Quasi-Quisling: co-design and the assembly of collaborateurs

References

• Barry, Andrew. 2001. Political Machines. London: Athlone.
   Google Scholar
• Binder, Thomas, Giorgio de Michelis, Pelle Ehn, Giulio Jacucci, Per Linde, and Ina Wagner. 2011. Design things. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, Michel. 1986. “Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay.” In Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? edited by John Law, 196–223. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, Michel. 1991. “Techno-Economic Networks and Irreversibility.” In A Sociology of Monsters? Essays on Power, Technology and Domination, edited by John Law, 132–161. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, Michel. 1999. “Actor-Network Theory: The Market Test.” In Actor-Network Theory and After, edited by John Law and John Hassard, 181–195. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, Michel, and John Law. 1982. “On Interests and Their Transformation: Enrolment and Counter-Enrolment.” Social Studies of Science 12 (4): 615–625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clegg, Stewart. 1989. Frameworks of Power. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, Bill, and Uma Kothari. 2001. Participation: The New Tyranny? London: Zed.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, Peter. 2004. Dangerous Liaisons: Collaboration and World War Two. Harlow: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, Gilles. 1988. Foucault. London: Athlone.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, Gilles. Part Five in Negotiations 1995. Postscript on Control Societies. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• DiSalvo, Carl. 2012. Adversarial Design. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dunne, Anthony. 1999. Hertzian Tales: Electronic Products, Aesthetic Experience and Critical Design. London: RCA CRD Research.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. 1977. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. London: Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, Jo. 2013. “The Tyranny of Structurelessness.” WSQ: Women's Studies Quarterly 41 (3): 231–246.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, Suzanne, and Maria Humphries. 2006. “Critical Evaluation of Appreciative Inquiry: Bridging an Apparent Paradox.” Action Research 4 (4): 401–418.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, Bertram. 1980. Collaboration in France during the Second World War. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hagberg, Mattias. 2006. “Demokrati på femton minuter.” Göteborgs-Posten, 11 June.
   Google Scholar
• Hamdi, Nabeel. 1991. Housing without Houses: Participation, Flexibility, Enablement. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
   Google Scholar
• Hamdi, Nabeel, and Reinhard Goethert. 1997. Action Planning for Cities: A Guide to Community Practice. Chichester: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, Andrew. 1992. “Contrived Collegiality: The Micropolitics of Teacher Collaboration.” In Managing Change in Education: Individual and Organizational Perspectives, edited by Nigel Bennett, Megan Crawford, and Colin Riches. London: Paul Chapman.
   Google Scholar
• Galloway, Alexander. 2004. Protocol: How Control Exists after Decentralization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gothenburg City Planning Office. 2006a. Report on the Development Plan for the Harbor Area “Program för detaljplaner, Södra Älvstranden, Delen Rosenlund – Lilla Bommen. Del 1 – underlag.” Gothenburg.
   Google Scholar
• Gothenburg City Planning Office. 2006b. Draft Evaluation of the Dialogue Teams’ Proposals “Utvärdering av parallella stadsanalyser - utkast.” Gothenburg.
   Google Scholar
• Granath, Kaj. 2005. “Folket har sagt sitt om Södra Älvstrandens framtid.” Göteborgs-Posten, 16 December.
   Google Scholar
• Harman, Graham. 2009. The Prince of Networks: Bruno Latour and Metaphysics. Melbourne: Re.press.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, David. 2005. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, David. 2008. “The Right to the City.” New Left Review, no. 53: 23–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, David. 2014. Seventeen Contradictions and the End of Capitalism. London: Profile Books.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 1988. “The Prince for Machines as well as for Machinations.” In Technology and Social Change, edited by Brian Elliott, 20–43. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 1999. Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 2004. “Why Has Critique Run Out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern.” Critical Inquiry 30 (4): 225–248.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 2013. “Biography of an Inquiry: On a Book about Modes of Existence.” Social Studies of Science 43 (2): 287–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno, and Steve Woolgar. 1986. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marres, Noortje. 2012. Material Participation: Technology, the Environment and Everyday Publics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Miessen, Markus. 2010. The Nightmare of Participation: Crossbench Practice as a Mode of Criticality. New York: Sternberg Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, Timothy. 2002. Rule of Experts: Egypt, Techno-Politics, Modernity. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nyström, Ulf. 2006. “Lag Rhizom vill med bättre kommunikationer att alla skall få tillgång till Södra Älvstranden.” Göteborgs-Posten, 3 June.
   Google Scholar
• OpenIDEO. 2011. “7 Tips on Better Brainstorming.” Accessed September 12, 2014. https://openideo.com/blog/seven-tips-on-better-brainstorming.
   Google Scholar
• Palmås, Karl, and Otto von Busch. 2011. “Helping Designers to Work outside of Hierarchies: Towards a Scholarship of ‘design meshworking’.” Swedish Design Research Journal 3 (2): 39–47.
   Google Scholar
• Rancière, Jacques. 2004. “Introducing Disagreement.” Angelaki 9 (3): 3–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rancière, Jacques. 2009. “A Few Remarks on the Method of Jacques Rancière.” Parallax 15 (3): 114–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rings, Werner. 1982. Life with the Enemy: Collaboration and Resistance in Hitler's Europe 1939-1945. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, Elizabeth, and Pieter Jan Stappers. 2008. “Co-creation and the New Landscapes of Design.” CoDesign 4 (1): 5–18.
   Google Scholar
• Star, Susan Leigh. 1991. “Power, Technologies and the Phenomenology of Conventions: On Being Allergic to Onions.” In A Sociology of Monsters? Essays on Power, Technology and Domination, edited by John Law, 26–56. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stark, David, and Verena Paravel. 2008. “PowerPoint in Public: Digital Technologies and the New Morphology of Demonstration.” Theory, Culture & Society 25 (5): 30–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strömberg, Knut. 2006. “Möjligheterna finns ännu.” Göteborgs-Posten, 15 June.
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, Erik. 2005. “Governance Innovation and the Citizen: The Janus Face of Governance-beyond-the-State.” Urban Studies 42 (11): 1991–2006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, Erik. 2007. “The Post-political City.” In Urban Politics Now, edited by BAVO, 58–76. Rotterdam: NAI.
   Google Scholar
• Team Rhizom. 2005. “Manuscript for PowerPoint Presentation to Be Held in front of Planners and Local Politicians, 30 November.” Gothenburg.
   Google Scholar
• Thorpe, Adam, and Lorraine Gamman. 2011. “Design with Society: Why Socially Responsive Design Is Good Enough.” CoDesign 7 (3–4): 217–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thörn, Catharina. 2008. “Intervention or the Need for a New Cultural Critique.” ArtMonitor nr 5/2008: 48–68.
   Google Scholar
• Tufte, Edward. 2006. “The Cognitive Style of PowerPoint: Pitching out Corrupts within.” In Beautiful Evidence, 156–185. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, John. 2007. Design for Micro-Utopias: Making the Unthinkable Possible. Aldershot: Gower.
   Google Scholar
• Žižek, Slavoj. 1999. The Ticklish Subject: The Absent Centre of Political Ontology. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar