References
- Ahn, T., & Vigdor, J. L. (2013). The impact of No Child Left Behind’s accountability sanctions on school performance: Regression discontinuity evidence from North Carolina. Lansing, MI. Retrieved from http://econ.msu.edu/seminars/docs/ahnvigdornclb_uva.pdf
- Almond, G. A. (1990). A discipline divided: Schools and sects in political science. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
- Andreyko, T. A. (2010). Principal leadership in the accountability era: Influence of expanding job responsibilities on functional work performance, stress management, and overall job satisfaction ( Dissertation). University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
- Anthony, A. B. (Eds.). (2011). Innovation in educational organizations: Implications for research and administrative practice. In M. DiPaola & P. Forsyth (Eds.), Leading research in educational administration: a festschrift for Wayne K. Hoy. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
- Anthony, A. B. (2012). Activity theory as a framework for investigating district-classroom system interactions and their influences on technology integration. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 44(4), 335–356, doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2012.10782594
- Archer, J. (2004). Tackling an impossible job. Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org/
- Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York, NY: Free Press.
- Batsell, H. (2013). High school principals in the vortex: Accountability, autonomy and social justice ( Dissertation). Arizona State University, Tempe.
- Beard, K. S. (2012). Making the case for the outlier: researcher reflections of an African-American female deputy superintendent who decided to close the achievement gap. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 25(1), 59–71. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2011.647724
- Bishop, J. N. (2009). Role perception of Georgia high school principals in light of requirements of No Child Left Behind: A qualitative profile of experiences ( Dissertation). Georgia Southern University, Statesboro.
- Brown, A. D., Colville, I., & Pye, A. (2015). Making sense of sensemaking in Organization Studies. Organization Studies, 36(2), 265–277. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840614559259
- Childress, S., Elmore, R., & Grossman, A. (2006). How to manage urban school districts. Harvard Business Review, 84(11), 55–68.
- Christensen, C. M., Horn, M. B., & Johnson, C. W. (2008). Disrupting class: How disruptive innovation will change the way the world learns. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
- Christensen, C. M., Horn, M. B., & Staker, H. (2013). Is K-12 blended learning disruptive? An introduction of the theory of hybrids. Lexington, MA. Retrieved from https://www.christenseninstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Is-K-12-Blended-Learning-Disruptive.pdf
- Coburn, C. E. (2001). Collective sensemaking about reading: How teachers mediate reading policy in their professional communities. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(2), 145–170. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737023002145
- Coburn, C. E. (2005). Shaping teacher sensemaking: School leaders and the enactment of reading policy. Educational Policy, 19, 476–509. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904805276143
- Coburn, C. E. (2006). Framing the problem of reading instruction: Using frame analysis to uncover the microprocesses of policy implementation. American Educational Research Journal, 43(3), 343–379. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312043003343
- Coburn, C. E. (2016). What’s policy got to do with it? How the structure-agency debate can illuminate policy implementation. American Journal of Education, 122(3), 465–475. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/685847
- Cohen, D. K., & Ball, D. L. (2006). Educational innovation and the problem of scale. In B. K. Schneider & S. K. McDonald (Eds.), Scale-up in education: Ideas in principle (Vol. 1, pp. 19–36). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
- Cooley, V. E., & Shen, J. (2003). School accountability and professional job responsibilities: A perspective from secondary principals. NASSP Bulletin, 87(634), 10–25. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/019263650308763402
- Copeland, M. A. (2003). Leadership of inquiry: Building and sustaining capacity for school improvement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25, 375–395. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737025004375
- Coplin, W. D., & O’leary, M. K. (1981). Basic policy studies skills. Croton–on-Hudson, NY: Policy Studies Associates.
- Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2007). Basics of qualitative research techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
- Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Dahlberg, K. (2006). Did Husserl change his mind? In P. D. Ashworth & M. C. Chung (Eds.), Phenomenology and psychological science: Historical and philosophical perspectives (pp. 89–100). New York, NY: Springer.
- Daly, A. J., Der Martirosian, C., Ong-Dean, C., Park, V., & Wishard-Guerra, A. (2011). Leading under sanction: Principals’ perceptions of threat rigidity, efficacy, and leadership in underperforming schools. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 10(2), 171–206. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2011.557517
- Darling-Hammond, L., Bae, S., Cook-Havey, C. M., Lam, L., Mercer, C., Podolsky, A., & Stosich, E. L. (2016). Pathways to new accountability through the Every Student Succeeds Act. Palo Alto, CA. Retrieved from https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/sites/default/files/product-files/Pathways_New-Accountability_Through_Every_Student_Succeeds_Act_04202016.pdf
- Elmore, R. F., Abelmann, C., & Furhman, S. H. (1996). The new accountability in state education policy. In H. Ladd (Ed.), Holding schools accountable: Performance-based reform in education (pp. 65–98). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institute.
- Elmore, R. F. (2004). The problem of stakes in performance-based accountability systems. In S. H. Furhman & R. F. Elmore (Eds.), Redesigning accountability systems for education (pp. 274–296). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
- Feldman, M. S. (1989). Order without design: Information production and policy making. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
- Firestone, W. A. (1989). Using reform: Conceptualzing district initiative. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(2), 151–164. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737011002151
- Fowler, F. C. (2013). Policy studies for educational leaders: An introduction (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
- Fullan, M. (2016). The new meaning of educational change (5th ed.). London: Routledge.
- Geijsel, F. P., Van den Berg, R., & Sleegers, P. J. (1999). The innovative capacity of schools in primary education: A qualitative study. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 12(2), 175–191. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/095183999236240
- Goldring, E., & Greenfield, W. (2002). The evolving concept of leadership. In J. Murphy (Ed.), The educational leadership challenge: Redefining leadership for the 21st century (pp. 1–17). Chicago, IL: NSSE.
- Gonzalez, R. A., & Firestone, W. A. (2013). Educational tug-of-war: Internal and external accountability of principals in varied contexts. Journal of Educational Administration, 51(3), 282–406. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231311311528
- Gregory, R. (1987). Perception. In R. L. Gregory & O. L. Zangwill (Eds.), The Oxford companion to the mind (pp. 598–601). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
- Hargreaves, A. (2006). Educational change over time? The sustainability and nonsustainability of three decades of secondary school change and continuity. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(1), 3–41. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X05277975
- Hess, F. M., & Kelly, A. P. (2011). Carrots, sticks, and the bully pulpit: Lessons from a half-century of federal efforts to improve American schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
- House, E. R. (1981). Three perspectives on innovation: Technological, political, and cultural. In R. Lehming & M. Kane (Eds.), Improving schools: Using what we know (pp. 17–41). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
- Hoy, A. W., & Hoy, W. K. (2012). Instructional leadership: A research-based guide to learning in schools (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
- Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2013). Educational administration: Theory, research and practice (9th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
- Ingle, K., Rutledge, S., & Bishop, J. (2011). Context matters: Principals’ sensemaking of teacher hiring and on-the-job performance. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(5), 579–610. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231111159557
- Jaafar, S. B., & Anderson, S. (2007). Policy trends and tensions in accountability for educational management and services in Canada. The Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 53(2), 207–227.
- Klein, A., & Sparks, S. D. (2016). Investing in innovation: An introduction to i3. Education Week, 35(25), 12, 16. Retrieved from https://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2016/03/23/investing-in-innovation-an-introduction-to-i3.html
- Knapp, M. S., & Feldman, S. B. (2012). Managing the intersection of internal and external accountability: Challenge for urban school leadership in the United States. Journal of Educational Administration, 50(5), 666–694. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231211249862
- LaRocque, L. (1986). Policy implementation in a school district: A multiperspective approach. Canadian Journal of Education, 11(4), 486–508. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/1494585
- Lau, C. M., Kilbourne, L. M., & Woodman, R. W. (2003). A shared schema approach to understanding organizational culture change. Research in Organizational Change and Development, 14, 225–256.
- Leithwood, K., Edge, K., & Jantzi, D. (1999). Educational accountability: The state of the art. Gütersloh, Germany: Bertelsmann Foundation Publishers.
- Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2008). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. School Leadership and Management, 28(1), 27–42. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13632430701800060
- Li, D. (2015). School accountability and principal mobility: How No Child Left Behind affects the allocation of school leaders. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School. Retrieved from http://www.hbs.edu/faculty/PublicationFiles/16-052_aa1fd47b-c7f0-46ff-bdae-742254397439.pdf
- Louis, K. S., Febey, K., & Schroeder, R. (2005). State-mandated accountability in high schools: Teachers’ interpretations of a new era. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 27, 177–204. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737027002177
- Lyons, J. E., & Algozzine, B. (2006). Perceptions of the impact of accountability on the role of principals. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 14(16), 16. Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/87
- Mailtis, S., & Christianson, M. (2014). Sensemaking in organizations: Taking stock and moving forward. Academy of Management Annals, 8, 57–125. doi:https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2014.873177
- Marks, H. M., & Printy, S. M. (2003). Principal leadership and school performance: An integration of transformational and instructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(3), 370–397. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X03253412
- McGhee, M. W., & Nelson, S. W. (2005). Sacrificing leaders, villainizing leadership: How education accountability policies impair school leadership. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(5), 367–372. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170508600507
- McGuinn, P., Berger, L., & Stevenson, D. (2011). Incentives, information, and infrastructure: The federal role in educational innovation. In F. M. Hess & A. P. Kelly (Eds.), Carrots, sticks, and the bully pulpit: Lessons from a half-century of federal efforts to improve American schools (pp. 125–154). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
- Miles, M. B., Huberman, M. A., & Saldaña. J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
- Moolenaar, N. M., Daly, A. J., & Sleegers, P. J. (2010). Occupying the principal position: Examining relationships between transformational leadership, social network position, and schools’ innovative climate. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(5), 623–670. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X10378689
- Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Murphy, J. (2002). The educational leadership challenge: Redefining leadership for the 21st century. Chicago, IL: NSSE.
- Nee, E. (2010). Q & A: Joanne Weiss. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 8(2). Retrieved from https://ssir.org/articles/entry/qa_joanne_weiss
- No Child Left Behind. (2001). Public Law 107-110, 107th U.S. Congress. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/index.html
- Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
- Preston, C., Goldring, E., Berends, M., & Cannata, M. (2012). School innovation in district context: Comparing traditional public schools and charter schools. Economics of Education Review, 31(2), 318–330. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2011.07.016
- Romney, A. K., Weller, S. C., & Batchelder, W. H. (1986). Culture as consensus: A theory of culture and informant accuracy. American Anthropologist, 88(2), 313–338.
- Russell, J. L., & Bray, L. E. (2013). Crafting coherence from complex policy messages: Educators’ perceptions of special education and standards based accountability practices. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 21(12), 12. Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/1044
- Saultz, A., White, R. S., McEachin, A., Fusarelli, L. D., & Fusarelli, B. C. (2017). Teacher quality, distribution, and equity in ESSA. Journal of School Leadership, 27, 653–675. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/105268461702700503
- Schacter, D. L., Gilbert, D. T., & Wenger, D. M. (2011). Psychology (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Worth.
- Schoen, L., & Fusarelli, L. D. (2008). Innovation, NCLB, and the fear factor: The challenge of leading 21st-century schools in an era of accountability. Educational Policy, 22(1), 181–203. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904807311291
- Solomon, Y., & Lewin, C. (2016). Measuring ‘progress’: Performativity as both driver and constraint in school innovation. Journal of Education Policy, 32(2), 226–238. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2015.1062147
- Spillane, J. P. (1998). State policy and the non-monolithic nature of the local school district: Organizational and professional considerations. American Educational Research Journal, 35(1), 33–63. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312035001033
- Spillane, J. P. (2000). District leaders’ perceptions of teacher learning. Philadelphia, PA. Retrieved from http://www.cpre.org/Publications/Publications.htm
- Spillane, J. P., Reiser, B. J., & Reimer, T. (2002). Policy implementation and cognition: Reframing and refocusing implementation research. Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 387–431. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543072003387
- Starbuck, W. H., & Milliken, F. J. (1988). Executives’ perceptual filters: What they notice and how they make sense. In D. C. Hambrick (Ed.), The executive effect: Concepts and methods for studying top managers (pp. 35–65). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
- Stone, D. A. (2002). Policy paradox: The art of political decision making. New York, NY: Norton.
- Stufflebeam, R. (2006). Introduction to methods to study perceptions. Retrieved from http://www.mind.ilstu.edu/curriculum/perception_intro/intro_to_methods_short.php
- The White House. (2009). Fact sheet: The Race to the Top. Retrieved from https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/fact-sheet-race-top
- Thomas, J. B., Clark, S. M., & Gioia, D. A. (1993). Strategic sensemaking and organizational performance: Linkages among scanning, interpretation, action, and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 36(2), 239–270.
- U.S. Department of Education. (2009a). Investing in innovation fund. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/programs/innovation/index.html
- U.S. Department of Education. (2009b). Race to the top fund. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/programs/racetothetop/index.html
- U.S. Department of Education. (2014). Significance guidance documents. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/policy/gen/guid/significant-guidance.html
- Viteritti, J. P. (2012). The federal role in school reform: Obama’s ‘Race to the Top’. Notre Dame Law Review, 87(5), 2087–2121.
- Wagner, T. (2008). The global achievement gap: Why even our best schools don’t teach the new survival skills our children need – And what we can do about it. New York, NY: Basic Books.
- Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Weiss, E. (2013). Mismatches in Race to the Top limit educational improvement. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.epi.org/publication/race-to-the-top-goals/
- Wieczorek, D., Clark, B., & Theoharis, G. (2018). Principals’ perspectives of a Race to the Top-style teacher evaluation system. Journal of School Leadership, 28, 566–595.