References
- Allen, C. D., & Penuel, W. R. (2015). Studying teachers’ sensemaking to investigate teachers’ responses to professional development focused on new standards. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(2), 136–149. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487114560646
- Allensworth, E. M., & Hart, H. (2018). How do principals influence student achievement? Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Consortium on School Research.
- Ambrose, S. C., Rutherford, B. N., Shepherd, C. D., & Tashchian, A. (2014). Boundary spanner multi-faceted role ambiguity and burnout: An exploratory study. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(6), 1070–1078. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2014.05.020
- Ancona, D. (2012). Sensemaking: Framing and acting in the unknown. In S. Snook, N. Nohria, & R. Khurana (Eds.), The handbook for teaching leadership: Knowing, doing, and being (pp. 3–19). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Avgar, I., Berkovich, I., & Shalev-Vigiser, Y. (2012). Building trust in the education system: Perceptions of teachers and principals. Jerusalem, Israel: The Van Leer Jerusalem Institute (in Hebrew).
- Avidov-Unger, O., & Reingold, R. (2015). Hindering and facilitating factors in the professional development reform of teachers. Studies in Educational Administration and Organization, 35, 12–21.
- Ball, S. J., Maguire, M., & Braun, A. (2012). How schools do policy: Policy enactment in secondary schools. London, UK: Routledge.
- Bannink, A., & Van Dam, J. (2007). Bootstrapping reflection on classroom conversations: Discourse contexts of novice teachers’ thinking. Evaluation and Research in Education, 20(2), 81–100. doi:https://doi.org/10.2167/eri400.0
- Bascia, N. (2009). Pushing on the paradigm: Research on teachers’ organizations as policy actors. In G. Sykes, B. Schneider, & D. Plank (Eds.), Handbook of educational policy research (pp. 785–792). New York, NY: Routledge.
- Bascia, N., & Osmond, P. (2012). Teacher unions and educational reform. Washington, DC: National Education Association.
- Beabout, B. (2012). Turbulence, perturbance and educational change. Complicity: an International Journal of Complexity and Education, 9(2), 15–29. Retrieved from https://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/complicity/article/view/17984
- BenDavid-Hadar, I. (2016). School finance policy and social justice. International Journal of Educational Development, 46(C), 166–174. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2015.10.003
- Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 611–639. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611
- Benoliel, P. (2017). Managing senior management team boundaries and school improvement: An investigation of the school leader role. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 20(1), 57–86. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2015.1053536
- Berkovich, I. (2011). No we won’t! Teachers’ resistance to educational reform. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(5), 563–578. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231111159548
- Berkovich, I. (2017). Educational reform hyperwaves: Reconceptualizing Cuban’s theories of change. Journal of Educational Change, 18(4), 413–438. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-017-9304-1
- Berkovich, I., & Eyal, O. (2018). The effects of principals’ communication on teachers’ emotional distress. Educational Management, Administration & Leadership, 46(4), 642–685. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143217694894
- Brezicha, K., Bergmark, U., & Mitra, D. L. (2015). One size does not fit all: Differentiating leadership to support teachers in school reform. Educational Administration Quarterly, 51(1), 96–132. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X14521632
- Bridwell-Mitchell, E. N. (2015). Theorizing teacher agency and reform: How institutionalized instructional practices change and persist. Sociology of Education, 88(2), 140–159. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040715575559
- Brooks, J. G., & Dietz, M. E. (2013). The dangers and opportunities of the common core. Educational Leadership, 70(4), 64–67.
- Bryk, A., Gomez, L., Grunow, A., & LeMahieu, P. (2015). Learning to improve: How America’s schools can get better at getting better. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
- Campbell, J. L. (2005). Where do we stand? Common mechanisms in organizations and social movement research. In G. F. Davis, D. McAdam, W. R. Scott, & M. N. Zald (Eds.), Social movements and organization theory (pp. 41–72). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
- Coburn, C. (2001). Collective sensemaking about reading: How teachers mediate reading policy in their professional communities. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(2), 145–170. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737023002145
- Coburn, C. E. (2004). Beyond decoupling: Rethinking the relationship between the institutional environment and the classroom. Sociology of Education, 77(3), 211–244. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/003804070407700302
- Coburn, C. E. (2005). Shaping teacher sensemaking: School leaders and the enactment of reading policy. Educational Policy, 19(3), 476–509. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904805276143
- Coburn, C. E. (2006). Framing the problem of reading instruction: Using frame analysis to uncover the microprocesses of policy information. American Educational Research Journal, 43(3), 343–372. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312043003343
- Coburn, C. E. (2016). What’s policy got to do with it? How the structure-agency debate can illuminate policy implementation. American Journal of Education, 122(3), 465–475. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/685847
- Coburn, C. E., Hill, H. C., & Spillane, J. P. (2016). Alignment and accountability in policy design and implementation: The common core state standards and implementation research. Educational Researcher, 45(4), 243–251. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X16651080
- Coburn, C. E., & Woulfin, S. L. (2012). Reading coaches and the relationship between policy and practice. Reading Research Quarterly, 47(1), 5–30. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/RRQ.008
- Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education. London, UK: Routledge.
- Creswell, J. W. (2014). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson.
- Daly, A. J., Finnigan, K. S., Jordan, S., Moolenaar, N., & Che, J. (2014). Misalignment and perverse incentives: Examining the role of the district leaders as brokers in the use of research evidence. Educational Policy, 28(2), 145–174. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904813513149
- Datnow, A., & Park, V. (2009). Conceptualizing policy implementation: Large-scale reform in an era of complexity. In D. Plank, B. Schneider, & G. Sykes (Eds.), Handbook of education policy research (pp. 348–361). New York, NY: Routledge.
- Day, C., Gu, Q., & Sammons, P. (2016). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: How successful school leaders use transformational and instructional strategies to make a difference. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52(2), 221–258. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X15616863
- Derrington, M. L., & Campbell, J. W. (2015). Implementing new teacher evaluation systems: Principals’ concerns and supervisor support. Journal of Educational Change, 16(3), 305–326. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-015-9244-6
- Durand, F. T., Lawson, H. A., Wilcox, K. C., & Schiller, K. S. (2016). The role of district office leaders in the adoption and implementation of the Common Core State Standards in elementary schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52(1), 45–74. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X15615391
- Flessa, J. J. (2012). Principals as middle managers: School leadership during the implementation of primary class size reduction policy in Ontario. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 11(3), 325–343. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2012.692429
- Fullan, M. (2015). The new meaning of educational change (5th ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
- Ganon-Shilon, S., & Schechter, C. (2017a). Making sense of school leaders' sense-making. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 45(4), 682–698. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143216628536
- Ganon-Shilon, S., & Schechter, C. (2017b). Making sense while steering through the fog: Principals' metaphors within a national reform implementation. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 25, 105. doi:https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.25.2942
- Ganon-Shilon, S., & Schechter, C. (2019). Principals' sense-making of their leadership role during an educational reform implementation. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 22(3), 279–300.
- Gawlik, M. A. (2015). Shared sensemaking: How charter school leaders ascribe meaning to accountability. Journal of Educational Administration, 53(3), 393–415. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-08-2013-0092
- Gawlik, M. A. (2017). Leadership knowledge and practices in the context of charter schools. Leadership and Policy in Schools. Advance online publication. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2017.1326145
- Gibbs, G. R. (2007). Analyzing qualitative data. London, UK: Sage.
- Glazer, J. L., & Peurach, D. P. (2013). School improvement networks as a strategy for large-scale education reform: The role of environments. Educational Policy, 27(4), 676–710. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904811429283
- He, Y., Tian, Z., & Chen, Y. (2007). Performance implications of nonmarket strategy in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 24(2), 151–169. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-006-9030-3
- Honig, M. I. (2006). Complexity and policy implementation: Challenges and opportunities for the field. In M. I. Honig (Ed.), New directions in education policy implementation: Confronting complexity (pp. 1–23). Albany: The State University of New York.
- Honig, M. I., & Hatch, T. C. (2004). Crafting coherence: How schools strategically manage multiple, external demands. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 16–30. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033008016
- Hopfenbeck, T. N., Flórez-Petour, M. T., & Tolo, A. (2015). Balancing tensions in educational policy reforms: Large-scale implementation of assessment for learning in Norway. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 22(1), 44–60.
- Hubbard, L., Mehan, H., & Stein, M. K. (2006). Reform as learning: School reform, organizational culture, and community politics in San Diego. New York, NY: Routledge.
- Hughes, W. H., & Pickeral, T. (2013). School climate and shared leadership. In T. Dary & T. Pickeral (Eds.), School climate practices for implementation and sustainability (pp. 26–29). New York, NY: National School Climate Center. Retrieved from http://www.schoolclimate.org/publications/documents/SchoolClimatePracticeBriefs-2013.pdf
- Israel Central Bureau of Statistics. (2017). Statistical abstract of Israel 2017 No. 68. Jerusalem, Israel: Author. Retrieved from http://www.cbs.gov.il/reader/?MIval=shnaton%2Fshnatonh_new.htm&CYear=2017&Vol=68&CSubject=8
- Israel Ministry of Education. (2011, August). A general collective agreement to implement “Oz Le’tmura” reform in high schools. Retrieved from http://cms.education.gov.il/NR/rdonlyres/AE536B84-6A48-4992-9FDB-B43515C703ED/133024/oz.pdf
- Israel Ministry of Education. (2015, February). Organizing the pedagogical work. Retrieved from http://cms.education.gov.il/EducationCMS/Units/Ofek/MaBaofek/
- Kalenze, E. (2014). Education is upside-down: Reframing reform to focus on the right problems. London, UK: Rowman & Littlefield.
- Kaplan, S. L., & Owings, A. W. (2017). Organizational behavior for school leadership: Leveraging your school for success. New York, NY: Routledge.
- Kelchtermans, G., Piot, L., & Ballet, K. (2011). The lucid loneliness of the gatekeeper: Exploring the emotional dimension in principal’s work lives. Oxford Review of Education, 37(1), 93–108. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2010.545192
- Kim, S., & Kim, J. N. (2015). Bridge or buffer: Two ideas of effective corporate governance and public engagement. Journal of Public Affairs, 16(2), 118–127.
- Kirtman, L., & Fullan, M. (2016). Leadership: Key competencies for whole-system change. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
- Knapp, M. S., & Feldman, S. (2012). Managing the intersection of internal and external accountability: Challenge for urban school leadership in the United States. Journal of Educational Administration, 50(5), 666–694. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231211249862
- Kohansal, R. (2015). Public school principals: Agents of bridging and buffering. Journal of School Leadership, 25(4), 621–658. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/105268461502500403
- Koyama, J. (2014). Principals as bricoleurs: Making sense and making do in an era of accountability. Educational Administration Quarterly, 50(2), 279–304. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X13492796
- Larsson, J., & Holmstrm, I. (2007). Phenomenographic or phenomenological analysis: Does it matter? Examples from a study on anaesthesiologists’ work. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 2(1), 55–64. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17482620601068105
- Leahy, S., & William, D. (2012). From teachers to schools: Scaling up professional development for formative assessment. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and learning (2nd ed., pp. 49–72). London, UK: Sage.
- Li, Y. Y. (2017). Processes and dynamics behind whole-school reform: Nine-year journeys of four primary schools. American Educational Research Journal, 54(2), 279–324. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216689591
- Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public service. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
- Louis, K. S., & Robinson, V. M. (2012). External mandates and instructional leadership: School leaders as mediating agents. Journal of Educational Administration, 50(5), 629–665. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231211249853
- Maitlis, S., & Christianson, M. (2014). Sensemaking in organizations: Taking stock and moving forward. The Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 57–125. doi:https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2014.873177
- Marsh, S., Waniganayake, M., & De Nobile, J. (2013). Leadership for learning as an intentional, community-wide activity: The importance of developing a shared language in schools. School Leadership & Management, 33(4), 395–411. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2013.813461
- März, V., & Kelchtermans, G. (2013). Sense-making and structure in teachers’ reception of educational reform. A case study on statistics in the mathematics curriculum. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29, 13–24. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.08.004
- März, V., Kelchtermans, G., & Dumay, X. (2016). Stability and change of mentoring practices in a capricious policy environment: Opening the “black box” of institutionalization. American Journal of Education, 122(3), 303–336. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/685846
- Matsummura, L. C., & Wang, E. (2014). Principals’ sensemaking of coaching for ambitious reading instruction in a high-stakes accountability policy environment. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 22(51), 1–33.
- McDonald, J. P. (2014). American school reform: What works, what fails, and why. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- McDonnell, L. M., & Weatherford, M. S. (2013). Evidence use and the common core state standards movement: From problem definition to policy adaption. American Journal of Education, 120(1), 1–25. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/673163
- McDonnell, L. M., & Weatherford, M. S. (2016). Recognizing the political in implementation research. Educational Researcher, 45(4), 233–242. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X16649945
- Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
- Miles, M. B., Huberman, M. A., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Nir, A., Ben-David, A., Bogler, R., Inbar, D., & Zohar, A. (2016). School autonomy and 21st century skills in the Israeli educational system. International Journal of Educational Management, 30(7), 1231–1246.
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. (2016). Education at a glance 2016: OECD indicators. Paris: Author. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/edu/education-at-a-glance-19991487.htm
- Ortlipp, M. (2008). Keeping and using reflective journals in the qualitative research process. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 695–705. Retrieved from http://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol13/iss4/8
- Paredes Scribner, S. M. (2013). Beyond bridging and buffering: Cases of leadership perspective and practice at the nexus of school-community relations. Journal of Cases in Educational Leadership, 16(3), 3–6. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1555458913498475
- Park, J. H., & Jeong, D. W. (2013). School reforms, principal leadership, and teacher resistance: Evidence from Korea. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 33(1), 34–52. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2012.756392
- Park, V., Daly, A. J., & Guerra, A. W. (2012). Strategic framing: How leaders craft the meaning of data use for equity and learning. Educational Policy. Advance online publication. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904811429295
- Patashnik, E. M., & Zelizer, J. E. (2013). The struggle to remake politics: Liberal reform and the limits of policy feedback in the contemporary American state. Perspectives on Politics, 11(4), 1071–1087. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592713002831
- Pesonen, H., Itakonen, T., Jahnukainen, M., Kontu, E., Kokko, T., Ojala, T., & Pirttimaa, R. (2015). The implementation of new special education legislation in Finland. Educational Policy, 29(1), 162–178. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904814556754
- Pietarinen, J., Pyhältö, K., & Soini, T. (2017). Large-scale curriculum reform in Finland: Exploring the interrelation between implementation strategy, the function of the reform, and curriculum coherence. The Curriculum Journal, 28(1), 22–40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2016.1179205
- Poole, W. (2007). Organizational justice as a framework for understanding union-management relations in education. Canadian Journal of Education, 30(3), 725–748. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/20466660
- Porter, R., Fusarelli, L. D., & Fusarelli, B. C. (2015). Implementing the common core: How educators interpret curriculum reform. Educational Policy, 29(1), 111–139. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904814559248
- Priestley, M., Edwards, R., Priestley, A., & Miller, K. (2012). Teacher agency in curriculum making: Agents of change and spaces for manoeuvre. Curriculum Inquiry, 42(2), 191–214. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-873X.2012.00588.x
- Ramberg, M. R. (2014). What makes reform work? School-based conditions as predictors of teachers’ changing practice after a national curriculum reform. International Education Studies, 7(6), 46–65. doi:https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v7n6p46
- Reitzug, U. C. (2015). Simplicity and complexity. Journal of School Leadership, 25(3), 416–423. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/105268461502500302
- Richards, L., & Morse, J. M. (2013). Read me first for a user’s guide to qualitative methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Rigby, J. G. (2015). Principals’ sensemaking and enactment of teacher evaluation. Journal of Educational Administration, 53(3), 374–392. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-04-2014-0051
- Rigby, J. G., Woulfin, S. L., & Marz, V. (Eds.). (2016). Understanding how structure and agency influence education policy implementation and organizational change [special issue]. American Journal of Education, 122(3), 295–302. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/685849
- Robinson, K., & Aronica, L. (2013). Finding your element: How to discover your talents and passions and transform your life. New York, NY: Viking.
- Rossman, G. B., & Rallis, S. F. (2012). Learning in the field: An introduction to qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Saarivirta, T., & Kumpulainen, K. (2016). School autonomy, leadership and student achievement: Reflections from Finland. International Journal of Educational Management, 30(7), 1268–1278.
- Saltrick, S. (2010). Making sense of accountability: A qualitative exploration of how eight New York City high school principals negotiate the complexity of today’s accountability landscape. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section A. Humanities and Social Sciences, 72(5).
- Schwartz-Shea, P. (2006). Judging quality: Evaluative criteria and epistemic communities. In D. Yanow & P. Schwartz-Shea (Eds.), Interpretation and method: Empirical research methods and the interpretive turn (pp. 89–113). Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
- Shaari, I., & Hung, D. (2018). Partnership between a central agency and its schools: Towards fostering laterality. Educational Management, Administration & Leadership, 46(4), 578–601. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143216682502
- Shaked, H., & Schechter, C. (2017). School principals as mediating agents in education reforms. School Leadership and Management, 37(1&2), 19–37.
- Siczek, M. M., & Engel, L. C. (2017). Teachers’ cognitive interpretation of U.S. global education. Educational Policy, 1–30. Advance online publication. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904817719517
- Snow, D. A., Rochford, E. B., Worden, S. K., & Benford, R. D. (1986). Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. American Sociological Review, 51(4), 464–481. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2095581
- Spillane, J. P., & Anderson, L. (2014). The architecture of anticipation and novices’ emerging understandings of the principal position: Occupational sense making at the intersection of individual, organization, and institution. Teachers College Record, 116(7), 1–42.
- Spillane, J. P., & Coldren, A. F. (2011). Diagnosis and design for school improvement: Using a distributed perspective to lead and manage change. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
- Spillane, J. P., Diamond, J. B., Burch, P., Hallett, T., Jita, L., & Zoltners, J. (2002). Managing in the middle: School leaders and the enactment of accountability policy. Educational Policy, 16(5), 731–763. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/089590402237311
- Spillane, J. P., & Kenney, A. W. (2012). School administration in a changing education sector: The U.S experience. Journal of Educational Administration, 50(5), 541–561. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231211249817
- Spillane, J. P., Shirrell, M., & Hopkins, M. (2016). Designing and deploying a Professional Learning Community (PLC) organizational routine: Bureaucratic and collegial structures in tandem. Les Dossiers Des Sciences De l’Education, 35, 97–122. doi:https://doi.org/10.4000/dse.1283
- Starratt, R., & Leeman, Y. (2011). Ethical tension in the daily work of principals: Finding a still point for leadership. EAF Journal, 22(1), 39–54.
- Steigenberger, N. (2015). Emotions in sensemaking: A change management perspective. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 28(3), 432–451. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-05-2014-0095
- Sullanmaa, J., Pyhältö, K., Pietarinen, J., & Soini, T. (2019). Differences in state and district level stakeholders’ perceptions of curriculum coherence and school impact in national curriculum reform. Journal of Educational Administration, 57(3), 210–226. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-08-2018-0153
- Taylor, S. L., Bogdan, R., & DeVault, M. L. (2016). Introduction to qualitative research methods: A guidebook and resource (4th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
- The National Authority for Measurement and Evaluation in Education. (2012). Evaluation of the New Horizon reform in elementary and junior high education at the end of three years of implementation. Jerusalem, Israel: Ministry of Education.
- Tichnor-Wagner, A., Harrison, C., & Cohen-Vogel, L. (2016). Cultures of learning in effective high schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52(4), 602–642. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X16644957
- Tran, H., McCormick, J., & Thu Nguyen, T. (2018). The cost of replacing South Carolina high school principals. Management in Education, 32(3), 109–118. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0892020617747609
- Tschannen-Moran, M. (2016). Trust matters: Leadership for successful schools (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
- Tubin, D., & Oplatka, I. (2010). Teachers’ perspectives on 40 years of reform: The case of the Israeli junior high school. Educational Studies, 36(4), 391–402. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03055690903424931
- Vaughan, D. (1996). The Challenger launch decision: Risky technology, culture, and deviance at NASA. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Weick, K. E. (2009). Making sense of the organization: Vol. 2. The impermanent organization. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
- Weick, K. E., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2007). Managing the unexpected: Resilient performance in an age of uncertainty (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
- Werts, A. B., & Brewer, C. A. (2015). Reframing the study of policy implementation: Lived experience as politics. Educational Policy, 29(1), 206–229. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904814559247
- Woulfin, S. L. (2015). Catalysts of change: An examination of coaches’ leadership practices in framing a reading reform. Journal of School Leadership, 25(3), 526–557. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/105268461502500309
- Woulfin, S. L., Donaldson, M. L., & Gonzales, R. (2016). District leaders’ framing of educator evaluation policy. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52(1), 110–143. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X15616661
- Woulfin, S. L., & Rigby, J. G. (2017). Coaching for coherence: How instructional coaches lead change in the evaluation era. Educational Researcher, 46(6), 323–328. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X17725525
- Young, T., & Lewis, W. D. (2015). Educational policy implementation revisited. Educational Policy, 29(1), 3–17. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904815568936