The Principal-Teacher’s Power Relationship Revisited: A National Study Based on the 2011-12 SASS Data

References

• Bacharach, S. B., Bauer, S., & Shedd, J. B. (1986). The work environment and school reform. Teachers College Record, 88(2), 241–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachrach, P., & Baratz, M. S. (1963). Decisions and nondecisions: An analytical framework. The American Political Science Review, 57(3), 632–642. doi:10.2307/1952568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, B. (1984). Subordinate teacher power in school organizations. Sociology of Education, 57(1), 43. doi:10.2307/2112467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barth, R. S. (1990). Improving schools from within: Teachers, parents, and principals can make the difference. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Blasé, J., & Blasé, J. (2001). Empowering teachers: What successful principals do (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blasé, J., & Kirby, P. C. (2008). Bringing out the best in teachers: What effective principals do? Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boles, K., & Troen, V. (1994, April 4–8). Teacher leadership in a professional development school. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED375103.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, J., & Boyd, W. L. (1986). Decentralization, devolution, and the school principal: Australian lessons on statewide educational reform. Educational Administration Quarterly, 22(4), 28–58. doi:10.1177/0013161X86022004003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David, J. (1990). Restructuring in progress: Lessons from pioneering districts. In R. Elmore (Ed.), Restructuring schools: The next generation of educational reform (pp. 289–298). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, J. B. (2013). Distributed leadership: Examining issues of race, power, and inequality. In L. C. Tillman & J. J. Scheurich (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational leadership for equity and diversity (pp. 83–104). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, J. B., & Spillane, J. P. (2016). School leadership and management from a distributed perspective: A 2016 retrospective and prospective. Management in Education, 30(4), 147–154. doi:10.1177/0892020616665938
   Google Scholar
• Dowding, K. M. (1996). Power. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elmore, R. F. (2000). Building a new structure for school leadership. Washington, DC: Albert Shanker Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Follett, M. P. (1924). Creative experience. New York, NY: Longmans Green.
   Google Scholar
• Follett, M. P. (1942). Dynamic administration. New York, NY: Harper & Brothers.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, F. C. (2009). Policy studies for educational leaders: An introduction (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• French, J. R., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150–167). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodlad, J. I. (1984). A place called school. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
   Google Scholar
• Gronn, P. (2000). Distributed properties: A new architecture for leadership. Educational Management & Administration, 28(3), 317–338. doi:10.1177/0263211X000283006
   Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P., Murphy, J., & Hausman, C. (1992). Restructuring schools: Principals’ perceptions of fundamental educational reform. Educational Administration Quarterly, 28(3), 330–349. doi:10.1177/0013161X92028003006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, A. (2003). Teacher leadership as distributed leadership: Heresy, fantasy or possibility? School Leadership & Management, 23(3), 313–324. doi:10.1080/1363243032000112801
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A. (2009). Distributed leadership and knowledge creation. In K. Leithwood, B. Mascall, & T. Strauss (Eds.), Distributed leadership according to the evidence (pp. 271–284). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Heck, R. H., & Thomas, S. L. (2015). An introduction to multilevel modeling techniques: MLM and SEM approaches using Mplus. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hines, S. C., & McCleary, L. E. (1980). The role of the principal in community involvement. NASSP Bulletin, 64(432), 67–75.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, P. (2010, August 02).Julia Gillard promises principal power. Herald Sun. Retrieved from http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/special-reports/julia-gillard-promises-principal-power/story-fn5ko0pw-1225899748741
   Google Scholar
• Ingersoll, R. M. (2003). Who controls teachers’ work?: Power and accountability in America’s schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, P. E., & Short, P. M. (1998). Principal’s leader power, teacher empowerment, teacher compliance and conflict. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 26(2), 147–159. doi:10.1177/0263211X98262004
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, S. M. (1990). Teachers at work: Achieving success in our schools. Scranton, PA: Harper Collins Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Keiser, N. M., & Shen, J. (2000). Principals' and teachers' perceptions of teacher empowerment. Journal of Leadership Studies, 7(3), 115–121.
   Google Scholar
• Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (1987). The leadership challenge: How to get extraordinary things done in organization. San Francisco: Lossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K. (1992). The move towards transformational leadership. Educational Leadership, 49(5), 8–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipman, P. (1997). Restructuring in context: A case study of teacher participation and the dynamics of ideology, race, and power. American Educational Research Journal, 34(1), 3–37. doi:10.3102/00028312034001003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, X. S., & Ramsey, J. (2008). Teachers’ job satisfaction: Analyses of the teacher follow-up survey in the United States for 2000–2001. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(5), 1173–1184. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lortie, D. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lukes, S. (2005). Power: A radical view (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Maiden, S., & Watkins, E. (2012, January 14). Let us dump bad teachers, state school heads plead. Sunday Mail (SA). Retrieved from http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/education/let-us-dump-bad-teachers-state-school-heads-plead/story-fn3o6nna-1226244452324
   Google Scholar
• Malen, B., & Cochran, M. V. (2015). Beyond pluralistic patterns of power: Research on the micropolitics of schools. In B. S. Cooper, J. G. Cibulka, & L. D. Fusarelli Eds., Handbook of education politics and policy (2nd pp. 3–36). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1978). The Structure of educational organizations. In J. W. Meyer (Ed.), Environments and organizations (pp. 78–109). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, D. A. (1973). Teacher power: Professionalization and collective bargaining. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, C. W. (1956). The power elite. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morriss, P. (2002). Power: A philosophical analysis (2nd ed.). Manchester, MA: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, J. (1994). Redefining the principalship in restructuring schools. NASSP Bulletin, 78(560), 94–99. doi:10.1177/019263659407856013
   Google Scholar
• Owens, R. G., & Valesky, T. C. (2007). Organizational behavior in education: Adaptive leadership and school reform (9th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Owens, R. G., & Valesky, T. C. (2015). Organizational behavior in education: Adaptive leadership and school reform (11th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, T. (1963). On the concept of political power. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 107(3), 232–262.
   Google Scholar
• Patterson, J. L., Purkey, S., & Parker, J. (1986). Productive school systems for a nonrational world. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J. (1981). Power in organizations. Marshfield, MA: Pitman Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S. W., Rowan, B., & Kang, S. J. (1991). A multilevel, multivariate model for studying school climate with estimation via the EM algorithm and application to US high-school data. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 16(4), 295–330.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Campos, L., Rincones-Gómez, R., & Shen, J. (2008). Do teachers, principals, and superintendents perceive leadership the same way? Frontiers of Education in China, 3(3), 360–385. doi:10.1007/s11516-008-0024-4
   Google Scholar
• Sarason, S. B. (1990). The predictable failure of educational reform: Can we change course before it’s too late? San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Sergiovanni, T. J., & Carver, F. D. (1973). The new school executive: A theory of administration. New York, NY: Dodd, Mead.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, J. (1998). Do teachers feel empowered? Educational Leadership, 55(7), 35–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, J. (2001). Teacher and principal empowerment: National, longitudinal, and comparative perspectives. Educational Horizons, 79(3), 124–129.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, J., & Xia, J. (2012). The relationship between teachers’ and principals’ decision-making power: Was it a win-win situation or a zero-sum game?. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 15(2), 153–174. doi:10.1080/13603124.2011.624643
   Google Scholar
• Short, P. M., & Johnson, P. E. (1994). Exploring the links among teacher empowerment, leader power, and conflict. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED372044.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Smylie, M. A. (1992). Teacher participation in school decision making: Assessing willingness to participate. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14(1), 53–67. doi:10.3102/01623737014001053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein, R., & King, B. (1992). Is restructuring a threat to principals’ power? NASSP Bulletin, 76(540), 26–31. doi:10.1177/019263659207654005
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. Institute of Education Sciences (IES), National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2005). The 1999–2000 schools and staffing survey public-use principal and teacher data (NCES Citation2005335). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/surveys/sass/dataprod9901.asp
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. Institute of Education Sciences (IES), National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2014). The 2011–12 schools and staffing survey restricted-use data files (NCES Citation2014356). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Waller, W. (1961). The sociology of teaching. New York, NY: Russell & Russell.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely-coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(1), 1–19. doi:10.2307/2391875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winerip, M. (1988, January 1). Tales of 1987: Strikers, dogs and U.F.O.’s. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/1988/01/01/nyregion/our-towns-tales-of-1987-strikers-dogs-and-ufo-s.html
   Google Scholar
• Wrong, D. H. (1979). Power, its forms, bases, and uses. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar