Becoming-design in corresponding: re/theorising the co- in codesigning

References

• Adams, R. S., and J. Siddiqui. 2013. Purdue DTRS – Design Review Conversations Database. West Lafayette, IN: XRoads Technical Report.
   Google Scholar
• Alexiou, K. 2010. “Coordination and Emergence in Design.” CoDesign 6: 75–97.10.1080/15710882.2010.493942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. 1986. Speech Genres and Other Late Essays, edited by C. Emberson and M. Holquist, Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cadoz, C. 1994. Les réalités virtuelles. Paris: Flammarion.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, A. 2008. Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195333213.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Crilly, N., A. Maier, and P. John Clarkson. 2008. “Representing Artefacts as Media: Modelling the Relationship Between Designer Intent and Consumer Experience.” International Journal of Design 2 (3): 15–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crilly, N. D., D. Matravers Good, and P. John Clarkson. 2008. “Design as Communication: Exploring the Validity and Utility of Relating Intention to Interpretation.” Design Studies 29: 425–457.10.1016/j.destud.2008.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 1980. Mille plateaux: capitalisme et schizophrénie. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, J. 1972. De la grammatologie. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.
   Google Scholar
• Ehn, P., and M. Kyng. 2003. “Cardboard Computers: Mocking-it-up or Hands-on the Future.” In The New Media Reader, edited by I. Wardrip-Fruin and N. Montfort, 649–662. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. 2003. “The Semiotic Body in its Environment.” In Discourses of the Body, edited by J. Coupland and R. Gwyn, 19–42. New York: Palgrave/Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hadar, U., and B. Butterworth. 1997. “Iconic Gestures, Imagery, and Word Retrieval in Speech.” Semiotica 115: 147–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halskov, K., and P. Daalsgard. 2007. “The Emergence of Ideas: The Interplay between Sources of Inspiration and Emerging Design Concepts.” CoDesign 3: 185–211.10.1080/15710880701607404
   Google Scholar
• Il’enkov, E. V. 1977. Dialectical Logic: Essays on its History and Theory. Moscow: Progress.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. 2007. “Earth, Sky, Wind, and Weather.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 13: S19–S38.10.1111/jrai.2007.13.issue-s1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. 2011. Being Alive: Essays on Movement, Knowledge and Description. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. 2013. Making: Anthropology, Archeology, Art and Architecture. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. 2015. The Life of Lines. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Iverson, J. M., and S. Goldin-Meadow. 1998. “Why People Gesture when They Speak.” Nature 396: 228.10.1038/24300
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. 2004. “Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction.” In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, edited by G. H. Lerner, 13–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, P. W. 1998. An Introduction to Usability. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Klee, P. [1925] 2014. Pädagogisches Skizzenbuch [Pedagogical Sketchbook]. Berlin: Gebr. Mann Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K., and F. Engels. 1978. Werke. vol. 3. Berlin: Dietz.
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M. 1945. Phénoménologie de la perception. Paris: Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, D. 2002. “Gesture and Language Dialectic.” Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 34: 7–37.10.1080/03740463.2002.10414607
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, K. 2005. “Collaborative imagining: The interactive use of gestures, talk, and graphic representation in architectural practice.” Semiotica 156–1 (4): 113–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, W.-M., and D. Lawless. 2002. “When Up is Down and Down is Up: Body Orientation, Proximity and Gestures as Resources for Listeners.” Language in Society 31: 1–28.10.1017/S004740450200101X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, W.-M., D. Lawless, and D. Masciotra. 2001. “Spielraum and Teaching.” Curriculum Inquiry 31: 183–207.10.1111/0362-6784.00191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, W.-M., and J.-F. Maheux. 2015. “The Visible and the Invisible: Mathematics as Revelation.” Educational Studies in Mathematics 88: 221–238.10.1007/s10649-014-9582-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, W.-M., and T. J. Mavin. 2015. “Peer Assessment of Aviation Performance: Inconsistent for Good Reasons.” Cognitive Science 39: 405–433.10.1111/cogs.2015.39.issue-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. 1987. Educating the Reflective Practitioner. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Sing, V., A. Dong, and J. S. Gero. 2012. “Computational Studies to Understand the Role of Social Learning in Team Familiarity and its Effects on Team Performance.” CoDesign 8: 25–41.10.1080/15710882.2011.633088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Socha, D., J. Tenenberg, and W.-M. Roth. 2016. “Taking a (Design) Stance.” In Analyzing Design Review Conversations edited by R. S. Adams, J. Siddiqui, and P. Buzzanell, 335–351. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vološinov, V. N. 1930. Marksizm i folosofija jazyka: osnovye problemy sociologičeskogo metoda b nauke o jazyke [Marxism and the philosophy of language : Main problems of the sociological method in linguistics]. Leningrad, USSR: Priboj.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotskij, L. S. 1934. Myšlenie i Reč’: Psixologičeskie Issledovanija [Thinking and speaking: psychological investigations]. Moscow, USSR: Gosudarstvennoe social’noèskonomičeskoe isdatel’stvo.
   Google Scholar
• Whitman, W. 1855. Leaves of Grass. Brooklyn, NY: Walt Whitman. Available at http://www.whitmanarchive.org/published/LG/1855/whole.html
   Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, L. 1997. Philosophische Untersuchungen/Philosophical Investigations. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar