Counterfactual scripting: challenging the temporality of participation

References

• Akrich, Madeleine. 1992. “The de-Scription of Technical Objects” In: Shaping Technology/Building Society, edited by Wiebe Bijker, and John Law, 205–224. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, Lars Bo, Peter Danholt, Kim Halskov, Nicolai Brodersen Hansen, and Peter Lauritsen. 2015. “Participation as a Matter of Concern in Participatory Design.” CoDesign 11 (3–4): 250–261. doi:10.1080/15710882.2015.1081246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnstein, Sherry R. 1969. “A Ladder Of Citizen Participation.” Journal of the American Institute of Planners 35 (4): 216–224.10.1080/01944366908977225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binder, Thomas, Giorgio De Michelis, Pelle Ehn, Giulio Jacucci, and Ina Wagner. 2011. Design Things. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blythe, Mark A., and Peter C. Wright. 2006. “Pastiche Scenarios: Fiction as a Resource for User Centred Design.” Interacting with Computers 18 (5): 1139–1164. doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2006.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bratteteig, Tone, and Ina Wagner. 2014. Disentangling Participation. Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Cham: Springer International Publishing. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-06163-4.10.1007/978-3-319-06163-4
   Google Scholar
• De Bie, Maria, Stijn Oosterlinck, and Seppe De Blust. 2012. “Participatie, ontwerp en toe-eigening in een democratische stadsvernieuwing.” In Stadsvernieuwingsprojecten in Vlaanderen (2002-2011) : een eigenzinnige praktijk in Europees perspectief, 29–33. ASP nv. http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-2100027.
   Google Scholar
• Di Salvo, Carlo, Andrew Clement, and Volker Pipek. 2012. “Participatory Design For, With, and By Communities.” In International Handbook of Participatory Design, 182–209. Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dindler, Christian. 2010. “The Construction of Fictional Space in Participatory Design Practice.” CoDesign 6 (3): 167–182. doi:10.1080/15710882.2010.493941.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiSalvo, Carl. 2009. “Design and the Construction of Publics.” Design Issues 25 (1): 48–63.10.1162/desi.2009.25.1.48
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehn, Pelle. 1988. “Work-oriented Design of Computer Artifacts.” Umeå: Umeå University. http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A580037&dswid=4636.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, Niall. 2000. Virtual History: Alternatives and Counterfactuals. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Forlano, Laura, and Anijo Mathew. 2014. “From Design Fiction to Design Friction: Speculative and Participatory Design of Values-embedded Urban Technology.” Journal of Urban Technology 21 (4): 7–24. doi:10.1080/10630732.2014.971525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginderachter, Maarten van, Koen Aerts, and Antoon Vrints. 2015. Het land dat nooit was: een tegenfeitelijke geschiedenis van België [The country that never was. A counterfactual history of Belgium]. Bezige Bij.
   Google Scholar
• Godfrey-Smith, Peter. 2009. “Causal Pluralism” In The Oxford Handbook of Causation, edited by Helen Beebee, Peter Menzies, and Christopher Hitchcock, 326–337. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzatto, Rodrigo Freese, Frederick M. C. van Amstel, Luiz Ernesto Merkle, and Timo Hartmann. 2013. “The Ideology of the Future in Design Fictions.” Digital Creativity 24 (1): 36–45. doi:10.1080/14626268.2013.772524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hales, Derek. 2013. “Design Fictions an Introduction and Provisional Taxonomy.” Digital Creativity 24 (1): 1–10. doi:10.1080/14626268.2013.769453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halskov, Kim, and Nicolai Brodersen Hansen. 2015. “The Diversity of Participatory Design Research Practice at PDC 2002–2012.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 74 (February): 81–92. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitchcock, Christopher. 2007. “How to Be a Causal Pluralist.” In Thinking About Causes: From Greek Philosophy to Modern Physics, edited by Peter K. Machamer and Gereon Wolters, 200–221. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press. http://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20140407-164135612.
   Google Scholar
• Lebow, Richard Ned. 2007. “Counterfactual Thought Experiments: A Necessary Teaching Tool.” The History Teacher 40 (2): 153–176. doi:10.2307/30036985.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, David. 1973. Counterfactuals. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Yvonna S, and Egon G Guba. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Vol. 75. Newbury Park, California: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lukens, Jonathan, and Carl DiSalvo. 2011. “Speculative Design and Technological Fluency.” International Journal of Learning and Media 3 (4): 23–40. doi:10.1162/IJLM_a_00080.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, Elizabeth B.-N., and Pieter Jan Stappers. 2008. “Co-creation and the New Landscapes of Design.” CoDesign 4 (1): 5–18. doi:10.1080/15710880701875068.
   Google Scholar
• Sanoff, Henry. 2008. “Multiple Views of Participatory Design.” International Journal of Architectural Research 2 (1): 57–69.
   Google Scholar
• Wakkary, Ron, William Odom, Sabrina Hauser, Garnet Hertz, and Henry Lin. 2015. “Material Speculation: Actual Artifacts for Critical Inquiry.” Aarhus Series on Human Centered Computing 1 (1): 12. doi:10.7146/aahcc.v1i1.21299.
   Google Scholar