Challenges of practicing digital imaginaires in collaborative museum design

References

• Barthes, R. 1970. Mythologies. Paris: Le Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. 2003. The Internet Galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, Business, and Society. Reprinted. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dal Falco, F., and S. Vassos. 2017. “Museum Experience Design: A Modern Storytelling Methodology.” The Design Journal 20 (sup1): S3975–S3983. doi:10.1080/14606925.2017.1352900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, S. M. 2010. “The Co-Production of Temporary Museum Exhibitions.” Museum Management and Curatorship 25 (3): 305–321. doi:10.1080/09647775.2010.498988.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, S. M., R. Paton, and T. J. O’Sullivan. 2013. “The Museum Values Framework: A Framework for Understanding Organisational Culture in Museums.” Museum Management and Curatorship 28 (4): 345–361. doi:10.1080/09647775.2013.831247.
   Google Scholar
• Détienne, F., M. Baker, and J.-M. Burkhardt. 2012. “Perspectives on Quality of Collaboration in Design.” CoDesign 8 (4): 197–199. doi:10.1080/15710882.2012.742350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drotner, K., and K. Schrøder, eds. 2013. Museum Communication and Social Media: The Connected Museum. Routledge Research in Museum Studies 6. New York; London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Flichy, P. 2007. The Internet Imaginaire. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giaccardi, E. 2012. Heritage and Social Media. Understanding Heritage in a Participatory Culture. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gobo, G. 2011. “Ethnography.” In Qualitative Research, edited by D. Silverman, 15–34. 3rd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Grewcock, D. 2014. Doing Museology Differently. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, A. H., and T. Moussouri. 2005. “Fuzzy” Boundaries: Communities of Practice and Exhibition Teams in European Natural History Museums.” Museum and Society 2 (3): 161–174.
   Google Scholar
• Hermann, G. 1997. “Shortcuts to Oz: Strategies and Tactics for Getting Museums to the Emeral City.” In The Wired Museum: Emerging Technology and Changing Paradigms, edited by K. Jones-Garmil and M. L. Anderson, 65–91. Washington: American Association of Museums.
   Google Scholar
• Holdgaard, N. 2014. “Online Museum Practices: A Holistic Analysis of Danish Museums and Their Users.” PhD diss., IT University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen.
   Google Scholar
• Holdgaard, N., and L. Klastrup. 2014. “Between Control and Creativity: Challenging Co-Creation and Social Media Use in a Museum Context.” Digital Creativity 25 (3): 190–202. doi:10.1080/14626268.2014.904364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holdgaard, N., and C. E. Simonsen. 2011. “Attitudes Towards and Conceptions of Digital Technologies and Media in Danish Museums.” MedieKultur. Journal of Media and Communication 50: 100–118.
   Google Scholar
• Holton, J. A. 2007. “The Coding Process and Its Challenges.” In The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory, edited by A. Bryant and K. Charmaz, 265–289. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Jones-Garmil, K., and M. Anderson, eds. 1997. The Wired Museum: Emerging Technology and Changing Paradigms. Washington, DC: American Association of Museums.
   Google Scholar
• Kéfi, H., and J. Pallud. 2011. “The Role of Technologies in Cultural Mediation in Museums: An Actor-Network Theory View Applied in France.” Museum Management and Curatorship 26 (3): 273–289. doi:10.1080/09647775.2011.585803.
   Google Scholar
• Knudsen, L. V., and A. R. Olesen. Forthcoming. “Complexities of Collaborating: Understanding and Managing Differences in Collaborative Design of Museum Communication.” In The Routledge Handbook of Museum Media and Communication, edited by K. Drotner, V. Dziekan, R. Parry, and K. Schrøder, 205–218. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1987. How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C. P. 2007. “Reconsidering Conflict in Exhibition Development Teams.” Museum Management and Curatorship 22 (2): 183–199. doi:10.1080/09647770701470427.
   Google Scholar
• Macdonald, S. 2001. “Ethnography in the Science Museum, London.” In Inside Organizations: Anthropologists at Work, edited by D. N. Gellner and E. Hirsch, 77–96. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Macdonald, S. 2002. Behind the Scenes at the Science Museum. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• MacLeod, S., J. Dodd, and T. Duncan. 2015. “New Museum Design Cultures: Harnessing the Potential of Design and ‘Design Thinking’ in Museums.” Museum Management and Curatorship 30 (4): 314–341. doi:10.1080/09647775.2015.1042513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marty, P. F., and R. Parry. 2008. “Introduction to Digital Heritage.” Museum Management and Curatorship 23 (4): 307–308. doi:10.1080/09647770802517241.
   Google Scholar
• Olesen, A. R. 2015. “Co-Designing Digital Museum Communication: An Exploration of Digital Museum Communication as It Emerges in Collaborative Design Interaction between Museum Staff and Digital Designers.” PhD diss., Roskilde University, Roskilde.
   Google Scholar
• Parry, R. 2007. Recoding the Museum: Digital Heritage and the Technologies of Change. London; New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Parry, R. 2013. “The End of the Beginning: Normativity in the Postdigital Museum.” Museum Worlds, Advances in Research 1 (1): 24–39. doi:10.3167/armw.2013.010103.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. 1990. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Beverly Hills: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Peacock, D. 2008. “Making Ways for Change: Museums, Disruptive Technologies and Organisational Change.” Museum Management and Curatorship 23 (4): 333–351. doi:10.1080/09647770802517324.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, T. 2014. “Interpretation Design: An Integrative, Interdisciplinary Practice.” Museum & Society 12 (3): 191–209.
   Google Scholar
• Rudloff, M. 2013. “Formidling i forandring: Et casestudie af væggen – Et dansk eksempel på digital, interaktiv museumsformidling i overgangen fra genstandsrepræsentation til brugergenereret kultur [Dissemination in change: A case study of the wall–A Danish example of digital interactive museum dissemination in the transition from object representation to user generated culture].” PhD diss., University of Southern Denmark, Odense.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, E. B.-N., and P. J. Stappers. 2008. “Co-Creation and the New Landscapes of Design.” CoDesign 4 (1): 5–18. doi:10.1080/15710880701875068.
   Google Scholar
• Šola, T. 1997. Essays on Museums and Their Theory: Towards the Cybernetic Museum. Helsinki: Suomen museoliitto (Finnish Museums Association).
   Google Scholar
• Star, S. L., and J. R. Griesemer. 1989. “Institutional Ecology, ‘Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39.” Social Studies of Science 19 (3): 387–420. doi:10.1177/030631289019003001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. L., and J. M. Corbin. 1990. The Basics of Qualitative Analysis: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stuedahl, D., and S. Ole. 2015. “Matters of Becoming, Experimental Zones for Making Museums Public with Social Media.” CoDesign 11 (3–4): 193–207. doi:10.1080/15710882.2015.1081245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taxén, G. 2004. “Introducing Participatory Design in Museums.” PDC 04 Proceedings of the Eighth Conference on Participatory Design 1: 204–213. Toronto: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/1011870.1011894.
   Google Scholar
• Watkins, J., and A. Russo. 2007. “Cultural Institutions, Co-Creativity and Communities of Interest.” In Online Communities and Social Computing, edited by D. Schuler, Vol. 4564, 212–221. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar