1,042
Views
20
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

School Middle Leaders’ Sense Making of a Generally Outlined Education Reform

&

References

  • Addonizio, M. F., & Kearney, C. P. (2012). Education reform and the limits of policy: Lessons from Michigan. Kalamazoo, MI: W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
  • Allen, C. D., & Penuel, W. R. (2015). Studying teachers’ sense-making to investigate teachers’ responses to professional development focused on new standards. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(2), 136–149. doi:10.1177/0022487114560646
  • Ancona, D. (2012). Sense-making: Framing and acting in the unknown. In S. Snook, N. Nohria, & R. Khurana (Eds.), The handbook for teaching leadership: Knowing, doing, and being (pp. 3–19). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Schechter, C. (2006). Doubting schoolwork: Exploring an emerging concept. Teachers College Record, 108(12), 2517–2539.
  • Shaked, H.,* & Schechter, C. (2017). School principals as mediating agents in education reforms. School Leadership and Management, 37(1&2), 19–37.
  • Ball, S. J., Maguire, M., & Braun, A. (2012). How schools do policy: Policy enactment in secondary schools. London, UK: Routledge.
  • BenDavid-Hadar, I. (2016). School finance policy and social justice. International Journal of Educational Development, 46, 166–174. doi:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2015.10.003
  • Bennett, N., Newton, W., Wise, C., Woods, P. A., & Eonomou, A. (2003). The role and purpose of middle leaders in schools. Nottingham, UK: National College of School Leadership.
  • Berkovich, I. (2011). No we won’t! Teachers’ resistance to educational reform. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(5), 563–578. doi:10.1108/09578231111159548
  • Birkland, T. (2010). An introduction to the policy process: Theories, concepts, and models of public policy making (3rd ed.). New York, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
  • Bogotch, I. E. (2014). Autonomy and accountability: The power/knowledge knot. School Leadership and Management, 34(4), 317–323. doi:10.1080/13632434.2014.943173
  • Briggs, A. R. J. (2007). Exploring professional identities: Middle leadership in further education colleges. School Leadership & Management, 27(5), 471–485. doi:10.1080/13632430701606152
  • Brooks, Z., & Cavanagh, R. (2009). An examination of middle leadership in western Australian secondary schools. In P. L. Jeffery (Ed.), International Research in Education Conference: Creating global networks—A capital idea (pp. 1–14). Canberra, Australia: AARE.
  • Brown, M., Rutherford, D., & Boyle, B. (2000). Leadership for school improvement: The role of the head of department in UK secondary schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 11(2), 237–258. doi:10.1076/0924-3453(200006)11:2;1-Q;FT237
  • Bryk, A. S., Sebring, P. B., Allensworth, E., Luppescu, S., & Easton, J. Q. (2010). Organizing schools for improvement: Lessons from Chicago. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Coburn, C. E. (2003). Rethinking scale: Moving beyond numbers to deep and lasting change. Educational Researcher, 32(5), 3–12. doi:10.3102/0013189X032006003
  • Coburn, C. E. (2006). Framing the problem of reading instruction: Using frame analysis to uncover the micro processes of policy implementation. American Educational Research Journal, 43(3), 343–379. doi:10.3102/00028312043003343
  • Cornelissen, J. (2012). Sense-making under pressure: The influence of professional roles and social accountability on the creation of sense. Organization Science, 23(1), 118–137. doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0640
  • Crane, A. (2014). Year coordinators as middle-leaders in independent girls’ schools: Their role and accountability. Leading & Managing, 20(1), 80–92.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2014). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Harlow, UK: Pearson.
  • Curtis, R. (2013). Finding a new way: Leveraging teacher leadership to meet unprecedented demands. Washington, DC: The Aspen Institute.
  • Daly, A. J., & Finnigan, K. (2011). The ebb and flow of social network ties between district leaders under high-stakes accountability. American Educational Research Journal, 48(1), 39–79. doi:10.3102/0002831210368990
  • Datnow, A. (2002). Can we transplant educational reform and does it last? Journal of School Change, 3(3–4), 215–239.
  • Diamond, J. B. (2012). Accountability policy, school organization, and classroom practice: Partial recoupling and educational opportunity. Education & Urban Society, 44(2), 151–182. doi:10.1177/0013124511431569
  • Dinham, S. (2007). The secondary head of department and the achievement of exceptional student outcomes. Journal of Educational Administration, 45(1), 62–79. doi:10.1108/09578230710722458
  • Elmore, R. (2004). School reform from the inside out: Policy, practice, and performance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
  • Etherington, K. (2004). Becoming reflexive researchers: Using ourselves in research. London, UK: Jessica Kingley.
  • Fitzgerald, T. (2004). School middle management: The frequently forgotten tier in schools. English in Aotearoa 40, Retrieved from https://englishonline.tki.org.nz/content/download/790/4673/file/School+Middle+Managers.doc
  • Fitzgerald, T., & Gunter, H. (2006). Leading learning: Middle leadership in schools in England and New Zealand. Management in Education, 20(3), 6–8. doi:10.1177/08920206060200030201
  • Fleming, P., & Amesbury, M. (2012). The art of middle management: A guide to effective subject, year and team leadership. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Flessa, J. J. (2012). Principals as middle managers: School leadership during the implementation of primary class size reduction policy in Ontario. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 11(3), 325–343. doi:10.1080/15700763.2012.692429
  • Fletcher-Campbell, F. (2003). Promotion to middle management: Some practitioners’ perceptions. Educational Research, 45(1), 1–15. doi:10.1080/0013188032000086082
  • Gawlik, M. A. (2015). Shared sensemaking: How charter school leaders ascribe meaning to accountability. Journal of Educational Administration, 53(3), 393–415. doi:10.1108/JEA-08-2013-0092
  • Gawlik, M. A. (2013). Extending the leadership role from policy broker to sensemaker: Emerging evidence from charter schools. In B. Barnett, A. R. Shoho, & A. J. Bowers (Eds.), School and district leadership in an era of accountability (pp. 87–108). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
  • Greany, T. (2014). Are we nearly there yet? Progress, issues and possible next steps for a self-improving school system. London, UK: Institute of Education.
  • Greany, T. (2015). The self-improving system in England: A review of evidence and thinking. London, UK: Association of School and College Leaders.
  • Gurr, D., & Drysdale, L. (2013). Middle-level secondary school leaders: Potential, constraints and implications for leadership preparation and development. Journal of Educational Administration, 51(1), 55–71. doi:10.1108/09578231311291431
  • Hammersley-Fletcher, L., & Strain, M. (2011). Power, agency and middle leadership in English primary schools. British Educational Research Journal, 37(5), 871–884. doi:10.1080/01411926.2010.506944
  • Heifetz, R., Grashow, A., & Linsky, M. (2009). The practice of adaptive leadership: Tools and tactics for changing your organization. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
  • Heng, M. A., & Marsh, C. J. (2009). Understanding middle leaders: A closer look at middle leadership in primary schools in Singapore. Educational Studies, 35(5), 525–536. doi:10.1080/03055690902883863
  • Honig, M. I. (2004). Where’s the “up” in bottom-up reform? Educational Policy, 18(4), 527–561. doi:10.1177/0895904804266640
  • Honig, M. I. (2012). District central office leadership as teaching: How central office administrators support principals’ development as instructional leaders. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(4), 733–774. doi:10.1177/0013161X12443258
  • Hopfenbeck, T., Flórez-Petour, M. T., & Tolo, A. (2015). Balancing tensions in educational policy reforms: Large-scale implementation of Assessment for Learning in Norway. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 22(1), 44–60. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2014.996524
  • Israeli Central Bureau of Statistics. (2013). Statistical abstract of Israel 2013 No. 64. Jerusalem, Israel: Author. Retrieved from http://www.cbs.gov.il/reader/shnaton/shnatone_new.htm?CYear=2013&Vol=64&CSubject=30.
  • Israeli Ministry of Education (2014a, August). CEO guidelines: Meaningful learning (Hebrew). Retrieved from http://cms.education.gov.il/EducationCMS/Units/LemidaMashmautit/mashmautit/AvneyDerech.htm
  • Israeli Ministry of Education (2014b, May). Adapting the curriculum of disciplines to the meaningful learning policy: A document for officials in headquarters, districts and educational institutions (Hebrew). Retrieved from http://meyda.education.gov.il/files/AgafA/hahinuch.pdf
  • Jubilee, S. K. (2013). The middle management paradox of the urban high school assistant principal: Making it happen (Doctoral dissertation). Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Kalenze, E. (2014). Education is upside-down: Reframing reform to focus on the right problems. London, UK: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Katzenmeyer, M., & Moller, G. (2009). Awakening the sleeping giant: Helping teachers develop as leaders (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
  • Key, K. (2010). 21st century skills: Why they matter, what they are, and how we can get there. In J. Bellanca & R. Brandt (Eds.), 21st century skills: Rethinking how student learn (pp. xiii–xxxi). Bloomington, In Solutions Tree Press.
  • Kirkham, G. (2005). Leading and achieving a learning school through developing middle leaders. European Journal of Teacher Education, 28(2), 151–163. doi:10.1080/02619760500093180
  • Koelsch, L. E. (2013). Reconceptualizing the member check interview. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 12(1), 168–179. doi:10.1177/160940691301200105
  • Koyama, J. (2014). Principals as bricoleurs: Making sense and making do in an era of accountability. Educational Administration Quarterly, 50(2), 279–304. doi:10.1177/0013161X13492796
  • Kraatz, M. S. (2009). Leadership as institutional work: A bridge to the other side. In T. B. Lawrence, R. Suddaby, & B. Leca (Eds.), Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations (pp. 59–91). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Leaders, N. (2013). Change agents: How state can develop effective school leaders—Concept paper. New York, NY: New Leaders.
  • Leask, M., & Terrell, I. (2013). Development planning and school improvement for middle managers. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Lemley, J. B., Schumacher, G., & Vesey, W. (2014). What learning environments best address 21st-century students’ perceived needs at the secondary level of instruction? NASSP Bulletin, 98(2), 101–125. doi:10.1177/0192636514528748
  • Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services ( 30th anniversary expanded ed.) New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Little, J. W. (2003). Constructions of teacher leadership in three periods of policy and reform activism. School Leadership & Management, 23(4), 401–419. doi:10.1080/1363243032000150944
  • Liu, F., & Maitlis, S. (2014). Emotional dynamics and strategizing processes: A study of strategic conversations in top team meetings. Journal of Management Studies, 51(2), 202–234. doi:10.1111/joms.2014.51.issue-2
  • Lupton, R., & Thomson, S. (2015). The coalition’s record on schools: Policy, spending and outcomes. 2010–2015. Retrieved from http://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/dps/case/spcc/WP13.pdf
  • Maitlis, S., & Christianson, M. (2014). Sense-making in organizations: Taking stock and moving forward. The Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 57–125. doi:10.1080/19416520.2014.873177
  • Mangin, M. M., & Stoelinga, S. R. (2008). Teacher leadership: What it is and why it matters. In M. M. Mangin & S. R. Stoelinga (Eds.), Effective teacher leadership: Using research to inform and reform (pp. 10–35). New York, NY: Teachers College.
  • Matsummura, L. C., & Wang, E. (2014). Principals’ sense-making of coaching for ambitious reading instruction in a high-stakes accountability policy environment. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 22(51), 1–33.
  • Matsumura, L. C., Garnier, H. E., & Spybrook, J. (2012). The effect of content-focused coaching on text discussion quality: A cluster randomized trial. Journal of Teacher Education, 63(3), 214–228. doi:10.1177/0022487111434985
  • McDonald, J. P. (2014). American school reform: What works, what fails, and why. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • McDonnell, L. M., & Weatherford, M. S. (2013). Evidence use and the common core state standards movement: From problem definition to policy adaption. American Journal of Education, 120, 1–25. doi:10.1086/673163
  • Miles, M. B., Huberman, M. A., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Monin, P., Noorderhaven, N., Vaara, E., & Kroon, D. (2013). Giving sense to and making sense of justice in postmerger integration. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 256–284. doi:10.5465/amj.2010.0727
  • Ng, S., & Chan, T. K. (2014). Continuing professional development for middle leaders in primary schools in Hong Kong. Journal of Educational Administration, 52(6), 869–886. doi:10.1108/JEA-07-2013-0077
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2011). Society at glance 2011—OECD social indicators. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/els/social/indicators/SAG
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2015). Education policy outlook 2015: Making reforms happen. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/edu/education-policy-outlook-2015-9789264225442-en.htm
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2016). OECD economic surveys—Israel. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/eco/surveys/Israel-Overview-OECD-Economic-Survey-2016.pdf
  • Ortlipp, M. (2008). Keeping and using reflective journals in the qualitative research process. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 695–705.
  • Parker, G. (2015). Teachers’ autonomy. Research in Education, 93(1), 19–33. doi:10.7227/RIE.0008
  • Patterson, J. A., Campbell, J. K., Johnson, D. M., Marx, G., & Whitener, M. (2013). Using policy attributes theory to examine comprehensive school reform implementation in two Title I middle schools. Planning & Changing, 44(1/2), 36–55.
  • Pellegrino, J. W., & Hilton, M. L. (2012). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
  • Peurach, D. J. (2011). Seeing complexity in public education: Problems, possibilities, and success for all. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Porter, R., Fusarelli, L. D., & Fusarelli, B. C. (2015). Implementing the common core: How educators interpret curriculum reform. Educational Policy, 29, 111–139. doi:10.1177/0895904814559248
  • Ramberg, M. R. (2014). What makes reform work? School-based conditions as predictors of teachers’ changing practice after a national curriculum reform. International Education Studies, 7(6), 46–65. doi:10.5539/ies.v7n6p46
  • Ribbins, P. (2007). Middle leadership in schools in the UK: Improving design—a subject leader’s history. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 10(1), 13–30. doi:10.1080/13603120600934061
  • Richards, L., & Morse, J. M. (2013). Readme first for a user’s guide to qualitative methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Robinson, K., & Aronica, L. (2015). Creative schools: The grassroots revolution that’s transforming education. New York, NY: Viking.
  • Rossman, G. B., & Rallis, S. F. (2012). Learning in the field: An introduction to qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Russell, J. L., & Bray, L. E. (2013). Crafting coherence from complex policy messages: Educators’ perceptions of special education and standards-based accountability policies. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 21, 12. Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/1044 doi:10.14507/epaa.v21n12.2013
  • Saito, E., & Sato, M. (2012). Lesson study as an instrument for school reform: A case of Japanese practices. Management in Education, 26(4), 181–186. doi:10.1177/0892020612445101
  • Schechter, C., Sykes, I., & Rosenfeld, J. (2004). Learning from success: A leverage for transforming schools into learning communities. Planning and Changing, 35(3&4), 154–168s
  • Scribner, S. M. P., & Bradley-Levine, J. (2010). The meaning(s) of teacher leadership in an urban high school reform. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(4), 491–522. doi:10.1177/0013161X10383831
  • Seashore Louis, K., & Robinson, V. M. (2012). External mandates and instructional leadership: School leaders as mediating agents. Journal of Educational Administration, 50(5), 629–665. doi:10.1108/09578231211249853
  • Seong, D. N. G., & Ho, J. M. (2012). How leadership for ICT reform is distributed within a school. International Journal of Educational Management, 26(6), 529–549.
  • Sleegers, P., Wassink, H., Veen, K., & Imants, J. (2009). School leaders’ problem framing: A sense-making approach to problem-solving processes of beginning school leaders. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 8(2), 152–172. doi:10.1080/15700760902737162
  • Smerek, R. E. (2011). Sense-making and sensegiving: An exploratory study of the simultaneous “being and learning” of new college and university presidents. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 18(1), 80–94. doi:10.1177/1548051810384268
  • Spillane, J. P., & Anderson, L. (2014). The architecture of anticipation and novices’ emerging understandings of the principal position: Occupational sense making at the intersection of individual, organization, and institution. Teachers College Record, 116(7), 1–42.
  • Spillane, J. P., Diamond, J. B., Burch, P., Hallett, T., Jita, L., & Zoltners, J. (2002). Managing in the middle: School leaders and the enactment of accountability policy. Educational Policy, 16(5), 731–763. doi:10.1177/089590402237311
  • Spillane, J. P., & Hunt, B. R. (2010). Days of their lives: A mixed-methods, descriptive analysis of the men and women at work in the principal’s office. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 42(3), 293–331. doi:10.1080/00220270903527623
  • Stevens, R. (2012). Identifying 21st century capabilities. International Journal of Learning and Change, 6(3–4), 123–137. doi:10.1504/IJLC.2012.050857
  • Stoelinga, S. R. (2008). Leading from above and below: Formal and informal teacher leadership. In M. M. Mangin & S. R. Stoelinga (Eds.), Effective teacher leadership: Using research to inform and reform (pp. 99–119). New York, NY: Teachers College.
  • Taylor, M., & Hallgarten, J. (2014). Clumsy, connected, curriculum-driven: Middle leadership for changing times. The Teaching Leaders Quarterly, 5, 7–9.
  • Taylor, S. L., Bogdan, R., & DeVault, M. L. (2016). Introduction to qualitative research methods: A guidebook and resource (4th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Thomson, P., & Hall, C. (2011). Sense-making as a lens on everyday change leadership practice: The case of Holly Tree Primary. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 14(4), 385–403. doi:10.1080/13603124.2011.585665
  • Thorpe, A., & Bennett-Powell, G. (2014). The perceptions of secondary school middle leaders regarding their needs following a middle leadership development programme. Management in Education, 28(2), 52–57. doi:10.1177/0892020614529808
  • Tracy, S. J. (2013). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Turner, C., & Sykes, A. (2007). Researching the transition from middle leadership to senior leadership in secondary schools: Some emerging themes. Management in Education, 21(3), 25–31. doi:10.1177/0892020607079989
  • Weick, K. E. (1979). The social psychology of organizing. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  • Weick, K. E. (1996). Sense-making in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Weick, K. E. (2009). Making sense of the organization. Volume 2: The impermanent organization. New York, NY: John Wiley.
  • Weick, K. E., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2007). Managing the unexpected: Resilient performance in an age of uncertainty. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
  • Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sense-making. Organization Science, 16(4), 409–421. doi:10.1287/orsc.1050.0133
  • Wenner, J. A., & Campbell, T. (2017). The theoretical and empirical basis of teacher leadership: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 87(1), 134–171. doi:10.3102/0034654316653478
  • Werts, A. B., & Brewer, C. A. (2015). Reframing the study of policy implementation: Lived experience as politics. Educational Policy, 29(1), 206–229. doi:10.1177/0895904814559247
  • Wise, C. (2001). The monitoring role of the academic middle manager in secondary schools. Educational Management and Administration, 29(3), 333–341. doi:10.1177/0263211X010293007
  • York-Barr, J., & Duke, K. (2004). What do we know about teacher leadership? Findings from two decades of scholarship. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 155–316. doi:10.3102/00346543074003255
  • Young, T., & Lewis, W. D. (2015). Educational policy implementation revisited. Educational Policy, 29(1), 3–17. doi:10.1177/0895904815568936
  • Youngs, P., Holdgreve-Resendez, R., & Qian, H. (2011). The role of instructional program coherence in beginning elementary teachers’ induction experiences. The Elementary School Journal, 111(3), 455–476. doi:10.1086/657655

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.