The breakdown of the municipality as caring platform: lessons for co-design and co-learning in the age of platform capitalism

References

• Seravalli, A., M. A. Eriksen, and P.-A. Hillgren. 2017. “Co-Design in Co-Production Processes: Jointly Articulating and Appropriating Infrastructuring and Commoning with Civil Servants.” Co-Design 13 (3): 187–201.
   Google Scholar
• Avram, G., J. H.-J. Choi, S. De Paoli, A. Light, P. Lyle, and M. Teli. 2017. “Collaborative Economies: From Sharing to Caring”. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Communities and Technologies (C&T ‘17), 305–307. New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Barker, R. 2012. “For a Society to Be Truly ‘Big’ It Must Have Universal Dimensions Which Sustain and Cultivate Solidarity and Equality”. LSE Blog. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/48510/1/__Libfile_repository_Content_LSE%20British%20Politics%20and%20Policy%20Blog_2012_Nov_2012_TO_DO_week2_blogs.lse.ac.uk-For_a_society_to_be_truly_big_it_must_have_universal_dimensions_which_sustain_and_cultivate_solidarit.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Berlant, L. 2016. “The Commons: Infrastructures for Troubling Times.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 34 (3): 393–419. doi:10.1177/0263775816645989.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binder, T., B. Eva, E. Pelle, and J. Halse. 2015. “Democratic Design Experiments: Between Parliament and Laboratory.” CoDesign 11 (3–4): 152–165. doi:10.1080/15710882.2015.1081248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botero, A., A. Light, L. Malmborg, S. Marttila, M. Salgado, and J. Saad-Sulonen. 2016. “Becoming Smart Citizens: How Replicable Ideas Jump”. Workshop at the Design and the City conference, Amsterdam. https://designandthecity.eu/programme/workshop/becoming-smart-citizens-how-replicable-ideas-jump/
   Google Scholar
• Brandsen, T., and V. Pestoff. 2006. “Co-Production, the Third Sector and the Delivery of Public Services: An Introduction.” Public Management Review 8 (4): 493–501. doi:10.1080/14719030601022874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bratteteig, T., K. Bødker, Y. Dittrich, P. H. Mogensen, and J. Simonsen. 2012. “Methods: Organising Principles and General Guidelines for Participatory Design Projects.” In Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design, edited by J. Simonsen and T. Robertson, 137–164. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Civil Society Futures. 2018. “The Story of Our Times: Power in Our Hands?” https://civilsocietyfutures.org/wpcontent/uploads/sites/6/2018/04/CSF_1YearReport.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Collins, K., and R. Ison 2006. “Dare We Jump off Arnstein’s Ladder? Social Learning as a New Policy Paradigm”. In Proceedings of PATH (Participatory Approaches in Science & Technology) Conference, 4–7 June 2006, Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Coote, A. 2010. Cutting It. The Big Society and the New Austerity. London: NEF.
   Google Scholar
• DiSalvo, B., J. Yip, E. Bonsignore, and C. DiSalvo, eds. 2017. Participatory Design for Learning: Perspectives from Practice and Research. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, G. 1990.The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Oxford: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. 2006. “Five Misunderstandings about Case-study Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 12 (2): 219–245. doi:10.1177/1077800405284363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawer, A. 2009. “Platforms, Markets and Innovation: An Introduction.” In Platforms, Markets and Innovation, edited by A. Gawer, 1–16. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Ivarsson Westerberg, A. 2014. “New Public Management Och Den Offentliga Sektorn.” In Det Långa 1990-Talet: När Sverige Förändrades, edited by K. Abiala, E. Blomberg, L. Ekdahl, R. Fleischer, Y. Hirdman, K. Molin, T. Nilsson, et al., 85–119. Umeå: Boréa Bokförlag.
   Google Scholar
• Jegou, F., and E. Manzini. 2008. Collaborative Services: Social Innovation and Design for Sustainability. Milano: Poli.design Edizioni.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson, H., M. Arvidson, and S. Johansson. 2015. “Welfare Mix as a Contested Terrain: Political Positions on Government–Non-Profit Relations at National and Local Levels in a Social Democratic Welfare State.” VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 26 (5): 1601–1619. doi:10.1007/s11266-015-9580-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koskinen, I., J. Zimmerman, T. Binder, J. Redstrom, and S. Wensveen. 2011. Design Research through Practice: From the Lab, Field, and Showroom. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Kumlin, S. 2001. “Ideology–Driven Opinion Formation in Europe: The Case of Attitudes Towards the Third Sector in Sweden.” European Journal of Political Research 39 (4): 487–518. doi:10.1111/ejpr.2001.39.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, A. 2015. “Troubling Futures: Can Participatory Design Research Provide a Constitutive Anthropology for the 21st Century?” IxD&A 26: 81–94.
   Google Scholar
• Light, A. 2018. “The Place in Our Hands: The Grassroots Making of Cultural Heritage.” In Media Innovations and Design in Cultural Institutions, edited by D. Stuedahl and V. Vestergaard, 103–120. Gothenborg: NORDICOM.
   Google Scholar
• Light, A., and C. Miskelly. 2015. “Sharing Economy Vs Sharing Cultures? Designing for Social, Economic and Environmental Good.” IxD&A 24: 49–62.
   Google Scholar
• Light, A., and C. Miskelly 2019. “Platforms, Scales and Networks: Meshing a Local Sustainable Sharing Economy.” Computer Supported Cooperative Work 28 (3–4): 591–626.
   Google Scholar
• Light, A., N. B. Hansen, K. J. Kim Halskov, F. H. Hill, and P. Dalsgaard. 2013. “Exploring the Dynamics of Ownership in Community-Oriented Design Projects.” In Proceedings of the International Conference on Communities and Technologies (C&T ‘13), 90–99. New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, M. 2007. Place-Shaping: A Shared Ambition for the Future of Local Government, the Lyons Inquiry into Local Government – Final Report, March 2007. London: Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Naturvårdsverket. 2016. Vägledningar Om Avfall. http://www.naturvardsverket.se/Stod-i-miljoarbetet/Vagledningar/Avfall/
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 1996. “Crossing the Great Divide: Coproduction, Synergy, and Development.” World Development 24 (6): 1073–1087. doi:10.1016/0305-750X(96)00023-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pretty, J. N. 1995. “Participatory Learning for Sustainable Agriculture.” World Development 23 (8): 1247–1263. doi:10.1016/0305-750X(95)00046-F.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puig de la Bellacasa, M. 2012. “‘Nothing Comes without Its World’: Thinking with Care.” The Sociological Review 60 (2): 197–216. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02070.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puig de la Bellacasa, M. 2017. Matters of care: Speculative ethics in more than human worlds. Posthumanities, Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reason, P., and H. Bradbury, eds. 2006. Handbook of Action Research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rodgers, P., and J. Yee, eds. 2014. The Routledge Companion to Design Research. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schuyt, K. 1998. “The Sharing of Risks and the Risks of Sharing: Solidarity and Social Justice in the Welfare State.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 1 (3): 297–311. doi:10.1023/A:1009907329351.
   Google Scholar
• Senge, P. M., and C. O. Scharmer. 2006. “Learning as a Community of Practitioners, Consultants and Researchers.” In Handbook of Action Research, edited by P. Reason and H. Bradbury, 195–206. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Seravalli, A. 2014. “Making Commons (attempts at composing prospects in the opening of production).” PhD diss., Malmö University.
   Google Scholar
• Simonsen, J., and T. Robertson, eds. 2012. Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Srnicek, N. 2016. Platform Capitalism. Cambridge: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Star, S. L., and K. Ruhleder. 1996. “Steps toward an Ecology of Infrastructure: Design and Access for Large Information Spaces.” Information Systems Research 7 (1): 111–134. doi:10.1287/isre.7.1.111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steve, L., S. John, and G. W. Jones. 2018. Centralisation, Devolution and the Future of Local Government in England. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Svingstedt, A., and H. Corvellec. 2018. “When Lock-Ins Impede Value Co-Creation in Service.” International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences 10 (1): 2–15. doi:10.1108/IJQSS-10-2016-0072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toni Robertson, T. W., J. D. Leong, and T. Koreshoff. 2014. “Mutual Learning as a Resource for Research Design”. In Proceedings of the ACM Participatory Design Conference 2014 (PDC’14), 25–28. New York: ACM. doi: 10.1089/g4h.2013.0066.
   Google Scholar
• Voorberg, W. 2017. “Co-Creation and Co-Production as A Strategy for Public Service Innovation: A Study to Their Appropriateness in A Public Sector Context”. PhD diss., Erasmus University, Rotterdam, NL.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, R., C. Cornwell, E. Flanagan, and H. Khan. 2018. Good and Bad Help: How Purpose and Confidence Transforms Lives. London: NESTA.
   Google Scholar