Democratic design experiments in urban planning – navigational practices and compositionist design

References

• Binder, Thomas, and Eva Brandt. 2008. “The Design: Lab as Platform in Participatory Design Research.” CoDesign 4 (2): 115–129.10.1080/15710880802117113
   Google Scholar
• Binder, Thomas, Eva Brandt, Joachim Halse, Maria Foverskov, Sissel Olander, and Signe Yndigegn. 2011. Living the (Codesign) Lab. In Nordic Design Research Conference 2011, Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Binder, Thomas, Eva Brandt, Pelle Ehn, and Joachim Halse. 2015. “Democratic Design Experiments: Between Parliament and Laboratory.” CoDesign 11 (3–4): 152–165.10.1080/15710882.2015.1081248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Björgvinsson, Erling, Pelle Ehn, Per-Anders Hillgren. 2010. “Participatory Design and ‘Democratizing Innovation’.” In Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference, 41–50. New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• DiSalvo, C. 2009. “Design and the Construction of Publics.” Design Issues 25 (1): 48–63.10.1162/desi.2009.25.1.48
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehn, Pelle. 2008. Participation in Design Things. In Proceedings of the Tenth Anniversary Conference on Participatory Design 2008, 92–101. New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Forester, John 2013. “On the Theory and Practice of Critical Pragmatism: Deliberative Practice and Creative Negotiations.” Planning Theory 12 (1): 5–22.10.1177/1473095212448750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, Stephen and Simon Marvin. 2001. “Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures”. In Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition, edited by Simon Marvin, 479. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Halse, Joachim, Eva Brandt, Brendon Clark, and Thomas Binder. 2010. Rehearsing the Future. Copenhagen: The Danish Design School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hassan, Gerry, Melissa Mean, and Charlie Tims. 2007. The Dreaming City. London: Demos.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. 2004. “Creativity and Urban Governance.” Policy Studies 25 (2): 87–102.10.1080/0144287042000262189
   Google Scholar
• Healey. 2009. “The Pragmatic Tradition in Planning Thought.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 28 (3): 277–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillier, Jean. 2008. “Plan(E) Speaking: A Multiplanar Theory of Spatial Planning.” Planning Theory 7 (1): 24–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John Law. 2009. The Greer-Bush Test: on Politics in STS, version of 23rd December 2009. http://www.heterogeneities.net/publications/Law2009TheGreer-BushTest.pdf, (downloaded on 23rd December, 2009).
   Google Scholar
• Koskinen, Ilpo, John Zimmerman, Thomas Binder, Johan Redström, and Stephan Wensveen. 2011. Design Research through Practice – From the Lab, Field and Showroom. Waltham: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 1988. “How to Write ‘the Prince’ for Machines as Well as for Machinations.” In Technology and Social Change, edited by Brian Elliott, 20–43: Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno, and Peter Weibel, eds. 2005. Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. 1992. “Notes on the Theory of the Actor-network: Ordering, Strategy, and Heterogeneity.” Systems Practice 5 (4): 379–393.10.1007/BF01059830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lissandrello, E., and J. Grin. 2011. “Reflexive Planning as Design and Work: Lessons from the Port of Amsterdam.” Planning Theory and Practice 12 (2): 223–248.10.1080/14649357.2011.580156
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, Chantal. 2007. “Artistic Actvism and Agonistic Spaces.” Art & Research 1 (2): 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Munthe-Kaas, Peter. 2015. “Infrastructuring Public Sector Innovation: Challenging Municipal Work Practices in Copenhagen.” European Planning Studies 23 (8): 1588–1608.10.1080/09654313.2014.941791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munthe-Kaas, Peter, Birgitte Hoffmann. Forthcomming. “Den Navigerende Byplanlægger.” In På Tværs, edited by Joachim Halse, Hanne Lindegaard, and Morten Krogh Petersen. Aalborg Universitetsforlag.
   Google Scholar
• Nambisan, Satish. 2008. Transforming Government through Collaborative Innovation. Washington, DC: Center for the Business of Government.
   Google Scholar
• Pløger, J. 2004. “Strife: Urban Planning and Agonism.” Planning Theory 3 (1): 71–92.10.1177/1473095204042318
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, Elizabeth B. -N., and Pieter Jan Stappers. 2008. “Co-creation and the New Landscapes of Design.” CoDesign 4 (1): 5–18.10.1080/15710880701875068
   Google Scholar
• Schön, Donald A. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner : How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sehested, K. 2009. “Urban Planners as Network Managers and Metagovernors.” Planning Theory and Practice 10 (2): 245–263.
   Google Scholar
• Stengers, Isabelle. 1997. Power and Invention: Situating Science. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stenros, J., M. Montola, and F. Mäyrä. 2007. “Pervasive Games in Ludic Society.” In Proceedings of the 2007 conference on Future Play, 30–37. New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• TEA. 2014. Resource and Waste Management Plan 2018. Copenhagen: The Technical and Environmental Administration.
   Google Scholar