Exploring blind spots in collaborative value creation in building design: a creativity perspective

References

• AART Architects. 2015. “Vestmyra Skole.” https://aart.dk/en/projects/vestmyra-public-school
   Google Scholar
• Agid, S., and E. Chin. 2019. “Making and Negotiating Value: Design and Collaboration with Community-led Groups.” CoDesign 15 (1): 75–89. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2018.1563191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baregheh, A., J. Rowley, and S. Sambrook. 2009. “Towards a Multidisciplinary Definition of Innovation.” Management Decision 47 (8): 1323–1339. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740910984578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biskjaer, M. M., P. Dalsgaard, and K. Halskov. 2014. “A Constraint-based Understanding of Design Spaces.” In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, 453–462. New York: ACM. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/2598510.2598533.
   Google Scholar
• Biskjaer, M. M., P. Dalsgaard, and K. Halskov. 2017. “Understanding Creativity Methods in Design.” In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, 839–851. New York: ACM. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/3064663.3064692.
   Google Scholar
• Bragança, L., S. M. Vieira, and J. B. Andrade. 2014. “Early Stage Design Decisions: the Way to Achieve Sustainable Buildings at Lower Costs.” The Scientific World Journal 2014: Article ID 365364. doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/365364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busby Perkins + Will Stantec Consulting. 2007. Roadmap for the Integrated Design Process. Vancouver: BC Green Building Roundtable.
   Google Scholar
• Chiaradia, A. J. F., L. Sieh, and F. Plimmer. 2017. “Values in Urban Design: A Design Studio Teaching Approach.” Design Studies 49: 66–100. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2016.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, A. S., F. Papandrea, and J. Bennett. 2007. “Assessing Cultural Values: Developing an Attitudinal Scale.” Journal of Cultural Economics 31 (4): 311–335. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-007-9045-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cockton, G. 2006. “Designing Worth Is Worth Designing.” In Proceedings of the 4th Nordic Conference on Human-computer Interaction: Changing Roles, edited by A. Mørch, K. Morgan, T. Bratteteig, G. Ghosh, and D. Svanaes, 165–174. New York: ACM. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/1182475.1182493.
   Google Scholar
• Crossick, G., and P. Kaszynska. 2016. Understanding the Value of Arts & Culture. The AHRC Cultural Value Project. Swindon, UK: Arts and Humanities Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• Dallas, M. 2006. Value and Risk Management – A Guide to Best Practice. London: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Frich, J., L. M. Vermeulen, C. Remy, M. M. Biskjaer, and P. Dalsgaard. 2019. “Mapping the Landscape of Creativity Support Tools in HCI.” In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Paper No. 389. New York: ACM. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300619.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, B. 1996. “Value-sensitive Design.” ACM Interactions 3 (6): 16–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/242485.242493.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, C. M., and Y. Kou. 2019. “Co-producing, Curating, and Defining Design Knowledge in an Online Practitioner Community.” CoDesign 15 (1): 41–58. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2018.1563193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groat, L., and D. Wang. 2013. Architectural Research Methods. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hammersley, H., 2002. “Value Management in Construction.” Association of Local Authority Business Consultants. http://www.alabc.org.uk/nov_02/HH%20Handout%20%20The%20Value%20Management%20Process.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Iversen, O. S., K. Halskov, and T. W. Leong. 2012. “Values-led Participatory Design.” CoDesign 8 (2–3): 87–103. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2012.672575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, R. R., and P. H. Kirkegaard. 2015. “Architectural Atmosphere in Learning Environments—Daylight in Practice.” In Proceedings of the 6th Velux Daylight Symposium. http://thedaylightsite.com/symposium/2015-2/presentations/
   Google Scholar
• Kamari, A., R. Corrao, and P. H. Kirkegaard. 2017. “Sustainability Focused Decision- Making in Building Renovation.” International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment 6 (2): 330–350. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsbe.2017.05.001.
   Google Scholar
• Keeler, M., and P. Vaidya. 2016. Fundamentals of Integrated Design for Sustainable Building. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Keeney, R. L. 1992. Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decision Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kemal, S., and I. Gaskell, eds. 2010. Explanation and Value in the Arts. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knudstrup, M. 2010. “How Can We Adapt Education Programmes to the Architecture of the Future?” Nordisk Arkitekturforskning 22 (1/2): 61–73.
   Google Scholar
• Kolko, J. 2007. “The Tenuous Relationship between Design and Innovation.” Artifact 1 (3): 198–203. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17493460701812129.
   Google Scholar
• Kommune, A. 2007. “Fra Boligområde Til Bydel. [From Housing Project to Neighborhood].” http://www.helhedsplangellerup.dk/~/media/Subsites/Helhedsplan-Gellerup/Dokumenter/Helhedsplan-Gellerup.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Krygiel, E., and B. Nies. 2008. Green BIM: Successful Sustainable Design with Building Information Modeling. Indianapolis, IN: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Laugier, M.-A. [1753] 1977. An Essay on Architecture. Translated by W. Herrmann. Los Angeles, CA: Hennessey & Ingalls.
   Google Scholar
• Lauring, M. 2010. “From Ecological Houses to Sustainable Cities: Architectural Minds.” Nordisk Arkitekturforskning 22 (1/2): 47–60.
   Google Scholar
• Laursen, M., and P. Svejvig. 2016. “Taking Stock of Project Value Creation: A Structured Literature Review with Future Directions for Research and Practice.” International Journal of Project Management 34: 736–747. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.06.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, B. 2006. How Designers Think: The Design Process Demystified. Burlington, MA: Elsevier/Architectural.
   Google Scholar
• Le Dantec, C. A., E. S. Poole, and S. P. Wyche. 2009. “Values as Lived Experience: Evolving Value Sensitive Design in Support of Value Discovery.” In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’09), 1141–1150. New York: ACM. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518875.
   Google Scholar
• Le Dantec, C. A., and E. Y.-L. Do. 2009. “The Mechanisms of Value Transfer in Design Meetings.” Design Studies 30 (2): 119–137. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2008.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepak, D. P., K. G. Smith, and M. S. Taylor. 2007. “Value Creation and Value Capture: A Multilevel Perspective.” Academy of Management Review 32 (1): 180–194. doi:https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.23464011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd, P. 2009. “Ethical Imagination and Design.” Design Studies 30 (2): 154–168. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2008.12.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luck, R., and J. McDonnell. 2006. “Architect and User Interaction: the Spoken Representation of Form and Functional Meaning in Early Design Conversations.” Design Studies 27 (2): 141–166. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2005.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luján Escalante, M. A. 2019. “Framework of Emergence: from Chain of Value to Value Constellation.” CoDesign 15 (1): 59–74. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2018.1563616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madsen, U. S., A. Beim, and A. Reitz. 2015. Værdiskabelse I Bygningsrenovering [Value Creation in Building Renovation]. Copenhagen, Denmark: CINARK. https://gi.dk/Publikationer/værdiskabelse.pdf
   Google Scholar
• McDonnell, J. 2009. “Collaborative Negotiation in Design: A Study of Design Conversations between Architect and Building Users.” CoDesign 5 (1): 35–50. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880802492862.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medway, P. 2000. “Writing and Design in Architectural Education.” In Transitions: Writing in Academic and Workplace Settings, edited by A. Pare, 89–129. Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, M. D. 2009. Qualitative Research in Business & Management. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Nabil, A., and J. Mardaljevic. 2006. “Useful Daylight Illuminances: A Replacement for Daylight Factors.” Energy and Buildings 38 (7): 905–913. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.03.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newcombe, R. 2003. “From Client to Project Stakeholders: A Stakeholder Mapping Approach.” Construction Management and Economics 21 (8): 841–848. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0144619032000072137.
   Google Scholar
• Nieto-Rodriguez, A. 2017. “Notorious Project Failures—Berlin Airport: Why Did It Go Wrong?” CIO, April 24. https://www.cio.com/article/3185909/project-management/notorious-project-failures-berlin-airport-why-did-it-go-wrong.html
   Google Scholar
• Nygaard, E. 2002. “arkitektonisk Kvalitet—Et Forsøg På En Kortfattet Definition [Architectural Quality–A Proposal for a Concise Definition].” Nordic Journal of Architectural Research 1: 91–96.
   Google Scholar
• Oldfield, P., D. Trabucco, and A. Wood. 2009. “Five Energy Generations of Tall Buildings: an Historical Analysis of Energy Consumption in High-rise Buildings.” The Journal of Architecture 14 (5): 591–613. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13602360903119405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osterwalder, A., Y. Pigneur, G. Bernarda, and A. Smith. 2014. Value Proposition Design: How to Create Products and Services Customers Want. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Pahl, G., and W. Beitz. 2013. Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Palen, L. 1999. “Social, Individual & Technological Issues for Groupware Calendar Systems.” In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’99), 17–24. New York: ACM. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/302979.302982.
   Google Scholar
• Pallasma, J. 2005. The Eyes of the Skin: Architecture and the Senses. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Pallister, J., ed. 2011. Hopkins Architects London 2012 Velodrome: Design in Pursuit of Efficiency. London: Emap Inform.
   Google Scholar
• Penny, R. K. 1970. “Principles of Engineering Design.” Postgraduate Medical Journal 46 (536): 344–349. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/pgmj.46.536.344.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prahalad, C. K., and V. Ramaswamy. 2004. “Co-Creation Experiences: the Next Practice in Value Creation.” Journal of Interactive Marketing 18 (3): 5–14. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.20015.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, M. 1961. “An Analysis of Creativity.” The Phi Delta Kappan 42 (7): 305–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rindova, V. P., and A. P. Petkova. 2007. “When Is a New Thing a Good Thing? Technological Change, Product Form Design, and Perceptions of Value for Product Innovations.” Organization Science 18 (2): 217–232. doi:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1060.0233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rönn, M. 2011. “Quality in Architecture—A Disputed Concept.” In Proceedings of 2011 ARCC Spring Research Conference: Architectural Reserach Considering Research Reflecting upon Current themes in Architectural Research, 235–244. Southfield, MI: Lawrence Technological University.
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, R. K. 2012. Explaining Creativity: the Science of Human Innovation. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford UP.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, K. 2004. “Measuring Innovation.” In Oxford Handbook of Innovation, edited by J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery, and R. Nelson, 148–179. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer, N. C., and G. M. Winch. 2002. How Buildings Add Value for Clients. London: Thomas Telford. doi:https://doi.org/10.1680/hbavfc.31289.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, L. 1993. “Do Categories Have Politics? The Language/Action Perspective Reconsidered.” In Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, edited by G. de Michelis, C. Simone, and K. Schmidt, 1–14. Dordrecht: Springer. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2094-4_1.
   Google Scholar
• Suh, N. P. 1990. The Principles of Design. Oxford: Oxford UP.
   Google Scholar
• Vitruvius, M. P. 1914. Ten Books on Architecture. Translated by M. H. Morgan. London: Humphrey Milford.
   Google Scholar
• Wandahl, S. 2005. “Value in Building.” PhD diss., Aalborg University, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Watermeyer, R., and A. Hedgecoe. 2016. “Selling ‘Impact’: Peer Reviewer Projections of What Is Needed and What Counts in REF Impact Case Studies. A Retrospective Analysis.” Journal of Education Policy 31 (5): 651–665. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2016.1170885.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WBDG. 2016. “Engage the Integrated Design Process.” Whole Building Design Guide, October 17. https://www.wbdg.org/design-objectives/aesthetics/engage-integrated-design-process
   Google Scholar
• Whitham, R., S. Moreton, S. Bowen, C. Speed, and A. Durrant. 2019. “Understanding, Capturing, and Assessing Value in Collaborative Design Research.” CoDesign 15 (1): 1–7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2018.1563194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeiler, W., P. Savanovic, and E. Quanje. 2007. “Design Decision Support for the Conceptual Phase of the Design Process.” In Proceedings of the International Association of Societies of Design Research: Emerging Trends in Design Research Conference (IASDR 2007), edited by S. Poggenpohl, 1–15. Hong Kong: School of Design, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University.
   Google Scholar