Principals’ Instructional Feedback Practices During Race to the Top

References

• Arlestig, H. (2008). Structural prerequisites for principals’ and teachers’ communication about teaching and learning issues. Improving Schools, 11(3), 189–2013. doi:10.1177/1365480208097000
   Google Scholar
• Blase, J., & Blase, J. (1999). Principals’ instructional leadership and teacher development: Teachers’ perspectives. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(3), 349–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blase, J., & Blase, J. (2004). Handbook of instructional leadership. How successful principals promote teaching and learning (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bredeson, P. V., & Johannsson, O. (2000). The school principal’s role in teacher professional development. Journal of In-Service Education, 26(2), 385–401. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13674580000200114
   Google Scholar
• Carraway, J. H., & Young, T. (2015). Implementation of a districtwide policy to improve principals’ instructional leadership: Principals’ sensemaking of the skillful observation and coaching laboratory. Educational Policy, 29(1), 230–256doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0895904814564216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coggshall, J.G., Rasmussen, C., Colton, A., Milton, J., & Jacques, C. (2012). Generating teaching effectiveness: The role of job-embedded professional learning in teacher education. Washington, DC: National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Chief State School Officers. (2016). Principles for teacher support and evaluation systems. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Danielson, C. (2011). Framework for teaching: 2011 (revised ed.). Princeton, NJ: The Danielson Group, LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Danielson, C. (2016). Charlotte Danielson on rethinking teacher evaluation. Education Week, 35(28), 20–24.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., Cook, C., Jaquith, A., & Hamilton, M. (2012). Creating a comprehensive system for evaluating and supporting effective teaching. Stanford, CA: Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Day, C., Gu, Q., & Sammons, P. (2016). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: How successful school leaders use transformational and instructional strategies to make a difference. Educational Administration Quarterly, 53(2), 221–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X15616863
   Google Scholar
• DiPaola, M., & Hoy, W. (2014). Improving instruction through supervision, evaluation, and professional development. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Doby-Holmes, L. (2011). Instructional coaching in elementary schools: Perceptions of principals, instructional coaches, and teachers. Doctoral dissertation. Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, Georgia.
   Google Scholar
• Drago-Severson, E., & Blum-DeStefano, J. (2014). Tell me so I can hear: A developmental approach to feedback and collaboration. Journal of Staff Development, 35(6), 16–22.
   Google Scholar
• Feeney, E. J. (2007). Quality feedback: The essential ingredient for teacher success. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 80(4), 191–198. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/TCHS.80.4.191-198
   Google Scholar
• Fishman, B. J., Marx, R. W., Best, S., & Tal, R. T. (2003). Linking teacher and student learning to improve professional development in systemic reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(6), 643–658. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(03)00059-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garza, R., Ovando, M., & O’Doherty, A. (2016). Aspiring school leaders’ perceptions of walkthrough observations. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 11(1), 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Glanz, J. (2005). Action research as instructional supervision: Suggestions for principals. NASSP Bulletin, 89 (643), 17–27.
   Google Scholar
• Glickman, C. D., Gordon, S. P., & Ross-Gordon, J. M. (2010). SuperVision and instructional leadership: A developmental approach (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Goddard, R., Goddard, Y., Kim, E. S., & Miller, R. (2015). A theoretical and empirical analysis of the roles of instructional leadership, teacher collaboration, and collective efficacy beliefs in support of student learning. American Journal of Education, 121(4), 501–530. doi:10.1086/681925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goe, L., Biggers, K., & Croft, A. (2012). Linking teacher evaluation to professional development: Focusing on improving teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality.
   Google Scholar
• Goldring, E., Grissom, J. A., Rubin, M., Neumerski, C. M., Cannata, M., Drake, T., & Schuermann, P. (2015). Make room value added: Principals’ human capital decisions and the emergence of teacher observation data. Educational Researcher, 44(2), 96–104. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0013189X15575031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grissom, J. A., Loeb, S., & Master, B. (2013). Effective instructional time use for school leaders: Longitudinal evidence from observations of principals. Educational Researcher, 42(8), 433–444. doi:10.3102/0013189X13510020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, P. L., & Stodolsky, S. S. (1995). Content as context: The role of school subjects in secondary school teaching. Educational Researcher, 24(5), 5–23. doi:10.3102/0013189X024008005
   Google Scholar
• Halverson, R., Kelley, C., & Kimball, S. (2004). Implementing teacher evaluation systems: How principals make sense of complex artifacts to shape local instructional practice. In W. Hoy, & C. G. Miskel (Eds.), Educational administration, policy, and reform: Research and measurement (pp. 153–188). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. doi:10.3102/003465430298487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, H. C., & Grossman, P. (2013). Learning from teacher observations: Challenges and opportunities posed by new teacher evaluation systems. Harvard Educational Review, 83(2), 371–384. doi:10.17763/haer.83.2.d11511403715u376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitt, D. H., & Tucker, P. D. (2016). Systematic review of key leader practices found to influence student achievement: A unified framework. Review of Educational Research, 86(2), 531–569. doi:10.3102/0034654315614911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochberg, E. D., & Desimone, L. M. (2010). Professional development in the accountability context: Building capacity to achieve standards. Educational Psychologist, 45(2), 89–106. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461521003703052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins, M., Spillane, J. P., Jakopvic, P., & Heaton, R. M. (2013). Infrastructure redesign and instructional reform in mathematics. The Elementary School Journal, 114(2), 200–224. doi:10.1086/671935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, C. K., & Bruegmann, E. (2009). Teaching students and teaching each other: The importance of peer learning for teachers. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 1(4), 85–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kersten, T. A., & Israel, M. S. (2005). Teacher evaluation: Principals’ insights and suggestions for improvement. Planning and Changing, 36(1/2), 47–67.
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2008). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. School Leadership and Management, 28(1), 27–42. doi:10.1080/13632430701800060
   Google Scholar
• Lochmiller, C. R. (2016). Examining administrators’ instructional feedback to high school math and science teachers. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52(1), 75–109. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013161X15616660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makkonen, R., Tejwani, J., & Venkateswaran, N. (2016). How are teacher evaluation data used in five Arizona districts? (REL 2016-142). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Educational Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Education Laboratory West. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs
   Google Scholar
• Mandinach, E. B. (2012). A perfect time for data use: Using data-driven decision making to inform practice. Educational Psychologist, 47(2), 71–85. doi:10.1080/00461520.2012.667064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, K. (2005). It’s time to rethink teacher supervision and evaluation. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(10), 727–735. doi:10.1177/003172170508601004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maslow, V. J., & Kelley, C. J. (2012). Does evaluation advance teaching practice? The effects of performance evaluation on teaching quality and system change in large diverse high schools. Journal of School Leadership, 22(3), 600–632.
   Google Scholar
• May, H., & Supovitz, J. A. (2011). The scope of principal efforts to improve instruction. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47(2), 332–352. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013161X10383411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumerski, C. M. (2012). Rethinking instructional leadership, a review: What do we know about principal, teacher, and coach instructional leadership, and where should we go from here? Educational Administration Quarterly, 49(2), 310–347. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013161X12456700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ovando, M. N., & Ramirez, J. A. (2007). Principals’ instructional leadership within a teacher performance appraisal system: Enhancing students’ academic success. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 20, 85–110. doi:10.1007/s11092-007-9048-1
   Google Scholar
• Ovando, M.N. (2005). Building instructional leaders’ capacity to deliver constructive feedback to teachers. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 18, 171–183. doi: 10.1007/s11092-006-9018-z
   Google Scholar
• Papay, J. P. (2012). Refocusing the debate: Assessing the purposes and tools of teacher evaluation. Harvard Educational Review, 82(1), 123–141. doi:10.17763/haer.82.1.v40p0833345w6384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pont, B., Nusche, D., & Moorman, H. (2008). Improving school leadership. Volume 1: Policy and practice. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Paris, France: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/edu/school/44374889.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Range, B. G., McKim, C., Mette, I. M., & Hvidston, D. J. (2014). Aspiring principals’ practices about teacher supervision and evaluation: Insights for educational leadership preparation programs. Education Leadership Review, 15(1), 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Range, B. G., Schertz, S., Holt, C. R., & Young, S. (2011). Supervision and evaluation: The Wyoming perspective. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 23(3), 243–265. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11092-011-9123-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigby, J. G. (2014). Three logics of instructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 50(4), 610–644. doi:10.1177/0013161X13509379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigby, J. G. (2015). Principals’ sensemaking and enactment of teacher evaluation. Journal of Educational Administration, 53(3), 374–392. doi:10.1108/JEA-04-2014-0051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigby, J. G., Larbi-Cherif, A., Rosenquist, B. A., Sharpe, C. J., Cobb, P., & Smith, T. (2017). Administrator observation and feedback: Does it lead toward improvement in inquiry-oriented math instruction. Educational Administration Quarterly, 53(3), 1–42. doi:10.1177/0013161X16687006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinke, C., & Valli, L. (2010). Making adequate yearly progress: Teacher learning in school-based accountability contexts. Teachers College Record, 112(3), 645–684. http://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentId=15771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sebastian, J., & Allensworth, E. (2012). The influence of principal leadership on classroom instruction and student learning a study of mediated pathways to learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(4), 626–663. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013161X11436273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver Strong and Associates. (2011). The thoughtful classroom teacher effectiveness framework. Retrieved from www.ThoughfulClassroom.com
   Google Scholar
• Siskin, L. S. (1991). Departments as different worlds: Subject subcultures in secondary schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 27(2), 134–160. doi:10.1177/0013161X91027002003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sisman, M. (2016). Factors related to instructional leadership perception and effect of instructional leadership on organizational values: A meta-analysis. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 16(5), 1761–1787. doi:10.12738/estp.2016.5.0172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P. (2015). Managing instructional quality and leading instructional improvement: Engaging with the essence of school improvement. The Australian Educational Leader, 37(1), 22–26.
   Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P. (2005). Primary school leadership practice: How the subject matters. School Leadership and Management, 25(4), 383397. doi:10.1080/13634230500197231
   Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P., & Hopkins, H. (2013). Organizing for instruction in education systems and school organizations: How the subject matters. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45(6), 721–747. doi:10.1080/00220272.2013.810783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P., Hopkins, M., & Sweet, T. M. (2015). Intra- and interschool interactions about instruction: Exploring the conditions for social capital development. American Journal of Education, 122, 71–110. doi:10.1086/683292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein, M. K., & Nelson, B. S. (2003). Leadership content knowledge. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(4), 423–448. doi:10.3102/01623737025004423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, D.A. (2013). Principals’ post-observation feedback and its influence on teacher professional growth at two southern California Catholic high schools (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Pepperdine University, Malibu, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, S., & Glanz, J. (2013). Supervision that improves teaching and learning: Strategies and techniques (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Teacher Practice Rubric. (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. J., & Bogdan, R. (1998). Introduction to qualitative research methods: A guidebook and resource (3rd ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Tuytens, M., & Devos, G. (2011). Stimulating professional learning through teacher evaluation: An impossible task for the school leader? Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(5), 891–899. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuytens, M., & Devos, G. (2017). The role of feedback from the school leader during teacher evaluation for teacher and school improvement. Teachers and Teaching, 23(1), 6–24. doi:10.1080/13540602.2016.1203770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States Department of Education. (2009). Race to the top program executive summary. Washington, DC:
   Google Scholar
• Wayne, M. (2011). Visiting classrooms: A design study to support principals’ instructional leadership. Doctoral dissertation. University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California.
   Google Scholar
• Wieczorek, D., & Theoharis, G. (2015). “We’re going to make lemonade out of lemons”: Urban principals, emotion, and Race to the Top implementation. NASSP Bulletin, 99(4),281–303.
   Google Scholar
• Wieczorek, D., Clark, B., & Theoharis, G. (under review). Principals’ perspectives of a Race to the Top-style teacher evaluation system.
   Google Scholar
• Young, S., Range, B. G., Hvidston, D., & Mette, I. M. (2015). Teacher evaluation reform: Principals’ beliefs about newly adopted teacher evaluation systems. Planning and Changing, 46(1–2), 158–174.
   Google Scholar