The oscillation between individual and social designing in co-located student teams

References

• Atman, C. J., R. S. Adams, M. E. Cardella, J. Turns, S. Mosborg, and J. Saleem. 2007. “Engineering Design Processes: A Comparison of Students and Expert Practitioners.” Journal of Engineering Education 96 (4): 359–379. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2007.tb00945.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bietti, L. M., M. J. Baker, and F. Détienne. 2016. “Joint Remembering in Collaborative Design: A Multimodal Approach in the Case of a Video Design Studio.” CoDesign 12 (4): 221–242. doi:10.1080/15710882.2015.1103752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bratman, M. E. 1992. “Shared Cooperative Activity.” The Philosophical Review 101 (2): 327–341. doi:10.2307/2185537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bush, J. T., J. A. LePine, and D. W. Newton. 2017. “Teams in Transition: An Integrative Review and Synthesis of Research on Team Task Transitions and Propositions for Future Research.” Human Resource Management Review 28 (4): 423–433. doi:10.1016/J.HRMR.2017.06.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casakin, H., L. J. Ball, B. T. Christensen, and P. G. Badke-Schaub. 2015. “How Do Analogizing and Mental Simulation Influence Team Dynamics in Innovative Product Design?” Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 29 (2): 173–183. doi:10.1017/S0890060415000050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, B. T., and L. J. Ball. 2014. “Studying Design Cognition in the Real World Using the ‘In Vivo’ Methodology.” In The Routledge Companion to Design Research, edited by P. Rodgers and J. Yee, 317–328. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, B. T., L. J. Ball, and K. Halskov, eds. 2017. Analysing Design Thinking: Studies of Cross-Cultural Co-Creation. Leiden: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, B. T., and C. D. Schunn. 2007. “The Relationship of Analogical Distance to Analogical Function and Pre-Inventive Structure: The Case of Engineering Design.” Memory and Cognition 35 (1): 29–38. doi:10.3758/BF03195939.pdf.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, H., and D. Stanton. 2003. “Designing Mobile Technologies to Support Co-Present Collaboration.” Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 7 (6): 365–371. doi:10.1007/s00779-003-0249-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, N. 2008. Engineering Design Methods: Strategies for Product Design. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, N. 2011. Design Thinking: Understanding How Designers Think and Work. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, N., H. Christiaans, and K. Dorst, eds. 1996. Analysing Design Activity. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, N., and A. C. Cross. 1995. “Observations of Teamwork and Social Processes in Design.” Design Studies 16 (2): 143–170. doi:10.1016/0142-694X(94)00007-Z.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, J. 1984. “Subsequent Versions of Invitations, Offers, Requests, and Proposals Dealing with Potential or Actual Rejection.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, edited by J. Atkinson and J. Heritage, 102–128. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Dreu, C. K. 2006. “When Too Little or Too Much Hurts: Evidence for a Curvilinear Relationship between Task Conflict and Innovation in Teams.” Journal of Management 32 (1): 83–107. doi:10.1177/0149206305277795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diehl, M., and W. Stroebe. 1987. “Productivity Loss in Brainstorming Groups: Toward the Solution of a Riddle.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53 (3): 497–509. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.53.3.497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorst, K. 2015. Frame Innovation: Create New Thinking by Design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dorst, K., and N. Cross. 2001. “Creativity in the Design Process: Co-Evolution of Problem-Solution.” Design Studies 22 (5): 425–437. doi:10.1016/S0142-694X(01)00009-6.
   Google Scholar
• Dunbar, K. 1995. “How Scientists Really Reason: Scientific Reasoning in Real-World Laboratories.” In The Nature of Insight, edited by R. J. Sternberg and J. E. Davidson, 365–395. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A., and H. A. Simon. 1999. Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, G., E. Giaccardi, H. Eden, M. Sugimoto, and Y. Ye. 2005. “Beyond Binary Choices: Integrating Individual and Social Creativity.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 63 (4): 482–512. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.04.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, C. E., S. A. Thompson, and V. Drake. 2012. “Bodily-Visual Practices and Turn Continuation.” Discourse Processes 49 (3–4): 192–212. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2012.654761.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. 1964. “The Neglected Situation.” American Anthropologist 66 (6_PART2): 133–136. doi:10.1525/aa.1964.66.suppl_3.02a00090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldschmidt, G. 1995. “The Designer as a Team of One.” Design Studies 16 (2): 189–209. doi:10.1016/0142-694X(94)00009-3.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. 1994. “Professional Vision.” American Anthropologist, New Series 96 (3): 606–633. doi:10.1525/aa.1994.96.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. 2003. “Pointing as Situated Practice.” In Pointing: Where Language, Culture and Cognition Meet, edited by S. Kita and P. Dukes, 217–241. London: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. 2006. “Human Sociality as Mutual Orientation in a Rich Interactive Environment: Multimodal Utterances and Pointing in Aphasia.” In Roots of Human Sociality: Culture, Cognition and Interaction, edited by S. C. Levinson and N. J. Enfield, 97–125. Oxford, UK: Berg Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. 2013. “The Co-Operative, Transformative Organization of Human Action and Knowledge.” Journal of Pragmatics 46 (1): 8–23. doi:10.1016/J.PRAGMA.2012.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gül, L. F., and M. L. Maher. 2009. “Co-Creating External Design Representations: Comparing Face-To-Face Sketching to Designing in Virtual Environments.” CoDesign 5 (2): 117–138. doi:10.1080/15710880902921422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, S. 2014. “Creative Synthesis: Exploring the Process of Extraordinary Group Creativity.” Academy of Management Review 39 (3): 324–343. doi:10.5465/amr.2012.0224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath, C., and J. Hindmarsh. 2002. “Analysing Interaction: Video, Ethnography and Situated Conduct.” In Qualitative Research in Action, edited by T. May, 99–121. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, C., J. Hindmarsh, and P. Luff. 2010. Video in Qualitative Research: Analyzing Social Interaction in Everyday Life. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, C., and P. Luff. 1998. “Convergent Activities: Line Control and Passenger Information on the London Underground.” In Cognition and Communication at Work, edited by Y. Engelström and D. Middleton, 96–129. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. 1984. “Transcript Notation.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, edited by J. Atkinson and J. Heritage, ix–xvi. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jett, Q. R., and J. M. George. 2003. “Work Interrupted: A Closer Look at the Role of Interruptions in Organizational Life.” Academy of Management Review 28 (3): 494–507. doi:10.5465/amr.2003.10196791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinsmann, M., R. Valkenburg, and J. Buijs. 2007. “Why Do(N’t) Actors in Collaborative Design Understand Each Other? an Empirical Study Towards a Better Understanding of Collaborative Design.” CoDesign 3 (1): 59–73. doi:10.1080/15710880601170875.
   Google Scholar
• Korde, R., and P. B. Paulus. 2017. “Alternating Individual and Group Idea Generation: Finding the Elusive Synergy.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 70 (5): 177–190. doi:10.1016/J.JESP.2016.11.002.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, B. 2006. How Designers Think the Design Process Demystified. Oxford: Elsevier Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, M., J. E. Mathieu, and S. J. Zaccaro. 2001. “A Temporally Based Framework and Taxonomy of Team Processes.” Academy of Management Review 26 (3): 356–376. doi:10.5465/amr.2001.4845785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonnell, J. 2009. “Collaborative Negotiation in Design: A Study of Design Conversations between Architect and Building Users.” CoDesign 5 (1): 35–50. doi:10.1080/15710880802492862.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oak, A., and P. Lloyd. 2016. “Throw One Out That’s Problematic’: Performing Authority and Affiliation in Design Education.” CoDesign 12 (1–2): 55–72. doi:10.1080/15710882.2015.1110179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pomerantz, A. 1984. “Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shaped.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, edited by J. Atkinson and J. Heritage, 57–101. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reiter-Palmon, R., B. Wigert, and T. D. Vreede. 2012. “Team Creativity and Innovation: The Effect of Group Composition, Social Processes, and Cognition.” In Handbook of Organizational Creativity, edited by M. Mumford, 295–326. London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, K. 2007. Group Genius: The Creative Power of Collaboration. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schembri, M., P. Farrugia, A. J. Wodehouse, H. Grierson, and A. Kovacevic. 2015. “Influence of Sketch Types on Distributed Design Teamwork.” CoDesign 11 (2): 18–99. doi:10.1080/15710882.2015.1054841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön, D. 1984. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. 1987. Educating the Reflective Practitioner. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. 1969. The Sciences of the Artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Streeck, J., C. Goodwin, and C. LeBaron, Eds. 2011. Embodied Interaction: Language and Body in the Material World. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whittaker, S., and B. O’Conaill. 1997. “The Role of Vision in Face-To-Face and Mediated Communication, Video-Mediated Communication.” In Computers, Cognition, and Work. Video-Mediated Communication, edited by K. E. Finn, A. J. Sellen, and S. Wilbur, 23–49. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Wiltschnig, S., B. T. Christensen, and L. J. Ball. 2013. “Collaborative Problem-Solution Co-Evolution in Creative Design.” Design Studies 34 (5): 515–542. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2013.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., K. Pfeuffer, M. K. Chong, J. Alexander, A. Bulling, and H. Gellersen. 2017. “Look Together: Using Gaze for Assisting Co-Located Collaborative Search.” Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 21 (1): 173–186. doi:10.1007/s00779-016-0969-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar