Ambiguity as agency: critical opportunists in the neoliberal city

References

• Alvesson, Mats, and Stefan Sveningsson. 2003. “Good Visions, Bad Micro-Management and Ugly Ambiguity: Contradictions of (Non-)Leadership in a Knowledge-Intensive Organization.” Organization Studies 24 (6): 961–988.10.1177/0170840603024006007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amin, Ash, ed. 1994. Post-Fordism: A Reader. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 1981. The Dialogical Imagination: Four Essays. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Björgvinsson, Erling, Pelle Ehn, and Per-Anders Hillgren. 2010. “Participatory Design and Democratizing Innovation.” In Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference, edited by K. Bodker, T. Bratteteig, D. Loi, and T. Robertson, 41–50. New York:ACM.10.1145/1900441
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, Neil, and Nik Theodore. 2005. “Neoliberalism and the Urban Condition.” City 9 (1): 101–107.10.1080/13604810500092106
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, Neil, Jamie Peck, and Nik Theodore. 2010. “After Neoliberalization?” Globalizations 7 (3): 327–345.10.1080/14747731003669669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davenport, Sally, and Shirley Leitch. 2005. “Circuits of Power in Practice: Strategic Ambiguity as Delegation of Authority.” Organization Studies 26 (11): 1603–1623.10.1177/0170840605054627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberg, Eric M. 1984. “Ambiguity as Strategy in Organizational Communication.” Communication Monographs 51 (3): 227–242.10.1080/03637758409390197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fainstein, Susan S. 1994. The City Builders: Property, Politics, and Planning in London and New York. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, Arthur W. 2005. “What is Dialogical Research, and Why Should We Do It?” Qualitative Health Research 15 (7): 964–974.10.1177/1049732305279078
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen. 1984. The Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. I. Boston, MA: Beacon.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, Tim, and Phil Hubbard. 1996. “The Entrepreneurial City: New Urban Politics, New Urban Geographies?” Progress in Human Geography 20 (2): 153–174.10.1177/030913259602000201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huybrechts, Liesbeth, Cristiano Storni, Yanki Lee, Selina Schepers, Jessica Schoffelen, and Katrien Dreessen. 2014. Participation is Risky. Approaches to Joint Creative Processes. Amsterdam: Valiz.
   Google Scholar
• Jarzabkowski, Paula, John A. A. Sillince, and Duncan Shaw. 2010. “Strategic Ambiguity as a Rhetorical Resource for Enabling Multiple Interests.” Human Relations 63 (2): 219–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosack, Stephen, and Archon Fung. 2014. “Does Transparency Improve Governance?” Annual Review of Political Science 17: 65–87.10.1146/annurev-polisci-032210-144356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miessen, Markus. 2010. The Nightmare of Participation. Berlin: Sternberg Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, Chantal. 2005. On the Political. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moulaert, Frank, Arantxa Rodriguez, and Erik Swyngedouw. 2003. The Globalized City: Economic Restructuring and Social Polarization in European Cities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moulaert, Frank, Flavia Martinelli, Sara González, and Erik Swyngedouw. 2007. “Introduction: Social Innovation and Governance in European Cities.” European Urban and Regional Studies 14 (3): 195–209.10.1177/0969776407077737
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmås, Karl, and Otto von Busch. 2015. “Quasi-Quisling: Co-Design and the Assembly of Collaborateurs.” CoDesign 11 (3–4): 236–249.10.1080/15710882.2015.1081247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, Jim, and Christy A. Strbiak. 1997. “The Ethics of Strategic Ambiguity.” Journal of Business Communication 34 (2): 149–159.10.1177/002194369703400202
   Google Scholar
• Rancière, Jaques. 1998. Disagreement: Politics and philosophy. Translated by Julie Rose. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sager, Tore. 2011. “Neo-liberal Urban Planning Policies: A Literature Survey 1990–2010.” Progress in Planning 76 (4): 147–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, Elizabeth B.-N., and Pieter Jan Stappers. 2008. “Co-Creation and the New Landscapes of Design.” Co-Design 4 (1): 5–18.
   Google Scholar
• Segers, Ruth, Pieter Van den Broeck, and Ahmed Z. Khan, eds. 2013. Handboek ruimtelijke kwaliteit [Handbook for Spatial Quality]. Brussel: ASP.
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, Erik. 2007. “Impossible/Undesirable Sustainability and the Post-Political Condition.” In The Sustainable Development Paradox, edited by Rob Krueger and David Gibbs, 13–40. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, Erik. 2010a. “Apocalypse Forever?.” Theory, Culture & Society 27 (2–3): 213–232.10.1177/0263276409358728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, Erik. 2010b. “Post-Democratic Cities: For Whom and for What?” Paper presented at Regional Studies Association Annual Conference, Budapest, May 26.
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, Erik, and Frank Moulaert. 2010. “Socially Innovative Projects, Governance Dynamics and Urban Change.” In Can Neighbourhoods Save the City?: Community Development and Social Innovation, edited by Frank Moulaert, Flavia Martinelli, Erik Swyngedouw and Sara Gonzalez, 219–234. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tewdwr-Jones, Mark, and Philip Allmendinger. 1998. “Deconstructing Communicative Rationality: A Critique of Habermasian Collaborative Planning.” Environment and Planning A 30 (11): 1975–1989.10.1068/a301975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thörn, Catharina. 2008. “Intervention or the Need for a New Cultural Critique.” Art Monitor 5: 48–66.
   Google Scholar
• Tomaney, John. 1994. “A New Paradigm of Work Organization and Technology?” In Post-Fordism, edited by Ash Amin, 157–194. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9780470712726
   Google Scholar
• von Busch, Otto. 2012. “Generation Open: Contested Creativity and Capabilities.” The Design Journal 15 (4): 443–459.10.2752/175630612X13437472804295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wertsch, J. V. 1998. Mind as Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zizek, Slavoj. 2000. “Holding the Place.” In Contingency, Hegemony, Universality, edited by Judith Butler, Ernesto Laclau and Slavoj Zizek, 309–329. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar