Push, Pull, Tap and Switch: Understanding the Career Decisions of Charter School Leaders

References

• Abelson, M. A., & Baysinger, B. D. (1984). Optimal and dysfunctional turnover: Toward an organizational level model. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 331–341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akiba, M., & Reichardt, R. (2004). What predicts the mobility of elementary school leaders? An analysis of longitudinal data in Colorado. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12(18). doi:10.14507/epaa.v12n18.2004
   Google Scholar
• Baker, B. (2007). Understanding the labor market for school administrators. Presented at the annual meeting of the University Council of Educational Administration. Alexandria, VA.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, B., Punswick, E., & Belt, C. (2010). School leadership stability, principal moves, and departures: Evidence from Missouri. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(4), 523–557. doi:10.1177/0013161X10383832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battle, D., & Gruber, K. (2010). Principal attrition and mobility: Results from the 2008–09 principal follow-up survey (NCES 2010-337). In National center for education statistics, Institute of education sciences, U.S. department of education. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Béteille, T., Kalogrides, D., & Loeb, S. (2012). Stepping stones: Principal career paths and school outcomes. Social Science Research, 41(4), 904–919. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.03.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickmore, D. L., & Dowell, -M.-M. S. (2011). Concerns, use of time, and the intersections of leadership: Case study of two charter school principals. Research in the Schools, 18(1), 44–61.
   Google Scholar
• Bitterman, A., Goldring, R., & Gray, L. (2013). Characteristics of public and private elementary and secondary school principals in the United States: Results from the 2011–12 schools and staffing survey (NCES 2013-313). U.S. department of education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch
   Google Scholar
• Boyce, J., & Bowers, A. J. (2016). Principal turnover: Are there different types of principals who move from or leave their schools? A latent class analysis of the 2007–2008 schools and staffing survey and the 2008–2009 principal follow-up survey. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 15(3), 237–272. doi:10.1080/15700763.2015.1047033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branch, G. F., Hanushek, E. A., & Rivkin, S. G. (2013). School leaders matter. Education Next, 13(1), 62–69.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, C. (2010). You’re leaving? Succession and sustainability in charter schools. Seattle, WA: Center on Reinventing Public Education, University of Washington.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, C., & Gross, B. (2008). Working without a safety net: How charter school leaders can best survive on the high wire. Seattle, WA: Center on Reinventing Public Education, University of Washington.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, D. M., & Peak, C. (2013). Leading charters how charter school administrators define their roles and their ability to lead. Management in Education, 27(4), 150–158. doi:10.1177/0892020613487919
   Google Scholar
• Chubb, J. E., & Moe, T. (1990). Politics, markets, and America’s schools. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2007). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cravens, X. C., Goldring, E., & Penaloza, R. (2012). Leadership practice in the context of US School Choice Reform. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 11(4), 452–476. doi:10.1080/15700763.2012.700989
   Google Scholar
• Cullen, J. B., & Mazzeo, M. J. (2008). Implicit performance awards: An empirical analysis of the labor market for public school administrators. San Diego, CA: University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Dynarski, S. M., Jacob, B., & Mahadevan, M. (2016). K-8 choice in michigan: Practices and Policies within Charter and Traditional Public Schools. Michigan, MI: Education Policy Initiative Policy Brief #4.
   Google Scholar
• Farley-Ripple, E. N., Raffel, J. A., & Welch, J. C. (2012). Administrator career paths and decision processes. Journal of Educational Administration, 50(6), 788–816. doi:10.1108/09578231211264694
   Google Scholar
• Farley-Ripple, E. N., Solano, P. L., & McDuffie, M. J. (2012). Conceptual and methodological issues in research on school administrator career behavior. Educational Researcher, 41(6), 220–229. doi:10.3102/0013189X12451774
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller, E., & Young, M. (2009). Principal attrition: Where do principals go after they leave the principalship? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, E. J., & Young, M. D. (2008). The revolving door: Principal turnover in Texas. Texas Study of Secondary Education, 17(2), 14–18.
   Google Scholar
• Furgeson, J., Gill, B., Haimson, J., Killewald, A., McCullough, M., Nichols-Barrer, I., … Lake, R. (2012). Charter-school management organizations: Diverse strategies and diverse student impacts: Updated Edition. Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Furgeson, J., Knechtel, V., Sullivan, M., Tuttle, C. C., Akers, L., Anderson, M. A., … Nichols-Barrer, I. (2014). KIPP leadership practices through 2010–2011 (No. be3018c6fc0348539f4b27334b5edd6c). Cambridge, MA: Mathematica Policy Research.
   Google Scholar
• Gates, S., Ringle, J., Santibanez, L., Guarino, C., Ghosh-Dastidar, B., & Brown, A. (2006). Mobility and turnover among school principals. Economics of Education Review, 25, 289–302. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2005.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawlik, M. A. (2008). Breaking loose: Principal autonomy in charter and public schools. Educational Policy, 22(6), 783–804. doi:10.1177/0895904807307058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawlik, M. A. (2015). Are you leaving? A case of succession in the Willow Tree Charter School. Journal of Cases in Educational Leadership, 18(2), 167–175. doi:10.1177/1555458915584672
   Google Scholar
• Gawlik, M. A. (2017). Leadership knowledge and practices in the context of Charter Schools. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 1–32. doi:10.1080/15700763.2017.1326145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grissom, J. A. (2011). Can good principals keep teachers in disadvantaged schools? Linking principal effectiveness to teacher satisfaction and turnover in hard-to-staff environments. Teachers College Record, 113(11), 2552–2585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. (1998). Exploring the principal’s contribution to school effectiveness: 1980–1995. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9, 157–191. doi:10.1080/0924345980090203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heck, R., & Hallinger, P. (2009). Assessing the contribution of distributed leadership to school improvement and growth in math achievement. American Education Research Journal, 46(3), 659–689. doi:10.3102/0002831209340042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingersoll, R. M. (2001). Teacher turnover and teacher shortages: An organizational analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 38(3), 499–534. doi:10.3102/00028312038003499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, Susan Moore and the Project on the Next Generation of Teachers. (2004). Finders and keepers: Helping new teachers survive and thrive in our schools. San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Kronholz, J. (2015). Boot camps for charter boards. Education Next, 15(3), Retrieved from http://educationnext.org/boot-camps-charter-boards/
   Google Scholar
• Lake, R., Dusseault, B., Bowen, M., Demeritt, A., & Hill, P. (June, 2010). The National Study of Charter Management Organization (CMO) Effectiveness: Report on Interim Findings, Center on Reinventing Public Education.
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., Patten, S., & Jantzi, D. (2010). Testing a conception of how school leadership influences student learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(5), 671–706. doi:10.1177/0013161X10377347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79–122. doi:10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mavrogordato, M., Goldring, E., & Smrekar, C. (2017). Charter school principals’ autonomy in the context of state accountability. In M. A. Gawlik & D. L. Bickmore (Eds.), Unexplored conditions of charter school principals: An examination of the issues and challenges for leaders (pp. 1–22). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oak, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, L. K. (1990). Social learning approach to career decision making: Krumboltz’s theory. Career Choice and Development: Applying Contemporary Theories to Practice, 2(1), 145–196.
   Google Scholar
• National Alliance for Public Charter Schools (NAPCS). (2014). Schools by Management Organization, 2012-13. In The Public Charter Schools dashboard. Washington, DC: NAPCS. Retrieved from http://dashboard.publiccharters.org/dashboard/schools/page/mgmt/year/2013
   Google Scholar
• Ni, Y. (2012). Teacher working conditions in Charter Schools and Traditional Public Schools: A comparative study. Teachers College Record, 114, 030303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ni, Y., Sun, M., & Rorrer, A. (2015). Principal turnover: Upheaval and uncertainty in charter schools? Educational Administration Quarterly, 51(3), 409–437. doi:10.1177/0013161X14539808
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidman, I. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, N. S., & Johnson, S. M. (2015). Teacher turnover in high-poverty schools: What we know and can do. Teachers College Record, 117(3), 1–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer Foundation and Public Agenda. (2015). Charter schools in perspective: A guide to research – key facts about Charter Schools. Retrieved March 14, 2018, from http://www.in-perspective.org/pages/introduction#sub4
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. (1994). Case studies. In K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 236–247). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Stuit, D. A., & Smith, T. M. (2012). Explaining the gap in charter and traditional public school teacher turnover rates. Economics of Education Review, 31(2), 268–279. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2011.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, M., & Ni, Y. (2016). Work environments and labor markets: Explaining principal turnover gap between charter schools and traditional public schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52(1), 144–183. doi:10.1177/0013161X15616659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torres, A. C. (2014). “Are We Architects or Construction Workers?” Re-examining Teacher Autonomy and Turnover in Charter Schools. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 22(124). Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v22.1614
   Google Scholar
• Torres, A. C. (2016). The uncertainty of high expectations: How principals influence relational trust and teacher turnover in no excuses charter schools. Journal Of School Leadership, 26(1), 61–91.
   Google Scholar
• Torres, A. C. (2016a). Is this work sustainable? teacher turnover and perceptions of workload in charter management organizations. Urban Education, 51(8), 891–914. doi:10.1177/0042085914549367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuttle, C. C., Gill, B., Gleason, P., Knechtel, V., Nichols-Barrer, I., & Resch, A. (2013). KIPP Middle Schools: Impacts on achievement and other outcomes. Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research.
   Google Scholar
• Wohlstetter, P., Smith, J., & Farrell, C. C. (2013). Choices and Challenges: Charter School performance in perspective (pp. 02138). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press. 8 Story Street First Floor.
   Google Scholar
• Woodworth, J. L., & Raymond, M. E. (2013). Charter School growth and replication (Vol. II). Palo Alto, CA: Center for Research on Educational Outcomes (CREDO).
   Google Scholar
• Woodworth, K. R., David, J. L., Guha, R., Wang, H., & Lopez, T. A. (2008). San Francisco bay area KIPP schools: A study of early implementation and achievement. Final report. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
   Google Scholar