Analysing design suggestions and use of resources in co-design of educational software: A case study

REFERENCES

• Baker, M.2010. “Close Collaboration, Dialogical Thinking and Affective Regulation.” In Workshop Proceedings of 9th International Conference on the Design of Cooperative Systems, International Reports on Socio-informatics. Aix-en-Provence, France, edited by V.Pipek, G.Stevens, and M.Rohde, 7 (1): 57–64. Bonn: IISI – International Institute for Socio-Informatics.
   Google Scholar
• Barab, S. A., M.Barnett, L.Yamagata-Lynch, K.Squire, and T.Keating. 2002. “Using Activity Theory to Understand the Contradictions Characterizing a Technology-Rich Introductory Astronomy Course.” Mind, Culture, and Activity9 (2): 76–107.
   Google Scholar
• Boujut, J. F., and E.Blanco. 2003. “Intermediary Objects as a Means to Foster Co-operation in Engineering Design.” Computer Supported Cooperative Work12 (2): 205–219.
   Google Scholar
• Bratteteig, T.2004. “Making Change. Dealing with Relations between Design and Use.” PhD diss., Department of Informatics, University of Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Burkhardt, J. M., F.Détienne, A. M.Hebert, L.Perron, S.Safin, and P.Leclercq. 2009. “An Approach to Assess the Quality of Collaboration in Technology-Mediated Design Situations.” In Proceedings of European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics ECCE 2009, Otaniemi, Helsinki, September 30–October 2, 0–1.
   Google Scholar
• Damsa, C., S.Ludvigsen, and J.Andriessen. 2013. “Knowledge Co-construction – Epistemic Consensus or Relational Assent?” In Affective Learning Together. Social and Emotional Dimensions of Collaborative Learning, edited by M.Baker, S.Järvelä, and J.Andriessen, 97–119. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Derry, S. J., R. D.Pea, B.Barron, R. A.Engle, F.Erickson, R.Goldman, R.Hall, et al. 2010. “Conducting Video Research in the Learning Sciences: Guidance on Selection, Analysis, Technology, and Ethics.” Journal of the Learning Sciences19 (1): 3–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Détienne, F., M.Baker, and J. M.Burkhardt. 2012. “Perspectives on Quality of Collaboration in Design.” CoDesign8 (4): 197–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolonen, J. A., and S.Ludvigsen. 2012. “Analyzing Students' Interaction with a 3D Geometry Learning Tool and Their Teacher.” Learning, Culture and Social Interaction1 (3–4): 167–182. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2012.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckert, C., and J. F.Boujut. 2003. “The Role of Objects in Design Co-operation: Communication Through Physical or Virtual Objects.” Computer Supported Cooperative Work12 (2): 145–151.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y.1999. “Innovative Learning in Work Teams: Analysing Cycles of Knowledge Creation in Practice.” In Perspectives on Activity Theory, edited by Y.Engeström, R.Miettinen, and R.Punamäki, 377–406. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Furberg, A., and S.Ludvigsen. 2008. “Students' Meaning-Making of Socio-scientific Issues in Computer Mediated Settings: Exploring Learning through Interaction Trajectories.” International Journal of Science Education30 (13): 1775–1799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glock, F.2009. “Aspects of Language Use in Design Conversation.” In About: Designing Analysing Design Meetings, edited by J.McDonnell, and P.Lloyd, 285–301. London: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Greenbaum, J., and M.Kyng. 1991. Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, B., and A.Henderson. 1995. “Interaction Analysis: Foundations and Practice.” Journal of the Learning Sciences4 (1): 39–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaptelinin, V., and B. A.Nardi. 2006. Acting with Technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Linell, P.1998. Approaching Dialogue. Talk, Interaction and Contexts in Dialogical Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Linell, P.2009. Rethinking Language, Mind and World Dialogically: Interactional and Contextual Theories of Human Sense-Making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Luck, R.2009. “Does this Compromise your Design? Socially Producing a Design Concept in Talk-in-Interaction.” In About: Designing Analysing Design Meetings, edited by J.McDonnell, and P.Lloyd, 233–249. London: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Ludvigsen, S.2009. “Sociogenesis and Cognition: The Struggle between Social and Cognitive Activities.” In Transformation of Knowledge through Classroom Interaction, edited by B.Schwarz, T.Dreyfus, and R.Hershkowitz, 302–318. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McDonnell, J.2009. “Collaborative Negotiation in Design: A Study of Design Conversations between Architect and Building Users.” In About: Designing Analysing Design Meetings, edited by J.McDonnell, and P.Lloyd, 251–267. London: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A.1988. The Psychology of Everyday Things. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Ostergaard, K., and J.Summers. 2009. “Development of a Systematic Classification and Taxonomy of Collaborative Design Activities.” Journal of Engineering Design20 (1): 57–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadimitriou, K., and C.Pellegrin. 2007. “Dynamics of a Project through Intermediary Objects of Design (IODs): A Sensemaking Perspective.” International Journal of Project Management25 (5): 437–445.
   Google Scholar
• Penuel, W. R., J.Roschelle, and N.Shechtman. 2007. “Designing Formative Assessment Software with Teachers: An Analysis of the Co-design Process.” Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning2 (1): 51–74.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, M., and D.Sanderson. 1998. “Coordinating Joint Design Work: The Role of Communication and Artefacts.” Design Studies19 (3): 273–288.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, T.1996. “Embodied Actions in Time and Place: The Cooperative Design of a Multimedia, Educational Computer Game.” Computer Supported Cooperative Work5 (4): 341–367.
   Google Scholar
• Säljö, R.2000. Lärande i Praktiken: Ett Sociokulturellt Perspektiv [Learning in Practice: A Sociocultural Perspective]. Stockholm: Prisma.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, E., and P. J.Stappers. 2008. “Co-creation and the New Landscapes of Design.” CoDesign4 (1): 5–18.
   Google Scholar
• Star, S. L.2010. “This Is Not a Boundary Object: Reflections on the Origin of a Concept.” Science, Technology, & Human Values35 (5): 601–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Star, S. L., and J. R.Griesemer. 1907. “Institutional Ecology, ‘Translations,’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–1939.” Social Studies of Science19: 387–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuedahl, D.2004. “Forhandlinger og overtalelser. Kunnskapsbygging på tvers av kunnskapstradisjoner i brukermedvirkende design av ny IKT.” [Negotiations and Persuasion. Knowledge Building across Knowledge Traditions in User Involvement in Design of New ICT]. PhD diss., Department of Education, University of Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Taxén, G.2005. “Participatory Design in Museums – Visitor-Oriented Perspectives on Exhibition Design.” PhD diss., Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Valsiner, J.1994. “Bidirectional Cultural Transmission and Constructive Sociogenesis.” In Sociogenesis Re-examined, edited by W.Graaf, and R.Maier, 47–70. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Valsiner, J., and R.Van der Veer. 2000. The Social Mind. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Veer, R., and J.Valsiner. 1988. “Lev Vygotsky and Pierre Janet: On the Origin of the Concept of Sociogenesis.” Developmental Review8 (1): 52–65. 10.1016/0273-2297(88)90011-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinck, D., and A.Jeantet. 1995. “Mediating and Commissioning Objects in the Sociotechnical Process of Product Design: A Conceptual Approach.” In Designs, Networks and Strategies. COST A3 Social Sciences, edited by D.Maclean, P.Saviotti, and D.Vinck, 111–129. Brussels: EC Directorate General Science R&D.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S.1978. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wertsch, J. V.1991. Voices of the Mind: Sociocultural Approach to Mediated Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• White, T., and R.Pea. 2011. “Distributed by Design: On the Promises and Pitfalls of Collaborative Learning with Multiple Representations.” Journal of the Learning Sciences20 (3): 489–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar