Middle Leaders Addressing Concerns with Teaching Performance in New Zealand Secondary Schools

References

• Adey, K. (2000). Professional development priorities: The views of middle managers in secondary schools. Educational Management & Administration, 28(4), 419–431. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263211X000284005
   Google Scholar
• Argyris, C., & Schӧn, D. A. (1974). Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Argyris, C., & Schӧn, D. A. (1996). Organizational learning II: Theory, method and practice. Addison Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Bassett, M. (2016). The role of middle leaders in New Zealand secondary schools: Expectations and challenges. Waikato Journal of Education, 21(1), 97–108. https://doi.org/10.15663/wje.v21i1.194
   Google Scholar
• Bassett, M., & Shaw, N. (2017). Building the confidence of first-time middle leaders in New Zealand primary schools. International Journal of Educational Management, 32(5), 749–760. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-05-2017-0101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, N., Woods, P., Wise, C., & Newton, W. (2007). Understandings of middle leadership in secondary schools: A review of empirical research. School Leadership & Management, 27(5), 453–470. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632430701606137
   Google Scholar
• Bridges, E. M. (1986). The incompetent teacher. Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, D. A., & Rao, C. (2019). Teachers as reform leaders in Chinese schools. International Journal of Educational Management, 33(4), 663–677. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-12-2017-0371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busher, H., & Harris, A. (2000). Subject leadership and school improvement. Paul Chapman.
   Google Scholar
• Butterfield, L., Borgen, W., Amundson, N., & Maglio, A. (2005). 50 years of critical incident technique: 1954-2004 and beyond. Qualitative Research, 5(4), 475–497. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794105056924
   Google Scholar
• Cardno, C. (2007). Leadership learning – The praxis of dilemma management. International Studies in Educational Administration, 35(2), 33–50. https://web.p.ebscohost.com/abstract?direct=true&profile=ehost&scope=site&authtype=crawler&jrnl=13241702&AN=27026136&h=Y%2fyZMehAK%2bRvLEgR9Wm4ba%2fy%2bUD02sBGfXoH8fLMSbT9%2bA4Qw6N3rwrXky1KkHZ0vdufta1gaOqd0zaRw9gAkw%3d%3d&crl=c&resultNs=AdminWebAuth&resultLocal=ErrCrlNotAuth&crlhashurl=login.aspx%3fdirect%3dtrue%26profile%3dehost%26scope%3dsite%26authtype%3dcrawler%26jrnl%3d13241702%26AN%3d27026136
   Google Scholar
• Cardno, C., & Bassett, M. (2015). Multiple perspectives of leadership development for middle-level pedagogical leaders in New Zealand secondary schools. Journal of Educational Leadership, Policy and Practice, 30(2), 30–38. https://search-informit-org.ezproxy.auckland.ac.nz/doi/abs/10.3316/INFORMIT.265350587913623
   Google Scholar
• Cardno, C., & Robson, J. (2016). Realising the value of performance appraisal for middle leaders in New Zealand secondary schools. Research in Educational Administration and Leadership, 1(2), 229–254. https://doi.org/10.30828/real/2016.2.3
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, & mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Earl, L. M., & Timperley, H. (2009). Understanding how evidence and learning conversations work. In L. M. Earl & H. Timperley (Eds.), Professional learning conversations: Challenges in using evidence for improvement (pp. 1–12). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Elmore, R. (2004). School reform from the inside out: Policy, practice, and performance. Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, T. (2009). The tyranny of bureaucracy. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 37(1), 51–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143208098164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, T., Gunter, H., & Eaton, J. (2006). The missing link? Middle leadership in schools in England and New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Educational Leadership, 21(1), 29–43. doi:10.1177/1741143208098164.
   Google Scholar
• Flanagan, J. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51(4), 327–358. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0061470
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flückiger, B., Lovett, S., Dempster, N., & Brown, S. (2015). Middle leaders: Career pathways and professional learning needs. Leading and Managing, 21(2), 60–74. doi:10.3316/informit.164490314492986.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M., Rincon-Gallardo, S., & Hargreaves, A. (2015). Professional capital as accountability. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 23(15), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v23.1998
   Google Scholar
• Galletta, A. (2012). Mastering the semi-structured interview and beyond: From research design to analysis and publication. New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Government of New Zealand (1988). Tomorrow’s schools: The reform of education Administration in New Zealand. Government of New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Grootenboer, P., Edwards-Groves, C., & Rönnerman, K. (2015). Leading practice development: Voices from the middle. Professional Development in Education, 41(3), 508–526. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2014.924985
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2013). The power of professional capital: With an investment in collaboration, teachers become nation builders. Journal of Staff Development, 34(3), 36–39.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A., & Shirley, D. (2009). The fourth way: The inspiring future for educational change. Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A. (1998). Improving ineffective departments in secondary schools: Strategies for change and development. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 26(3), 269–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263211X98263005
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A., & Jones, M. (2017). Middle leaders matter: Reflections, recognition, and renaissance. School Leadership & Management, 37(3), 213–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2017.1323398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, A., & Muijs, D. (2005). Improving schools through teacher leadership. Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knapp, M. S., & Feldman, S. B. (2012). Managing the intersection of internal and external accountability: Challenge for urban school leadership in the United States. Journal of Educational Administration, 50(5), 666–694. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231211249862
   Google Scholar
• Koh, H., Gurr, D., Drysdale, L., & Ang, L. L. (2011). How school leaders perceive the leadership role of middle leaders in Singapore primary schools. Asia Pacific Education Review, 12(4), 609–620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-011-9161-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapan, S. D. (Ed.). (2003). Foundations for research: Methods of inquiry in education and the social sciences. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Le Fevre, D. (2014). Barriers to implementing pedagogical change: The role of teachers’ perceptions of risk. Teaching and Teacher Education, 38, 56–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Fevre, D. M., & Robinson, V. M. (2015). The interpersonal challenges of instructional leadership: Principals’ effectiveness in conversations about performance issues. Educational Administration Quarterly, 51(1), 58–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X13518218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K. (2016). Department-Head leadership for school improvement. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 15(2), 117–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2015.1044538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipscombe, K., Tindall-Ford, S., & Kirk, M. (2019). Leading a top down directive from the bottom up: A school and university partnership. Leading & Managing, 25(1), 29–43. doi:10.3316/ielapa.757473251939271.
   Google Scholar
• Lipscombe, K., Tindall-Ford, S., & Lamanna, J. (2021). School middle leadership: A systematic review. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, (January), 1–19. doi:10.1177/1741143220983328.
   Google Scholar
• Marcy, R. T., & Mumford, M. D. (2010). Leader cognition: Improving leader performance through causal analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, S. G. (2012). Educational middle change leadership in New Zealand: The meat in the sandwich. International Journal of Educational Management, 26(6), 502–528. doi:10.1108/09513541211251361.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. (2008). Tomorrow’s schools: The reform of education administration in New Zealand. Government Printer.
   Google Scholar
• Muijs, D., & Harris, A. (2006). Teacher led school improvement: Teacher leadership in the UK. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(8), 961–972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.04.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsen, T., & Gustafsson, J. E. (2016). Teacher quality, instructional quality and student outcomes: Relationships across countries, cohorts and time. Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 results: Excellence and equity in education. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264266490-en
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, C., & Beneicke, S. (2003). Professional development support for poorly performing teachers: Challenges and opportunities for school managers in addressing teacher learning needs. Journal of In-Service Education, 29(1), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674580300200245
   Google Scholar
• Riggio, R. E., & Lee, J. (2007). Emotional and interpersonal competencies and leader development. Human Resource Management Review, 17(4), 418–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2007.08.008
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, V. M. (1993). Problem-based methodology: Research for the improvement of practice. Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, V. (2016). The theory and practice of open-to-learningTM leadership. In V. M. J. Robinson, D. M. Le Fevre, & C. Sinnema (Eds.), Open-to-learning^TM leadership: How to build trust while tackling tough issues (pp. 1–21). Hawker Brownlow Education.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, V. M. J., Hohepa, M., & Lloyd, C. (2009). School leadership and student outcomes: Identifying what works and why. New Zealand Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, V. M. J., & Lai, M. K. (2006). Practitioner research for educators: A guide to improving classrooms and schools. Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, V.M.J., Meyer, F., Le Fevre, D., Sinnema, C. (2020). The effectiveness of leaders’ problem-solving conversations: Truth-seeking or truth-claiming?. Journal of Leadership and Policy in Schools, 20(4), 650–671. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2020.1734627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, V. M. J., Sinnema, C. E., & Le Fevre, D. (2014). From persuasion to learning: An intervention to improve leaders’ response to disagreement. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 13(3), 260–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2014.922997
   Google Scholar
• Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22(2), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-2004-22201
   Google Scholar
• Sinnema, C., Meyer, F., Le Fevre, D., Chalmers, H., & Robinson, V.M.J., (2021). Educational Leaders’ problem-solving conversations: Testing validity of key beliefs about problems, their explanation, and solutions. Journal of Educational Change, 1–49.
   Google Scholar
• Thorpe, A., & Bennett-Powell, G. (2014). The perceptions of secondary school middle leaders regarding their needs following a middle leadership development programme. Management in Education, 28(2), 52–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892020614529808
   Google Scholar
• Wragg, E. C., Haynes, G. S., Wragg, C. M., & Chamberlin, R. P. (2000). Failing teachers? Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Yariv, E. (2006). “Mum effect”: Principals’ reluctance to submit negative feedback. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(6), 533–546. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940610684382
   Google Scholar