Micro-politics, Senior Management Teams, and Principals’ Inner Circle: A Structural Exploration

References

• Acker-Hocevar, M., & Touchton, D. (1999, April). A model of power as social relationships: Teacher leaders describe the phenomena of effective agency in practice. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, D. P., & Stevenson, D. L. (1986). Mothers’ strategies for children’s school achievement: Managing the transition to high school. Sociology of Education, 59, 156–166. doi:10.2307/2112340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, S. (1987). The micropolitics of the school: Towards a theory of school organisation. London, UK: Methuen/Routlege.
   Google Scholar
• Benoliel, P. (2017). Managing senior management team boundaries and school improvement: An investigation of the school leader role. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 20(1), 57–86. doi:10.1080/13603124.2015.1053536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkovich, I. (2011). No we won’t! teachers’ resistance to educational reform. Journal Of Educational Administration, 49(5), 563–578. doi:10.1108/09578231111159548
   Google Scholar
• Berkovich, I. (2014). Neo-liberal governance and the ‘new professionalism’ of israeli principals. Comparative Education Review, 58(3), 428–456. doi:10.1086/676403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkovich, I., & Markman, N. (2010). The state and teachers’ organizations. Jerusalem, Israel: The Van Leer Jerusalem Institute. [Hebrew].
   Google Scholar
• Beugré, C. D., & Liverpool, P. R. (2006). Politics as determinants of fairness perceptions in organizations. In E. Vigoda-Gadot & A. Drory (Eds.), Handbook of organizational politics (pp. 122–135). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Blase, J. (1991). The politics of life in schools: Power, conflict, and cooperation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blase, J., & Anderson, G. (1995). The micropolitics of educational leadership: From control to empowerment. 1234 Amsterdam Ave., New York, NY 10027: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Blenkin, G. M., Edwards, G., & Kelly, A. V. (1997). Perspectives on educational change. In A. Harris, N. Bennet, & M. Preedy (Eds.), Organizational effectiveness and improvement in education (pp. 216–230). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bolden, R. (2011). Distributed leadership in organizations: A review of theory and research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13(3), 251–269. doi:10.1111/ijmr.2011.13.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryk, A. S., & Schneider, B. (2003). Trust in schools: A core resource for school reform. Educational Leadership, 60(6), 40–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bush, T. (2008). Leadership and management development in education. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bush, T., & Glover, D. (2012). Distributed leadership in action: Leading high-performing leadership teams in English schools. School Leadership & Management, 32(1), 21–36. doi:10.1080/13632434.2011.642354
   Google Scholar
• Child, J. (1972). Organizational structure, environment, and performance: The role of strategic choice. Sociology, 6(1), 1–22. doi:10.1177/003803857200600101
   Google Scholar
• Cranston, N., & Ehrich, L. (2009). Senior management teams in schools: Understanding their dynamics, enhancing their effectiveness. Leading and Managing, 15(1), 14.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, S. E., Morris, M. L., & Gore, J. S. (2002). Thinking about oneself and others: The relational-interdependent self-construal and social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(3), 399. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.3.399
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day, C., Hopkins, D., Harris, A., & Ahtaridou, E. (2009). The impact of school leadership on pupil outcomes: Final report. Nottingham, UK: Department for Children, Schools and Families.
   Google Scholar
• Dobson, M. S., & Dobson, D. S. (2001). Enlightened office politics. New York, NY: American Management Association.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrich, L. C., & Cranston, N. (2004). Developing senior management teams in schools: Can micropolitics help? International Studies in Educational Administration, 32(1), 21–31.
   Google Scholar
• Everitt, B. (1993). Cluster analysis (3rd ed.). London, UK: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Ferris, G. R., & Kacmar, K. M. (1992). Perceptions of organizational politics. Journal of Management, 18(1), 93–116. doi:10.1177/014920639201800107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firestone, W. A., & Martinez, M. C. (2005, April). The dark side of distributed leadership: Integrating the micropolitical with the cognitive. Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Flessa, J. (2009). Educational micropolitics and distributed leadership. Peabody Journal of Education, 84(3), 331–349. doi:10.1080/01619560902973522
   Google Scholar
• Gillborn, D. (2014). Racism as policy: A critical race analysis of education reforms in the United States and England. The Educational Forum, 78(1), 26–41. doi:10.1080/00131725.2014.850982
   Google Scholar
• Grant, C. (2006). Emerging voices on teacher leadership: Some South African views. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 34(4), 511–532. doi:10.1177/1741143206068215
   Google Scholar
• Grodzki, J. S. (2011). Role identity: At the intersection of organizational socialization and individual sensemaking of new principals and vice-principals. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 127, 1–47.
   Google Scholar
• Gronn, P. (2003). The new work of educational leader. London, UK: Paul Chapman.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, V., & Wallace, M. (1996). Let the team take the strain: Lessons from research into senior management teams in secondary schools. School Organization, 16(3), 297–309. doi:10.1080/0260136960160305
   Google Scholar
• Handford, V., & Leithwood, K. (2013). Why teachers trust school leaders. Journal of Educational Administration, 51(2), 194–212. doi:10.1108/09578231311304706
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A., & Muijs, D. (2002). Teacher leadership: A review of research. London, UK: General Teaching Council.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, A. W., & Weindling, D. (1996). Developing successful leaders. In K. Leithwood, J. D. Chapman, D. Corson, P. Hallinger, & A. Hart (Eds.), International handbook of educational leadership and administration  (pp. 309–336). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Hatch, J. A. (1987). Status and social power in a kindergarten peer group. The Elementary School Journal, 88(1), 79–92. doi:10.1086/461525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heng, M. A., & Marsh, C. J. (2009). Understanding middle leaders: A closer look at middle leadership in primary schools in Singapore. Educational Studies, 35(5), 525–536. doi:10.1080/03055690902883863
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoang, H., & Antoncic, B. (2003). Network-based research in entrepreneurship: A critical review. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2), 165–187. doi:10.1016/S0883-9026(02)00081-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoy, W. K., & Sweetland, S. R. (2001). Designing better schools: The meaning and measure of enabling school structures. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37(3), 296–321. doi:10.1177/00131610121969334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung, M. C., Wu, J., Chang, J. H., & Yang, D. L. (2005). An efficient k-Means clustering algorithm using simple partitioning. Journal of Information Science and Engineering, 21(6), 1157–1177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuzmits, F., Sussman, L., Adams, A., & Raho, L. (2002). Using information and e-mail for political gain. Information Management, 36(5), 76.
   Google Scholar
• Kwan, P., & Walker, A. (2008). Vice-principalship in Hong Kong: Aspirations, competencies, and satisfaction. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 19(1), 73–97. doi:10.1080/09243450701856549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewicki, R. J., McAllister, D. J., & Bies, R. J. (1998). Trust and distrust: New relationships and realities. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 438–458. doi:10.5465/amr.1998.926620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lumby, J. (2013). Distributed leadership: The uses and abuses of power. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 41(5), 581–597. doi:10.1177/1741143213489288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malen, B., & Cochran, M. V. (2008). Beyond pluralistic patterns of power: Research on the micropolitics of schools. In B. Cooper, J. Cibulka & L. Fusarelli (Eds.), Handbook of education politics and policy (pp. 148–178). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, C., & Hooley, R. M. (2006). The assistant principal: Leadership choices and challenges. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maxcy, B. D., & Nguyen, T. S. O. N. T. (2006). The politics of distributing leadership: Reconsidering leadership distribution in two Texas elementary schools. Educational Policy, 20(1), 163–196. doi:10.1177/0895904805285375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayrowetz, D. (2008). Making sense of distributed leadership: Exploring the multiple usages of the concept in the field. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(3), 424–435. doi:10.1177/0013161X07309480
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayrowetz, D., Murphy, J., Seashore Louis, K., & Smylie, M. A. (2007). Distributed leadership as work redesign: Retrofitting the job characteristics model. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 6(1), 69–101. doi:10.1080/15700760601091275
   Google Scholar
• McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect-and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 24–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGlynn, C., & Bekerman, Z. (2007). The management of pupil difference in Catholic‐Protestant and Palestinian‐Jewish integrated education in Northern Ireland and Israel. Compare, 37(5), 689–703. doi:10.1080/03057920701420882
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. P., Stanley, L. J., & Parfyonova, N. M. (2012). Employee commitment in context: The nature and implication of commitment profiles. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(1), 1–16. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2011.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, M. J., Macmillan, R. B., & Northfield, S. K. (2011). Principal succession and the micropolitics of educators in schools: Some incidental results from a larger study. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 117, 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886. doi:10.5465/amr.1997.9711022105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mooney, A. C., & Amason, A. C. (2011). In search of the CEOs inner circle and how it is formed. In M. A. Carpenter (Ed.), The handbook of research on top management teams (pp. 35–48). New York, NY: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Moye, M. J., Henkin, A. B., & Egley, R. J. (2005). Teacher-principal relationships: Exploring linkages between empowerment and interpersonal trust. Journal of Educational Administration, 43(3), 260–277. doi:10.1108/09578230510594796
   Google Scholar
• Muijs, D., & Harris, A. (2006). Teacher led school improvement: Teacher leadership in the UK. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(8), 961–972. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2006.04.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Dwyer, C. (2006). Runaway state-building: Patronage politics and democratic development. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press..
   Google Scholar
• Omoijiade, P. O. (2016). The management of political actors in institutions. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), 5(4), 17–30. doi:10.20525/ijrbs.v5i4
   Google Scholar
• Piot, L., & Kelchtermans, G. (2016). The micropolitics of distributed leadership: Four case studies of school federations. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 44(4), 632–649. doi:10.1177/1741143214559224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, C., & Brundrett, M. (2005). Leadership succession in schools: A cause for concern. Management in Education, 19(5), 15–18. doi:10.1177/089202060501900504
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, C., Brundrett, M., & Nevill, A. (2008). Leadership talent identification and development: Perceptions of heads, middle leaders and classroom teachers in 70 contextually different primary and secondary schools in England. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 36(3), 311–335. doi:10.1177/1741143208090592
   Google Scholar
• Rintoul, H. M., & Goulais, L. (2010). Vice principalship and moral literacy: Developing a moral compass. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 38(6), 745–757. doi:10.1177/1741143210379061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberto, M. A. (2003). The stable core and the dynamic periphery in top management teams. Management Decision, 41(2), 120–131. doi:10.1108/00251740310457560
   Google Scholar
• Silva, D. Y., Gimbert, B., & Nolan, J. (2000). Sliding the doors: Locking and unlocking possibilities for teacher leadership. Teachers College Record, 102, 779–804. doi:10.1111/tcre.2000.102.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somech, A. (2002). Explicating the complexity of participative management: an investigation of multiple dimensions. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(3), 341–371. doi:10.1177/0013161X02383003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somers, M. J. (2009). The combined influence of affective, continuance and normative commitment on employee withdrawal. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74(1), 75–81. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2008.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. B. (2001). Investigating school leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Educational Researcher, 30, 23–28. doi:10.3102/0013189X030003023
   Google Scholar
• Tahir, L. M., Lee, S. L., Musah, M. B., Jaffri, H., Said, M. N. H. M., & Yasin, M. H. M. (2016). Challenges in distributed leadership: Evidence from the perspective of headteachers. International Journal of Educational Management, 30(6), 848–863.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action. New York, NY: McGraw- Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Tschannen-Moran, M. (2014). Trust matters: Leadership for successful schools. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Tschannen-Moran, M., & Gareis, C. R. (2017). Principals, trust, and cultivating vibrant schools. In K. Leithwood, J. Sun, & K. Pollock (Eds.), How school leaders contribute to student success (pp. 153–174). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Tsoumbris, P., & Xenikou, A. (2010). Commitment profiles: The configural effect of the forms and foci of commitment on work outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77(3), 401–411. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2010.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, C. (2003). A critical review of research on subject leaders in secondary schools. School Leadership & Management, 23(2), 209–227. doi:10.1080/1363243032000091968
   Google Scholar
• Van Maele, D., Forsyth, P. B., & Van Houtte, M. (2014). Trust and school life. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Vigoda-Gadot, E., & Kapun, D. (2005). Perceptions of politics and perceived performance in public and private organisations: A test of one model across two sectors. Policy & Politics, 33(2), 251–276. doi:10.1332/0305573053870185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigoda‐Gadot, E., & Talmud, I. (2010). Organizational politics and job outcomes: The moderating effect of trust and social support. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(11), 2829–2861. doi:10.1111/jasp.2010.40.issue-11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vurgan, Y. (2011). Employing teachers in the education system: Monitoring the phenomenon of employing teachers through intermediaries. Jerusalem, Israel: The Knesset (in Hebrew).
   Google Scholar
• Walker, K., Kutsyuruba, B., & Noonan, B. (2011). The fragility of trust in the world of school principals. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(5), 471–494. doi:10.1108/09578231111159502
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, M. (2002). Modelling distributed leadership and management effectiveness: Primary school senior management teams in England and Wales. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 13(2), 163–186. doi:10.1076/sesi.13.2.163.3433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, M., & Hall, V. (1994). Inside the SMT: Teamwork in secondary school management. London, UK: Paul Chapman Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Wasti, S. A. (2005). Commitment profiles: Combinations of organizational commitment forms and job outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67(2), 290–308. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2004.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenner, J. A., & Campbell, T. (2017). The theoretical and empirical basis of teacher leadership: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 87(1), 134–171. doi:10.3102/0034654316653478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westphal, J. D., & Zajac, E. J. (1997). Defections from the inner circle: Social exchange, reciprocity, and the diffusion of board independence in US corporations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 161–183. doi:10.2307/2393812
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, P. M. (2009). A conceptual framework for understanding the working relationship between school principals and vice-principals. School Leadership and Management, 29(2), 157–179. doi:10.1080/13632430902775558
   Google Scholar
• Woods, P. A., & Gronn, P. (2009). Nurturing democracy: The contribution of distributed leadership to a democratic organizational landscape. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 37, 430–451. doi:10.1177/1741143209334597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• York-Barr, J., & Duke, K. (2004). What do we know about teacher leadership? Findings from two decades of scholarship. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 255–316. doi:10.3102/00346543074003255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu-Kwong, P. K., & Walker, A. (2010). Secondary school vice‐principals: Commitment, challenge, efficacy and synchrony. British Educational Research Journal, 36(4), 531–548. doi:10.1080/01411920903018026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar