Staffing for School Turnaround in Rural Settings

References

• Aaronson, D., Barrow, L., & Sander, W. (2007). Teachers and student achievement in the Chicago public high schools. Journal of Labor Economics, 25(1), 95–135. https://doi.org/10.1086/508733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adnot, M., Dee, T., Katz, V., & Wyckoff, J. (2017). Teacher turnover, teacher quality, and student achievement in DCPS. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39(1), 54–76. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373716663646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, J. P., Pianta, R. C., Gregory, A., Mikami, A. Y., & Lun, J. (2011). An interaction-based approach to enhancing secondary school instruction and student achievement. Science, 333(6045), 1034–1037. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1207998
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayers, J. (2011). Center for American Progress. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED535987
   Google Scholar
• Balch, R., & Springer, M. G. (2015). Performance pay, test scores, and student learning objectives. Economics of Education Review, 44, 114–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2014.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnum, M. (2021, September 23). Teacher vacancies up as year begins. Chalkbeat. https://www.chalkbeat.org/2021/9/23/22689774/teacher-vacancies-shortages-covid
   Google Scholar
• Barrow, L. H., & Burchett, B. M. (2001). Needs of Missouri rural secondary science teachers. The Rural Educator, 22(2), 14–19.
   Google Scholar
• Bastian, K. C., & Marks, J. T. (2017). Connecting teacher preparation to teacher induction: Outcomes for beginning teachers in a university-based support program in low-performing schools. American Educational Research Journal, 54(2), 360–394. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831217690517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, A. B., & Gravelle, M. (2013). The benefits and challenges of special education positions in rural settings: Listening to the teachers. The Rural Educator, 34(2). https://doi.org/10.35608/ruraled.v34i2.400
   Google Scholar
• Bleiberg, J., & Harbatkin, E. (2020). Teacher evaluation reform: A convergence of federal and local forces. Educational Policy, 34(6), 918–952. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904818802105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, D., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2005a). Explaining the short careers of high-achieving teachers in schools with low-performing students. American Economic Review, 95(2), 166–171. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282805774669628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, D., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2005b). The draw of home: How teachers’ preferences for proximity disadvantage urban schools. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24(1), 113–132. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.20072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brownell, M. T., Bishop, A. M., & Sindelar, P. T. (2005). NCLB and the demand for highly qualified teachers: Challenges and solutions for rural schools. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 24(1), 9–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/875687050502400103
   Google Scholar
• Brunner, E., Cowen, J. M., Strunk, K. O., & Drake, S. (2019). Teacher labor market responses to statewide reform: Evidence from Michigan. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 41(4), 403–425. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373719858997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannata, M. (2010). Understanding the teacher job search process: Espoused preferences and preferences in use. Teachers College Record, 112(12), 2889–2934. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811011201205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, D., & Lavertu, S. (2018). School improvement grants in Ohio: Effects on student achievement and school administration. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 40(3), 0162373718760218. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373718760218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chetty, R., Friedman, J. N., & Rockoff, J. E. (2014). Measuring the impacts of teachers II: Teacher value-added and student outcomes in adulthood. The American Economic Review, 104(9), 2633–2679. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.9.2633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chingos, M. M., & West, M. R. (2011). Promotion and reassignment in public school districts: How do schools respond to differences in teacher effectiveness? Economics of Education Review, 30(3), 419–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2010.12.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Close, K., Amrein-Beardsley, A., & Collins, C. (2018). National Education Policy Center. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED591993
   Google Scholar
• Clotfelter, C., Glennie, E. J., Ladd, H. F., & Vigdor, J. L. (2008a). Teacher bonuses and teacher retention in low-performing schools: Evidence from the North Carolina $1,800 teacher bonus program. Public Finance Review, 36(1), 63–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1091142106291662
   Google Scholar
• Clotfelter, C., Glennie, E., Ladd, H., & Vigdor, J. (2008b). Would higher salaries keep teachers in high-poverty schools? Evidence from a policy intervention in North Carolina. Journal of Public Economics, 92(5), 1352–1370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clotfelter, C. T., Ladd, H. F., Vigdor, J. L., & Diaz, R. A. (2004). Do school accountability systems make it more difficult for low-performing schools to attract and retain high-quality teachers? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 23(2), 251–271. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.20003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen-Vogel, L. (2011). Staffing to the test: Are today’s school personnel practices evidence based? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33(4), 483–505. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373711419845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, T. (1999). Attracting and retaining teachers in rural areas. ERIC digest. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED438152
   Google Scholar
• Cowen, J. M., Butler, J. S., Fowles, J., Streams, M. E., & Toma, E. F. (2012). Teacher retention in Appalachian schools: Evidence from Kentucky. Economics of Education Review, 31(4), 431–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2011.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullen, J. B., Koedel, C., & Parsons, E. (2019). The compositional effect of rigorous teacher evaluation on workforce quality. Education Finance and Policy, 16(1), 7–41. https://doi.org/10.1162/edfp_a_00292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dee, T. (2012). School turnarounds: Evidence from the 2009 stimulus (Working Paper No. 17990). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w17990
   Google Scholar
• Dee, T., & Wyckoff, J. (2015). Incentives, selection, and teacher performance: evidence from IMPACT. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 34(2), 267–297. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Early, D. M., Maxwell, K. L., Ponder, B. D., & Pan, Y. (2017). Improving teacher-child interactions: A randomized controlled trial of making the most of classroom interactions and my teaching partner professional development models. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 38, 57–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2016.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller, S. C., & Ladd, H. F. (2013). School-based accountability and the distribution of teacher quality across grades in elementary school. Education Finance and Policy, 8(4), 528–559. https://doi.org/10.1162/EDFP_a_00112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldhaber, D., & Gratz, T. (2021). School district staffing challenges in a rapidly recovering economy. CEDR Flash Brief No. 11082021–1. The Center for Education Data & Research, University of Washington. https://4f730634-e809-4181-92d7-ed1dc705414a.filesusr.com/ugd/1394b9_7709c1ab926247469c2aa9c076b977bc.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Goldhaber, D., & Hansen, M. (2010). Using performance on the job to inform teacher tenure decisions. American Economic Review, 100(2), 250–255. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.2.250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldhaber, D., Strunk, K. O., Brown, N., Naito, N., & Wolff, M. (2020). Teacher staffing challenges in California: Examining the uniqueness of rural school districts. AERA Open, 6(3), 2332858420951833. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858420951833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldring, E., Grissom, J. A., Rubin, M., Neumerski, C. M., Cannata, M., Drake, T., & Schuermann, P. (2015). Make room value added: Principals’ human capital decisions and the emergence of teacher observation data. Educational Researcher, 44(2), 96–104. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X15575031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grissom, J. A., Kalogrides, D., & Loeb, S. (2017). Strategic staffing? How performance pressures affect the distribution of teachers within schools and resulting student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 54(6), 1079–1116. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831217716301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guarino, C. M., Santibanez, L., & Daley, G. A. (2006). Teacher recruitment and retention: A review of the recent empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 76(2), 173–208. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543076002173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammer, P. C., Hughes, G., McClure, C., Reeves, C., & Salgado, D. (2005). Appalachia Educational Laboratory at Edvantia (NJ1). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED489143
   Google Scholar
• Heissel, J. A., & Ladd, H. F. (2018). School turnaround in North Carolina: A regression discontinuity analysis. Economics of Education Review, 62, 302–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2017.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry, G. T., & Guthrie, J. E. (2019) The Effects of Race to the Top School Turnaround in North Carolina . (EdWorkingPaper: 19-107). Retrieved from Annenberg Institute at Brown University: 10.26300/w488-pf83
   Google Scholar
• Henry, G. T., Guthrie, J. E., & Townsend, L. W. (2015). Outcomes and impacts of North Carolina’s initiative to turn around the lowest-achieving schools. http://cerenc.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/ES-FINAL-Final-DST-Report-9-3-15.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Henry, G. T., & Harbatkin, E. (2020). The next generation of state reforms to improve their lowest performing schools: An evaluation of North Carolina’s school transformation intervention. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 13(4), 702–730. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2020.1814464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry, G. T., McNeill, S. M., & Harbatkin, E. (2021). Accountability-Driven School Reform: Are There Unintended Effects on Younger Children in Untested Grades? (EdWorkingPaper: 19-66). Retrieved from Annenberg Institute at Brown University: https://doi.org/10.26300/4b08-h585
   Google Scholar
• Henry, G. T., Pham, L. D., Kho, A., & Zimmer, R. (2020). Peeking into the black box of school turnaround: A formal test of mediators and suppressors. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 42(2), 232–256. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373720908600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell, W. G., & Magazinnik, A. (2017). Presidential prescriptions for state policy: Obama’s Race to the Top initiative. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 36(3), 502–531. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingersoll, R. M. (2001). Teacher turnover and teacher shortages: An organizational analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 38(3), 499. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038003499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingersoll, R. M. (2003). Is there really a teacher shortage? A research report (September; pp. 1–32). University of Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• James, J., & Wyckoff, J. H. (2020). Teacher evaluation and teacher turnover in equilibrium: Evidence from DC public schools. AERA Open, 6(2), 2332858420932235. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858420932235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jimerson, L. (2005). Special challenges of the “No Child Left Behind” Act for rural schools and districts. Rural Educator, 26(3), 1–4. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ783827.
   Google Scholar
• Kane, T. J., McCaffrey, D. F., Miller, T., & Staiger, D. O. (2013). Have we identified effective teachers? Validating measures of effective teaching using random assignment. MET Project. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, J. H., & Diliberti, M. K. (2021). Divergent and inequitable teaching and learning pathways during (and perhaps beyond) the pandemic: Key findings from the American educator panels spring 2021 COVID-19 surveys. RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA168-6.html
   Google Scholar
• Kraft, M. A., Papay, J. P., & Chi, O. L. (2020). Teacher skill development: Evidence from performance ratings by principals. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 39(2), 315–347. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.22193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loeb, S., Miller, L. C., & Wyckoff, J. (2015). Performance screens for school improvement: The case of teacher tenure reform in New York City. Educational Researcher, 44(4), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X15584773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loeb, S., & Reininger, M. (2004). Public policy and teacher labor markets. What we know and why it matters. Education Policy Center.
   Google Scholar
• Malen, B., Croninger, R., Muncey, D., & Redmond-Jones, D. (2002). Reconstituting schools: “Testing” the “theory of action“. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(2), 113–132. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737024002113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malen, B., & Rice, J. K. (2016). School reconstitution as a turnaround strategy: An analysis of the evidence. In W. Matthis, & T. Trujillo (Eds.), Learning from the Federal Market-Based Reforms: Lessons for the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) (pp. 99–125). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Maranto, R. (2013). How do we get them on the farm? Efforts to improve rural teacher recruitment and retention in Arkansas. Rural Educator, 34(1). https://doi.org/10.35608/ruraled.v34i1.406
   Google Scholar
• McClure, C., & Reeves, C. (2004). Rural teacher recruitment and retention review of the research and practice literature. Appalachia Educational Laboratory. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED484967
   Google Scholar
• Miller, L. C. (2012). Situating the rural teacher labor market in the broader context: A descriptive analysis of the market dynamics in New York State. Journal of Research in Rural Education (Online), 27(13), 1–31. http://jrre.psu.edu/articles/27-13.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mobra, T. J., & Hamlin, D. E. (2020). Emergency certified teachers’ motivations for entering the teaching profession: Evidence from Oklahoma. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 28, 109. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.28.5295
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, T. D. (2020). Examining the teacher labor market in different rural contexts: Variations by urbanicity and rural states. AERA Open, 6(4), 2332858420966336. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858420966336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North Carolina State Board of Education, Department of Public Instruction. (2020). Report to the North Carolina General Assembly: Low-performing districts and schools, improvement planning, and statewide support: 2019-20 school year (Report to the Joint Legislative Education Oversight Committee on Low Performing Districts and Schools No. 38). Public Schools of North Carolina. https://simbli.eboardsolutions.com/Meetings/Attachment.aspx?S=10399&AID=235414&MID=7758
   Google Scholar
• Papay, J., & Hannon, M. (2018, November 8). The effects of school turnaround strategies in Massachusetts. 2018 APPAM Fall Research Conference: Evidence for Action: Encouraging Innovation and Improvement, Washington, D.C. https://appam.confex.com/appam/2018/webprogram/Paper26237.html
   Google Scholar
• Pham, L. D., Nguyen, T. D., & Springer, M. G. (2021). Teacher merit pay: A meta-analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 58(3), 0002831220905580. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831220905580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Player, D. (2015). The supply and demand for rural teachers. Rural Opportunities Consortium of Idaho.
   Google Scholar
• Proffit, A. C., Sale, R. P., Alexander, A. E., & Andrews, R. S. (2004). The Appalachian model teaching consortium: Preparing teachers for rural Appalachia. Rural Educator, 26(1), 24–29. https://doi.org/10.35608/ruraled.v26i1.518
   Google Scholar
• Reininger, M. (2012). Hometown disadvantage? It depends on where you’re from: Teachers’ location preferences and the implications for staffing schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 34(2), 127–145. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373711420864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice, J. K., & Malen, B. (2003). The human costs of education reform: The case of school reconstitution. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(5), 635–666. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X03257298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivkin, S. G., Hanushek, E. A., & Kain, J. F. (2005). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73(2), 417–458. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2005.00584.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rockoff, J. E. (2004). The impact of individual teachers on student achievement: Evidence from panel data. American Economic Review, 94(2), 247–252. https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828041302244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronfeldt, M., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2013). How teacher turnover harms student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 50(1), 4–36. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831212463813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, L., Christianson, M. D., & Hague Angus, M. (2015). Improvement efforts in rural schools: Experiences of nine schools receiving school improvement grants. Peabody Journal of Education, 90(2), 194–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2015.1022109
   Google Scholar
• Shuls, J. (2018). School Finance in Rural America. In M. Q. McShane, & A. Smarick (Eds.), No Longer Forgotten: The Triumphs and Struggles of Rural Education in America (pp. 99–116). Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Stoddard, C., & Toma, E. F. (2021). Introduction to special topic: Rural education finance and policy. AERA Open, 7, 23328584211011610. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584211011607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strunk, K. O., Marsh, J. A., Hashim, A. K., Bush-Mecenas, S., & Weinstein, T. (2016). The impact of turnaround reform on student outcomes: Evidence and insights from the Los Angeles unified school district. Education Finance and Policy, 11(3), 251–282. https://doi.org/10.1162/EDFP_a_00188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, M., Penner, E. K., & Loeb, S. (2017). Resource- and approach-driven multidimensional change: Three-year effects of school improvement grants. American Educational Research Journal, 54(4), 607–643. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831217695790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. L., Brown, K. M., Townsend, L. W., Henry, G. T., & Fortner, C. K. (2011). Turning Around North Carolina‘s Lowest Achieving Schools (2006-2010). Consortium for Educational Research and Evaluation–North Carolina. https://publicpolicy.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/107/2015/07/Turning-Around-NCs-Lowest-Achieving-Schools-2006-20101.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Viano, S., Pham, L. D., Henry, G. T., Kho, A., & Zimmer, R. (2020). What teachers want: School factors predicting teachers’ decisions to work in low-performing schools. American Educational Research Journal, 58(1), 201–233. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831220930199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisberg, D., Sexton, S., Mulhern, J., Keeling, D., Schunck, J., Palcisco, A., & Morgan, K. (2009). The widget effect: Our national failure to acknowledge and act on differences in teacher effectiveness (Second Edition). New Teacher Project. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED515656
   Google Scholar
• Wright, S. P., White, J. T., Sanders, W. L., & Rivers, J. C. (2010). SAS EVAAS statistical models. SAS Institute.
   Google Scholar