Special Interest Group Influence in School Districts: Exploring the Impact of Locale

References

• Alsbury, T. L., & Whitaker, K. S. (2007). Superintendent perspectives and practice of accountability, democratic voice and social justice. Journal of Educational Administration, 45(2), 154–174. doi:10.1108/09578230710732943
   Google Scholar
• Anzia, S. F. (2011). Election timing and the electoral influence of interest groups. The Journal of Politics, 73(2), 412–427. doi:10.1017/S0022381611000028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anzia, S. F. (2013). Timing and turnout: How off-cycle elections favor organized groups. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anzia, S. F. (2014). Timing and turnout: How off-cycle elections favor organized groups. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anzia, S. F. (2019). Looking for influence in all the wrong places: How studying subnational policy can revive research on interest groups. The Journal of Politics, 81(1), 343–351. doi:10.1086/700726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asen, R., Gurke, D., Conners, P., Solomon, R., & Gumm, E. (2013). Research evidence and school board deliberations: Lessons from three Wisconsin school districts. Educational Policy, 27(1), 33–63. doi:10.1177/0895904811429291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F. R., & Leech, B. L. (1998). Basic interests. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bjork, L., & Lindle, J. C. (2001). Superintendents and interest groups. Educational Policy, 15(1), 76–91. doi:10.1177/0895904801015001005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borter, G., Ax, J., & Tanfani, J. (2022, February 15). School boards get death threats amid rage over race, gender, mask policies. Reuters Investigates. https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/usa-education-threats/
   Google Scholar
• Carl, J. (2009). “Good politics is good government”: The troubling history of mayoral control of the public schools in twentieth-century Chicago. American Journal of Education, 115(2), 305–336. doi:10.1086/595666
   Google Scholar
• Cramer, K. J. (2016). The politics of resentment: Rural consciousness in Wisconsin and the rise of Scott Walker. University of Chicago Press, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. A. (1961). Who governs?: Democracy and power in an American city. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• DeBray, E., Hanley, J., Scott, J., & Lubienski, C. (2020). Money and influence: Philanthropies, intermediary organisations, and Atlanta’s 2017 school board election. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 52(1), 63–79. doi:10.1080/00220620.2019.1689103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dynes, A. M., Hartney, M. T., & Hayes, S. D. (2021). Off-cycle and off center: Election timing and representation in municipal government. American Political Science Review 115(3), 1097–1103.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, M. R., & Ihrke, D. M. (2016a). Differences in school boards with hired and elected superintendents: A first look. International Review of Public Administration, 21(4), 292–304. doi:10.1080/12294659.2016.1266181
   Google Scholar
• Ford, M. R., & Ihrke, D. M. (2016b). Do school board governance best practices improve district performance? Testing the key work of school boards in Wisconsin. International Journal of Public Administration, 39(2), 87–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, M., & Ihrke, D. (2016c). Determinants of conflict on Wisconsin school boards. Public Policy and Administration, 31(2), 169–189. doi:10.1177/0952076715610414
   Google Scholar
• Ford, M., & Ihrke, D. (2020a). Uncontested: Electoral competition in American school board elections. Journal of Educational Administration, 58(6), 661–675. doi:10.1108/JEA-02-2019-0020
   Google Scholar
• Ford, M. R., & Ihrke, D. M. (2020b). Comparing school board governing dynamics in small rural and suburban districts. Public Administration Quarterly, 44(1), 131–158.
   Google Scholar
• Frederickson, H. G. (1991). Toward a theory of the public for public administration. Administration & Society, 22(4), 395–417. doi:10.1177/009539979102200401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilens, M., & Page, B. I. (2014). Testing theories of American politics: Elites, interest groups, and average citizens. Perspectives on Politics, 12(3), 564–581. doi:10.1017/S1537592714001595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, C. B., & Leland, S. M. (2019). Do cities and counties attempt to circumvent changes in their autonomy by creating special districts? The American Review of Public Administration, 49(2), 203–217. doi:10.1177/0275074018804665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanushek, E. A. (1997). Assessing the effects of school resources on student performance: An update. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19(2), 141–164. doi:10.3102/01623737019002141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess, F. (2008a). Money, interest groups, and school board elections. In T. L. Alsbury (Ed.), The future of school board governance (pp. 137–154). New York, NY: Rowman and Littlefield Education.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, F. M. (2008b). Looking for leadership: Assessing the case for mayoral control of urban school systems. American Journal of Education, 114(3), 219–245. doi:10.1086/529502
   Google Scholar
• Hess, F., & Leal, D. (2005). School house politics: Expenditures, interests, and competition in school board elections. In W. G. Howell (Ed.), Besieged: School boards and the future of education politics (pp. 228–253). Washington D.C., USA: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, P., & Jochim, A. (2018). Unlocking potential: How political skill can maximize superintendent effectiveness. Center on Reinventing Public Education (pp. 1–23). University of Washington: Seattle, WA.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, P. T. (2004). Recovering from an accident: Repairing governance with competitive advantage. In N. Epstein (Ed.), Who’s in charge here? (pp. 75–103). Washington, DC, USA: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Ihrke, D. M., & Scott Niederjohn, M. (2005). Conflict on city councils in Wisconsin. Journal of Urban Affairs, 27(4), 453–462. doi:10.1111/j.0735-2166.2005.00246.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarl, M., Fredriksson, A., & Persson, S. (2012). New public management in public education: A catalyst for the professionalization of Swedish school principals. Public Administration, 90(2), 429–444. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01995.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamenetz, A. (2021, October 26). A look at the groups supporting school board protesters nationwide. National Public Radio. https://www.npr.org/2021/10/26/1049078199/a-look-at-the-groups-supporting-school-board-protesters-nationwide
   Google Scholar
• Kettl, D. F. (2018). The politics of the administrative process (7th ed.). Thousands Oaks, CA, USA.: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Kogan, V., Lavertu, S., & Peskowitz, Z. (2018). Election timing, electorate composition, and policy outcomes: Evidence from school districts. American Journal of Political Science, 62(3), 637–651. doi:10.1111/ajps.12359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowalski, T. J. (2003). Superintendent shortage: The wrong problem and wrong solutions. Journal of School Leadership, 13(3), 288–303. doi:10.1177/105268460301300303
   Google Scholar
• Long, N. E. (1949). Power and administration. Public Administration Review, 9(4), 257–264. doi:10.2307/972337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFarland, A. (2010). Interest group theory. In L.S. Maisel, J.MBerry., & G.C. Edwards III. The Oxford handbook of American political parties and interest groups (pp. 37–56). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McFarland, A. S. (2007). Neopluralism. Annual Review of Political Science, 10(1), 45–66. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.072005.152119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGlynn, A. J. (2010). Identifying the causes of mayoral control in urban public school systems. Urban Education, 45(5), 661–686. doi:10.1177/0042085910377438
   Google Scholar
• Meier, K. J., & Bohte, J. (2001). Structure and discretion: Missing links in representative bureaucracy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11(4), 455–470. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a003511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, M. (2008) First, kill all the school boards. Atlantic Monthly. 92–94.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, C. W. (1956). The power elite. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moe, T. M. (2005). Teacher unions and school board elections. In W. G. Howell (Ed.), Besieged: School boards and the future of education politics (pp. 254–287). Washington, DC, USA: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, R. T., & Giovinazzo, C. T. (2012). The distortion gap: Policymaking under federalism and interest group capture. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 42(2), 189–210. doi:10.1093/publius/pjr037
   Google Scholar
• Mosher, E. (1975). The school board in the family of governments. In P. J. Cistone (Ed.), Understanding school boards: Problems and prospects. (pp. 79–102). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mullins, D. R., & Pagano, M. A. (2005). Local budgeting and finance: 25 years of developments. Public Budgeting & Finance, 24(4s), 3–45. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5850.2005.00002.x
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, A. (2019). A simple model explaining the interaction between special interest spending and voter choices. Journal of Economics and Political Economy, 6(3), 201–226.
   Google Scholar
• O’Toole, L. J., Jr, & Meier, K. J. (2004). Parkinson’s law and the new public management? Contracting determinants and service‐quality consequences in public education. Public Administration Review, 64(3), 342–352. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00378.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, P. E. (1976). School politics Chicago style. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raffel, J. A. (2007). Why has public administration ignored public education, and does it matter? Public Administration Review, 67(1), 135–151. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00703.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reckhow, S. (2013). Follow the money: How foundation dollars change public school politics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reckhow, S., Henig, J. R., Jacobsen, R., & Alter Litt, J. (2017). “Outsiders with deep pockets”: The nationalization of local school board elections. Urban Affairs Review, 53(5), 783–811. doi:10.1177/1078087416663004
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. (2000). Government, interest groups and policy change. Political Studies, 48(5), 1006–1025. doi:10.1111/1467-9248.00292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roelofs, J. (2003). Foundations and public policy: The mask of pluralism. Albany, NY, USA: SUNY press.
   Google Scholar
• Schuck, P. H. (1977). Public interest groups and the policy process. Public Administration Review, 37(2), 132–140. doi:10.2307/974325
   Google Scholar
• Schumaker, P. (2013). Group involvements in city politics and pluralist theory. Urban Affairs Review, 49(2), 254–281. doi:10.1177/1078087412473068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein, J., & Marley, P. (2013). More than they bargained for: Scott Walker, unions, and the fight for Wisconsin. Madison, WI, USA: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Viteritti, J. P., (Ed.). (2009). When mayors take charge: School governance in the city. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, K. K., Shen, F. X., Anagnostopoulos, D., & Rutledge, S. (2007). The education mayor: Improving America’s schools. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar