Living in the lab: an analysis of the work in eight living laboratories set up in care homes for technology innovation

References

• Abowd, G., A. Bobick, I. Essa, E. Mynatt, and W. l. Rogers. 2002. The Aware Home: A Living Laboratory for Technologies for Successful Aging. AAAI Technical Report WS-02-02. Menlo Park, CA: American Association for Artificial Intelligence.
   Google Scholar
• Almirall, E., and J. Wareham. 2008. “Living Labs and Open Innovation: Roles and Applicability.” Electronic Journal for Virtual Organizations and Networks 10 (3): 21–46.
   Google Scholar
• Balka, E. 2010. “Broadening Discussion about Participatory Design: A Response to Kyng.” Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 22 (1): 77–84.
   Google Scholar
• Bannon, L., and P. Ehn. 2013. “Design: Design Matters in Participatory Design.” In Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design, edited by J. Simonsen and T. Robertsen, 37–63. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bergvall-Kåreborn, B., and A. Ståhlbröst. 2009. “Living Lab: An Open and Citizen-centric Approach for Innovation.” International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development 1 (4): 356–370.10.1504/IJIRD.2009.022727
   Google Scholar
• Binder, T., and E. Brandt. 2008. “The Design: Lab as Platform in Participatory Design Research.” CoDesign 4 (2): 115–129. doi:10.1080/15710880802117113.
   Google Scholar
• Björgvinsson, E., P. Ehn, and P.-A. Hillgren. 2012. “Agonistic Participatory Design: Working with Marginalised Social Movements.” CoDesign 8 (2–3): 127–144. doi:10.1080/15710882.2012.672577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bossen, C., C. Dindler, and O. S. Iversen. 2010. “User Gains and PD Aims: Assessment from a Participatory Design Project.” In PDC’10, 141–150. New York: ACM. doi:10.1145/19004411900461.
   Google Scholar
• Bossen, C., C. Dindler, and O. S. Iversen. 2012. “Impediments to User Gains: Experiences from a Critical Participatory Design Project.” In PDC’12, Vol. 1, 31–40. New York: ACM.doi:10.1145/2347635.2347641.
   Google Scholar
• Carayon, P. 2009. “The Balance Theory and the Work System Model … Twenty Years Later.” International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 25 (5): 313–327. doi:10.1080/10447310902864928.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. M., and M. B. Rossen. 2013. “Wild at Home: The Neighbourhood as a Living Laboratory for HCI.” ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 20 (3). Article No. 16. doi:10.1145/2491500.2491504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colomer, J., D. Salvi, M. Cabrera-Umpierrez, M. Arredondo, P. Abril, V. Jimenez-Mixco, R. Garcia-Betances, et al. 2014. “Experience in Evaluating AAL Solutions in Living Labs.” Sensors 14: 7277–7311. doi:10.3390/s140407277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Følstad, A. 2008. “Living Labs for Innovation and Development of Information and Communication Technology: A Literature Review.” Electronic Journal for Virtual Organizations and Networks 10: 110–131.
   Google Scholar
• Hyysalo, S., and L. Hakkarainen. 2014. “What Difference Does a Living Lab Make? Comparing Two Health Technology Innovation Projects.” CoDesign 10 (3–4): 191–208. doi:10.1080/15710882.2014.983936.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Intille, S., K. Larson, J. Beaudin, J. Nawyn, E. Tapia, and P. Kaushik. 2005. “A Living Laboratory for the Design and Evaluation of Ubiquitous Computing Technologies.” In CHI EA ’05, 1941–1944. doi:10.1145/1056808.1057062.
   Google Scholar
• Ishmael, J., S. Bury, D. Pezaros, and N. Race. 2008. “Deploying Rural Community Wireless Mesh Networks.” IEEE Internet Computing 12 (4): 22–29. doi:10.1109/MIC.2008.76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iversen, O. S., and C. Dindler. 2014. “Sustaining Participatory Design Initiatives.” CoDesign 10 (3–4): 153–170. doi:10.1080/15710882.2014.963124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanstrup, A. M., K. Bjerge, and J. E. Kristensen. 2010. “A Living Laboratory Exploring Mobile Support for Everyday Life with Diabetes.” Wireless Personal Communications 53 (3): 395–408.10.1007/s11277-010-9953-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kjeldskov, J., and M. B. Skov 2014. “Was it worth the Hassle? Ten Years of Mobile HCI Research Discussions on Lab and Field Evaluations.” In Mobile HCI’14, 43–52. New York: ACM. doi: 10.1145/2628363.2628398.
   Google Scholar
• Leminen, S., M. Westerlund, and A.-G. Nyström. 2012. “Living Labs as Open-innovation Networks.” Technology Innovation Management Review, 2 (9): 6–11.
   Google Scholar
• Moen, A., and P. F. Brennan. 2005. “Health@Home: The Work of Health Information Management in the Household (HIMH): Implications for Consumer Health Informatics (CHI) Innovations.” Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 12 (6): 648–656.10.1197/jamia.M1758
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogonowski, C., B. Ley, J. Hess, L. Wan, and V. Wulf. 2013. “Designing for the Living Room: Long-term Users Involvement in a Living Lab.” In CHI 2013, 1539–1548. New York: ACM. doi:10.1145/2470654.2466205.
   Google Scholar
• Pallot, M., B. Trousse, B. Senach, and D. Scapin. 2010. “Living Lab Research Landscape: From User Centred Design and User Experience towards User Cocreation.” First European Summer School “Living Labs”, Paris, France, August 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Ponce de Leon, M., M. Eriksson, S. Balasubramaniam, and W. Donnelly. 2006. “Creating a Distributed Mobile Networking Testbed Environment – Through the Living Lab Approach.” TRIDENTCOM 2006. New Jersey: IEEE. doi:10.1109/TRIDNT.2006.1649138.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. 1995. Diffusion of Inovations. 4th ed. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, Y., H. Sharp, and J. Preece. 2011. Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction. 3rd ed. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. J., and P. Carayon-Sainfort. 1989. “A Balance Theory of Job Design for Stress Reduction.” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 4 (1): 67–79.10.1016/0169-8141(89)90051-6
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. J., and P. Carayon. 1995. “New Technology, Automation, and Work Organization: Stress Problems and Improved Technology Implementation Strategies.” International Journal of Human Factors in Manufacturing 5 (1): 99–116. doi:10.1002/hfm.4530050107.
   Google Scholar
• Ståhlbröst, A. 2008. “Forming Future IT – The Living Lab Way of User Involvement.” Doctoral thesis, Luleå University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Winthereik, J. C., L. Malmborg, and T. B. Andersen. 2009. “Living Labs as a Methodological Approach to Universal Access in Senior Design.” In Universal Access in HCI, Part I, HCII 2009, LNCS, Vol. 5614, edited by Constantine Stephanidis, 174–183. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar