Contextual Influence on School Leader Problem Framing: The Role of Perceived Organizational Image and Identity in Making Sense of Policy-Related Problems

References

• Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: An analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 1(3), 385–405. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410100100307
   Google Scholar
• Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 611–639. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Carraway, J. H., & Young, T. (2015). Implementation of a districtwide policy to improve principals’ instructional leadership: Principals’ sensemaking of the skillful observation and coaching laboratory. Educational Policy, 29(1), 230–256. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904814564216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coburn, C. E. (2001). Collective sensemaking about reading: How teachers mediate reading policy in their professional communities. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(2), 145–170. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737023002145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coburn, C. E. (2004). Beyond decoupling: Rethinking the relationship between the institutional environment and the classroom. Sociology of Education, 77(3), 211–244. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/003804070407700302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coburn, C. E. (2005). Shaping teacher sensemaking: School leaders and the enactment of reading policy. Educational Policy, 19(3), 476–509. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904805276143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coburn, C. E. (2006). Framing the problem of reading instruction: Using frame analysis to uncover the microprocesses of policy implementation. American Educational Research Journal, 43(3), 343–349. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312043003343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Currie, G., & Brown, A. D. (2003). A narratological approach to understanding processes of organizing in a UK hospital. Human Relations, 56(5), 563–586. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726703056005003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datnow, A., & Park, V. (2009). Conceptualizing policy implementation: Large-scale reform in an era of complexity. In Sykes, G., Schneider, B., & Plank, D. N. (Eds.), Handbook of education policy research  (pp. 364–377). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dutton, J. E., Dukerich, J. M., & Harquail, C. V. (1994). Organizational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(2), 239–263. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2393235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frandsen, S. (2017). Organizational image. In C. In Scott & L. Lewis (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of organizational communication, 4 volume set (pp. 1795–1804). John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Ganon-Shilon, S., & Schechter, C. (2017). Making sense of school leaders’ sense-making. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 45(4), 682–698. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143216628536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawlik, M. A. (2015). Shared sense-making: How charter school leaders ascribe meaning to accountability. Journal of Educational Administration, 53(3), 393–415. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-08-2013-0092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gioia, D. A., Schultz, M., & Corley, K. G. (2000). Organizational identity, image, and adaptive instability. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 63–81. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.2791603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gioia, D. A., & Thomas, J. B. (1996). Identity, image, and issue interpretation: Sensemaking during strategic change in academia. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(3), 370–403. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2393936
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Sociology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, F. D. (2010). Dissent from within: How educational insiders use protest to create policy change. Educational Policy, 24(4), 655–686. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904809335110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatch, M. J., & Schultz, M. (1997). Relations between organizational culture, identity and image. European Journal of Marketing, 31(5–6), 356–365. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/03090569710167583
   Google Scholar
• Honig, M. (2006). Complexity and policy implementation. In Honig, M. I. (Ed.), New Directions in Education Policy Implementation: Confronting Complexity (pp. 1–25). Suny Press.
   Google Scholar
• Honig, M. (2009). What works in defining “what works” in educational improvement: Lessons from educational policy implementation research, directions for future research. In Sykes, G., Schneider, B., & Plank, D. N. (Eds.), Handbook of education policy research (pp. 333–347). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jennings, J. L. (2010). School choice or schools’ choice? Managing in an era of accountability. Sociology of Education, 83(3), 227–247. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040710375688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liljenberg, M. (2015). School leaders as coupling agents–mediating between external demands and internal values. Education Inquiry, 6(4), 25527. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3402/edui.v6.25527
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public service. Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Lockett, A., Currie, G., Finn, R., Martin, G., & Waring, J. (2014). The influence of social position on sensemaking about organizational change. Academy of Management Journal, 57(4), 1102–1129. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louis, K. S., Febey, K., & Schroeder, R. (2005). State-mandated accountability in high schools: Teachers’ interpretations of a new era. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 27(2), 177–204. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737027002177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maitlis, S. (2005). The social processes of organizational sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal, 48(1), 21–49. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.15993111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maitlis, S., & Christianson, M. (2014). Sensemaking in organizations: Taking stock and moving forward. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 57–125. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2014.873177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, M. N. (1996). Sampling for qualitative research. Family Practice, 13(6), 522–526. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/13.6.522
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, M. W. (1987). Learning from experience: Lessons from policy implementation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 9(2), 171–178. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737009002171
   Google Scholar
• Mills, J. H., Thurlow, A., & Mills, A. J. (2010). Making sense of sensemaking: the critical sensemaking approach. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 5(2), 182–195. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/17465641011068857 2
   Google Scholar
• Mizrahi-Shtelman, R. (2019). Role identity and sensemaking as institutional mechanisms for policy translation: The case of school principals and education reforms in Israel. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 1–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2019.1638422
   Google Scholar
• Park, V., Daly, A. J., & Guerra, A. W. (2013). Strategic framing: How leaders craft the meaning of data use for equity and learning. Educational Policy, 27(4), 645–675. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904811429295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Porac, J. F., Thomas, H., & Baden‐Fuller, C. (1989). Competitive groups as cognitive communities: The case of Scottish knitwear manufacturers. Journal of Management Studies, 26(4), 397–416. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1989.tb00736.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, S. (2011). The director of education as a leader of pedagogical issues: A study of leadership in municipal educational sector activities. School Leadership & Management, 31(5), 471–490. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2011.587405
   Google Scholar
• Rho, E., Yun, T., & Lee, K. (2015). Does organizational image matter? Image, identification, and employee behaviors in public and nonprofit organizations. Public Administration Review, 75(3), 421–431. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigby, J. G., Woulfin, S. L., & März, V. (2016). Understanding how structure and agency influence education policy implementation and organizational change. American Journal of Education, 122(3), 295–302. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/685849?journalCode=aje
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robson, C. (2002). Real world research: A resource for social scientists and practitioner-researchers (Vol. 2). Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, S. G., & Lane, V. R. (2000). A stakeholder approach to organizational identity. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 43–62. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.2791602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skolinspektionen. (2010). Kvalitet i fritidshem.
   Google Scholar
• Skolverket. (2016). Fritidshemmet: Ett kommentarmaterial till läroplanens fjärde del.
   Google Scholar
• Skolverket. (2018a). Curriculum for the compulsory school, preschool class and school-age educare 2011: Revised 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Skolverket. (2018b). Nya läroplansdelar för fritidshemmet och förskoleklassen: En utvärdering av Skolverkets insatser samt implementeringen av läroplansdelen för fritidshemmet.
   Google Scholar
• Skolverket. (2019a, June 23). Ansvarsfördelning – Vem gör vad inom skolan? Stockholm: Skolverket.?https://www.skolverket.se/for-dig-som-ar./elev-eller-foralder/skolans-organisation/ansvar---vem-gor-vad
   Google Scholar
• Skolverket. (2019b) . Elever i fritidshem läsåret 2018/19.
   Google Scholar
• Skolverket. (2019c, August 28). Krav för att få legitimation med behörighet i fritidshemmet. Stockholm: Skolverket. https://www.skolverket.se/regler-och-ansvar/lararlegitimation-och-forskollararlegitimation/regler-och-krav-for-lararlegitimation/krav-for-att-fa-legitimation-med-behorighet-i-fritidshemmet
   Google Scholar
• Skolverket. (2020a, June 23). Rektorns ansvar. Stockholm: Skolverket. https://www.skolverket.se/regler-och-ansvar/ansvar-i-skolfragor/rektorns-ansvar
   Google Scholar
• Skolverket. (2020b, June 22). This is the Swedish school system. Stockholm: Skolverket. https://utbildningsguiden.skolverket.se/languages/english-engelska/this-is-the-swedish-school-system
   Google Scholar
• Sleegers, P., Wassink, H., van Veen, K., & Imants, J. (2009). School leaders’ problem framing: A sense-making approach to problem-solving processes of beginning school leaders. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 8(2), 152–172. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15700760902737162
   Google Scholar
• Snow, D. A., Rochford, E. B., Jr, Worden, S. K., & Benford, R. D. (1986). Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. American Sociological Review, 51(4), 464–481. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2095581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P., Diamond, J. B., Burch, P., Hallett, T., Jita, L., & Zoltners, J. (2002a). Managing in the middle: School leaders and the enactment of accountability policy. Educational Policy, 16(5), 731–762. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/089590402237311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P., Reiser, B. J., & Reimer, T. (2002b). Policy implementation and cognition: Reframing and refocusing implementation research. Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 387–431. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543072003387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suri, H. (2011). Purposeful sampling in qualitative research synthesis. Qualitative Research Journal, 11(2), 63–75. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ1102063
   Google Scholar
• Thurlow, A., & Mills, J. H. (2009). Change, talk and sensemaking. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 22(5), 459–479. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/09534810910983442
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations  (Vol. 3). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, J. A. (1989). The powers of problem definition: The case of government paperwork. Policy Sciences, 22(2), 97–121. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00141381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whetten, D. A. (2006). Albert and Whetten Revisited: Strengthening the concept of organizational identity. Journal of Management Inquiry, 15(3), 219–234. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492606291200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woulfin, S. L., Donaldson, M. L., & Gonzales, R. (2016). District leaders’ framing of educator evaluation policy. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52(1), 110–143. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X15616661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar