A Dramatic Confrontation of Frames: Arts-Integration Teacher Development, Organizational Learning, and School Change

References

• Anderson, R. C., Guerreiro, M., & Smith, J. (2016). Are all biases bad? collaborative grounded theory in developmental evaluation of education policy. Journal ofMultidisciplinary Evaluation, 12(27),44–57. URL: http://journals.sfu.ca/jmde/index.php/jmde_1/article/view/449
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, R. C., & Pitts, C. (2017). Growing sustainable school culture: arts integration to nourish the soil and the seeds. In (Eds.), Arts evaluation and assessment: measuring impact in schools and communities. Switzerland: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Apple, M. (1982). Curriculum and the labor process: The logic of technical control. Social Text, 5(p), 108–125. doi:10.2307/466338
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Berliner, D. (2011). Rational responses to high stakes testing: The case of curriculum narrowing and the harm that follows. Cambridge Journal of Education, 41(3), 287–302. doi:10.1080/0305764X.2011.607151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolman, L., & Deal, T. (2013). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership 5th edition. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Burnaford, G., Brown, S., Doherty, J., & McLaughlin, H. J. (2007). Arts integration frameworks, research practice. Washington, DC: Arts Education Partnership.
   Google Scholar
• Castner, D. J., Schneider, J. L., & Henderson, J. G. (2017). An ethic of democratic, curriculum-based teacher leadership. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 16(2), 328–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbett, D., Wilson, B., & Morse, D. (2002). The arts are an “R” too. Jackson, MS: Mississippi Arts Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Cuban, L. (1990). Reforming again, again, and again. Educational Researcher, 19(1), 3–13. doi:10.3102/0013189X019001003
   Google Scholar
• Dannetta, V. (2002). What factors influence a teacher’s commitment to student learning? Leadership and Policy in Schools, 1(2), 144–171. doi:10.1076/lpos.1.2.144.5398
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). The flat world and education: How America’s commitment to equity will determine our future. New York, NY: Teacher’s College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Datnow, A. (2011). Collaboration and contrived collegiality: Revisiting Hargreaves in the age of accountability. Journal of Educational Change, 12(2), 147–158. doi:10.1007/s10833-011-9154-1
   Google Scholar
• Dedoose Version 7.0.23. (2016). Dedoose: A web application for managing, analyzing, and presenting qualitative and mixed method research data. Los Angeles, CA: SocioCultural Research Consultants, LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1989). Freedom and culture. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books. (Original work published in 1939).
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, J. B., & Spillane, J. P. (2004). High-stakes accountability in urban elementary schools: Challenging or reproducing inequality? Teachers College Record, 106(6), 1145–1176. doi:10.1111/tcre.2004.106.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunst, C. J., Trivette, C. M., & Hamby, D. W. (2010). Meta-analysis of the effectiveness of four adult learning methods and strategies: Supplemental tables and references. Learning, 3(1), 91–112.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M., & Quinn, J. (2015). Coherence: The right drivers in action for schools, districts, and systems. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giles, C., & Hargreaves, A. (2006). The sustainability of innovative schools as learning organizations and professional learning communities during standardized reform. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(1), 124–156. doi:10.1177/0013161X05278189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government Accountability Office. (2009). Access to arts education: inclusion of additional questions in education’s planned research would help explain why instruction time has decreased for some students (GAO-09-286). Retrieved from https://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-09-286
   Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. R. (1986). Staff development and the process of teacher change. Educational Researcher, 15(5), 5–12. doi:10.3102/0013189X015005005
   Google Scholar
• Hall, G., & Hord, S. (2014). Implementing change: Patterns, principles, and potholes. New York, NY: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Herzberg, F. (1965). The motivation to work among finnish supervisors. Personnel Psychology, 18(4), 393–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herzberg, F. (1966). Work and the nature of man. Cleveland, OH: World Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B. (1959). The motivation to work (2nd ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hetland, L., Winner, E., Venema, S., & Sheridan, K. (2013). Studio thinking 2: The real benefits of visual arts education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (2002). Student achievement through professional development. Designing training and peer coaching: Our need for learning. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
   Google Scholar
• Lackey, L., & Huxhold, D. (2016). Arts integration as school reform: Exploring how teachers experience policy. Arts Education Policy Review, 117(4), 211–222. doi:10.1080/10632913.2016.1213120
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. (1971). Street-level bureaucracy and the analysis of urban reform. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 6(4), 391–409.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, H. M., & Louis, K. S. (1999). Teacher empowerment and the capacity for organizational learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(5), 707–750. doi:10.1177/0013161X99355003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396. doi:10.1037/h0054346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maurer, T. J., & Tarulli, B. A. (1994). Investigation of perceived environment, perceived outcome, and person variables in relationship to voluntary development activity by employees. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 3–14. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.79.1.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mays, N., & Pope, C. (1995). Rigour and qualitative research. British Medical Journal, 311, 109–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyers, C. V., & Smylie, M. A. (2017). Five myths of school turnaround policy and practice. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 16(3), 502–523. doi:10.1080/15700763.2016.1270333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: a methods sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Noblit, G. W., Corbett, H. D., Wilson, B. L., & McKinney, M. B. (2009). Creating and sustaining arts-based school reform: The A+ schools program. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Noe, R. A., & Wilk, S. L. (1993). Investigation of the factors that influence employees’ participation in development activities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 291–302. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.2.291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orfield, G. (2014). Tenth annual brown lecture in education research: A new civil rights agenda for american education. Educational Researcher, 43(6), 273–292. doi:10.3102/0013189X14547874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peppler, K., Powell, C. W., Thompson, N., & Catterall, J. (2014). Positive impact of arts integration on student academic achievement in English language arts. The Educational Forum, 78, 364–377. doi:10.1080/00131725.2014.941124
   Google Scholar
• Pink, D. H. (2011). Drive: the surprising truth about what motivates us. New York: NY: Riverhead Books.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, E., & Cohen, M. (2013). Phenomenology. In A. Trainor & E. Graue (Eds.), Reviewing qualitative research in the social sciences (pp. 181–196). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rabkin, N., Reynolds, M., Hedberg, E., & Shelby, J. (2011). Integration specialists and the future of education: A report on the integration specialist research project. Chicago, IL: NORC at the University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, A. H. (2013). Arts integration and the success of disadvantaged students: A research evaluation. Arts Education Policy Review, 114(4), 191–204. doi:10.1080/10632913.2013.826050
   Google Scholar
• Salas, E., Tannenbaum, S. I., Kraiger, K., & Smith-Jentsch, K. A. (2012). The science of training and development in organizations: What matters in practice. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(2), 74–101. doi:10.1177/1529100612436661
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senge, P. M. (2006). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. Chicago, IL: Crown Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Stoelinga, S., Silk, Y., ., Reddy, P., & Rahman, N. (2015). Turnaround arts initiative: Final evaluation report. Washington, D.C.: President’s Committee on the Arts and the Humanities.
   Google Scholar
• Stoll, L., Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Wallace, M., & Thomas, S. (2006). Professional learning communities: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Change, 7(4), 221–258. doi:10.1007/s10833-006-0001-8
   Google Scholar
• Thier, M., Smith, J., Pitts, C., & Anderson, R. C. (2016). Influential spheres: examining actors’ perceptions of education governance. International Journal Of Education Policy & Leadership, 11(9), 1–21. http://journals.sfu.ca/ijepl/index.php/ijepl/article/view/682
   Google Scholar
• Wang, F., & Hannafin, M. J. (2005). Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 5–23. doi:10.1007/BF02504682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wohlstetter, P., & Smith, A. K. (2000). A different approach to systemic reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 8(1), 7.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y. (2012). World class learners: Educating creative and entrepreneurial students. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zuckerman, S. J., Wilcox, K. C., Durand, F. T., Lawson, H. A., & Schiller, K. S. (2018). Drivers for change: A study of distributed leadership and performance adaptation during policy innovation implementation.Leadership and Policy in Schools, 17(4), 618–646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar