO.
  • Handelzalts, A. (2009). Collaborative curriculum development in teacher design teams. Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente.
  • Heidegger, G., & Petersen, W. (2005). Quality through self-evaluation and development. In W. Petersen, G. Heidegger, & B. Niemeyer (Eds.), Re-Integration (pp. 94–123). Norderstedt, Germany: GRIN Verlag.
  • Hentig, H. (1985). Die Menschen stärken, die Sachen klären : Ein Plädoyer für die Wiederherstellung der Aufklärung. [Making students stronger and subject topics clearer: An appeal to rebuild the Age of Enlightenment] Stuttgart, Germany: Philipp Reclam jun.
  • Hentig, H. (1993). Die Schule neu denken : Eine Übung in praktischer Vernunft : Eine zornige, aber nicht eifernde, eine radikale, aber nicht utopische Antwort auf Hoyerswerda und Mölln, Rostock und Solingen. [Rethinking school: An exercise in practical reason] München, Germany: Hanser.
  • Hentig, H. (1996). Bildung : Ein Essay (7. edition 2007). [Bildung: An essay] Beltz, Germany: Weinheim.
  • Hopmann, S. (2015). “Didaktik meets Curriculum” revisited: Historical encounters, systematic experience, empirical limits. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 1(0). doi:10.3402/nstep.v1.27007
  • Hörner, W., & Waterkamp, D. (Eds.). (1981). Curriculumentwicklung im internationalen Vergleich. [International comparison of curriculum development] Weinheim, Germany: Beltz.
  • Horng, E. L., Klasik, D., & Loeb, S. (2010). Principal’s time use and school effectiveness. American Journal of Education, 116(4), 491–523. doi:10.1086/653625
  • Huber, S. G. (Ed.). (2012). Jahrbuch Schulleitung 2012. Befunde und Impulse zu den Handlungsfeldern des Schulmanagements. [Yearbook school leadership 2012] Köln, Germany: Carl Link.
  • Huber, S. G. (2013a). Forschung zu Belastung und Beanspruchung von Schulleitung. In S. G. Huber (Ed.), Jahrbuch Schulleitung 2013. Befunde und Impulse zu den Handlungsfeldern des Schulmanagements (pp. 222–240). [Research into strain and stress of school leaders] Köln, Germany: Wolters Kluwer Deutschland.
  • Huber, S. G. (2013b). Schulleitung heute: Zwischen Begeisterung und Belastung? In Allgemeiner Schulleitungsverband Deutschlands (eds.) b: Sl Beruf Schulleitung. [School leadership of today: Caught between enthusiasm and strain] Berlin, Germany.
  • Huber, S. G. (2013c). Handbuch Führungskräfteentwicklung. Grundlagen und Handreichungen zur Qualifizierung und Personalentwicklung im Schulsystem. [Handbook leadership development. knowledge base and guidance for qualification and personnel development in the school system] Köln, Germany: Carl Link.
  • Huber, S. G. (2016a). Germany: The School Leadership Research Base in Germany. In H. Ärlestig, C. Day, & O. Johansson (Eds.), A decade of research on school principals (pp. 375–402). Basel, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-23027-6_18
  • Huber, S. G. (2017). Schulleitung – Forschung in den deutschsprachigen Ländern: Belastungs und Beanspruchungserleben im Schulleitungshandeln. [School leadership - Research in the German-speaking countries: Experiences of strain and stress in school leadership] Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
  • Huber, S. G. (Ed.). (2016b). Steuergruppenhandbuch. Grundlagen für die Arbeit in zentralen Handlungsfeldern des Schulmanagements (4th ed.). [Handbook for steering groups. Knowledge base for their work in central fields of school management] Köln, Germany: Link-Luchterhand.
  • Huber, S. G., Gördel, B.-M., Kilic, S., & Tulowitzki, P. (2016). Accountability in the German school system. In J. Easley II, & P. Tulowitzki (Eds.), Educational Accountability: International perspectives on challenges and possibilities for school leadership (pp. 165–183). London, UK: Routledge.
  • Huber, S.G. & Muijs, D. (2010). School leadership effectiveness. The growing insight in the importance of school leadership for the quality and development of schools and their pupils. In S.G. Huber (Ed.), School leadership - international perspectives (S. 57–78). Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Huber, S. G., Schneider, N., Gleibs, H. E., & Schwander, M. (2012). Leadership in der Lehrerbildung: Entwicklung von Kompetenzen für pädagogische Führung. [Leadership in teacher education: The development of competences for educational leadership] Stiftung der deutschen Wirtschaft.
  • Huber, S. G., & Schwander, M. (2013). Arbeitstagebuch: Wie verteilt sich die Arbeit von Schulleitungen? [End-of-day log: How is school leaders’ work distributed?] b:sl Beruf Schulleitung. Allgemeiner Schulleitungsverband Deutschlands e.V. (ASD) (Ed.)
  • Huber, S. G., & Wolfgramm, C. (2013a). Das Kollegium als soziale Ressource. [Staff as social resource] b:sl Beruf Schulleitung. Allgemeiner Schulleitungsverband Deutschlands e.V. (ASD) (Ed./Hrsg.).
  • Huber, S. G., & Wolfgramm, C. (2013b). Was bedingt Unzufriedenheit und hohe Belastung? [Conditions for work dissatisfaction and high strain] b:sl Beruf Schulleitung. Allgemeiner Schulleitungsverband Deutschlands e.V. (ASD) (Ed./Hrsg.)
  • Huber, S. G., Wolfgramm, C., & Kilic, S. (2013a). Vorlieben und Belastungen im Schulleitungshandeln: Ausgewählte Ergebnisse aus der Schulleitungsstudie 2011/2012 in Deutschland, Österreich, Liechtenstein und der Schweiz. [Preferences and strain in school leadership: Selected findings of the school leadership study 2011/2012 in Germany, Austria, Liechtenstein and Switzerland] In S. G. Huber (Ed.), Jahrbuch Schulleitung 2013. Befunde und Impulse zu den Handlungsfeldern des Schulmanagements (pp. 259–271). Köln, Germany: Wolters Kluwer Deutschland.
  • Huber, S. G., Wolfgramm, C., & Kilic, S. (2013b). Tätigkeitsvorlieben. [Preferences of activities] b:sl Beruf Schulleitung. Allgemeiner Schulleitungsverband Deutschlands e.V. (ASD) (Ed./Hrsg.)
  • Huber, S.G., Wolfgramm, C., & Kilic, S. (2014). Soziale Beziehungen als Ressourcen und Stressoren im Schulleitungsalltag. Empirische Ergebnisse der Schulleitungsstudie 2012 in Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz. In H. Buchen, L. Horster & H.-G. Rolff (Ed./Hrsg.), Schulleitung und Schulentwcklung [School Leadership and School Development], A 3.6, S. 1–17. Stuttgart: Raabe.
  • Jackson, D. & West, M. (1999). Learning through leading: Leading through learning. Leadership for sustained school improvement. Paper presented at the International Congress for School Effectiveness and Improvement 1999, San Antonio, Texas.
  • Kelly, A. V. (2009). The Curriculum: Theory and practice (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
  • Kerr, J. F. (1968). Changing the curriculum. London, UK: University of London Press.
  • Klumpp, L., Pont, B., Figueroa, D. T., Albiser, E., Wittenberg, D., Zapata, J., & Fraccola, S. (2014). Education policy outlook Germany. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
  • Kmetz, J. T., & Willower, D. J. (1982). Elementary school principals’ work behavior. Educational Administration Quarterly, 18(4), 62–78. doi:10.1177/0013161X82018004006
  • Kultusministerkonferenz KMK. (1997). 280. Sitzung der Kultusministerkonferenz. Konstanzer Beschluss zur Durchführung länderübergreifender Vergleichsuntersuchungen zum Lernund Leistungsstand von Schülerinnen undSchülern. [Agreement on the Conduction of Comparative Testing of Pupil Achievement among the Länder] Konstanz. October, 23, 24.
  • Kultusministerkonferenz KMK (2001a). Weiterentwicklung des Schulwesens in Deutschland seit Abschluss des Abkommens zwischen den Ländern der Bundesrepublik zur Vereinheitlichung auf dem Gebiet des Schulewesens vom 28.10.1964 i.d.F. vom 14.10. 1971.[Development of the Education System in Germany Since 1971] Bonn. May, 10.
  • Kultusministerkonferenz KMK (2001b). 296. Sitzung der Kultusministerkonferenz. Definition von sieben vorrangigen Handlungsfeldern als Konsequenz aus PISA. [Definition of Seven Relevant Fields of Action as Consequence of PISA] Bonn. December, 5, 6.
  • Kultusministerkonferenz KMK (2002a). Bildungsstandards zur Sicherung von Qualität und Innovation im föderalen Wettbewerb der Länder. [Educational Standards to Assure Quality and Innovation in the Federal Competition of the Länder] Bonn. May, 23, 24.
  • Kultusministerkonferenz KMK (2002b). Bewertung der bundesinternen Leistungsvergleiche (PISA-E). [Assessment of the Comparison of the PISA Results of the German Länder] Berlin. June, 25.
  • Krug, S. E. (1992). Instructional leadership: A constructivist perspective. Educational Administration Quarterly, 28(3), 430–443. doi:10.1177/0013161X92028003012
  • Kuper, H. (2008). Entscheiden und Kommunizieren Eine Skizze zum Wandel schulischer Leitungs-und Partizipationsstrukturen und den Konsequenzen für die Lehrerprofessionalität. [Deciding and communicating. On the changes in structures of leadership and participation in schools and the consequences for teachers professionalization] In W. Helsper, S. Busse, M. Hummrich, R.-T. Kramer (Eds.), Pädagogische professionalität in organisationen (pp. 149–162). Berlin: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-531-90777-2_8
  • Lee, J. C.-K., & Dimmock, C. (1999). Curriculum leadership and management in secondary schools: A Hong Kong case study. School Leadership & Management, 19(4), 455–481. doi:10.1080/13632439968970
  • Leithwood, K., Begley, P. T., & Cousins, J. B. (1990). The nature, causes and consequences of principals’ practices: An agenda for future research. Journal of Educational Administration, 28(4). doi:10.1108/09578239010001014
  • Leithwood, K., Jantzi, D., & Steinbach, R. (1999). Changing leadership for changing times. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
  • Liebel, H. (1992). Psychologie der Mitarbeiterführung. [The psychology of leading staff] In E. Gabele, W. Oechsler, & H. Liebel (Eds.), Führungsgrundsätze und Mitarbeiterführung: Probleme erkennen und lösen (pp. 109–161). Wiesbaden, Germany: Gabler.
  • Martin, W. J., & Willower, D. J. (1981). The managerial behavior of high school principals. Educational Administration Quarterly, 17(1), 69–90. doi:10.1177/0013161X8101700105
  • Maurer, H. (2006). Allgemeines Verwaltungsrecht (16th ed.). [General administrative law] München, Germany: C. H. Beck.
  • Meyer, H. (1972). Einführung in die curriculum-Methodologie. [Introduction to the methodology of curriculum] München, Germany: Kösel.
  • Morgan, G. (2006). Images of organization (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Neumann, K., Fischer, H. E., & Kauertz, A. (2010). From PISA to educational standards: The impact of large-scale assessments on science education in Germany. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(3), 545–563. doi:10.1007/s10763-010-9206-7
  • Oelkers, J. (1983). Kodifizierte Bestimmungsfaktoren curricularer Lernereignisse: Bildungskonzeptionen. [Codified defining factors of curricular learning: Conceptions of Bildung] In U. Hameyer, K. Frey, & H. Haft (Eds.), Handbuch der Curriculumforschung (pp. 361–372). Weinheim, Germany: Beltz.
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2009). Creating effective teaching and learning environments : First results from TALIS. Paris, France: OECD.
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2013). PISA 2012 results: What makes schools successful (Vol. IV). Paris, France: OECD.
  • Paulsen, F. (1892). Einleitung in die Philosophie. [Introduction to philosophy] Berlin, Germany: Hertz.
  • Paulsen, F. (1896a). Geschichte des gelehrten Unterrichts auf den deutschen Schulen und Universitäten vom Ausgang des Mittelalters bis zur Gegenwart. Mit besonderer Rücksicht auf den klassischen Unterricht. Band 2 (3rd ed.). [The history of academic instruction in German schools and universities from the Late Middle Ages to the present] Leipzig, Germany: Walter de Gruyter & Co.
  • Paulsen, F. (1896b). Geschichte des gelehrten Unterrichts: Erster band (3rd ed.). [The history of academic instruction] Leipzig, Germany: Veit & Comp. (Republished in 2009).
  • Pinar, W. F. (2004). What is curriculum theory? Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
  • Pinar, W. F. (2011). The character of curriculum studies: Bildung, currere, and the recurring question of the subject. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Portelli, J. P. (1987). On defining curriculum. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 2(4), 354–367.
  • Robinson, V. M. J., Lloyd, C. A., & Rowe, K. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635–674. doi:10.1177/0013161X08321509
  • Rolff, H.-G., Rhinow, E., & Röhrich, T. (Eds.). (2009). Unterrichtsentwicklung - eine Kernaufgabe der Schule: Die Rolle der Schulleitung für besseres Lernen. Köln, Germany: LinkLuchterhand.
  • Rosenbusch, H. S. (1997). Organisationspädagogische perspektiven einer reform der schulorganisation. [Organizational educational perspectives of a reform of school organization] SchulVerwaltung, 10, 329–334.
  • Rosenbusch, H. S. (2005). Organisationspädagogik. [Organizational education] München, Germany: Wolters Kluwer.
  • Roth, H. (1968). Stimmen die deutschen Lehrpläne noch? [Are the German curricula still up-to-date?] Die Deutsche Schule, 60(2), 69–76.
  • Rutter, M. (1979). Fifteen thousand hours: Secondary schools and their effects on children. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Seashore Louis, K., Dretzke, B., & Wahlstrom, K. (2010). How does leadership affect student achievement? Results from a national US survey. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 21(3), 315–336. doi:10.1080/09243453.2010.486586
  • Schümer, G., Tillmann, K.-J., & Weiß, M. (eds) (2004). Die Institution Schule und die Lebenswelt der Schüler. Vertiefende Analysen der PISA-2000-Daten zum Kontext von Schülerleistungen. [Analysis of the PISA-2000 Data] Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
  • Skilbeck, M. (1998). School-based curriculum development. In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan, & D. Hopkins (Eds.), International handbook of educational change (pp. 121–144). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Sorkin, D. (1983). Wilhelm Von Humboldt: The theory and practice of self-formation (Bildung), 1791–1810. Journal of the History of Ideas, 44(1), 55. doi:10.2307/2709304
  • Southworth, G. (2002). Instructional leadership in schools: Reflections and empirical evidence. School Leadership & Management, 22(1), 73–91. doi:10.1080/13632430220143042
  • Spillane, J. P., & Hunt, B. (2010). Days of their lives: A mixed-methods, descriptive analysis of the men and women at work in the principal’s office. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 42(3), 293–331. doi:10.1080/00220270903527623
  • Taba, H. (1962). Curriculum development: Theory and practice. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace & World.
  • Tenorth, H.-E. (Ed.). (1986). Allgemeine Bildung. Analysen zu ihrer Wirklichkeit, Versuche über ihre Zukunft. [General Bildung. Analysis of its reality, visions of its future] München, Germany: Juventa.
  • Tenorth, H.-E. (2001). Kerncurriculum Oberstufe (2nd ed.). [Core curriculum] Beltz, Germany: Weinheim.
  • Tenorth, H.-E. (2004). Kerncurriculum Oberstufe II. [Core curriculum sec II] Weinheim, Germany: Beltz.
  • Toombs, W. E., & Tierney, W. G. (1993). Curriculum definitions and reference points. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 8(3), 175–195.
  • Tulowitzki, P. (2013). Leadership and school improvement in France. Journal of Educational Administration, 51(6), 812–835. doi:10.1108/JEA-03-2012-0026
  • Tulowitzki, P. (2015). The development of educational leadership and teaching professions in Germany. ECPS—Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies, (11), 45–55. doi:10.7358/ecps-2015-011-tulo
  • Uljens, M., & Ylimaki, R. (2015). Towards a discursive and non-affirmative framework for curriculum studies, Didaktik and educational leadership. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 1(0). doi:10.3402/nstep.v1.30177
  • van den Akker, J. (2004). Curriculum perspectives: An introduction. In J. van den Acker, W. Kuiper, U. Hameyer (Eds.), Curriculum landscapes and trends (pp. 1–10). Dordrecht, TheNetherlands: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-017-1205-7_1
  • van den Akker, J. (2010). Building bridges: How research may improve curriculum policies and classroom practices. In S. M. Stoney (Ed.), Beyond Lisbon 2010: Perspectives from research and development for education policy in Europe (CIDREE Yearbook 2010) (pp. 175–196). Slough, UK: NFER.
  • Weniger, E. (1971). Theorie der Bildungsinhalte (Didaktik als Bildungslehre. Teil 1) (9th ed.). [Theory of the contents of Bildung] Beltz, Germany: Weinheim.
  • Weniger, E. (1975). Theorie der Bildungsinhalte und des Lehrplans. In E. Weniger (Ed.), Ausgewählte Schriften zur geisteswissenschaftlichen Pädagogik (pp. 199–294). [Theory of the contents of Bildung and of curriculum] Weinheim, Germany: Beltz.
  • Wildy, H., & Dimmock, C. (1993). Instructional leadership in primary and secondary schools in Western Australia. Journal of Educational Administration, 31(2). doi:10.1108/09578239310041873
  • Wiles, J. (2008). Leading curriculum development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  • Wunderer, R., & Grunwald, W. (1980). Führungslehre. Band II: Kooperative Führung. [Leadership studies. Vol. II: Cooperative leadership] Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.