Exploring the complexity of participation

References

• Agid, S., and E. Chin. 2019. “Making and Negotiating Value: Design and Collaboration with Community Led Groups.” CoDesign 15 (1): 75–89. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2018.1563191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agid, S., and Y. Akama. 2018. “Dance of Designing: Rethinking Position, Relation and Movement in Service Design.” Paper presented at the ServDes2018 conference, Milan, Italy, June 18–19.
   Google Scholar
• Aguirre, M., N. Agudelo, and J. Romm. 2017. “Design Facilitation as Emerging Practice: Analyzing How Designers Support Multi-stakeholder Co-creation.” She-Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics and Innovation 3 (3): 198–209.
   Google Scholar
• Akama, Y. 2014. “Attuning to Ma (Between-ness) in Designing.” Paper presented at the Participatory Design Conference, Windhoek, Namibia, October 6–9.
   Google Scholar
• Akama, Y., and A. Prendiville. 2014. “Embodying, Enacting and Entangling Design: A Phenomenological View to Co-designing Services.” Swedish Design Research Journal 1 (13): 29–40.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, P. M. 1998. “Evolving Complexity in Social Science.” Systems: New Paradigms for the Human Sciences, edited by G. Altman and W.A. Koch, 3–38. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, P. V. K., and W. S. Mosleh. 2020. “Conflicts in Co-design: Engaging with Tangible Artefacts in Multi-stakeholder Collaboration.” CoDesign: International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts 1–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2020.1740279.
   Google Scholar
• Basballe, D. A., K. Halskov, and N. B. Hansen. 2016. “The Early Shaping of Participatory Design at PDC.” Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 14th Participatory Design Conference, Aarhus, Denmark: Short Papers, Interactive Exhibitions, Workshops-Volume 2.
   Google Scholar
• Bjerknes, G., P. Ehn, M. Kyng, and K. Nygaard. 1987. Computers and Democracy: A Scandinavian Challenge. Avebury, U.K.: Gower Pub.
   Google Scholar
• Bjerknes, G., and T. Bratteteig. 1995. “User Participation and Democracy: A Discussion of Scandinavian Research on System Development.” Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 7 (1): 1.
   Google Scholar
• Björgvinsson, E., P. Ehn, and P. A. Hilgren. 2010. “Participatory Design and Decomcratizing Innovation.” Paper presented at the Participatory Design Conference, Sydney, Australia, November 29.
   Google Scholar
• Blomberg, J., J. Giacomi, A. Mosher, and P. Swenton-Wall. 1993. “Ethnographic Field Methods and Their Relation to Design.” In Participatory Design: Principles and Practices, edited by I. D. Schuler and A. Namioka, 123–155. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Bødker, S., C. Dindler, and O. S. Iversen. 2017. “Tying Knots: Participatory Infrastructuring at Work.” Computer Supported Coorporate Work 26: 245–273. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-017-9268-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bønnelycke, J., C. T. Sandholdt, and A. P. Jespersen. 2018. “Co-designing Health Promotion at a Science Centre: Distributing Expertise and Granting Modes of Participation.” CoDesign 15 (2): 128–141. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2018.1434547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandt, E. 2001. “Event-Driven Product Development: Collaboration and Learning.” PhD Dissertation. Technical University of Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Brandt, E., J. Messeter, and T. Binder. 2008. “Formatting Design Dialogues–games and Participation.” Co-Design 4 (1): 51–64.
   Google Scholar
• Bratteteig, T., and I. Wagner. 2014. Disentangling Participation: Power and Decision-making in Participatory Design. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Buur, J., and H. Larsen. 2010. “The Quality of Conversations in Participatory Innovation.” CoDesign 6 (3): 121–138. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2010.533185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deserti, A., and F. Rizzo. 2014. “Design and the Cultures of Enterprises.” Design Issues 30 (1): 36–56. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon, B. 2018. “From Making Things Public to the Design of Creative Democracy: Dewey’s Democratic Vision and Participatory Design.” CoDesign 16 (2): 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elias, N. 1998. On Civilisation, Power and Knowledge. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elias, N., and J. L. Scotson. 1994. The Established and the Outsiders. Vol. 32. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Elias, N., Goudsblom, J., and S. Mennell. 1998. “On Civilization, Power, and Knowledge: Selected Writings.” Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gottlieb, F., H. Larsen, and V. Sørensen. 2013. “Multi Stakeholder Innovation.” Paper presented at the 3rd Participatory Innovation Conference 2013, Lahti, Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Greenbaum, J., and D. Loi. 2012. “Participation, the Camel and the Elephant of Design: An Introduction.” CoDesign 8 (2): 81–85. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2012.690232.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, D. 2002. The Emergence of Leadership: Linking Self-organization and Ethics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Halskov, K., and N. B. Hansen. 2015. “The Diversity of Participatory Design Research Practice at PDC 2002–2012.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 74: 81–92. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heape, C., H. Larsen, and L. Revsbæk. 2015. “Participation as Taking Part in an Improvised Temporal Unfolding.” Paper presented at the 5th Decennial Aarhus Conference: Critical Alternatives. Aarhus, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Huybrechts, L., N. Hendriks, S. L. Yndigegn, and L. Malmborg. 2018. “Scripting: An Exploration of Designing for Participation over Time with Communities.” CoDesign 14 (1): 17–31. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2018.1424205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karasti, H., E. Parmiggiani, A. Botero, and K. Baker. 2018. “In Frastructuring in PD: What Does Infrastructuring Look Like? When Does It Look like That?” Workshop presented at the Participatory Design Conference, Hasselt and Genk, Belgium, August 20–24.
   Google Scholar
• Kauffman, S. 1996. At Home in the Universe: The Search for the Laws of Self-organization and Complexity. New York, USA: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kensing, F., and J. Blomberg. 1998. “Participatory Design: Issues and Concerns.” Computer Supported Cooperative Work 7: 167–185. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008689307411.
   Google Scholar
• Knutz, E., T. Markussen, and S. M. Thomsen. 2018. “Materiality in Probes: Three Perspectives for Co-exploring Patient Democracy.” CoDesign 15 (2): 142–162. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2018.1445759.
   Google Scholar
• Kyng, M. 1998. “Users and Computers: A Contextual Approach to Design of Computer Artifacts.” Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 10 (1,2): 7–44.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, H. 2006. “Risk and “Acting” into the Unknown.” In Experiencing Risk, Spontaneity and Improvisation in Organizational Change: Working Live, edited by P. Shaw and R. Stacey, 46–71, New York, USA: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, H. 2011. “Improvisational Theatre: A Contribution to Organizational Change.” In Facilitating Change, edited by L. Baungaard, 327-356. Copenhagen: Polyteknisk Boghandel og Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, H., and M. Bogers. 2014. “Innovation as Improvisation ‘In the Shadow’.” Creativity and Innovation Management 23 (4): 386–399. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B., and M. Akrich. 1992. “A Summary of Convenient Vocabulary for the Semiotics of Human and Non-human Assemblies.” In Shaping Technology/building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, edited by W. E. Bijker and J. Law, 259–264, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Light, A., and Y. Akama. 2012. “The Human Touch: Participatory Practice and the Role of Facilitation in Designing with Communities.” Paper presented at the Participatory Design Conference, Roskilde, Danmark, August 12–16.
   Google Scholar
• Light, A., and Y. Akama. 2014. “Structuring Future Social Relations: The Politics of Care in Participatory Practice.” Paper presented at the Participatory Design Conference, Windhoek, Namibia, October 6–9.
   Google Scholar
• Lucero, A., K. Vaajakallio, and P. Dalsgaard. 2012. “The Dialogue-Labs Method: Process, Space and Materials as Structuring Elements to Spark Dialogue in Co-Design Events.” CoDesign 8 (1): 1–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2011.609888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lurås, S. 2016. “Systems Intertwined: A Systemic View on the Design Situation.” Design Issues 32 (3): 30–41. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madden, D., Y. Cadet-James, I. Atkinson, and F. Watkin Lui. 2014. “Probes and Prototypes: A Participatory Action Research Approach to Codesign.” CoDesign 10 (1): 31–45. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2014.881884.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattelmäki, T., and F. Sleeswijk Visser. 2011. “Lost in Co-X: Interpretations of Co-design and Co-creation.” Paper presented at the 4th World Conference on Design Research (IASDR 2011), Delft, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Mead, G. H. 1934. Mind, Self, and Society: From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist (Works of George Herbert Mead). Vol. 1. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mosleh, W. S. 2017. “Ethnographic Tools: From Insight to Intervention.” Paper presented at the Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference Proceedings, Montréal, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Nygaard, K., and O. T. Bergo. 1975. “The Trade unions-New Users of Research.” Personnel Review 4 (2): 5–10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/eb055278.
   Google Scholar
• Prigogine, I. 1997. The End of Certainty: Time Chaos and the New Laws of Nature. New York NY: New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saad-Sulonen, J., E. Eriksson, K. Halskov, H. Karasti, and J. Vines. 2018. “Unfolding Participation over Time: Temporal Lenses in Participatory Design.” CoDesign 14 (1): 4–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2018.1426773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmi, A., and T. Mattelmäki. 2019. “From within and In-between–co-designing Organizational Change.” CoDesign 1–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2019.1581817.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, E. B.-N., and P. J. Stappers. 2014. “Probes, Toolkits and Prototypes: Three Approaches to Making in Codesigning.” CoDesign 10 (1): 5–14. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2014.888183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, P. 2002. Changing Conversations in Organizations: A Complexity Approach to Change. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Simeone, L. 2018. “Incompleteness and Redundancy: Organisational Components of a Design-enabled Infrastructure to Support Coordinated Action of Multiple Stakeholders.” CoDesign 15 (4): 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stacey, R., and C. Mowles. 2016. Strategic Management and Organisational Dynamics: The Challenge of Complexity to Ways of Thinking about Organisations. Edinburgh, United Kingdom: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Stacey, R. D. 2001. Complex Responsive Processes in Organizations: Learning and Knowledge Creation. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stacey, R. D. 2003. “Learning as an Activity of Interdependent People.” The Learning Organization 10 (6): 325–331. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/09696470310497159.
   Google Scholar
• Stacey, R. D., and D. Griffin. 2005. A Complexity Perspective on Researching Organizations: Taking Experience Seriously. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stacey, R. D., D. Griffin, and P. Shaw. 2000. Complexity and Management: Fad or Radical Challenge to Systems Thinking. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Star, S. L., and K. Ruhleder. 1996. “Steps toward and Ecology of Infrastructure: Design and Access for Large Information Spaces.” Information Systems Research 7 (1): 111–134. doi:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.7.1.111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winschiers-Theophilus, H., N. J. Bidwell, and E. Blake. 2012. “Altering Participation through Interactions and Reflections in Design.” CoDesign 8 (2–3): 163–182. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2012.672580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar