Engaging in Joint Work with Principals: How Principal Supervisors’ Joint Facilitation of Teams Contributes to Principals’ Practice Development

References

• Boudett, City, & Murnane. (2013). Data wise: A step-by-step guide to using assessment results to improve teaching and learning. Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, S., & Wildy, H. (2011). Improving the small rural or remote school: The role of the district. Australian Journal of Education, 55(1), 24–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/000494411105500104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corcoran, A., Casserly, M., Price-Baugh, R., Walston, D., Hall, R., & Simon, C. (2013, October). Rethinking leadership: The changing role of principal supervisors. Council of Great City Schools. http://www.wallacefoundation.org/knowledgecenter/Documents/Rethinking-Leadership-The-Changing-Role-of-Principal-Supervisors.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cosner, DeVoto, & Rah’man. (2018). Drawing in the school context as a learning resource in school leader development: Application-oriented projects in active learning designs. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 13(3), 238–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/1942775118763872
   Google Scholar
• Cosner, S., Walker, L., Swanson, J., & Herbert, M. (2019). Elaborating learning-focused leadership coaching activities experienced by aspiring leaders during principal preparation [Unpublished manuscript]. Department of Educational Policy Studies, University of Illinois.
   Google Scholar
• Cosner, S., Walker, L., Swanson, J., Herbert, M., & Whalen, S. (2018). Examining the architecture of leadership coaching: Considering developmental affordances from multifarious structuring. Journal of Educational Administration, 56(3), 364–380. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-05-2017-0049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council of Chief State School Officers. (2015). Model principal supervisor professional standards 2015. https://ccsso.org/sites/default/files/201710/2015PrincipalSupervisorStandardsFinal1272015.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Davis, S., Darling-Hammond, L., LaPoint, M., & Meyerson, D. (2005). School leadership study: Developing successful principals. Stanford Educational Leadership Institute. https://edpolicy.stanford.edu/library/publications/244
   Google Scholar
• Derrington, M., & Campbell, J. (2015). Implementing new teacher evaluation systems: Principals concerns and supervisor support. Journal of Educational Change, 16, 305–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-015-9244-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmore, R. F. (2004). School reform from the inside out: Policy, practice, and performance. Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fry, B., & Bottoms, G. (2009). The district leadership challenge: Empowering principals to improve teaching and learning. Southern Regional Education Board. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/afb0/57e75fb011468074fbd58287fb4d31b01333.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gates, S., Baird, M., Master, B., & Chavez-Herrerias, E. (2019). Principal pipelines: A feasible, affordable, and effective way for districts to improve schools. RAND. https://www.wallacefoundation.org/knowledge-center/Documents/Principal-Pipelines-AFeasible-Affordable-and-Effective-Way-for-Districts-to-Improve-Schools.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Goldring, E., Grissom, J., Rubin, M., Rogers, L., Neel, M., & Clark, M. (2018). A new role emerges for principal supervisors: Evidence from six districts in the principal supervisor initiative. Wallace Foundation. https://www.wallacefoundation.org/knowledge-center/Documents/A-New-Role-Emerges-for-Principal-Supervisors.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Grissom, J. A., Loeb, S., & Master, B. (2013). Effective instructional time use for school leaders: Longitudinal evidence from observations of school leaders. Educational Researcher, 42(8), 433–444. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X13510020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grissom, J. A., Rubin, M., Neumerski, C., Cannata, M., Drake, T., Goldring, E., & Schuermann, P. (2017). Central office supports for data-driven talent management decisions: Evidence from the implementation of new systems for measuring teacher dffectiveness. Educational Researcher, 46(1), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X17694164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gronn, P. (2000). Distributed properties: A new architecture for leadership. Educational Management & Administration, 28(3), 317–38l. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263211X000283006
   Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. (2010). Collaborative leadership and school improvement: Understanding the impact on school capacity and student learning. School Leadership & Management, 30(2), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632431003663214
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A., & O'Connor, M. T. (2018). Collaborative professionalism: When teaching together means learning for all. Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A. (2012). Distributed leadership: Implications for the role of the principal. Journal of Management Development, 31(1), 7–17. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621711211190961
   Google Scholar
• Heck, R. H., & Hallinger, P. (2009). Assessing the contribution of distributed leadership to school improvement and growth in math achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 46(3), 659–689. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209340042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honig, M. I. (2008). District central offices as learning organizations: How sociocultural and organizational learning theories elaborate district central office administrators’ participation in teaching and learning improvement efforts. American Journal of Education, 114(4), 627–664. https://doi.org/10.1086/589317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honig, M. I. (2012). District central office leadership as teaching: How central office administrators support principals’ development as instructional leaders. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(4), 733–774. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X12443258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honig, M. I., & Rainey, L. R. (2014). Central office leadership in principal professional learning communities: The practice beneath the policy. Teachers College Record, 116(4), 1–48. https://www-tcrecord-org.proxygw.wrlc.org/library
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honig, M. I., & Rainey, L. R. (2020). Supervising principals for instructional leadership: A teaching and learning approach. Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klar, H. (2012). Fostering department chair instructional leadership capacity: Laying the groundwork for distributed instructional leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 15(2), 175–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2011.577910
   Google Scholar
• Knapp, M. S., Honig, M. I., Plecki, M. L., Portin, B. S., & Copland, M. A. (2014). Learning-focused leadership in action: Improving instruction in schools and districts. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Korach, S., & Cosner, S. (2017). Developing the leadership pipeline: Comprehensive leadership development. In M. D. Young & G. M. Crow (Eds.), Handbook of research on the education of school leaders, 2E (pp. 262–282). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kruse, S., Louis, K., & Bryk, A. (1995). An emerging framework for analyzing school-based professional community. In K. S. Louis & S. Kruse (Eds.), Professionalism and community: Perspectives on reforming urban schools (pp. 23–44). Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., & Louis, K. S. (Eds.). (2012). Linking leadership to student learning. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., Louis, K. S., Anderson, S., & Wahlstrom, S. (2004). How leadership influences student learning. Wallace Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Little, J. (1990). The persistence of privacy: Autonomy and initiative in teachers’ professional relations. The Teachers College Record, 91(4), 509–536. d o i:1 0.1 61-4681/90/9104/509$1.25/0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd, G. M., Rice, C. L., & McCloskey, A. V. (2020). Opportunities for professional learning about mathematics instruction: The role of joint work in student-teaching triads. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 23(5), 499–525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-019-09439-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockton, M. (2019). Chasing joint work: Administrators’ efforts to structure teacher collaboration. School Leadership & Management, 39(5), 496–518. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2018.1564269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• National Policy Board for Educational Administration. (2015). Professional standards for educational leaders 2015. http://npbea.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Professional-Standards-for-Educational-Leaders_2015.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Neumerski, C. (2013). Rethinking instructional leadership, a review: What do we know about principal, teacher, and coach instructional leadership, and where should we go from here? Educational Administration Quarterly, 49(2), 310–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X12456700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penuel, W. R., Allen, A. R., Coburn, C. E., & Farrell, C. (2015). Conceptualizing research–practice partnerships as joint work at boundaries. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 20(1–2), 182–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/10824669.2014.988334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, J. (2009). Coaching leadership learning through partnership. School Leadership & Management, 29(1), 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632430802646388
   Google Scholar
• Rowland, C. (2017, February). Principal professional development: New opportunities for a renewed state focus. American Institutes for Research. https://www.air.org/sites/default/files/downloads/report/Principal-Professional-Development-New-Opportunities-State-Focus-February-2017.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P. (2006). Distributed leadership. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. B. (2001). Investigating school leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Educational Researcher, 30(3), 23–28. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X030003023
   Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P., Healy, K., & Parise, L. M. (2009). School leaders’ opportunity to learn: A descriptive analysis from a distributed perspective. Educational Review, 61(4), 407–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131910903403998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stosich, E. L. (2020). Central office leadership for instructional improvement: Developing collaborative leadership among principals and instructional leadership team members. Teachers College Record, 122(9), 1–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thessin, R. A. (2019). Establishing productive principal/principal supervisor partnerships for instructional leadership. Journal of Educational Administration, 57(5), 463–483. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-09-2018–0184
   Google Scholar
• Thessin, R. A., & Louis, K. S. (2019). Supervising school leaders in a rapidly changing world. Journal of Educational Administration, 57(5), 434–444. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-09-2019–228
   Google Scholar
• Thessin, R. A. & Louis, K. S. (2020, April). The principal’s role has changed. Is professional learning keeping up? The Learning Professional, 41(2), 40–46. https://learningforward.org/journal/beyond-the-basics/the-principals-role-has-changed/
   Google Scholar
• Tseng, V., Easton, J. Q., & Supplee, L. H. (2017). Research‐practice partnerships: Building two-way streets of engagement. Social Policy Report, 30(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2379-3988.2017.tb00089.x
   Google Scholar
• Turnbull, B., Riley, D., & MacFarlane, J. (2015). Districts taking charge of the principal pipeline. Wallace Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of Education. (2016). Non-regulatory guidance for Title II, Part A: Building systems of support for excellent teaching and learning. https://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/essa/essatitleiipartaguidance.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wahlstrom, K., & Louis, K. (2008). How teachers experience principal leadership: The roles of professional community, trust, efficacy, and shared responsibility. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(4), 458–495. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X08321502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, S., Lerche, T., Muckenthaler, M., Heimlich, U., & Kiel, E. (2019). Making inclusive instruction succeed: What matters (most) from teachers’ perspectives? The role of teachers’ personal characteristics, joint professional work, and school-related parameters. Educational Research and Evaluation, 25(3–4), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2019.1646142
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Zepeda, S. (2019). Professional development: What works (3rd ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar