Democratic design experiments: between parliament and laboratory

References

• Binder, Thomas. 2007. “Why Design:Labs.” Proceedings of the Nordic Design Research Conference, Konstfack, Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Binder, Thomas, Eva Brandt, Joachim Halse, Maria Foverskov, Sissel Olander, and Signe Yndigegn. 2011. Living the (codesign) Lab. Proceedings of the Nordic Design Research Conference (NORDES), Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Bjerknes, Gro, Pelle Ehn, and Morten Kyng. 1987. Computers and Democracy. Aldershot: Gower Publishing Company Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Björgvinsson, Erling, Pelle Ehn, and Per-Anders Hillgren. 2012. “Agonistic Participatory Design: Working With Marginalised Social Movements.” CoDesign 8 (2–3): 127–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandt, Eva, Thomas Binder, and Elizabeth Sanders. 2013. “Tools and Techniques: Ways of Engaging Telling, Making and Enacting.” In Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design, edited by Jesper Simonsen and Toni Robertson, 145–181. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Branzi, Andrea. 1988. Learning From Milan: Design and the Second Modernity. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Mark B. 2009. Science in Democracy: Expertise, Institutions, and Representation. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bødker, Kjeld, Finn Kensing, and Jesper Simonsen. 2004. Participatory IT Design: Designing for Business and Workplace Realities. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, Michel, Pierre Lascoumes, and Yannick Barthe. 2009. Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy, Inside Technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, Michel. 1986. “Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay.” Power, Action, and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge 32: 196–223.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, Nigel. 1971. “Here Comes Everyman.” In The Design Research Society Conference, edited by Nigel Cross, 11–14. Manchester: Academy Editions.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, John. 2012. The Public and Its Problems: An Essay in Political Inquiry. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• DiSalvo, Carl. 2009. “Design and the Construction of Publics.” Review of Design Issues 25 (1): 48–63. doi:10.1162/desi.2009.25.1.48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiSalvo, Carl. 2012. Adversarial Design, Design Thinking, Design Theory. The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dunne, Anthony, and Fiona Raby. 2002. Design Noir: The Secret Life of Electronic Objects. Berlin: Birkhäuser.
   Google Scholar
• Gaver, Bill, and John Bowers. 2012. “Annotated Portfolios.” Review of Interactions 19 (4): 40–49. doi:10.1145/2212877.2212889.
   Google Scholar
• Giaccardi, Elisa, and Gerhard Fischer. 2005. “Creativity and Evolution: A Metadesign Perspective.” In Proceedings of the European Academy of Design (Ead-6) Conference, Bremen, Germany, March.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, Austin, and Morten Kyng. 1991. “There is No Place Like Home.” In Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems, edited by Kyng and Greenbaum. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, Tim. 2000. The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jönsson, Li, and Tau Ulv Lenskjold. 2014. “A Foray into Not-Quite Companion Species: Design Experiments With Urban Animals as Significant Others.” Review of Artifact 3 (2): 7.1–7.13.
   Google Scholar
• Karasti, Helena, and Anna-Liisa Syrjänen. 2004. “Artful Infrastructuring in Two Cases of Community PD.” In 8th Conference on Participatory design: Artful integration: interweaving media, materials and practices, 20–30. ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, Klaus. 1995. “Redesigning design.” In Design Pleasure or Responsibility? edited by P. Tahkokallio and S. Vihma. Helsinki: University of Art and Design.
   Google Scholar
• Kyng, Morten and Joan Greenbaum. 1991. Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Lanzara, Giovan Francesco. 1991. “Shifting Stories. Learning From a Reflective Experiment in a Design Process.” In The Reflective Turn: Case Studies in and on Educational Practice, 285–320. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Translated by Catherine Porter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 1999. Pandoras Hope, Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory, Clarendon Lectures in Management Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 2008. “A Cautious Prometheus? A Few Steps Toward a Philosophy of Design (with Special Attention to Peter Sloterdijk).” In Networks of Design. Cornwall.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 2010. “An Attempt at a ‘Compositionist Manifesto’.” Review of New Literary History 41: 471–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno, and Peter Weibel. 2005. “Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy.” In 1072 s. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, ZKM/Center for Art and Media in Karlsruhe.
   Google Scholar
• Law, John, and Annemarie Mol. 2001. “Situating Technoscience: An Inquiry into Spatialities.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 19 (5): 609–621. doi:10.1068/d243t.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindstöm, Kristina, and Åsa Ståhl. 2014. Patchworking Publics-in-the-Making – Design, Media and Public Engagement. Doctoral dissertation Malmö University.
   Google Scholar
• Lury, Celia, and Nina Wakeford, eds. 2012. Inventive Methods: The Happening of the Social. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Manzini, Ezio, and Fransesca Rizzo. 2011. “Small Projects/Large Changes: Participatory Design as an Open Participated Process.” Review of CoDesign 7 (3–4): 199–215. doi:10.1080/15710882.2011.630472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marres, Noortje. 2005. “Issues Spark a Public into Being – A Key But Often Forgotten Point of the Lippmann-Dewey Debate.” In Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy, edited by Bruno Latour and Peter Weibel. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, ZKM/Center for Art and Media in Karlsruhe.
   Google Scholar
• Mazé, Ramia, and Johan Redström. 2008. “Switch! Energy Ecologies in Everyday Life.” Review of International Journal of Design 2 (3): 55–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller, Michael J. 2002. “Participatory Design: The Third Space in HCI.” In The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook, edited by Julie A. Jacko and Andrew Sears, 1051–1068. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Olander, Sissel. 2014. The Network Lab: A Proposal for Design-Anthropological Experimental Set-Ups in Cultural Work and Social Research. Doctoral dissertation. Copenhagen: Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, Schools of Architecture Design and Conservation.
   Google Scholar
• Pipek, Volkmar, and Volker Wulf. 2009. “Infrastructuring: Towards an Integrated Perspective on the Design and Use of Information Technology.” Journal of the Association for Information Systems (JAIS) 10 (5): 447–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg. 2010. An Epistemology of the Concrete: Twentieth-Century Histories of Life. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schuler, Douglas, and Aki Namioka. 1993. Participatory Design: Principles and Practices. Hilsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, Donald. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Seravalli, Anna. 2014. Making Commons – attempts at composing prospects in the opening of production. Doctoral dissertation Malmö University.
   Google Scholar
• Simonsen, Jesper, and Toni Robertson. 2013. Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Star, Susan L. 1991. “Power, Technology and the Phenomenology of Conventions: On Being Allergic to Onions.” In A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination, edited by John Law. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Star, Susan L. and Karen Ruhleder. 1996. “Steps Towards an Ecology of Infrastructure: Design and Access for Large Information Spaces.” Information Systems Research 7 (1): 111–134. 10.1287/isre.7.1.111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suchman, Lucy, Jeanette Blomberg, Julian Orr, and Randy Trigg. 1999. “Reconstructing Technologies as Social Practice.” Review of American behavioral Scientist 43 (3): 392–408. doi:10.1177/00027649921955335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Telier, A.  (Thomas Binder, Giorgio De Michelis, Pelle Ehn, Giulio Jacucci, Per Linde and Ina Wagner) 2011. Design Things. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thackara, John. 2005. In the Bubble: Designing in a Complex World. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar