Values-Driven Leadership Through Institutional Structures and Practices: How Successful Schools in England and Hong Kong “Absorb” Policy

References

• Adonis, A. (2012). Education, education, education: Reforming England’s schools. London, UK: Biteback Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Arlestig, H., Day, C., & Johansson, O. (Eds.). (2016). A decade of research on school principals: Case studies from 24 countries. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J., Maguire, M., & Braun, A. (2012). How schools do policy: Policy enactments in secondary schools. Oxon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barnard, C. (1968). Functions of the executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bottery, M. (2007). Reports from the front line: English headteachers’ work in an era of practice centralization. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 35(1), 89–110. doi:10.1177/1741143207071384
   Google Scholar
• Bottery, M., Ngai, G., Wong, P. M., & Wong, P. H. (2013). Values, priorities and responses: Comparing English headteachers’ and Hong Kong principals’ perceptions of their work. School Leadership & Management, 33(1), 43–60. doi:10.1080/13632434.2012.740798
   Google Scholar
• Braun, A., Maguire, M., & Ball, S. J. (2010). Policy enactments in the UK secondary school: Examining policy, practice and school positioning. Journal of Education Policy, 25(4), 547–560. doi:10.1080/02680931003698544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, M. H., & Hosking, D. M. (1986). Distributed leadership and skilled performance as successful organization in social movements. Human Relations, 39(1), 65–79. doi:10.1177/001872678603900104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant, D. A., Ko, J., & Walker, A. (2018). How do school principals in Hong Kong shape policy? Leadership and Policy in Schools.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, Y. C., Ko, J., & Lee, T. T. H. (2016). School autonomy, leadership and learning: A reconceptualization. International Journal of Educational Management, 30(2), 177–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copeland, M. K. (2014). The emerging significance of values-based leadership: A literature review. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 8(2), 105–135.
   Google Scholar
• Courtney, S. J. (2015). Mapping school types in England. Oxford Review of Education, 41(6), 799–818. doi:10.1080/03054985.2015.1121141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research method: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Day, C., & Armstrong, P. (2016). School leadership research in England. In H. Arlestig, C. Day, & O. Johansson (Eds.), A decade of research on school principals: Cases from 24 countries (Vol. 21, pp. 245–268). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Day, C., Gu, Q., & Sammons, P. (2016). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: How successful school leaders use transformational and instructional strategies to make a difference. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52(2), 221–258. doi:10.1177/0013161X15616863
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day, C., Harris, A., Hadfield, M., Tolley, H., & Beresford, J. (2000). Leading schools in times of change. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Day, C., Hopkins, D., Harris, A., & Ahtaridou, E. (2009). The impact of school leadership on pupil outcomes. Final report. London, UK: Department for Children, Schools and Families (DCSF).
   Google Scholar
• Day, C., Sammons, P., Leithwood, K., Hopkins, D., Gu, Q., Brown, E., & Ahtaridou, E. (2011). School leadership and student outcomes: Linking with learning. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deal, T. E., & Peterson, K. D. (1999). Shaping school culture: The heart of leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Education and Manpower Bureau. (2006). Incorporated management committee establish and operation. Hong Kong: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Education Commission. (2000). Learning for life, learning through life: Reform proposals for the education system in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Printing Department.
   Google Scholar
• Gibb, C. A. (1969). Leadership. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology (Vol. 4, 2nd ed., pp. 205–283). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Glatter, R. (2012). Persistent preoccupations: The rise and rise of school autonomy and accountability in England. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 40(5), 559–575. doi:10.1177/1741143212451171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gold, A. (2003). Principled principals? Values-driven leadership: Evidence from ten case studies of ‘outstanding’ school leaders. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 31(2), 127–138.
   Google Scholar
• Greenfield, T. B. (1986). The decline and fall of science in educational administration. Interchange, 17(2), 57–80. doi:10.1007/BF01807469
   Google Scholar
• Gronn, P. (2000). Distributed properties: A new architecture for leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 28(3), 317–338. doi:10.1177/0263211X000283006
   Google Scholar
• Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(4), 423–451. doi:10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00120-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu, Q., Rea, S., Smethem, L., Dunford, J., Varley, M., Sammons, P., … Powell, L. (2016). Teaching Schools Evaluation. Final Report. London, UK: Department for Education (DfE).
   Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P., & Ko, J. (2015). Education accountability and principal leadership effects in Hong Kong primary schools. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, (2015(3), 18–29.
   Google Scholar
• Halstead, J. M., & Taylor, M. J. (Eds.). (1996). Values in education and education in values. London, UK: Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Hammersley-Fletcher, L. (2015). Value(s)-driven decision-making: The ethics work of English headteachers within discourses of constraint. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 43(2), 198–213. doi:10.1177/1741143213494887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, D. H. (2010). Creating a self-improving school system. Nottingham, UK: National College for School Leadership.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgkinson, C. (1978). Towards a science of administration. Oxford, UK: Blackwells.
   Google Scholar
• Hoyle, E., & Wallace, M. (2005). Educational leadership: Ambiguity, professionals and managerialism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson, S., & Day, C. (2007). The international successful school principalship project (ISSPP): An overview of the project, the case studies and their contexts. International Studies in Educational Administration, 35(3), 3–10.
   Google Scholar
• Ko, J., Cheng, Y. C., & Lee, T. T. H. (2016). The development of school autonomy and accountability in Hong Kong: Multiple changes in governance, work, curriculum, and learning. International Journal of Educational Management, 30(7), 1207–1230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ko, J. Y., Hallinger, P., & Walker, A. D. (2012). Exploring school improvement in Hong Kong secondary schools. Peabody Journal of Education, 87(2), 216–234. doi:10.1080/0161956X.2012.664474
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., Mascall, B., & Strauss, T. (Eds.). (2009). Distributed leadership according to the evidence. Oxon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K. A., & Riehl, C. (2003). What we know about successful school leadership. Nottingham, UK: National College for School Leadership.
   Google Scholar
• Moos, L., Johansson, O., & Day, C. (Eds.). (2011). How school principals sustain success over time: International perspectives. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer-Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Mourshed, M., Chijioke, C., & Barber, M. (2010). How the world’s most improved school systems keep getting better. New York, NY: McKinsey & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Muijs, D., & Chapman, C. (2009). Accountability for improvement: Rhetoric or reality? In C. Chapman & H. Gunter (Eds.), Radical reforms: Perspectives on an era of educational change (pp. 28–41). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Qian, H., & Walker, A. (2013). How principals promote and understand teacher development under curriculum reform in China. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 304–315. doi:10.1080/1359866X.2013.809050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, S. (2014). Playing by the rules? The professional values of head teachers tested by the changing policy context. Management in Education, 28(2), 38–43. doi:10.1177/0892020613508972
   Google Scholar
• Sergiovanni, T. J. (1992). Moral leadership: Getting to the heart of school improvement. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. B. (2001). Investigating school leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Educational Researcher, 30(3), 23–28. doi:10.3102/0013189X030003023
   Google Scholar
• Teddlie, C., & Yu, F. (2007). Mixed methods sampling: A typology with examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 77–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, A. (2012). Leaders seeking resonance: Managing the connectors that bind schools. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 15(2), 237–253. doi:10.1080/13603124.2011.626079
   Google Scholar
• Walker, A., Bryant, D., & Lee, M. (2013). International patterns of principal preparation: Commonalities and variations in pre-service programmes. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 41(4), 405–434. doi:10.1177/1741143213485466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, A., & Ko, J. (2011). Principal leadership in an era of accountability: A perspective from the Hong Kong context. School Leadership & Management, 31(4), 369–392. doi:10.1080/13632434.2011.606269
   Google Scholar
• Whitty, G. (2010). Marketization and post-marketization in education. In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan, & D. Hopkins (Eds.), Second international handbook of educational change (pp. 405–413). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ylimaki, R., & Jacobson, S. (Eds.). (2011). US and cross-national policies, practices, and preparation: Implications for successful instructional leadership, organizational learning, and culturally responsive practices. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar