The Missing Link: Principals’ Ambidexterity and Teacher Creativity

References

• Aktamis, H., & Ergin, O. (2008). The effect of scientific process skills education on students’ scientific creativity, science attitudes and academic achievements. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 9(1), 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Alencar, E. M., Fleith, D. D. S., Boruchovitch, E., & Borges, C. N. (2015). Creativity in elementary school: Inhibiting and facilitating factors according to school principals. Psicologia: Teoria E Pesquisa, 31(1), 105–114. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-37722015011849105114
   Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Westview.
   Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M. (1997). Motivating creativity in organizations: On doing what you love and loving what you do. California Management Review, 40(1), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M., & Conti, R. (1999). Changes in the work environment for creativity during downsizing. Academy of Management Journal, 42(6), 630–640. https://doi.org/10.5465/256984
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M., Schatzel, E. A., Moneta, G. B., & Kramer, S. J. (2004). Leader behaviors and the work environment for creativity: Perceived leader support. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(1), 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arar, K. H. (2019). The challenges involved when Arab women forge a path to educational leadership: Context, personal cost, and coping. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 47(5), 749–765. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143217753191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arens, A. K., Morin, A. J., & Watermann, R. (2015). Relations between classroom disciplinary problems and student motivation: Achievement as a potential mediator? Learning and Instruction, 39, 184–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atalay, O., & Kahveci, N. G. (2015). An experimental study on effectiveness of integrated curriculum model (ICM) in social studies education for gifted and talented learners. Educational Research and Reviews, 10(8), 1049–1062. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1063641
   Google Scholar
• Baccarella, C. V., Meinel, M., Wagner, T. F., & Voigt, K. I. (2018). The effect of a creativity supporting environment on ambidexterity and innovation performance. Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings, (2018(1), 14455. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2018.14455abstract
   Google Scholar
• Bae, S., song, J., & Kim, H. (2012). Teachers’ creativity in career technical education: The mediating effect of knowledge creation practices in the learning organization. The Korean Social Science Journal, 39(1), 59–81. http://www.kossrec.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/04_Sang-Hoon-Bae.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership. Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2010). Nurturing creativity in the classroom. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berkovich, I. (2018). Will it sink or will it float: Putting three common conceptions about principals’ transformational leadership to the test. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(6), 888–907. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143217714253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berson, Y., Da’as, R., & Waldman, D. A. (2015). How do leaders and their teams bring about organizational learning and outcomes? Personnel Psychology, 68(1), 79–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12071
   Google Scholar
• Berson, Y., Nemanich, L. A., Waldman, D. A., Galvin, B. M., & Keller, R. T. (2006). Leadership and organizational learning: A multiple levels perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 577–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.003
   Google Scholar
• Besançon, M., & Lubart, T. (2008). Differences in the development of creative competencies in children schooled in diverse learning environments. Learning and Individual Differences, 18(4), 381–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2007.11.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birkinshaw, J., & Gupta, K. (2013). Clarifying the distinctive contribution of ambidexterity to the field of organization studies. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 287–298. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2012.0167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bledow, R., Frese, M., Anderson, N., Erez, M., & Farr, J. (2009). A dialectic perspective on innovation: Conflicting demands, multiple pathways, and ambidexterity. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 2(3), 305–337. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9434.2009.01154.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations extensions, and new directions (pp. 349–381). Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Brion, S., & Mothe, C. (2016). Organizational context and innovation ambidexterity: Is creativity the missing link? [Paper presentation]. XXVe Conférence de l’AIMS, Tunis, Tunisia. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01419039/document
   Google Scholar
• Brown, R. D., & Hauenstein, N. M. A. (2005). Interrater agreement reconsidered: An alternative to the rwg indices. Organizational Research Methods, 8(2), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428105275376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. M. (2006). Structural equation modeling with EQS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Carmeli, A., & Halevi, M. Y. (2009). How top management team behavioral integration and behavioral complexity enable organizational ambidexterity: The moderating role of contextual ambidexterity. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(2), 207–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.01.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cayirdag, N. (2017). Creativity fostering teaching: Impact of creative self-efficacy and teacher efficacy. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 17(6), 1959–1975. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2017.6.0437
   Google Scholar
• Cropley, A., & Cropley, D. H. (2009). Fostering creativity: A diagnostic approach for higher education and organizations. Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cropley, A. J. (1997). Fostering creativity in the classroom: General principles. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), Creativity research handbook (Vol. 1, pp. 83–114). Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W., & White, R. E. (1999). An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 522–537. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.2202135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Da’as, R. (2019). Teachers’ skill flexibility: Examining the impact of principals’ skills and teachers’ participation in decision making during educational reform. International Journal of Educational Management, 33(2), 287–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Da’as, R. & Qadach, M. (2020). Examining organizational absorptive capacity construct: A validation study in the school context. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 19(3), 327–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Da’as, R., Schechter, C., & Qadach, M. (2019). From principal’s cognitive complexity to teacher's intent to leave: Exploring the mediating role of school's absorptive capacity and teacher's commitment. Journal of Educational Administration, 58(2), 227–245.
   Google Scholar
• Da'as, R. (2020, November). Principals' ambidexterity and creativity-fostering teacher behavior. Presented at the Virtual UCEA Planning Committee conference.
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19(2), 109–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(85)90023-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desailly, J. (2015). Creativity in the primary classroom. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Diliello, T. C., Houghton, J. D., & Dawley, D. (2011). Narrowing the creativity gap: The moderating effects of perceived support for creativity. The Journal of Psychology, 145(3), 151–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2010.548412
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drago-Severson, E., & Pinto, K. (2009). School leadership in support of teachers‘ learning: The dramatic differences that financial resources make. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 8(4), 446–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700760802613661
   Google Scholar
• Drazin, R., Glynn, M. A., & Kazanjian, R. K. (1999). Multilevel theorizing about creativity in organizations: A sensemaking perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 286–307. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.1893937
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du, Y., Xie, L., Zhong, J. A., Zou, H., Law, R., & Yan, X. (2019). Creativity fostering teacher behavior on student creative achievement: Mediation of intrinsic motivation and moderation of openness to experience. School Psychology International, 40(5), 525–542. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034319868271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10–11), 1105–1121. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farmer, S. M., Tierney, P., & Kung-mcintyre, K. (2003). Employee creativity in Taiwan: An application of role identity theory. Academy of Management Journal, 46(5), 618–630. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.572.7165&rep=rep1&type=pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floyd, S. W., & Lane, P. J. (2000). Strategizing throughout the organization: Managing role conflict in strategic renewal. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 154–177. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.2791608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forrester, V., & Hui, A. (2007). Creativity in the Hong Kong classroom: What is the contextual practice? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2(1), 30–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2006.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 209–226. https://doi.org/10.5465/20159573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilson, L. L., & Shalley, C. E. (2004). A little creativity goes a long way: An examination of teams’ engagement in creative processes. Journal of Management, 30(4), 453–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2003.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goertz, J. (2000). Creativity: An essential component for effective leadership in today’s schools. Roeper Review, 22(3), 158–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190009554024
   Google Scholar
• Good, D., & Michel, E. J. (2013). Individual ambidexterity: Exploring and exploiting in dynamic contexts. Journal of Psychology, 147(5), 435–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2012.710663
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu, Q., Tang, T. L. P., & Jiang, W. (2015). Does moral leadership enhance employee creativity? Employee identification with leader and leader–member exchange (LMX) in the Chinese context. Journal of Business Ethics, 126(3), 513–529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1967-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P. (2011). Leadership for learning: Lessons from 40 years of empirical research. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(2), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231111116699
   Google Scholar
• Hambrick, D. C. (2007). Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 334–343. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.24345254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F., & Coutts, J. J. (2020). Use omega rather than Cronbach’s alpha for estimating reliability. But …. Communication Methods and Measures, 14(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2020.1718629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, Z. L., & Wong, P. K. (2004). Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science, 15(4), 481–494. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Convention criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, S. T., Bedell, K. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2007). Climate for creativity: A quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 19(1), 69–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410709336883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksen, S. G., & Treffinger, D. J. (2004). Celebrating 50 years of reflective practice: Versions of creative problem solving. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 38(2), 75–101. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2004.tb01234.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Israeli Central Bureau of Statistics. (2016). Israeli annual statistical report 67. Israel Central Bureau of Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, N. C. (2012). Public school accountability and professional autonomy: The role of principal ambidexterity. Academy of Management Proceedings, (2012(1), 12541. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2012.12541abstract
   Google Scholar
• James, L., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1993). rwg: An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(2), 306–309. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.2.306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kark, R., Shamir, B., & Chen, G. (2003). The two faces of transformational leadership: Dependence and empowerment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(2), 243–255. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.2.246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karpova, E., Marcketti, S. B., & Barker, J. (2011). The efficacy of teaching creativity: Assessment of student creative thinking before and after exercises. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 29(1), 52–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X11400065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four C model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, T., & Weibler, J. (2014). Behind managers’ ambidexterity—Studying personality traits, leadership, and environmental conditions associated with exploration and exploitation. Schmalenbach Business Review, 66(3), 309–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03396909
   Google Scholar
• Knapp, M. S., Feldman, S. B., & Seashore Louis, K. (2012). Managing the intersection of internal and external accountability: Challenge for urban school leadership in the US. Journal of Educational Administration, 50(5), 666–694. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231211249862
   Google Scholar
• Koo, T. K., & Li, M. Y. (2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15(2), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruse, S. D. (2003). Remembering as an organizational memory. Journal of Educational Administration, 41(4), 332–347. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230310481612
   Google Scholar
• Kurland, H., Peretz, H., & Hertz‐Lazarowitz, R. (2010). Leadership style and organizational learning: The mediate effect of school vision. Journal of Educational Administration, 48(1), 7–30. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231011015395
   Google Scholar
• Li, C. R., Lin, C. J., & Tien, Y. H. (2015). CEO transformational leadership and top manager ambidexterity. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 36(8), 927–954. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-03-2014-0054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Q., Maggitti, P. G., Smith, K. G., Tesluk, P. E., & Katila, R. (2013). Top management attention to innovation: The role of search selection and intensity in new product introductions. Academy of Management Journal, 56(3), 893–916. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lüdtke, O., Marsh, H. W., Robitzsch, A., Trautwein, U., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2008). The multilevel latent covariate model: A new, more reliable approach to group-level effects in contextual studies. Psychological Methods, 13(3), 203–229. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012869
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Nagengast, B., Trautwein, U., Morin, A. J. S., Abduljabbar, A. S., & Koller, O. (2012). Classroom climate and contextual effects: Conceptual and methodological issues in the evaluation of group-level effects. Educational Psychologist, 47(2), 106–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.670488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Robitzsch, A., Trautwein, U., Asparouhov, T., Muthén, B., & Nagengast, B. (2009). Doubly-latent models of school contextual effects: Integrating multilevel and structural equation approaches to control measurement and sampling error. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 44(6), 764–802. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273170903333665
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masry-Herzallah, A. & Da'as, R. (2020). Cultural values, school innovative climate and organizational affective commitment: A study of Israeli teachers. International Journal of Educational Management. 35(2), 496–512. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-06-2020–0302
   Google Scholar
• Mathisen, G. E., & Einarsen, S. (2004). A review of instruments assessing creative and innovative environments within organizations. Creativity Research Journal, 16(1), 119–140. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1601_12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCharen, B., Song, J., & Martens, J. (2011). School innovation: The mutual impacts of organizational learning and creativity. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 39(6), 676–694. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143211416387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Mom, T. J., Van Den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2009). Understanding variation in managers‘ ambidexterity: Investigating direct and interaction effects of formal structural and personal coordination mechanisms. Organization Science, 20(4), 812–828. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran, S. (2010). Creativity in school. In K. Littleton, C. Wood, & J. Kleine Staarman (Eds.), International handbook of psychology in education (pp. 319–359). Emerald Group Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Morin, A. J., Marsh, H. W., Nagengast, B., & Scalas, L. F. (2014). Doubly latent multilevel analyses of classroom climate: An illustration. The Journal of Experimental Education, 82(2), 143–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2013.769412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mu, T., Riel, A., & Schouteten, R. (2020). Individual ambidexterity in SMEs: Towards a typology aligning the concept, antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Small Business Management. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2019.1709642
   Google Scholar
• Mulford, B., & Silins, H. (2011). Revised models and conceptualization of successful school principalship that improve student outcomes. International Journal of Educational Management, 25(1), 61–82. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513541111100125
   Google Scholar
• Mumford, M. D., Scott, G. M., Gaddis, B., & Strange, J. M. (2002). Leading creative people: Orchestrating expertise and relationships. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(6), 705–750. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00158-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, J., Neumerski, C. M., Goldring, E., Grissom, J., & Porter, A. (2016). Bottling fog? The quest for instructional management. Cambridge Journal of Education, 46(4), 455–471. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2015.1064096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012). Mplus version 7 user’s guide. Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Nemanich, L. A., & Vera, D. (2009). Transformational leadership and ambidexterity in the context of an acquisition. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(1), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2004, April). The ambidextrous organization. Harvard Business Review, 82(4), 74–83. http://www.iot.ntnu.no/innovation/norsi-pims-courses/tushman/O%C3%86Reilly%20&%20Tushman%20(2004).pdf
   Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 324–338. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2013.0025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Reilly III, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator’s dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 185–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2008.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parjanen, S. (2012). Experiencing creativity in the organization: From individual creativity to collective creativity. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management, 7, 109–128. https://doi.org/10.28945/1580
   Google Scholar
• Pelagio Rodriguez, R., & Hechanova, M. R. M. (2014). A study of culture dimensions, organizational ambidexterity, and perceived innovation in teams. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 9(3), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242014000300002
   Google Scholar
• Pietsch, M., Tulowitzki, P., & Cramer, C. (2020). Principals between exploitation and exploration: Results of a nationwide study on ambidexterity of school leaders. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220945705
   Google Scholar
• Pietsch, M., Tulowitzki, P., & Koch, T. (2019). On the differential and shared effects of leadership for learning on teachers’ organizational commitment and job satisfaction: A multilevel perspective. Educational Administration Quarterly, 55(5), 705–741. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X18806346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piirto, J. (2010). The five core attitudes, seven I’s, and general concepts of the creative process. In R. A. Beghetto & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Nurturing creativity in the classroom (pp. 142–171). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., Zyphur, M. J., & Zhang, Z. (2010). A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation. Psychological Methods, 15(3), 209–233. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Printy, S. (2008). Leadership for teacher learning: A community of practice perspective. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(2), 187–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X07312958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qadach, M., Schechter, C., & Da’as, R. (2020a). An integrative model for predicting faculty properties and student achievement in Israeli elementary schools: exploring the role principals' characteristics and organizational learning mechanisms. Educational Administration Quarterly, 56(5), 736–778.
   Google Scholar
• Qadach, M., Schechter, C., & Da’as, R. (2020b). From principals to teachers to students: Exploring an integrative model for predicting students’ achievements. Educational Administration Quarterly, 56(5), 736–778. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X20907133
   Google Scholar
• Qadach, M., Schechter, C., & Da’as, R. (2020c). Instructional leadership and teachers' intent to leave: The mediating role of collective teacher efficacy and shared vision. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 48(4), 617–634. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143219836683
   Google Scholar
• Raisch, S., & Birkinshaw, J. (2008). Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of Management, 34(3), 375–409. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308316058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revilla, E., & Rodríguez-Prado, B. (2018). Building ambidexterity through creativity mechanisms: Contextual drivers of innovation success. Research Policy, 47(9), 1611–1625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, K. (2011). Out of our minds: Learning to be creative (2nd ed.). Capstone.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, V. M., Lloyd, C. A., & Rowe, K. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635–674. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X08321509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schechter, C., & Qadach, M. (2016). Principals’ learning mechanisms: Exploring an emerging construct. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 15(2), 141–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2015.1031256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580–607. https://doi.org/10.5465/256701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sebastian, J., & Allensworth, E. (2012). The influence of principal leadership on classroom instruction and student learning: A study of mediated pathways to learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(4), 626–663. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X11436273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheremata, W. A. (2000). Centrifugal and centripetal forces in radical new product development under time pressure. Academy of Management Review, 25(2), 389–408. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.3312925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silins, H. C., Mulford, W. R., & Zarins, S. (2002). Organizational learning and school change. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(5), 613–642. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X02239641
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soh, K. (2000). Indexing creativity fostering teacher behavior: A preliminary validation study. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 34(2), 118–134. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2000.tb01205.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soh, K. (2015). Creativity fostering teacher behaviour around the world: Annotations of studies using the CFT Index. Cogent Education, 2(1), 1034494. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2015.1034494
   Google Scholar
• Soh, K. (2018). Creativity fostering teacher behavior: Measurement and research. World Scientific Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Soh, K., & Boylan, M. (2015). Creativity fostering teacher behaviour around the world: Annotations of studies using the CFTIndex. Cogent Education, 2(1), 1034494. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2015.1034494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, J. H., Kim, W., Chai, D. S., & Bae, S. H. (2014). The impact of an innovative school climate on teachers’ knowledge creation activities in Korean schools: The mediating role of teachers’ knowledge sharing and work engagement. KEDI Journal of Educational Policy, 11(2), 179–203. https://search.proquest.com/openview/433bbeb7440e4fb6286a91c106443891/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=946348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoll, L., & Temperley, J. (2009). Creative leadership: A challenge of our times. School Leadership & Management, 29(1), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632430802646404
   Google Scholar
• Supovitz, J., Sirinides, P., & May, H. (2010). How principals and peers influence teaching and learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(1), 31–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670509353043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45(2), 1137–1148. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tierney, P., Farmer, S. M., & Graen, G. B. (1999). An examination of leadership and employee creativity: The relevance of traits and relationships. Personnel Psychology, 52(3), 591–620. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1999.tb00173.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Triandis, H. (1993). Collectivism and individualism as cultural syndromes. Cross-Cultural Research, 27(3–4), 155–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/106939719302700301
   Google Scholar
• Turner, N., & Lee-Kelley, L. (2013). Unpacking the theory on ambidexterity: An illustrative case on the managerial architectures, mechanisms and dynamics. Management Learning, 44(2), 179–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507612444074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tushman, M. L., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1996). Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38(4), 8–30. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, J. J. (2016). Change and innovation at the Canada School: An investigation into the antecedents of organizational ambidexterity [Unpublished MBA thesis]. University of Northern British Columbia.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Q., Siribanpitak, P., & Charoenkul, N. (2018). Creative leadership strategies for primary school principals to promote teachers’ creativity in Guangxi, China. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2018.08.007
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, J., & George, J. M. (2001). When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging the expression of voice. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 682–696. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar