Publication Cover
CoDesign
International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts
Volume 13, 2017 - Issue 4
9,189
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Creativity, play and transgression: children transforming spatial design

, , &
Pages 245-260 | Received 10 Jun 2015, Accepted 18 Mar 2016, Published online: 12 Apr 2016

References

  • Adams, A., and S. Ingham. 1998. Changing Places: Children’s Participation in Environmental Planning. London: The Children’s Society.
  • Bayram, M. 2010. “Design is Fun: Promoting Play in Design Process.” Masters diss., University of Cincinnati. Accessed May 11, 2015. https://etd.ohiolink.edu/rws_etd/document/get/ucin1280779027/inline.
  • Bhabha, H. K. 1994. The Location of Culture. London: Routledge.
  • Birch, J., R. Parnell, M. Patsarika, and M. Šorn. Forthcoming. Spatial Design With Children. London: Routledge.
  • Blanchet-Cohen, N., and R. Rainbow. 2006. “Partnership between Children and Adults? The Experience of the International Children’s Conference on the Environment”. Childhood 13 (1): 113–126. doi: 10.1177/0907568206059976.
  • Bowden, J. A., and E. Walsh, eds. 2000. Phenomenography. Melbourne: RMIT University Press.
  • Bowden, J. A., and P. Green. 2005. Doing Developmental Phenomenography. Melbourne: RMIT University Press.
  • Buur, J., and Larsen, H. 2010. “The Quality of Conversations in Participatory Innovation.” CoDesign 6 (3): 121–138.10.1080/15710882.2010.533185
  • Burroughs, W., and B. Gysin. 1978. The Third Mind. New York: Viking Press.
  • CABE Space, and CABE Education. 2004. Involving Young People in the Design and Care of Urban Spaces. What Would You Do with This Space? Accessed May 11, 2015. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20110118095356/http:/www.cabe.org.uk/files/what-would-you-do-with-this-space.pdf.
  • Carruthers, P. 2003. “On Fodor’s Problem.” Mind and Language 18 (5): 502–523. doi: 10.1111/1468-0017.00240.
  • Chawla, L. 1997. “Growing Up in Cities: A Report on Research Under Way.” Environment and Urbanization 9 (2): 247–252.10.1177/095624789700900212
  • Clark, A. 2007. Early Childhood Spaces: Involving Young Children and Practitioners in the Design Process. Working Paper 45. The Hague: Bernard van Leer Foundation.
  • Clifton, N. 2008. “The ‘Creative Class’ in the UK: An Initial Analysis.” Geografiska Annaler, Series B: Human Geography 90 (1): 63–82. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0467.2008.00276.x.
  • Craft, A. R. 2013. “Childhood, Possibility Thinking and Wise, Humanising Educational Futures.” International Journal of Educational Research 61: 126–134.10.1016/j.ijer.2013.02.005
  • Day, L., L. Sutton, and S. Jenkins. 2011. Children’s and Young People’s Participation in Planning and Regeneration. Birmingham, AL: ECORYS, Centre for Research in Social Policy.
  • Dent, M., and S. Whitehead, eds. 2002. Managing Professional Identities: Knowledge, Performativity and the ‘New’ Professional. London: Routledge.
  • Dorst, K. 2006. Understanding Design: 175 Reflections on Being a Designer. Amsterdam: BIS.
  • Edmiston, B. 2010. “Playing with Children, Answering with Our Lives: A Bakhtinian Approach to Coauthoring Ethical Identities in Early Childhood.” British Journal of Educational Studies 58 (2): 197–211. doi: 10.1080/00071000903522484.
  • Florida, R. 2002. The Rise of the Creative Class: And How It’s Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life. New York: Basic Books.
  • Frank, I. K. 2006. “The Potential of Youth Participation in Planning.” Journal of Planning Literature 20 (4): 351–357. doi: 10.1177/0885412205286016.
  • Freire, P. 1998. Pedagogy of Freedom: Ethics, Democracy and Civic Courage. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
  • Gerber, E. 2007. “Improvisation Principles and Techniques for Design.” In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1069–1072. New York: ACM.
  • Green, P. 2005. “A Rigorous Journey into Phenomenography: From a Naturalistic Inquirer Viewpoint”. In Doing Developmental Phenomenography, edited by J. A. Bowden and P. Green, 32–47. Melbourne: RMIT University Press.
  • Hart, R. 1992. Children’s Participation: From Tokenism to Citizenship. Florence: UNICEF.
  • Holland, D., W. Lachiocotte, D. Skinner, and C. Cain. 1998. Identity and Agency in Cultural Worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Hope, A. 2005. “Panopticism, Play and the Resistance of Surveillance: Case Studies of the Observation of Student Internet Use in UK Schools.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 26 (3): 359–373.10.1080/01425690500128890
  • Hughson, J., and D. Inglis. 2002. “Inside the Beautiful Game: Towards a Merleau-Pontian Phenomenology of Soccer Play.” Journal of the Philosophy Of Sport 29 (1): 1–15.
  • Knowles-Yánez, K. 2005. “Children’s Participation in Planning Processes.” Journal of Planning Literature 20 (1): 3–14. doi: 10.1177/0885412205277032.
  • Koralek, B., and Mitchell, M. 2005. “The Schools We’d like: Young People’s Participation in Architecture”. In Children’s Spaces, edited by M. Dudek, 114–153. Oxford: Architectural Press.
  • Kozbelt, A., R. A. Beghetto, and M. A. Runco. 2010. “Theories of Creativity.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity, edited by J. C. Kaufman and R. J. Sternberg, 20–47. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511763205
  • Linder, C., and D. Marshall. 2003. “Reflection and Phenomenography: Towards Theoretical and Educational Development Possibilities.” Learning and Instruction 13 (3): 271–284.10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00002-6
  • Lynch, K., ed. 1977. Growing Up in Cities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Mainemelis, C., and S. Ronson. 2006. “Ideas Are Born in Fields of Play: Towards a Theory of Play and Creativity in Organizational Settings.” Research in Organizational Behavior 27: 81–131. doi: 10.1016/S0191-3085(06)27003-5.
  • Malone, K., and T. Tranter. 2003. “Children’s Environmental Learning and the Use, Design and Management of School Grounds.” Children, Youth and Environments 13 (2): 87–137.
  • Marton, F. 1981. “Phenomenography – Describing Conceptions of the World around Us.” Instructional Science 10 (2): 177–200.10.1007/BF00132516
  • McDonnell, J. 2012. “Accommodating Disagreement: A Study of Effective Design Collaboration.” Design Studies 33 (1): 44–63.10.1016/j.destud.2011.05.003
  • Mezirow, J. 1985. “A Critical Theory of Self-directed Learning.” New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education. 25: 17–30.10.1002/(ISSN)1536-0717
  • Montuori, A., and R. Purser. 1997. “Le Dimensioni Sociali Della Creativita.” [Social Creativity: The Challenge of Complexity.] Pluriverso 1 (2): 78–88.
  • O'Sullivan, E. 2003. “Bringing a Perspective of Transformative Learning to Globalized Consumption.” International Journal of Consumer Studies 27 (4): 326–330.10.1046/j.1470-6431.2003.00327.x
  • Paulus, P. B., and B. A. Nijstad, eds. 2003. Group Creativity: Innovation Through Collaboration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Percy-Smith, B. 2006. “From Consultation to Social Learning in Community Participation with Young People.” Children, Youth and Environments 16 (2): 154–179.
  • Perkel, Dan. 2007 “Everyday Creativity: Appropriation Before, During and After Dissemination.” Paper Presented At: Supporting Creative Acts Beyond Dissemination. Creativity & Cognition, Washington DC, USA, June 13.
  • Petrescu, D. 2005. “Losing Control, Keeping Desire”. In Architecture and Participation, edited by P. Blundell Jones, D. Petrescu, and J. Till, 43–64. London: Routledge.
  • Petrescu, D. 2012. “Relationscapes: Mapping Agencies of Relational Practice in Architecture.” City, Culture, Society 3 (2): 135–140.10.1016/j.ccs.2012.06.011
  • Richards, R. 2010. “Everyday Creativity: Process and Way of Life – Four Key Issues.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity, edited by J. C. Kaufman and R. J. Sternberg, 189–215. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511763205
  • Romdenh-Romluc, K. 2007. “Merleau Ponty and the Power to Reckon with the Possible.” In Reading Merleau Ponty: On Phenomenology of Perception, edited by T. Baldwin, 44–58. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Russ, S. W., and Fiorelli, J. A. 2010. “Developmental Approaches to Creativity”. In The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity, edited by J. C. Kaufman and R. J. Sternberg, 233–249. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Sawyer, K. 2007. Group Genius. The Creative Power of Collaboration. New York: Basic Books.
  • Sawyer, K. 2010. “Individual and Group Creativity.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity, edited by J. C. Kaufman and R. J. Sternberg, 366–380. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511763205
  • Smith, P. K. 2009. Children and Play: Understanding Children’s Worlds. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • South London Gallery, ed. 2011. The Cat Came as a Tomato. London: South London Gallery.
  • Till, J. 2005. “The Negotiation of Hope.” In Architecture and Participation, edited by P. Blundell Jones, D. Petrescu, and J. Till, 19–42. Oxford: Spon Press.
  • Till, J., and T. Schneider. 2009. “Beyond Discourse: Notes on Spatial Agency.” Footprint: Delft School of Design Journal 4: 97–111.
  • Uprichard, E. 2008. “Children as ‘Being and Becomings’: Children, Childhood and Temporality.” Children & Society 22 (4): 303–313.10.1111/chso.2008.22.issue-4
  • Valentine, G. 2004. Public Space and the Culture of Childhood. Aldershot: Ashgate.
  • Vannatta, S. A. 2008. “Phenomenology of Sport: Playing and Passive Synthesis.” Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 35 (1): 63–72.
  • Ward, C. 1978. The Child in the City. New York: Pantheon.
  • Willis, P. 1990. Common Culture: Symbolic Work at Play in the Everyday Cultures of the Young. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  • Zimmermann, A. C., and J. Morgan. 2011. “The Possibilities and Consequences of Understanding Play as Dialogue.” Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 5 (1): 46–62. doi: 10.1080/17511321.2010.511250.