How Principals of Successful Schools Enact Education Policy: Perceptions and Accounts From Senior and Middle Leaders

References

• Ball, S., Maguire, M., Braun, A., & Hoskins, K. (2011). Policy subjects and policy actors in schools: Some necessary but insufficient analyses. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 32(4), 611–624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (1994). Education reform: A critical and post-structural approach. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J., Maguire, M., & Braun, A. (2012). How schools do policy: Policy enactments in secondary schools. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barth, R. (1976). A principal and his school. The National Elementary Principal, 56(November/December), 9–21.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, A., Ball, S., Maguire, M., & Hoskins, K. (2011). Taking context seriously: Towards explaining policy enactments in the secondary school. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 32(4), 585–596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, A., Maguire, M., & Ball, S. (2010). Policy enactments in the UK secondary school: Examining policy, practice and school positioning. Journal of Education Policy, 25(4), 547–560. doi:10.1080/02680931003698544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryk, A., Sebring, P., Allensworth, E., Luppescu, S., & Easton, J. (2010). Organizing schools for improvement: Lessons from Chicago. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, D. K., Moffitt, S. L., & Goldin, S. (2007). Policy and practice: The dilemma. American Journal of Education, 113(4), 515–548. doi:10.1086/518487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cranston, N. (2009). Middle-level school leaders: Understanding their roles and aspirations. In N. Cranston & L. Ehrich (Eds), Australian educational leadership today (pp. 217–241). Brisbane: Australian Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Day, C., Gu, Q., & Sammons, P. (2016). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: How successful school leaders use transformational and instructional strategies to make a difference. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52(2), 221–258. doi:10.1177/0013161X15616863
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day, C., Sammons, P., Hopkins, D., Harris, A., Leithwood, K., Gu, Q., & Kington, A. (2009). The impact of school leadership on pupil outcomes: Final report. London, England: UK Department for Children, Schools and Families Research.
   Google Scholar
• Day, C., Sammons, P., Leithwood, K., Hopkins, D., Gu, Q., Brown, E., & Ahtaridou, E. (2011). Successful school leadership: Linking with learning and achievement. Maidenhead, England: McGraw Hill Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deal, T., & Peterson, K. (2009). Shaping school culture: Pitfalls, paradoxes, & promises (Second Edition ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education. (2013). New advice to help schools set performance-related pay. Press Release. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-advice-to-help-schools-set-performance-related-pay
   Google Scholar
• Dinham, S. (2007). The secondary head of department and the achievement of exceptional student outcomes. Journal of Educational Administration, 45(1), 62–79. doi:10.1108/09578230710722458
   Google Scholar
• Drysdale, L., & Gurr, D. (2011). Theory and practice of successful school leadership in Australia. School Leadership and Management, 31(4), 355–368. doi:10.1080/13632434.2011.606273
   Google Scholar
• Elmore, R. F. (1995). Structural reform and educational practice. Educational Researcher, 24(9), 23–26. doi:10.3102/0013189X024009023
   Google Scholar
• Elmore, R. F. (2003). Accountability and capacity. In M. Carnoy, R. Elmore, & L. Siskin (Eds.), The new accountability (pp. 195–209). New York and London: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Fuhrman, S. (1999). The new accountability (RB-27-January). Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Gu, Q., & Johansson, O. (2013). Sustaining school performance: School contexts matter. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 16, 301–326. doi:10.1080/13603124.2012.732242
   Google Scholar
• Gu, Q., Rea, S., Hill, R., Smethem, L., & Dunford, J. (2014). Teaching schools evaluation: Emerging issues from the early development of case study Teaching School Alliances. London: Department for Education.
   Google Scholar
• Gu, Q., Sammons, P., & Mehta, P. (2008). Leadership characteristics and practices in schools with different effectiveness and improvement profiles. School Leadership & Management, 28(1), 43–63. doi:10.1080/13632430701800078
   Google Scholar
• Gurr, D., & Drysdale, L. (2013). Middle‐level secondary school leaders: Potential, constraints and implications for leadership preparation and development. Journal of Educational Administration, 51(1), 55–71. doi:10.1108/09578231311291431
   Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. (1999). Next generation methods for the study of leadership and school improvement. In J. Murphy & K. Louis (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration (2nd ed., pp. 141–162). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. (2010a). Collaborative leadership and school improvement: Understanding the impact on school capacity and student learning. School Leadership and Management, 30(2), 95–110. doi:10.1080/13632431003663214
   Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2010b). Leadership for learning: Does collaborative leadership make a difference? Educational Management, Administration and Leadership, 38(6), 654–678. doi:10.1177/1741143210379060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatch, T. (2002). When improvement programs collide. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(8), 626–639.
   Google Scholar
• Honig, M., & Hatch, T. (2004). Crafting coherence: How schools strategically manage multiple, external demands. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 16–30. doi:10.3102/0013189X033008016
   Google Scholar
• Hubbard, L., Mehan, H., & Stein, M. (2006). Reform as learning. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, D. (2004). Structural equation modelling. In M. Lewis-Beck, A. Bryman, & T. Liao (Eds.), Encyclopaedia of social science research methods (pp. 1089–1093). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Klar, H. W., & Brewer, C. (2013). Successful leadership in high-needs schools: An examination of core leadership practices enacted in challenging contexts. Educational Administration Quarterly, 49(5), 768–808. doi:10.1177/0013161X13482577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kotter, J. (1996). Leading change. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., Day, C., Sammons, P., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2006). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership.
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Strauss, T. (2010). Leading school turnaround: How successful leaders transform low-performing schools. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., & Riehl, C. (2005). What do we already know about school leadership? In W. Firestone & C. Riehl (Eds.), A New Agenda: Directions for research on educational leadership (pp. 22–47). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., Sun, J., & Pollock, K. (Eds.). (2017). How school leaders contribute to student success: The four paths framework. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Maguire, M., Braun, A., & Ball, S. J. (2015). Where you stand depends on where you sit: The social construction of policy enactments in the (English) secondary school. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 36(4), 485–499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning, P. K. (1982). Organizational work: Structuration of environments. The British Journal of Sociology, 33(1), 118–134. doi:10.2307/589339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, D., Crowson, R., & Shipps, D. (2011). Shaping education policy: Power and process. New York & London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Newmann, F. M. (1996). Authentic achievement: Restructuring schools for intellectual quality. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Ni, Y., Yan, R., & Pounder, D. (2018). Collective leadership: Principals’ decision influence and the supportive or inhibiting decision influence of other stakeholders. Education Administration Quarterly, 54(2), 216–248. doi:10.1177/0013161X17723427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, C. M. (2008). So much reform, so little change: The persistence of failure in urban schools. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, V., Lloyd, C., & Rowe, K. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44, 635–674. doi:10.1177/0013161X08321509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sammons, P., Davies, S., Day, C., & Gu, Q. (2014). Using mixed methods to investigate school improvement and the role of leadership. Journal of Educational Administration, 52, 565–589. doi:10.1108/JEA-10-2013-0121
   Google Scholar
• Sammons, P., Gu, Q., Day, C., & Ko, J. (2011). Exploring the impact of school leadership on pupil outcomes: Results from a study of academically improved and effective schools in England. International Journal of Educational Management, 25, 83–101.
   Google Scholar
• Sammons, P., Gu, Q., & Robertson, D. (2007). Exploring Headteacher and Key Staff Perceptions of Leadership and School Improvement: A quantitative Report. London: Department for Education.
   Google Scholar
• Shaked, H., & Schechter, C. (2018). School middle leaders’ sense making of a generally outlined education reform. Leadership and Policy in Schools. doi:10.1080/15700763.2018.1450513
   Google Scholar
• Silins, H., & Mulford, W. (2002). Leadership and school results. In K. Leithwood & P. Hallinger (Eds.), Second international handbook of educational leadership and administration (pp. 561–612). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Spillane, J., Diamond, J., Burch, P., Hallett, T., Jita, L., & Zoltner, J. (2002). Managing in the middle: School leaders and the enactment of accountability policy. Educational Policy, 16(5), 731–762. doi:10.1177/089590402237311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spillane, J., Reiser, B., & Reimer, T. (2002). Policy implementation and cognition: Reframing and refocusing implementation research. Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 387–431. doi:10.3102/00346543072003387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P. (2004). Standards Deviation: How Schools Misunderstand Education Policy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, J., & Leithwood, K. (2012). Transformational School Leadership Effects on Student Achievement. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 11(4), 418–451.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, J., & Leithwood, K. (2015a). Leadership effects on student learning mediated by teacher emotions. Societies, 5, 566–582. doi:10.3390/soc5030566
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, J., & Leithwood, K. (2015b). Direction-setting school leadership practices: A meta-analytical review of evidence about their influence. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 26(4), 499–523. doi:10.1080/09243453.2015.1005106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Glasersfeld, E. (1989). Cognition, construction of knowledge, and teaching. Synthese, 80(1), 121–140. doi:10.1007/BF00869951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, A. (2011). School leadership as connective activity. Australia: Australian Council for Educational Leaders.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. (1979). The social psychology of organizing. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. (2005). Organizing and the process of sense-making. Organization Science, 16(4), 409–421. doi:10.1287/orsc.1050.0133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenner, J. A., & Campbell, T. (2017). The theoretical and empirical basis of teacher leadership: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 87(1), 134–171. doi:10.3102/0034654316653478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar