Perspectives of South Korean School Principals on Job Satisfaction: In Comparison to German and U.S. Principals

References

• Bae, H. (2016). Bullying involvement of Korean children in Germany and in Korea. School Psychology International, 37(1), 3–17. doi:10.1177/0143034315605421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ban, J. C., & Kim, S. K. (2011). 2011 An analysis report of school information. Seoul, South Korea: Korea Education and Research Information Service.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, S. C., & Brazer, S. D. (2013). The impact of isolation on the job satisfaction of new principals. Journal of School Leadership, 23(1), 152–177. doi:10.1177/105268461302300106
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, D. A., & Nash, P. W. (2008). Essentials of psychology (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning. Retrieved from http://books.google.com/books?id=4Do-bFrt9tUC
   Google Scholar
• Billman, P. S. (2004). Mission possible: Achieving and improving academic achievement. DeKalb: Northern Illinois University.
   Google Scholar
• Bonsen, M., von der Gathen, J., Iglhaut, C., & Pfeiffer, H. (2002). Die Wirksamkeit von Schulleitung: Empirische Annaherungen an ein Gesamtmodell schulischen Leistungshandelns. Weinheim, Munchen: Juventa.
   Google Scholar
• Boyce, J., & Bowers, A. J. (2016). Principal turnover: Are there different types of principals who move from or leave their schools? A latent class analysis of the 2007–2008 schools and staffing survey and the 2008–2009 principal follow-up survey. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 15(3), 237–272. doi:10.1080/15700763.2015.1047033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bracken, B. A., & Barona, A. (1991). State-of-the-art procedures for translating, validating, and using psychoeducational tests for cross-cultural assessment. School Psychology International, 12, 119–132. doi:10.1177/0143034391121010
   Google Scholar
• Brislin, R. W. (1986). The wording and translation of research instruments. In W. J. Lonner & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Field methods in cross-cultural research (pp. 137–164). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Cha, S. (2016). Decentralization in educational governance and its challenges in Korea: Focused on policy conflicts between central and local government in education. Asia Pacific Education Review, 17, 479–487. doi:10.1007/s12564-016-9448-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cranny, C. J., Smith, P. C., & Stone, E. R. (1992). Job satisfaction: How people feel about their jobs and how it affects their performance. New York, NY: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Darmody, M., & Smith, E. (2016). Primary school principals’ job satisfaction and occupational stress. International Journal of Educational Management, 30(1), 115–128. doi:10.1108/IJEM-12-2014-0162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, S., Darling-Hammond, L., LaPointe, M. A., & Meyerson, D. (2005). School leadership study: Preparing successful principals. Review of Research. Retrieved from http://www.stanford.edu/dept/seli/research/documents/SELI_sls_research_review.pdf
   Google Scholar
• De Simone, S. (2015). Expectancy value theory: Motivating healthcare workers. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 5(2), 19–23.
   Google Scholar
• DiPaola, M., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (2003). The principalship at a crossroads: A study of the conditions and concerns of principals. NASSP Bulletin, 87(634), 43–62. doi:10.1177/019263650308763404
   Google Scholar
• Easley, J., II, & Elmeski, M. (2016). From policy and practice to possibilities: The context of educational accountability in the U.S. and praxis of school leadership. In J. Easley II & P. Tulowitzki (Eds.), Educational accountability – International perspectives on challenges and possibilities for school leadership (pp. 34–53). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• English, F. W. (2005). Handbook of educational leadership: Advances in theory, research, and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Estes, B., & Polnick, B. (2012). Examining motivation theory in higher education: An expectancy theory analysis of tenured faculty productivity. International Journal of Management, Business, and Administration, 15(1), 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Federici, R., & Skaalvik, E. (2012). Principal self-efficacy: Relations with burnout, job satisfaction and motivation to quit. Social Psychology of Education, 15(3), 295–320. doi:10.1007/s11218-012-9183-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feige, C. (2012). Effektives Management von Bildungseinrichtungen. Eine empirische Vergleichsstudie zur Identifikation erfolgsrelevanter Handlungsdimensionen des Managements für die pädagogische Wirksamkeit von Schulen und Erwachsenenbildungseinrichtungen. Uelvesbüll, Germany: Der Andere Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Fend, H. (1998). Qualität im Bildungswesen. Schulforschung zu Systembedingungen, Schulprofilen und Lehrerleistung. Weinheim, München: Juventa.
   Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2002). What do you call people with visions? The role of vision, mission, and goals in school leadership and improvement. In K. Leithwood & P. Hallinger (Eds.), Handbook of research in educational leadership and administration (pp. 9–40). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, D., Hary, C., & Müller, U. (2012). An investigation of factors impacting the motivation of German and US teachers to become school principals. Research in Comparative & International Education, 7, 353–364. doi:10.2304/rcie.2012.7.3.352
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, D. R., & Müller, U. (2009). Different systems: Similar challenges? Factors impacting the motivation of German and U.S. teachers to become school leaders. International Journal of Educational Research, 48(5), 299–306. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2010.02.001
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, D. R., Müller, U., Wang, C., & Hachen, J. (2019). Factors influencing school principal’s motivation to become principals in the USA and Germany. International Journal of Educational Research, 95, 90–96. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2019.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, R. D., Müller, U., & Wang, C. (2016). Motivating teachers to become school principals in the U.S.A. and Germany. Journal of Global Research in Education and Social Science, 7(2), 83–93.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A. (2002). Effective leadership in schools facing challenging contexts. School Leadership and Management, 22(1), 15–26. doi:10.1080/13632430220143024a
   Google Scholar
• Harris, S., Arnold, M., Carr, C. S., Lowery, S., & Worsham, S. E. (2004). Motivating and inhibiting factors of the principalship in three states. In C. S. Carr & C. L. Fulmer (Eds.), Educational leadership: Knowing the way, showing the way, and going the way (pp. 307–317). Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Education.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, S. G. (2012). Qualität und Entwicklung von Schule: Die Rolle von schulischen Führungskräften. In S. G. Huber (Ed.), Führungskräfteentwicklung. Grundlagen und Handreichungen zur Qualifizierung und Personalentwicklung im Schulsystem (pp. 5–11). Köln, Germany: Carl Link.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, S. G., & Gordel, B. (2006). Quality assurance in the German school system. European Educational Research Journal, 5, 196–209. doi:10.2304/eerj.2006.5.3.196
   Google Scholar
• Hulin, C. L. (1991). Adaptation, persistence, and commitment in organizations. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 445–505). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hulpia, H., & Devosa, G. (2009). Exploring the link between distributed leadership and job satisfaction of school leaders. Educational Studies, 35(2), 153–171. doi:10.1080/03055690802648739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaac, R. G., Zerbe, W. J., & Pitt, D. C. (2001). Leadership and motivation: The effective application of expectancy theory. Journal of Managerial Issues, 13, 212–226.
   Google Scholar
• James, L. A., & Lawrence, R. J. (1989). Integrating work environment perceptions: Explorations into the measurement of meaning. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 739–751. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.74.5.739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jo., H. S. (2013). The track of policies for educational equality and its implications in Korea. Journal of Educational Changes, 14, 73–94.
   Google Scholar
• Judge, T. A., & Church, A. H. (2000). Job Satisfaction: Research and practice. In C. L. Cooper & E. A. Locke (Eds.), Industrial and organizational psychology: Linking theory with practice (pp. 166–198). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Judge, T. A., Hulin, C. L., & Dalal, R. S. (2012). Job satisfaction and job affect. In S. J. W. Kozlowski (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of organizational psychology, volume 1 (pp. 496–525). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, G.-J. (2002). Education policies and reform in South Korea. In Africa Region, The World Bank (Ed.), Secondary Education in Africa: Strategies for Renewal. Retrieved from http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTAFRREGTOPEDUCATION/Resources/444659-1220976732806/Secondary_Education_Strategies_renewal.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S., & Kim, E. P. (2005). Profiles of school administrators in South Korea: A comparative perspective. Educational Management Administration, 33, 289–310. doi:10.1177/1741143205054011
   Google Scholar
• Klein, E. D. (2015). Zwillinge oder entfernte Verwandte? Strategien der Schulleitung in Schulen in deprivierter Lage in Deutschland und den USA. Zeitschrift Für Bildungsforschung, 6(1), 5–23. doi:10.1007/s35834-015-0138-8
   Google Scholar
• Klein, E. D. (2016). Schulleitungshandeln an staatlichen Schulen in Deutschland und den USA: Eine vergleichende Analyse auf Basis von PISA-Daten. Zeitschrift Für Erziehungswissenschaft. doi:10.1007/s11618-016-0695-1
   Google Scholar
• Korean Educational Development Institution. (2017). Education statistics 2017: K-12 school edition (SM2017-06). Retrieved from https://www.kedi.re.kr/khome/main/research/listPubForm.do
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S.-Y., & Oh, I. (2012). School violence in South Korea: An overview of school violence and intervention efforts. In S. R. Jimerson, A. B. Nickerson, M. J. Mayer, & M. J. Furlong (Eds.), Handbook of school violence and school safety international research and practice (pp. 541–554). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., Hallinger, P., Furman, G. C., Riley, K., MacBeath, J., Gronn, P., & Mulford, B. (Eds.). (2002). Second international handbook of educational leadership and administration. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer Netherlands. doi:10.1007/978-94-010-0375-9
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2008). Linking leadership to student learning: The contributions of leader efficacy. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44, 496–528. doi:10.1177/0013161X08321501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., & Mascall, B. (2008). Collective leadership effects on student achievement. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44, 529–561. doi:10.1177/0013161X08321221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, J. H. (2013). The school collapse debate. In N. Abelmann, J. Choi, J., & S. Park, (Eds.), No alternative?: Experiments in South Korean education (pp. 46–72). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Louis, K. S., & Kruse, S. D. (1998). Creating community in reform: Images of organizational learning in inner-city schools. In K. Leithwood & K. S. Louis (Eds.), Organizational learning in schools (pp. 17–46). Lisse, Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
   Google Scholar
• Marzano, R. J., Waters, T., & McNulty, B. A. (2005). School leadership that works: From research to results. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• McEwan, E. K. (2003). 10 traits of highly effective principals: From good to great performance. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, A. (2013). Principal turnover and student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 36, 60–72. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2013.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon, Y. L., Oh, H. S., Park, J. H., Kim, Y. Y., Jang, M. B., Lim, J. Y., & Kim, M. J. (2009). Outcome analysis and revision of a 5-year plan for school violence prevention and measures. Seoul, South Korea: Korean Ministry of Education, Science and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Moos, L. (2008). School leadership for “Democratic Building”: Fundamentalist beliefs of critical reflection? School Leadership and Management, 28, 229–246. doi:10.1080/13632430802145829
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2016). Education policy outlook: Korea. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/education/policyoutlook.htm
   Google Scholar
• Pietsch, M., & Tulowitzki, P. (2017). Disentangling school leadership and its ties to instructional practices – An empirical comparison of various leadership styles. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 28, 629–649. doi:10.1080/09243453.2017.1363787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, L. W., & Lawler, E. E. (1968). Managerial attitudes and performance. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, V., Lloyd, C., & Rowe, K. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the different effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44, 635–674. doi:10.1177/0013161X08321509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saiti, A., & Fassoulis, K. (2012). Job satisfaction: Factor analysis of Greek primary school principals’ perceptions. International Journal of Educational Management, 26, 370–380.
   Google Scholar
• Sammons, P., Day, C., Stobart, G., Kington, A., & Gu, Q. (2007). Exploring variations in teachers’ work, lives and their effects on pupils: Key findings and implications from a longitudinal mixed-method study. British Educational Research Journal, 33, 681–701. doi:10.1080/01411920701582264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schermuly, C. C., Schermuly, R. A., & Meyer, B. (2011). Effects of vice-principals’ psychological empowerment on job satisfaction and burnout. International Journal of Educational Management, 25, 252–264.
   Google Scholar
• Seth, M. (2013). South Korea’s educational exceptionalism. In N. Abelmann, J. Choi, & S. Park (Eds.), No alternative?: Experiments in South Korean education (pp. 17–27). Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Snodgrass Rangel, V. (2018). A review of the literature on principal turnover. Review of Educational Research, 88(1), 87–124. doi:10.3102/0034654317743197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tran, H. (2016). The impact of pay satisfaction and school achievement on high school principals’ turnover intentions. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 174114321663611. doi:10.1177/1741143216636115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turabik, T., & Baskan, G. A. (2015). The importance of motivation theories in terms of education systems. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 186, 1055–1063. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.006
   Google Scholar
• Tyre, P. (2015). Why do more than half of principals quit after five years? The Hechinger Report. Retrieved from http://hechingerreport.org/why-do-more-than-half-of-principals-quit-after-five-years/
   Google Scholar
• Vroom, V. (1964). Work and motivation. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, C., Hancock, D. R., & Muller, U. (2017). Factorial and item-level invariance of a principal perspectives survey: German and U.S. Principals. Journal of Applied Measurement, 18, 215–227.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Waters, T., Marzano., R. J., & McNulty, B. (2003). Balanced leadership: What 30 years of research tells us about the effect of leadership on student achievement. Denver, CO: Mid-Continent Research for Education and Learning.
   Google Scholar
• West, M., Ainscow, M., & Stanford, J. (2005). Sustaining improvement in schools in challenging circumstances: A study of successful practice. School Leadership and Management, 25, 77–93. doi:10.1080/1363243052000317055
   Google Scholar
• Winter, P. A., Rinehart, J. S., Keedy, J. L., & Bjork, L. G. (2007). Principal recruitment: Assessing job pursuit intentions among educators enrolled in principal certification programs. Journal of School Leadership, 17, 28–53. doi:10.1177/105268460701700102
   Google Scholar