District-Led School Turnaround: A Case Study Of One U.S. District’s Turnaround Launch For Multiple Schools

References

• Aladjem, D. K., Birman, B., Orland, M., Harr-Robbins, J., Heredia, A., Parrish, T. B., & Ruffini, S. J. (2010). Achieving dramatic school improvement: An exploratory study. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of education, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development, Policy and Program Studies Service. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/other/dramatic-school-improvement/exploratory-study.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, S., Leithwood, K., & Strauss, T. (2010). Leading data use in schools: Organizational conditions and practices at the school and district levels. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 9, 292–327. doi:10.1080/15700761003731492
   Google Scholar
• Atchison, B., Diffey, L., Rafa, A., & Sarubbi, M. (2017). Equity in education: Key questions to consider. Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.
   Google Scholar
• Baroody, K. (2011). Turning around the nation’s lowest performing schools: Five steps districts can take to improve their chances of success. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress.
   Google Scholar
• Billingham, C. M., & Hunt, M. O. (2016). School racial composition and parental choice: New evidence on the preferences of white parents in the United States. Sociology of Education, 89(2), 99–117. doi:10.1177/0038040716635718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, K. M. (2006). Leadership for social justice and equity: Evaluating a transformative framework and andragogy. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(5), 700–745. doi:10.1177/0013161X06290650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clotfelter, C. T. (2001). Are whites still fleeing? Racial patterns and enrollment shifts in urban public schools, 1987–1996. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 20(2), 199–221. doi:10.1002/pam.2022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council of Chief State School Officers’. 2015. Model principal supervisor professional standards. Washington, DC: CCSSO. Retrieved from https://www.ccsso.org/sites/default/files/2017-10/2015PrincipalSupervisorStandardsFinal1272015.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice, 39(3), 124–130. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuban, L. (1990). Reforming again, again, and again. Educational Researcher, 19(1), 3–13. doi:10.3102/0013189X019001003
   Google Scholar
• Cummings, S., Bridgman, T., & Brown, K. G. (2016). Unfreezing change as three steps: Rethinking Kurt Lewin’s legacy for change management. Human Relations, 69(1), 33–60. doi:10.1177/0018726715577707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly, A. J., & Finnigan, K. S. (2016). Thinking and acting systematically: Improving school districts under under pressure. Washington, D.C.: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• de la Torre, M., Allensworth, E., Jagesic, S., Sebastian, J., Salmonowicz, M., Meyers, C., & Gerdeman, D. (2013). Turning around low-performing schools in Chicago: Full report. Chicago, IL: Consortium on Chicago School Research at the University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Dee, T. S. (2012). School turnarounds: Evidence from the 2009 Stimulus (Working Paper No. 17990). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K. (1986). Interpretive biography. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dey, I. (1993). Qualitative data analysis: A user-friendly guide for social scientists. London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Duke, D. L., & VanGronigen, B. A. (2018). Small city school districts’ capacity for improvement and the struggle for educational equity. Urban Education. doi:10.1177/0042085918772625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. (2006). Change theory: A force for school improvement. Victoria, Australia: The Centre for Strategic Education.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. (2010). All systems go: The change imperative for whole system reform. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. (2015). The new meaning of educational change. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. (2016). The elusive nature of whole system improvement in education. Journal of Educational Change, 17(4), 539–544. doi:10.1007/s10833-016-9289-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, B., Zimmer, R., Christman, J., & Blanc, S. (2007). State takeover, school restructuring, private management, and student achievement in Philadelphia. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A., & Jones, M. (2015). Transforming education systems: Comparative and critical perspectives on school leadership. Asia Pacific Journal Of Education, 35(1), 311–318. doi: 10.1080/02188791.2015.1056590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, D., & Larsen, M. (2016). The effects of the new orleans post-katrina school reforms on student academic outcomes. New Orleans, LA: Tulane University, Education Research Alliance for New Orleans.
   Google Scholar
• Heckman, J. J. (1979). Sample bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47(1), 153–162. doi:10.2307/1912352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herman, R., Dawson, P., Dee, T., Greene, J., Maynard, R., Redding, S., & Darwin, M. (2008). Turning around chronically low-performing schools: A practice guide (NCEE #2008 4020). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, F. M. (1999). Spinning wheels: The politics of urban school reform. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, F. M., & Kelly, A. P. (2011). Carrots, sticks, and the bully pulpit: Lessons from a half-century of federal efforts to improve America’s schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, A. D. (2008). The problem with “proficiency”: Limitations of statistics and policy under no child left behind. Educational Researcher, 37(6), 351–360. doi:10.3102/0013189X08323842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honig, M. (2012). District central office leadership as teaching: How central office administrators support principals’ development as instructional leaders. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(4), 733–774. doi:10.1177/0013161X12443258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honig, M., Copland, M., Rainey, L., Lorton, J., & Newton, M. (2010). Central office transformation for district-wide teaching and learning. Seattle, WA: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington. Retrieved from, https://depts.washington.edu/ctpmail/PDFs/S2-CentralAdmin-04-2010.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins, D., Stringfield, S., Harris, A., Stoll, L., & Mackay, T. (2014). School and system improvement: A narrative state-of-the-art review. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 25(2), 257–281. doi:10.1080/09243453.2014.885452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurlburt, S., Le Floch, K. C., Therriault, S. B., & Cole, S. (2011). Baseline analyses of SIG applications and SIG-eligible and SIG-awarded schools (NCEE 2011-4019). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Available at http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/pubs/20114019/pdf/20114019.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Khalifa, M. A., Gooden, M. A., & Davis, J. E. (2016). Culturally responsive school leadership: A synthesis of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 1272–1311. doi:10.3102/0034654316630383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladson-Billings, G. (2006). From the achievement gap to the education debt: Understanding achievement in U.S. schools. Educational Researcher, 35(7), 3–12. doi:10.3102/0013189X035007003
   Google Scholar
• Le Floch, K. C., Birman, B., O’Day, J., Hurlburt, S., Mercado-Garcia, D., Goff, R., & Wei, T. E. (2014). Case studies of schools receiving school improvement grants: Findings after the first year of implementation (NCEE 2014-4015). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• LeCompte, M. D. (2000). Analyzing qualitative data. Theory into Practice, 39(3), 146–154. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip3903_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeCompte, M. D., & Schensul, J. J. (2010). Designing and conducting ethnographic research: An introduction. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics. Concept, method and reality in social science: Equilibrium and social change. Human Relations, 1(1), 5–41. doi:10.1177/001872674700100103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LiCalsi, C., Citkowicz, M., Friedman, L. B., & Brown, M. (2015). Evaluation of massachusetts district and school turnaround assistance: Impact of School Redesign Grants (SRG). Washington, D.C.: American Institutes for Research.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Louis, K. S., Leithwood, K., Wahlstrom, K. L., & Anderson, S. E. (2010). Investigating the links to improved student learning: Final report of research findings. New York, NY: Wallace Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Lutterloh, C., Cornier, J. P., & Hassel, B. (2016). Measuring school turnaround success. Washington, DC: Department of Education, Center on School Turnaround.
   Google Scholar
• MacLeod, J. (1985). Ain’t no makin’ it: Aspirations and attainment for a low-income neighborhood. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Magnuson, K. A., & Waldfogel, J. (2005). Early childhood care and education: Effects on ethnic and racial gaps in school readiness. The Future of Children, 15(1), 169–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, J. A. (2016). The political dynamics of district reform: The form and fate of the los angeles public school choice initiative. Teachers College Record, 118, 9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Meyers, C. V., Lindsay, J., Condon, C., & Wan, Y. (2012). A statistical approach to identifying schools demonstrating substantial improvement in student learning. What does it mean to be a school in need of turnaround? [Special Issue]. Journal Of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 17(1), 1–22. doi: 10.1080/10824669.2012.636703
   Google Scholar
• Meyers, C. V., & Sadler, J. (2018). District leaders engaged in school turnaround: Identified challenges and espoused responses. NASSP Bulletin, 102(2), 89–110. doi: 10.1177/0192636518786008
   Google Scholar
• Meyers, C. V., & Smylie, M. (2017). The myths of school turnaround policy and practice. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 16(3), 502–523. doi: 10.1080/15700763.2016.1270333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Milner, H. R. (2007). Race, culture, and researcher positionality: Working through dangers seen, unseen, and unforeseen. Educational Researcher, 36(7), 388–400. doi:10.3102/0013189X07309471
   Google Scholar
• Milner, H. R. (2012). Beyond a test score: Explaining opportunity gaps in educational practice. Journal of Black Studies, 43(6), 693–718. doi:10.1177/0021934712442539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minnici, A., & Hill, D. D. (2007). Educational architects: Do state education agencies have the tools necessary to implement NCLB? Washington, DC: Center on Education Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, J., & Meyers, C. V. (2008). Turning around failing schools: Leadership lessons from the organizational sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, J. F. (1998). Preparation for the school principalship: The United States’ story. School Leadership & Management, 18(3), 359–372. doi:10.1080/13632439869556
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, J. F., & Bleiburg, J. F. (2019). School turnaround policies and practices in the US: Learning from failed school reform. New York, NY: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Payne, C. (2008). So much reform, so little change: The persistence of failure in urban schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, C., & Reitzug, U. C. (2014). School turnaround fever: The paradoxes of a historical practice promoted as a new reform. Urban Education, 49(1), 8–38. doi:10.1177/0042085912472511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Player, D., Hitt, D. H., & Robinson, W. (2014). District readiness to support school turnaround: A user’s guide to inform the work of state education agencies and districts. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Center on School Turnaround.
   Google Scholar
• Reardon, S. F., & Galindo, C. (2009). The Hispanic-White achievement gap in math and reading in the elementary grades. American Educational Research Journal, 46(3), 853–891. doi:10.3102/0002831209333184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reardon, S. F., & Portilla, X. A. (2016). Recent trends in income, racial, and ethnic school readiness gaps at kindergarten entry. AERA Open. doi:10.1177/2332858416657343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Schueler, B. E. (2018). A third way: The politics of school district takeover and turnaround in Lawrence, Massachusetts. Educational Administration Quarterly. doi:10.1177/0013161X18785873
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schueler, B. E., Goodman, J. S., & Deming, D. J. (2017). Can states take over and turn around School districts? Evidence from lawrence, massachusetts. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39(2), 311–332. doi:10.3102/0162373716685824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, C., Dunn, L., & McCauley, C. (2017). Reframing turnaround: From a school initiative to a system initiative. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-exerimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel-Hawley, G., Bridges, K., & Shields, T. J. (2017). Solidifying segregation or promoting diversity? School closure and rezoning in an urban district. Educational Administration Quarterly, 53(1), 107–141. doi:10.1177/0013161X16659346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smylie, M. A. (2016). Three organizational lessons for school district improvement. In A. J. Daly & K. S. Finnigan (Eds.), Thinking and acting systemically: Improving school districts under pressure (pp. 209–220). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Street, C., & Ward, K. (2010). Retrospective case study. In A. J. Mills, G. Durepos, & E. Wiebe (Eds.), Encyclopedia of case study research (pp. 824–827). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Strunk, K. O., Marsh, J. A., Hashim, A. K., Bush-Mecenas, S., & Weinstein, T. (2016). The impact of school turnaround reform on student outcomes: Evidence and insights from the los angeles unified school district. Educational Finance and Policy, 11(3), 251–282. doi:10.1162/EDFP_a_00188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuit, D. (2010). Are bad schools immortal? The scarcity of turnarounds and shutdowns in both charter and district sectors. Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Institute. Available at [Registration required] http://www.edexcellence.net
   Google Scholar
• Stuit, D. (2012). Turnaround and closure rates in the charter and district sectors. [Special Issue]. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 17(1), 40–54. doi:10.1080/10824669.2012.637032
   Google Scholar
• Sun, M., Penner, E. K., & Loeb, S. (2017). Resource- and approach-driven multidimensional change: Three-year effects of school improvement grants. American Educational Research Journal, 54(4), 607–643. doi:10.3102/0002831217695790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanborn, P. (2010). Case study research: What, why and how? Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Tannenbaum, C., Boyle, A., Graczewski, C., James-Burdumy, S., Dragoset, L., & Hallgren, K. (2015). State capacity to support school turnaround (NCEE 2015-412). Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED556118.pdf
   Google Scholar
• The Center on School Turnaround. 2017. Four domains for rapid school improvement: A systems framework [The Center on School Turnaround at WestEd]. San Francisco, CA: WestEd. Available at http://centeronschoolturnaround.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/CST_Four-Domains-Framework-Final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Trujillo, T., & Renée, M. (2015). Irrational exuberance for market-based reform: How federal turnaround policies thwart democratic schooling. Teachers College Record, 117, 1–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnbull, B. J., Anderson, L. M., Riley, D. L., MacFarlane, J. R., & Aladjem, D. K. (2016). The principal pipeline initiative in action. New York, NY: The Wallace Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.wallacefoundation.org/knowledge-center/Documents/Building-a-Stronger-Principalship-Vol-5-The-Principal-Pipeline-Initiative-in-Action.pdf
   Google Scholar
• VanGronigen, B. A., & Meyers, C. V. (2019). How state education agencies are administering school turnaround efforts: 15 years after No Child Left Behind. Educational Policy, 33(3), 423–452. doi: 10.1177/0895904817691846
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waters, T., & Marzano, R. J. (2006). School district leadership that works: The effect of superintendent leadership on student achievement. Denver, CO: McREL. Retrieved from http://www.ctc.ca.gov/educator-prep/ASC/4005RR_Superintendent_Leadership.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmer, R., Kho, A., Henry, G., & Viano, S. (2015). Evaluation of the effects of Tennessee’s achievement school district on student test scores. Nashville, TN: Tennessee Consortium on Research, Evaluation and Development.
   Google Scholar