Spatialising differently through ability and techné

References

• Anderson, J. 2004. “Talking Whilst Walking: A Geographical Archaeology of Knowledge.” Area 36 (3): 254–261. doi:10.1111/area.2004.36.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter, P., and S. Jack. 2008. “Qualitative Case Study Methodology: Study Design and Implementation for Novice Researchers.” The Qualitative Report 13 (4): 544–559.
   Google Scholar
• Bezemer, J., and D. Mavers. 2011. “Multimodal Transcription as Academic Practice: A Social Semiotic Perspective.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 14 (3): 191–206. doi:10.1080/13645579.2011.563616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 2005. Giving an Account of Oneself. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Candlin, F. 2006. “The Dubious Inheritance of Touch: Art History and Museum Access.” Journal of Visual Culture 5 (2): 137–154. doi:10.1177/1470412906066906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chouinard, V. 1997. “Making Space for Disabling Difference: Challenges Ableist Geographies.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 15: 379–387. doi:10.1068/d150379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cober, R., O. Au, and J. J. Son, 2012. “Using a Participatory Approach to Design a Technology-Enhanced Museum Tour for Visitors Who are Blind.” In Proceedings of the 2012 iConference, 592–594. New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Devlieger, P., and M. Strickfaden. 2012. “Reversing the {Im}Material Sense of a Non-Place: The Impact of Blindness on the Brussels Metro.” Space & Culture 15 (3): 224–238. doi:10.1177/1206331212445951.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dicks, B., B. Soyinka, and A. Coffey. 2006. “Multimodal Ethnography.” Qualitative Research 6 (1): 77–96. doi:10.1177/1468794106058876.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. 2001. Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How It Can Succeed Again. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geiser, T. 2008. “Embodiment, Emotion and Empathy: A Phenomenological Approach to Apprenticeship Learning.” Anthropological Theory 8: 299–318. doi:10.1177/1463499608093816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. 1979. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Herssens, J. 2011. Designing Architecture for More: A Framework of Haptic Design Parameters. Hasselt/Leuven: UHasselt, KULeuven, LULU Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Herssens, J., and A. Heylighen. 2012. “Blind Photographers: An (Im)Material Quest into the Spatial Experience of Blind Children.” Children, Youth and Environments 22 (1): 99–124.
   Google Scholar
• Hickey-Moody, A., and V. Crowley. 2010. “Disability Matters: Pedagogy, Media and Affect.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 31 (4): 399–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. 2011. Being Alive: Essays on Movement, Knowledge and Description. Routledge: New York.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, M. 1998. Minima Ethnographica: Intersubjectivity and the Anthropological Project. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuber, R., W. Yu, and G. McAllister. 2007. “Towards Developing Assistive Haptic Feedback for Visually Impaired Internet Users”. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems,1525–1534. New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• McRuer, R. 2002. “Compulsory Able-Bodiedness and Queer/Disabled Existence.” In Disability Studies: Enabling the Humanities, edited by S. Snyder, B. Brueggemann, and R. Garland-Thomson, 369–380. New York: Modern Language Association.
   Google Scholar
• Metatla, O., N. Bryan-Kinns, T. Stockman, and F. Martin. 2015. “Designing with and for People Living with Visual Impairments: Audio-Tactile Mock-Ups, Audio Diaries and Participatory Prototyping.” CoDesign 11 (1): 35–48. doi:10.1080/15710882.2015.1007877.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omansky, B. 2011. Borderlands of Blindness. Boulder: Lynne Reinner Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S. 2011. “Multimodality, Multisensoriality and Ethnographic Knowing: Social Semiotics and the Phenomenology of Perception.” Qualitative Research 11 (1): 261–276. doi:10.1177/1468794111399835.
   Google Scholar
• Rieger, J. 2016. “Doing Dis/Ordered Mapping/S: Embodying Disability in the Museum Environment.” Doctoral Dissertation., University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Rieger, J., and M. Strickfaden. 2016. “Taken for Granted: The Material Relations between Disability and Codes/Guidelines.” Societies 6: 1-11. Switzerland: MDPI.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz, A., and M. Strickfaden. 2015. “Spatial Explorations and Digital Traces: Experiences of Legal Blindness through Filmmaking.” Societies 5: 1–19. Switzerland: MDPI.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz, A., and M. Strickfaden. 2016. “Light in the Borderlands: A Film Created by Three Legally Blind Urban Explorers.” In Rethinking Disability: World Perspectives in Culture and Society, edited by P. Devlieger, S. E. Brown, B. Miranda- Galarza, and M. Strickfaden, 317–329. Antwerpen: Garant Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Salgado, M., and A. Botero. 2008. “Opening Exhibitions: The Visually Impaired and the Design of Probes Packages.” Proceedings of the Tenth Anniversary Conference on Participatory Design 2008, 150–153. Bloomington: Indiana University.
   Google Scholar
• Sterne, J. 2005. “Communication as Techne.” In Communication As…: Perspectives on Theory, edited by G. J. Shepard, J. St. John, and Striphas, 90–98. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Strickfaden, M. 2016. “In Focus: Blind Photographers Challenge Visual Expectations.” In Rethinking Disability: World Perspectives in Culture and Society, edited by P. Devlieger, S. E. Brown, B. Miranda-Galarza, and M. Strickfaden, 149–163. Antwerpen Belgium: Garant Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Strickfaden, M. n.d. Light in The Borderlands. Film. https://meganstrickfaden.com/Film. Accessed Oct 10, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Strickfaden, M., and P. Devlieger. 2011a. “The Brussels Metro: Accessibility through Co- Creation.” International Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness 105: 638–647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strickfaden, M., and P. Devlieger. 2011b. “Empathy through Accumulating Techné: Designing an Accessible Metro.” The Design Journal 14: 207–230. doi:10.2752/175630611X12984592780041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, W., and J. Rieger. 2015. “A Design History of Design: Complexity, Criticality, and Cultural Competence.” RACAR: Revue D’art Canadienne/Canadian Art Review 40 (2): 15–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, S., A. Roper, J. Marshall, J. Galliers, N. Devane, T. Booth, and C. Woolf. 2015. “Codesign for People with Aphasia through Tangible Design Languages.” CoDesign 11 (1): 21–34. doi:10.1080/15710882.2014.997744.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolbring, G. 2008a. “The Politics of Ableism.” Development 51 (2): 252–258. doi:10.1057/dev.2008.17.
   Google Scholar
• Wolbring, G. 2014. “Ability Privilege: A Needed Addition to Privilege Studies.” In Journal for Critical Animal Studies 12 (2): 118–141.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 2003. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar